OK. I’ll bite. Who are you really? I mean really?

That Greek name is kind of cute since it looks like a good natured Greek is helping out Israelis.

That is hard to accept when most Greeks know Israeli bankers are the reason Greeks are scrounging in trash cans for food and committing suicide in public places because they have no money.

a quick look at Stanley Heller’s blogsite confirms Paul’s view that he is an old-time ‘good jew’ – perhaps by now, one hopes, he may even be an old jew having a good time.

quite a lot of what he writes seems ‘ok’ to my rather uncritical eye – he criticizes brutal and inhumane activities of the IDF and its Stern gang/Likudite masters. it is true that in other places he leans towards a strain of ‘…but, to be fair to Israel,…’-type apologetics which perhaps places him within the region (controversially?) identified as the AZZ pole of the great dialectic.

this latter fact explains why he sides with the Alialbunimahian tendency wrt the wandering who?

however we should not follow a Grunsteinian(Tonylean) methodology of excommunication and censorship of those with whom we disagree.

profound ideas initially shock people. (Copernicus etc/ Kuhnian paradigm shifts) Gilad’s exploration in TWW has evidently played precisely that abrasively catalytic role for a certain sector of the Jewish intelligentsia.

in general, energetic new ideas take time to be absorbed and begin to play a less emotive role in debate. meanwhile those who introduce them are often unfairly accused of subversion/iconoclasm/treason/atheism/apostasy/unamericanactivities or other thought-crimes.

no serious thinker, whether jew, goy or half-caste, can live forever in the comfortable knowledge that he or she has damned a book without making some attempt to come to grips with its central themes. it is a matter of conscience, or cognitive dissonance. here, dersh is not a serious thinker. i would not like to condemn Heller as unserious without further consideration. there is obviously an ongoing mossad/hasbara psyop aimed against TWW. equally obviously it is doomed to ignominious failure, both because, unlike humans, ideas are not easily poisoned, bribed, seduced, blackmailed or imprisoned.

also because (as so many have done) to condemn a work without reading it is a confession of both prejudice and intellectual dishonesty and sloppiness.

one great weakness of latter-day zionists is their utter lack of realization that they appear to sane, humane people as ludicrous caricatures of what a human being should be. one refrains from laughteronly because they are addicted to robbery, profiteering, illegal weapons trading, murder, oppression, genocide and ethnic cleansing and other similar human foibles.