Why they call him ‘Agent’ Cameron
by Stuart Littlewood
Saturday, December 15th, 2012
Britain’s prime minister David Cameron has again shown why he should stand down from British politics.
In a speech to Conservative Friends of Israel at a lunch the other day he said – and not for the first time – things that are deeply disturbing to people who expect him to put British interests first. He again compromised himself and this country with ridiculous pledges of support for a foreign military power whose behaviour is beyond the Pale and an affront to human decency. Here are some of his remarks…
I am a passionate friend of Israel – and that’s the way it’s going to stay.
In that case you shouldn’t be in British politics, Mr Cameron. You have fallen foul of the Seven Principles of Public Life, especially the principle of ‘Integrity’ which says quite simply: “Holders of public office should not place themselves under any financial or other obligation to outside individuals or organisations that might seek to influence them in the performance of their official duties.”
We promised to stand up for Israel and in Government that’s exactly what we’ve done. We said it was ridiculous that Israeli officials felt unable to visit Britain because of the malicious and unfounded use of arrest warrants so we changed the law to end it.
Unfounded? Tzipi Livni, for example, was responsible for launching the pre-meditated blitzkrieg four years ago which caused the deaths of 1,400 defenceless Gazans (including 320 children and 109 women), horribly maimed thousands more and caused immense devastation to essential infrastructure and services. She showed no remorse. Livni’s office issued a statement saying she was proud of Operation Cast Lead, and speaking later at a conference at Tel Aviv’s Institute for Security Studies, she said: “I would today take the same decisions.”
We said we’d resist calls for boycotts on Israel and yes – we are going to keep on working with Israel, doing business with Israel, trading with Israel.”
Even though Israel is in continual breach of EU-Israel Agreement rules and forcibly prevents its neighbours, the Palestinians, from doing business and trade with the outside world…
To me it is clear what needs to happen… We need the Palestinians to understand there is only one path to statehood, and that is through negotiations with Israel. We made that clear with that UN vote a couple of weeks ago.
Wrong. The correct path to statehood is through implementation of international law and UN resolutions and the approval of the international community. Only when the illegal occupation is ended and the right of self-determination is restored can meaningful talks begin.
We said that Britain could not support a resolution that set back the prospects for peace and that did not commit the Palestinians to return to negotiations without preconditions. Well: they did not provide the assurances that we asked for. So… we did not vote for it.
Pure blackmail. Bullying Palestinians into resuming failed and discredited talks to bargain with the thief for the return of their lands and property when it is still being stolen with impunity, is utterly immoral. There can be no peace under occupation. And nobody ‘negotiates’ with a gun to their head, nor should they be expected to.
And I have made something else clear that needs to be made clear to the Palestinians. Britain will never tolerate the obscenity of a football tournament named after a suicide bomber who killed 20 Israelis in a restaurant. We will not tolerate incitement to terrorism.”
This is about Wafa Idris. It has become a favourite rant and Cameron was banging on about it a couple of months earlier at another top Jewish gathering. According to The Jerusalem Post (September 2011) a Fatah-affiliated youth centre in the Ama’ari refugee camp near Ramallah named a sports event after female suicide bomber Wafa Idris, a 28 year-old paramedic who had been shot several times by Israeli rubber bullets during her work for the Red Crescent. Relatives said she was angry at seeing children shot and killed by the IDF in Ramallah. Idris was the first Palestinian woman to carry out a suicide bombing. The Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigade, a subsidiary of Abbas’s Fatah (who are Cameron’s friends in Occupied Palestine), claimed responsibility for the bomb attack although her family said she was not known to be an activist with any Palestinian militant group.
Cameron, before opening his mouth, might have asked what led her to do it. Wafa Idris was born in the Ama’ari refugee camp http://www.unrwa.org/etemplate.php?id=105 . Set up by the Red Cross in 1949 it provided tents to refugees from Jaffa, Ramla and Lydda, towns allocated for an Arab state in the UN Partition but subjected to a bloody programme of ethnic cleansing in 1948.
In Lydda the Israelis massacred 426 men, women, and children. 176 of them were slaughtered in the town’s main mosque. See http://www.palestineremembered.com/al-Ramla/al-Lydd/index.html for lurid details. Out of the 19,000 people who called Lydda home, only 1,052 were allowed to stay. The remainder were forced to walk into exile in the scalding July heat leaving a trail of bodies – men, women and children – along the way.
The slaughter in Lydda was led by a certain Moshe Dayan. The event was witnessed by two American newspapermen who reported that “practically everything in their way died. Riddled corpses lay by the roadside.” They saw “the corpses of Arab men, women and even children strewn about in the wake of the ruthlessly brilliant charge”. This appalling war crime didn’t prevent Dayan becoming a great hero in Israel, and later defence minister and foreign minister.
Today Tel Aviv University has a Moshe Dayan Centre named after the war criminal, but I haven’t heard Cameron complain about that. Likewise the Menachem Begin Centre in West Jerusalem is named after the terrorist leader responsible for the bomb attack in 1946 on the British mandate government based in the King David Hotel, killing 91. Has Agent Cameron anything to say about that?
Back to the Ama’ari refugee camp, now run by the UNRWA, where Wafa Idris was obliged to live in squalor as a result of Israel’s criminal land-grab and forcible eviction of her parents from Ramla. At Ama’ari 10,500 people are squeezed into less than 1 square kilometre in dreadful conditions.
However the camp’s football team has won the Palestine football championship several times and qualified to represent Palestine in regional and international competitions.
The Arab media were lavish in their praise for Idris, the “courageous Palestinian girl”, and as a result she became a heroic symbol of Palestinian womanhood in their struggle to throw off the occupation. If it’s OK for Israel to name major institutions after its famous terrorists what right has Cameron to get upset when a Palestinian football team similarly commemorates one of theirs?
So, in Gaza too, Hamas need to know that they must renounce violence and they will not be allowed to dictate the way forward in the peace process.
Does Cameron have the balls to tell Israel it too must renounce violence? Hamas, in case he has forgotten, is the legitimate democratic authority. He may not like it but he should respect it and work with them, like the good democrat he claims to be.
Last month, when rockets rained down on Israel, we were unequivocal about the right of Israelis to live free from attack by terrorist groups on their border.
When Gaza suffers air strikes on a daily basis, how unequivocal is Cameron about the right of Palestinians to live free from attack by the terrorist state occupying their lands?
I’ve never had to run for cover as the air-raids sound overhead. I’ve never had to give gas masks to my children. I do understand that for the Israeli people, uncertainty isn’t such a great thing. It means instability. Anxiety. Fear.
If he goes to Gaza he can experience fear and anxiety in abundance under Israeli air raids. I vividly remember as a kid being bombed by the Nazis every night in London – and not with garden-shed whizz-bangs. I remember German bombers flying at rooftop height down our street to avoid the anti-aircraft guns. At least they didn’t use white phosphorus like the Israelis.
Cameron’s hyper-partisan, head-over-heels friendship – no, obsession – with Israel is allowed to steer nearly every aspect of Britain’s foreign policy. What drives this? You need look no further than The Jewish Chronicle which in 2006 reported on the backers bankrolling David Cameron‘s bid for power and provided a fascinating insight into how the pro-Israel lobby infiltrates government and destroys the principles of integrity and accountability so vital to public life.
When Cameron became Conservative leader he proclaimed: “The belief I have in Israel is indestructible – and you need to know that if I become Prime Minister, Israel has a friend who will never turn his back on Israel.”
Agent Cameron is very careful not to let the words ‘justice’ and ‘law’ pass his lips in connection with Israel’s illegal occupation of the Holy Land. And he and his foreign secretary, Hague, will put on a wonderful show of hand-wringing, deploring and urging whenever Israel commits atrocities, but they never condemn the racist regime or use any obvious levers like suspension of trade or other sanctions.
On the contrary, they shamelessly find ways of rewarding the Israeli regime’s crimes against humanity, making us complicit with its racist ambitions.
Stuart Littlewood
14 December 2012
Posted by Stuart Littlewood
on December 15, 2012. Filed under Britain,Human Rights,Israel,Zionism.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0.
You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
64 Responses to Why they call him ‘Agent’ Cameron
You must be logged in to post a comment Login
Blake
December 15, 2012 at 6:51 pm
He is such an insult to intelligence. Forget the original phrase. I coined this one for this toerag speaking out of both corners of his mouth.
David Holden
December 15, 2012 at 7:53 pm
brilliant piece, Stu
the obvious thing to me is that the (spineless and self-serving piece of shite who assumes the title of) Prime Minister is not talking to the world but only to a narrow constituency of zionist Jew backers and their camp followers, the lackey army of dependent shills and hacks who have no truth in them.
therefore it is another truly sickening performance.
such toadies and arse-lickers as Cameron and his ilk (politics, in particular, is thick with them) may ‘get on in the world’ – but deep down they know exactly what they are: willing slaves.
those whose servitude is the result of misfortune may earn our sympathy, even respect. those who sell themselves into mental slavery to a gang of robbers and murderers neither get, nor deserve, any respect or affection whatsoever from anyone who knows what is what.
well, let this mediocrity enjoy the charismatic job title and the nice house he has acquired at the expense of an indelible brown stain on his nose.
for the present.
pgg804
December 16, 2012 at 1:31 am
“I vividly remember as a kid being bombed by the Nazis every night in London – and not with garden-shed whizz-bangs. I remember German bombers flying at rooftop height down our street to avoid the anti-aircraft guns. At least they didn’t use white phosphorus like the Israelis.” Yes, but honorable, peace loving Americans did. They used napalm. According to wikipedia “”Napalm is the most terrible pain you can imagine.”
That’s something to think about. The NAZIS didn’t use a napalm or phosphorous, but Americans did. I’m not sure about the British. If you’re interested in why the NAZIS bombed England, you might want to listen to David Irving explain. He was a child in London when the bombs were being dropped (probably not far from where you lived). Mr. Irving explains that while Hitler was offering peace to Britain, Churchill was trying to get Hitler to drop bombs on Londoners and in order to do this he ordered the RAF to attack Berlin. My parents were children in Germany at that time.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sbobokzG-oE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tHX6pY5pSu8&feature=endscreen&NR=1
fool me once...
December 17, 2012 at 11:07 pm
@pgg804
I watched the first utube link you posted of Irving giving a speech. It was interesting listening to his, as a historian, exposure of the british “leaders” bullshit, costing many lives.
But, at 5.40mins he says;
“…which would have preserved Britain and the British Empire, which I’ve always considered to be one of the great civilising culturing influences, in the history of the world. We would now have been the predominant influence on the world. Not the Soviets, not the Americans, we would have been there. We could have been dictating the terms of peace and civilisation today, instead of those newcomers the Americans, or those barbarians the Russians…”
So Irving thinks pre 1940, the great british “civilising culturing” empire was a good thing? Everyone in the Empire treated fairly, equally and with respect? And he calls himself an historian who’s into peace?
Nah, bollox, he’s just another supremacist tosser, full of his own tribe’s self importance.
Jay Knott
December 19, 2012 at 2:51 pm
He’s not just another supremacist tosser. He’s another supremacist tosser who contributes to our understanding of WWII.
David Holden
December 22, 2012 at 10:30 am
good point. would it be an unwarranted generalization to suggest that we all tend towards reductionism during our brief spells of vilification? perhaps the process could be marginally elucidated in terms of the reflex tightening of a conceptual sphincter to accompany the verbal discharge of faecal matter? obviously the words italicized are intended metaphorically.
fool me once...
December 23, 2012 at 5:37 pm
Ok
Irving is interesting to listen to on the subject of WW2 but it’s a mistake to try and give him some kind of hero status, unless of course one is into supremacism.
Jay Knott
December 19, 2012 at 2:40 pm
“Mr. Irving explains that while Hitler was offering peace to Britain, Churchill was trying to get Hitler to drop bombs on Londoners and in order to do this he ordered the RAF to attack Berlin.” This comment by pgg804 is simplistic and one-sided.
You can’t just say ‘Irving explains’. ‘Who started bombing civilians’ is controversial. Saying Britain was the first depends on claiming that the German bombing of Rotterdam was not an a war crime, because the city was under siege, so it was collateral damage under the rules of war. Britain bombed Berlin the next day. It is undoubtedly true though that Germany tried hard to make peace.
pgg804
December 20, 2012 at 4:12 am
I would suggest you watch the second video I posted. Speaking of Churchill, Irving says “But until the summer of 1940, not one bomb had dropped on an English town. He had to provoke it somehow.” Irving goes on to explain how Churchill provoked it.
Hitler did not want a war in the west. He didn’t want a war with England or France. Irving goes on to explains in another part of this speech (I’m not sure at what minute in the speech) that Hitler even offered German divisions to defend England if her interests were ever attacked. Although I would have, Hitler never asked for any of the territories in the west that were stolen from Germany in 1919 be returned. He didn’t ask for Alsace-Lorraine (given to France), Schleswig (given to Denmark), South Tyrol (given to Italy) or the areas given to Belgium. All these areas were populated by German speakers, but unlike the areas in the east that were stolen from Germany, Hitler never asked that these territories be returned in order to keep peace with the west. In the case of Italy, he would have lost the only ally Germany had in Europe, but he didn’t ask for the other areas either.
This is important. There never would have been a war in the west (including bombing Amsterdam), or any other western town if Churchill did not do everything in his power to make this war. You have to listen to the whole speech. The war with Poland even possibly could have been avoided.
The fact that you don’t agree with Irving’s views on England’s colonies (I don’t either) has nothing to do with the facts he reveals from the archives. If you don’t watch the whole speech (parts 1 – 10), you don’t hear that Churchill started that war for his own personal reasons (financial) and powerful Jews paid him to attack Germany.
I think if the English people knew that Churchill was willingly destroying the British empire and lying when he told them Germany wanted to attack England and take over the world, they may have asked for his head. They thought they were fighting to save the empire, not destroy it.
Churchill and FDR spoke the most outrageous lies in order to start a war with Germany.
On October 27, 1941 FDR made a speech explaining how the allies obtained a map from the NAZIS in which they planned to take over South America and redraw the boundaries into seven “vassal states”. What FDR didn’t know is that British intelligence created that map and fed it or gave it to the Americans as ‘evidence’ of Hitler’s plans. The historian David Irving revealed this in one of his speeches.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZnplFYUs6iE
To understand how ridiculous this propaganda is you have to consider that Germany was already fighting Great Britain and the biggest and most brutal war in history with the Soviet Union was four months old. As Irving points out to laughs in his audience, “on top of all this he’s going to take over South America and march up the coast to Washington, D.C.” That is approximately what David Irving said.
Jay Knott
December 20, 2012 at 10:27 pm
I agree with your general point. The fact that someone is a ‘supremacist’ doesn’t mean all the facts they claim are false. I find Pat Buchanan’s “The Unnecessary War” the best explanation of how idiotic it was of Britain to declare war on Germany and initiate the greatest slaughter in history.
pgg804
December 21, 2012 at 3:54 am
David Irving was born in 1938. His thoughts are those of a person from those years. But unlike other people who have been told to change the way they think about empires, colonies and race he has maintained the thoughts he grew up with and its a good thing for us he has. Most people will alter their way of thinking to adapt to the world and make themselves acceptable to other people or they won’t reveal their real thoughts to get along. Take Deliberation; if people voiced the opinions expressed here at work or in public they could lose their jobs (especially if they work for the main stream media). Things are changing, but people are still not free to express their thoughts without repercussions. Most historians know what they can’t say if they want to stay on the good side of the people in power.
David Irving has sacrificed a very lucrative career in the interest of truth and he has put up with verbal abuse and physical threats for many years. I admire someone like that immensely. There are very few people like that. I believe he deserves the Nobel Prize for literature.
pgg804
December 21, 2012 at 4:03 am
I read Buchanan’s book too. I think its excellent.
Jay Knott
December 23, 2012 at 5:59 pm
Whoever started the bombing of civilians in WWII, it turns out the Brits started the Christmas truce of WWI:
http://tinyurl.com/co9zowc
Unfortunately, it didn’t last.
Alex
December 16, 2012 at 8:04 am
“Britain’s prime minister David Cameron has again shown why he should stand down from British politics.”
The Problem is not Cameron but the British politics. The zionist entity is the fruit of that politics, a British creation. Ask Galloway.
Does the British friends have have the balls to admit that.
“Hamas, in case he has forgotten, is the legitimate democratic authority. He may not like it but he should respect it and work with them, like the good democrat he claims to be.”
Hamas was elected as a resistance movement, and I can assure you, the moment Hamas drop the gun, Cameron would be happy to deal with Hamas, and I can assure you also, at that very moment, Hamas will lose its legitimity.
Stu
December 16, 2012 at 10:02 pm
Hamas are very strong on social welfare, Alex, and this underpins their legitimacy. I can’t really see them dropping the gun – they’re entitled to claim that Palestinians have the right to defend themselves.
Eric Blenheim
December 17, 2012 at 2:38 pm
David Cameron is Jewish, being born to a full Jewish mother, and said on television at the time of the national elections that brought him into power; “I will empower UK Jews”.
What a racist statement Mr Cameron made there, as he was saying that whites, blacks, Asians and all other non-Jews are not only unfit to rule their own country, he was saying that they were also non-entitled to run their own country.
Not only that, he was saying it with considerable chutzpah, that he was going right ahead and doing it, right to their faces, knowing that they neither could, not would, do anything about it, as Cameron knows full well that the British people are all in a hypnotic daze. You can actually see the rippled cloud patterns that are typically made by the HAARP mind control technology over the city of London very often.
But not
a murmur of dissent or any form of query about the purpose or justification for this quiet surrender of Britain, yet again, to the worldwide entity of the Jewish people called Israel.
But the people are not capable of thought any longer, they cannot see that a hostile foreign power is taking over Britain, and has been doing so to each successive generation ever since the traitor Oliver Cromwell let the Jews back into England centuries ago, in return for finances to allow him to fulfill his own petty ambitions of political power.
England was finished from that moment on. Just like Britain went to war against their brothers, the Germans, who were only trying to fight against the Marxists, who intended to slaughter all Gentiles, as they had started in Russia, and the Ukraine, with 10 million Christians deliberately starved to death by Jewish agent Stalin, and Churchill laughed and called him ‘Uncle Joe’ people when he told him that, in a meeting with Roosevelt, all three being Jews and having no care at all for the very lives of the Gentiles, with Gentiles only considered by the Jewish crime cult (never a true religion) as not even being living souls, but demonic beings comprised of a much darker, satanic substance than living soul, that must all be slaughtered eventually so that the Jews alone can dwell on this planet. Read their own scriptures and the works of Jew and Freemason Karl Marx to confirm that very fact.
Both Karl Marx and the Jewish Torah and Talmud state many times that all races of Gentiles are to be eventually exterminated, after a long period of total enslavement, as Rabbi Ovadia Yosef has confirmed so well.
I do hope that what I say here is not considered racist in any way, as I am merely drawing attention to the racism of the Jewish religion, and that of their political agents.
Rabbi Stephen S Wise stated in 1935 “Some call it Marxism…, I call it Judaism”. Marxism is the political and military enforcement of world domination by the Jews over all other races until those other races are ultimately exterminated. Every word I write can be entirely substantiated with many quotes from Karl Marx, the Talmud and The Torah, and the most extreme hard-core racists of all the Jews, the Chabad Lubavitchers, control most powerful governments in this world, including the UK and the USA.
Stalin wanted to invade all of Europe and do just the same there too, just as fellow Jewish agent Roosevelt also did. and Roosevelt even supplied Stalin with many hundreds of millions of dollars worth of military equipment for a full year after Stalin stated in Russia that he wanted to invaded America once the Axis powers were defeated, in a criminal abuse of the ‘lend-lease agreement’ between the US and Russia. Roosevelt privately referred to the American people as ‘the enemy.’
And of course, British PM Cameron was voted into power immediately after making this bizarre, right in your face hostile racist statement, and of course, he did indeed put Jews in every position of power and influence that he could, just like he said he would.
The Jews have such a hold on the minds of people in Britain that they can be told to do anything at all, even to their own disadvantage, and it is simply a conditioned reflex that they will go ahead and do it.
They even think fluoride is good for them, and would certainly never ask for it to be removed as an entire people, they are not capable anymore, like little children, and no one speaks the language of the rest of the different peoples in Britain anyway, so cohesive opinion and action has thereby been prevented by a masterful political stroke by the Jewish politicians, as they continually cram so many foreign peoples into the country that no societal cohesiveness is possible any longer, on any issue at all.
The Jews control it all very easily, taking the Gentile soldiers of Great Britain to war against the Gentile soldiers of other nations whenever they please, and the Jewish politicians are completely unstoppable when they do that.
Elections are merely a formality just for show; they are completely unnecessary to the Jews really, just as David Cameron has literally stated in public, to the entire nation on television, but not a flicker of life in any meaningful number of British Gentiles of any race, to question this invasion of their country without a shot being fired.
The British people are dead from the neck up and have not even noticed, the Jews have almost totally succeeded in world domination without the slightest opposition, whilst the wars they constantly arrange serve only to annihilate all their imagined enemies, the Gentiles, where one Gentile nation is constantly locked in a war of annihilation against another Gentile nation by the deceitful and cunning arrangement of the Jews, who orchestrate the whole bloody affair.
Mentally, they are finished, under a deep and ultimately suicidal hypnosis. Their water and toothpaste contains fluoride, a substance known to have no medical benefits, with it’s only real intention being in the realms of mind control, to make people utterly docile and acquiescent.
Take for instance the Noahide Laws passed by President George Bush through the US Congress in 1991, that authorizes the guillotining to death by beheading of all non-Jews throughout the USA, in the event of a state of national emergency being declared and the constitution being suspended.
There are guillotines installed on every military base throughout America, and Gentile US troops, under the command of senior Jewish politicians and military officers, will literally go out into American communities and butcher fellow Gentiles in the civilian population when requested to do so, unquestioningly. That is total mind control
Blake
December 17, 2012 at 4:29 pm
Nope Jews are not a race but a religion so something you can convert to so you okay there Eric. I find we all walk on eggshells to cater for them. Recently even a commentator I admire on here asked why I was sent a racist link to another article.
Eric Blenheim
December 18, 2012 at 7:40 pm
We certainly would not be OK there Blake, as what awful penalty would we face from the real God (not Yahweh) by adopting a belief system that thoroughly intends the complete extermination of all Gentiles from this planet?. That intent is clearly stated by the Talmud, the Torah, and by Karl Marx, that all other races and peoples, great and small, should be annihilated in a revolutionary holocaust, that being the entire stated purpose of all Gentiles.
Rabbi Stephen S Wise; “Some call it Marxism…, I call it Judaism”.
Current (and past) Rabbinical opinion is that even if a Jew appears to convert to be a Christian, they always remain a Jew. Also, if a Christian appears to convert to being a Jew, they can never ever really convert to become a Jew.
This is because the source of the Jew is held to be God, whilst the source of the Gentile is literally held by rabbis to be a form of spiritual excrement left behind from the creation process, from the three, dark, feminine, satanic, hellish lower three spheres of creation.
Gentile souls are regarded as non-living eternally, so how could they ever be converted? Gentile souls are regarded as pure evil, the opposite pole of pure good, that the Jews believe themselves to be.
Rabbis believe that any sin that a Jew appears to commit is in fact entirely due to the evil presence of Gentiles, or demonic animal souls, that have polluted eternally good, pure and innocent Jews.
Hence the ritual of animal sacrifice, called Kapparot, where all ‘sin’ is passed back to the source where the Jews believe it came from, the eternally evil Gentile souls, in the form of a chicken, or the passover lamb, or worse, as there are numerous accounts of Gentile children being abducted around the time of Passover and their blood-drained bodies being found dumped later after being tortured to death in another version of Kapparot, with remains of blood-soaked grains from Matzo bread being found stuck in the wounds.
Thus the Gentile is eternally irredeemable in Jewish eyes, so can never be truly converted, even if the semblance of conversion is enacted to satisfy the Gentile desire, so as not to betray the real truth of intended eternal hostility towards the Gentiles.
Also, check out ’100,000 Radiations’ by Barry Chamish, I think you will find I am correct on this. They tend to exterminate or sterilize any black Jews, and they will do (and have been doing) just the same to whites and all people of different races.
Dr Karl Skorecki has recently proven that all Ashkenazim and Sephardim are real Jews with the same DNA, dating back 3,300 years, with their communities splitting up some time after that. So they are not the Gentile proselytes that numerous apologists for the Jewish people have been stating erroneously.
Another recent study in the NY Times proved the same thing. Also, their DNA has been confirmed in various studies as having originated in the Old Testament geographical region. Rabbis also state that Jews are a race, not a belief system.
Ariadna Theokopoulos
December 18, 2012 at 8:00 pm
I know. I too follow the NYT for scientific studies.
What I find the most offensive in these jews dating back 3,300 years in the geographical region of the Old Testament is that they believe about gentiles:
“spiritual excrement left behind from the creation process, from the three, dark, feminine, satanic, hellish lower three spheres of creation.”
“feminine,” eh? Despicable.
Blake
December 19, 2012 at 8:11 pm
Eric: Just to clarify. You believe Ashkenaz are bloodline Israelites?
Eric Blenheim
December 20, 2012 at 8:24 pm
Yes. I know that some wish to believe otherwise.
I don’t think right to return as a result of demonstrating genetic origin in one particular part of the world should automatically grant anyone the right to claim territory years later that they have already given up and moved away from. That is a little con trick waved before our eyes by the Jews.
Trying to oppose Jewish world domination by thinking that those Ashkenazi Jews in Israel are just Gentile proselytes is actually assisting the Jews to do their terrorism and world takeover by allowing them to say that the ‘real’ Jews are in no way involved in this, that ‘real’ Jews are not Zionists, and that real Jews present no threat to the world at all, so why doesn’t everyone just stop criticizing them. Sayanim love to play that game, as well as those who intend to oppose Jewish terrorism do, strangely accepting that erroneous account of Gentile Ashkenazim proselytes being responsible for Jewish crimes also, though the latter have been conned into accepting that belief, thinking that it strengthens their position against Jewish terrorism, whilst it actually weakens their position, because it entirely absolves ‘real’ Jews of having any complicity in what Israel and Ashkenazim are doing worldwide.
See the great number of comments on various websites saying how the Ashkenazim are not real Jews, and that real Jews are really great people.
The Jews originally took ancient Israel from other peoples anyway, by murdering them, and they are using just the same method today. They rely on primitive superstition in the gullible to assist in validating their ridiculous claim that some alleged ‘God’ gave that land to them in the first place. Nobody ever gave anyone any piece of paper in the beginning.
Blake
December 20, 2012 at 10:16 pm
Don’t need to wish Eric. They are the ones claiming lineage to the invading Israelites (which is not a land deed to Palestine anyway).
However, even Ben Zion Dinur, the father of Israeli historiography, was not hesitant about describing the Khazars as the origin of the Jews in Eastern Europe, and describes Khazaria as ‘the mother of the diasporas’ in Eastern Europe Ibn al-Faqih wrote “All of the Khazars are Jews.” Christian of Stavelot wrote in 864 that “all of them profess the Jewish faith in its entirety”.
Some books about Khazars:
1. The Thirteenth Tribe by Arthur Koestler.
2. The Jews of Khazaria by Kevin Alan Brook.
3. The Invention of the Jewish People by Shlomo Sand.
4. The Kuzari and the Shap ing of Jewish Identity, 1167–1900 by Adam Shear .
5. FACTS ARE FACTS by Benjamin H. Freedman 6. History of the Jews – Prof H. Graetz
Blake
December 20, 2012 at 10:44 pm
OFF TOPIC but can anybody tell me what happened to that edit button we used to have on here?
Somoe
December 22, 2012 at 2:51 pm
The edit facility was removed as it was impeding the website – so many calculations, timers etc it was slowing the site considerably.
Blake
December 22, 2012 at 3:34 pm
Thanks Somoe.
Eric Blenheim
December 21, 2012 at 5:46 pm
But the genomes of the Ashkenazim and the Sephardim have been proven to be identical in the important areas that denote them as coming from the same ancestry, and Middle Eastern geographical area, and regardless of the factuality or non-factuality of the ridiculous Bible stories, the genomes of those people still match up with the genome of the present day Palestinians in the ‘Bible lands’, who the Jews are fond of calling apes and subhumans etc.
They tried to sweep the evidence of that similarity between their own genome and that of the allegedly sub-human Palestinian people under the carpet by having the study that revealed it removed from published research documents if I remember correctly.
I believe that the recent studies on the genetic similarities of these peoples prove that they really do in fact share a common origin in the present day Middle East area called Israel.
Nonetheless, Yahweh is not really God, and the Jewish crime cult are just a sly bunch of selfish psychopaths perpetrating their own world domination master race genocidal nastiness on the rest of us, which is not remotely spiritual in the slightest.
But as the Jewish ‘faith’ quite clearly states that Gentiles are non-living souls, eternally irredeemable demons at the best, then whacking us all is no problem at all to them. The Jews are spiritually blind to the existence of the soul in it’s true nature, an as they do not know themselves in the light of the true God, then they cannot know the actual soul nature of any other people either. Their supposed ‘religion’ is thus completely unfit for purpose, except as a criminal vehicle for materialistic and psychic world supremacy, to the detriment of all Gentile souls.
With the application of the slightest bit of genuine intellect, Jews would understand that they would all be better off spiritually and socially by leaving that religion, just as Theodor Herzl proposed.
While we wait for the Jews to do that, they carry on butchering the rest of the world.
Ariadna Theokopoulos
December 21, 2012 at 9:38 pm
All true, Eric.
Other studies I am sure you are familiar with showed just as definitively that the Ashkenazi genome is almost identical to that of the Mohawk and Choctaw Native American tribes. Some say this proves there was an Ashkenazi Jewish presence in the New World before Columbus, others even speculate that the Ashkenazi PREDATED the native American tribes.
The close similarity with the Mohawk explains the dense concentration of Jews in the New York area lasting into our times, just as the genomic relatedness with the Choctaw explains the very old Jewish settlements (retirement homes) in Florida.
Looking at this picture (below) one is struck by the somatic resemblance between this Native Americam blowing the shofar and Netanyahu.
http://ts2.mm.bing.net/th?id=H.4991156543227937&pid=15.1
Eric Blenheim
December 22, 2012 at 6:51 pm
That is fascinating, and I have read of other survivors of the Great Flood, besides those on Noah’s Ark, with accounts of various peoples either surviving underground, even traveling by tunnels between continents, or even flying by ancient technology, and as you say, peoples did travel after the flood to America from the Middle East thousands of years ago, and then we have the account of the Hopi people that say they have come originally from another planet, and those that say they have come from ‘underground’.
There are several races not acknowledged by mainstream science that have lived on the surface of the earth, that are now extinct, or perhaps now surviving in regions of the ‘inner earth’ according to some, including giants, whose remains have been carefully hidden from the public by the Smithsonian Institute of America, and even President Abraham Lincoln referred to them as factual beings. They are also known as the ‘Mound Builders’.
The Kashmiri people also regard themselves as a lost tribe of Israelites by the way, with a population today numbering about 26 million, and their physiognomy is very different from most other peoples of India.
Also, in further support of what you say, the various names of God used by the American Indian peoples not only include Manitou, and Wakantanka, but also a name very similar to ‘Yahweh’ when you hear them chant it, though I am not sure of the name of the particular tribe it is that chants that name of their ‘God’.
Ariadna Theokopoulos
December 22, 2012 at 7:30 pm
“the account of the Hopi people that say they have come originally from another planet ”
definitely israeli forefathers
Ariadna Theokopoulos
December 23, 2012 at 12:08 am
“That is fascinating”
Thank you. I try.
Eric Blenheim
December 23, 2012 at 12:39 am
Amazing about the link between the Hopis and the Jews isn’t it? But so strange how the modern Jewish settlers that came with Columbus, another Jew, to New York, in the intended new Jewish homeland, would then go about whacking the Indians. Probably a process of eugenics to remove the bloodlines they saw as defunct.
Churchill said it was a good thing that one inferior people in America was replaced by a superior people, so I suppose the Hopis were seen as a branch of their people that were no longer worthy of living, or at least, existing in numbers that might be a threat to the racial dominance of the ‘superior’ strain of their species.
My worry is, bearing in mind the massive wars that have taken place between the planets in the past, that these Jews are in fact some race that has spawned all over the galaxy, playing a little game at being ordinary humans, whilst in fact they toy with other races like a cat with a mouse, using them like bees in a beehive, till they are ready to exterminate them altogether, after having built up their own technologies sufficiently using Gentile resources and labour. DARPA will soon perfect robotic humans in the next 30 years, and then it will be the end of the lot of us unless we put a spoke in their wheels, as Gentile slaves will be entirely redundant.
It is highly probable that they have been having some extraterrestrial help, also in in the psychic dimension, and they were the only people to invent the atom, hydrogen and nuclear bombs, clearly indicating a genocidal streak in them.
The Jews are not very intelligent spiritually, having decided to go the atheistic route and declare themselves God. I think they are very scared of other races having psychic abilities, as they shove loads of fluoride into people to calcify their pineal glands, and strangely, they give more fluoride to the tribes on the reservations than they give to other Americans.
The German mediums of the Vril society that channeled the spaceship technology from Aldebaran must have rattled them, so they are trying to make sure that no other people can channel any other technology that might trump theirs, and that is why they try to destroy all other religions, and the minds and bodies of all other people to prevent them from having full access to their benefits.
The Jewish path is to destroy all others to achieve what they erroneously consider a benefit, whereas more spiritually intelligent souls would actually do the opposite, and try to assist the souls in all other races to progress spiritually, as all souls form part of the same cosmic body ultimately, but the Jews in their madness have forgotten all this.
Blake
December 21, 2012 at 10:17 pm
ERIC, you sound like a plant. Pretend to hate Jews but then whine about their genomes as if your life depends on it. Say how is a genome of an invader a land deed to Palestine anyway?
Eric Blenheim
December 22, 2012 at 7:53 pm
My earlier reply to your comment has been removed. I wonder why. Is that the real purpose of this site?
Anyone can read very clearly what I have already stated about the non-validity of any claim to any land area on the basis of genetics. I see you slighted me earlier by stating “Jews are not a race but a religion so something you can convert to so you okay there Eric”.
Why on earth would you think that I should wish to convert to such an insane religion that is totally opposed to any real spiritual ethics, and totally opposed to God Himself?
You are quite plainly working as an Israeli agent.
You write with the grammatical errors of a typical Israeli sayan.
I am thoroughly reminded once more of the words of Theodor Herzl, who stated; “We shall lead every revolution against us”, intending for Jews to be leading members of every movement against the Jews, so as to head any such organizations off in the wrong direction, and to subvert them. I see plainly that you are doing that very thing by falsely accusing me of working for Jewish interests.
That is why you, as a sayan, are posting on this site, posting as someone who opposes Jewish crimes, whilst you try to undermine me for actually opposing Jewish crimes. That is the only possible conclusion, and it is so obvious, and I have met many of your type before.
Once more, I firmly believe that the Jewish criminal terrorist cult known as Judaism should be banned worldwide by international law, and that Israel should have all legal recognition as a state withdrawn due to it’s constant terrorist activities and the current threat, which has never been withdrawn or appropriately addressed with military force by traitorous politicians in governments worldwide, of nuclear annihilation of the rest of the entire world using the ‘Samson Option’.
The alleged holocaust, which was used as the basis for the foundation of the state of Israel, necessitating the entire WWII to create that illusion, purely as a plan to create the state of Israel, is now proven totally to be a fraud.
Blake, you are a fraud.
Roy Bard
December 22, 2012 at 7:57 pm
EB: “My earlier reply to your comment has been removed. I wonder why. Is that the real purpose of this site? ”
It was trashed because it was abusive and added nothing to the deLiberations…..
Attack the ball not the player please!
Blake
December 22, 2012 at 8:19 pm
I don’t know how many times I have received death threats from hasbara sayanim but if it makes you feel better about calling me one of them so be it. I want to see justice done and the usurping zio entity vanish from the pages of time. I hope that was grammatically correct enough for you to understand.
Blake
December 22, 2012 at 8:20 pm
@ Roy: I did not see it but I know you are fair and would not trash just any comment so it must have been pretty abusive.
Ariadna Theokopoulos
December 23, 2012 at 1:50 am
Try to be more concise. Especially now that you are predictable.
David Holden
December 18, 2012 at 11:57 am
Cameron’s Khazar bloodline
, thank you for submitting a copy of your recently re-issued standard hazbarbazaar anti-semitic diatribe mk 2.007. our research department will study your version with interest.
as a young website which lacks the reach of more established e-publications like the eJC we @deLib are flattered to have been granted the honour of this attention.
If you wish to become a regular deLib contributor I would advise you to be careful with your facts, as there are some sharp proofreaders on here who, you will soon discover if you persist, are less merciful than myself when it comes to critiquing sloppy journalism! But perhaps you are a one-post wonder? If not, having thus credentialised yourself, perhaps you could on occasion attempt greater brevity in future. Treat it as an exercise. And remember many of our readers are busy people.
The following information, which, whether true or not, is, from the circumstances of its publication, unlikely easily to be contradictable by any readily available source in the public domain, suggests your claim that David Cameron is Jewish, being born to a full Jewish mother is slightly exaggerated – in your eagerness you may have missed the word Ian (emphasized in bold below):
according to Harry Mount (claims to be C’s 2nd cousin)
10th April 2010 (during general election campaign)
“Cameron is also from a comfortable, but not overwhelmingly grand, background, with a mixture of English, Scottish, Welsh and Jewish blood. His father, Ian Cameron, was a successful stockbroker, a partner at Panmure Gordon, like his father and grandfather. Ian Cameron’s mother, Enid Levita, was from a distinguished Polish Jewish banking background. David’s mother, Mary, is the daughter of a baronet, Sir William Mount (my great-uncle), who owned a pedimented Georgian house, Wasing Place, near Aldermaston, and several thousand acres of Berkshire, bought in 1759 by John Mount, a successful publisher and stationer in Tower Hill.”
I am sorry to have been the one to bring this to your attention. May I assure you that, like yourself, I loath Casmeron as a lying zionist toady and will not sleep easy in my bed until every last Jew has been wiped from the face of the map.
For the purpose of ensuring a stream of future reparation payments to my descendants should this purported cartographic holocaust ever become a reality, G_d forbid, I would not hesitate to include in this total the six million part-Jews-by-blood like myself – I affix myself to a sub-category within the larger group (I am one of the justly infamous twelve point fiver percenters) since I was told by my mother that one of her grandmothers was Jewish. However I have not yet been able to afford the genetic screening that might furnish a scientific confrmation or refutation her otherwise potentially fallible testimony.
Eric Blenheim
December 18, 2012 at 9:14 pm
I am not sure why you refer to what I wrote as hasbara, as by doing so you are stating that I am writing Jewish political propaganda. I assure you thoroughly that I think the Jewish religion should be made illegal all over the world as a criminal terrorist organization, and Israel disarmed and have all statehood withdrawn. I can’t make you out. Who are you representing? I just don’t know. Perhaps I have mistaken the purpose of this article, or this site in some way.
As regards Cameron’s mother being Jewish, although I did read that in an article, I am not sure if we read the same article. Perhaps the author I read was not so well researched, or maybe he was.
Anyway, PM David Cameron’s Jewish lineage is amply confirmed in other ways in the following article;
‘David Cameron ‘could be a direct descendant of Moses’’
2009 07 13
By Russell Jenkins
He may well also be from partly ‘Maronite’ type crypto-Jewish lineage also, though much of the details of those lines has been ‘lost’ in their various flights from ‘persecution’.
However, if a rabbi were to take a blood sample and have it tested by a geneticist, I do not think he would be found to be lacking in that department, and if he were, why on earth would the Jews have approved him for election as Prime Minister. Also, if he were not Jewish himself, why on earth would he then suicidally and traitorously support the Jews and Israel, knowing full well their stated intent of world domination?
This country, as well as the US, has been completely owned since about 1930 by Jewish banking concerns, due to defaultment on banking ‘loans’ made to Britain, so that now, all candidates fielded for elections to be PM have to be in the pocket of the Rothschild banking corporation, being no more, in effect than banking CEO’s for the Rothschilds.
I can provide rabbinical quotes and scriptural quotes to back up everything else I say, but did not want to flood your page with huge masses of stuff. However, that is not a cop-out, and can provide quotes on those issues to prove anything I have said, though I bear in mind your request for brevity.
Ariadna Theokopoulos
December 23, 2012 at 12:14 am
“I assure you thoroughly that I think the Jewish religion should be made illegal all over the world ”
Neah, wouldn’t that be kind of, you know, Jewish?
“if a rabbi were to take a blood sample and have it tested by a geneticist”
That would be a contaminated sample, mixed with saliva.
“I can provide rabbinical quotes and scriptural quotes to back up everything else I say”
But can you make it illegal all over the world and still use it for quotes?
Eric Blenheim
December 23, 2012 at 2:16 am
I see the joke, very good. We should present all the Jewish scriptures in an international court, and it looks like that would have to be our own court, as the UN is completely defunct. Those scriptures should be used as evidence of their being instrumental in maintaining and perpetuating a major criminal cult, and then every copy in existence burned, so they won’t be able contaminate people’s minds in the future.
I expect that now all the rabbis will be feverishly digging little holes all over the place and putting Jewish time capsules with Talmuds and Torahs in all over the place.
Plan two, ship every one of them to some island somewhere and keep naval ships all round to stop them escaping, or send them all to Birobidzan, where they can be mindwiped and reeducated in a positive manner for a few generations to get all that nastiness out of them.
Of course, if they persisted, then they would have to be penalized further in top security prison mental hospitals, or have their heads stuffed with Kotex, as criminals intent on committing genocide on all other peoples.
Hitler was nice to them, helping them to live elsewhere after giving them training in agriculture etc, and then deporting as many of them as he could to Palestine, before the alleged ‘allies’ stopped them sailing there, and they still got nasty against him and said all those lies about some fake holocaust. Some people are never grateful eh?
Even the German resistance never quite sussed out that all Germans were supposed to die in a racial holocaust, even themselves, the whole genome had to go, ideally, and it would not have mattered if a Jesuit priest was in control of Germany either, according to Churchill, or if the NSDAP did not exist, they would have crushed Germany still, even if they had had a Liberal Democrat administration run by a Buddhist monk.
The Germans are seen by the Jews as too brainy and independent a variety of Gentile for the Jews, not stupid enough to boss around as slaves forever, so they felt that they had to cull as many Germans as possible. The Talmud tells them to cull Gentiles by military means if they start to see themselves as equal to the Jews, that is, independent and above being slaves to the Jews, and that was indicated by the Germans opting out of a usurious banking system, which is the usual means of imposing slavery through the international Jewish banks.
The Jews would probably play along at being nice with us too, if we offered them another homeland, then falsely accuse us of killing another 6 million, then have a few more hundred million of us killed in their wars in ‘retribution’, which is business as usual really, as we Gentiles are eternally guilty of something in their eyes, quite literally.
In Mein Kampf, Hitler specifically stated he would never allow a Jewish state to come into existence, as it would quickly become a base from which criminal activities would be directed all over the world, with the Jews there enjoying protected status, and this has happened. If Hitler had won the war, Israel most surely would never have been allowed to come into existence, and there would be no wars and no Samson Option threatened against the entire world today, with no atomic weapons anywhere either, and no DU in the ground and no GMO’s etc.
The Muslims in Pakistan have the right idea about how to deal with those criminals who are injecting children with live attenuated polio virus on behalf of Jewish Gates’ killing machine. 47,500 Indian kids were left permanently crippled by Bill Gates’ maliciously contaminated vaccines, and only one in 200 infected with polio is left permanently crippled, so 9.5 million kids were infected in just one year alone in that country, with just that one disease from those vaccines, and certainly many thousands more unvaccinated children picked up the infection from them. 9.5 million infected from the vaccines represents about one in every 17 kids vaccinated that year in India for polio. Officially, there was not a single case of polio in India that year, in 2011 I think. Imagine how many other diseases they received vaccines for.
Jews certainly are the masters of inflicting as slow and sadistic a kill as they possibly can on us poor Gentiles, so they can be sure we are in hell even in this life.
Ariadna Theokopoulos
December 23, 2012 at 2:21 am
I think you shot your wad.
fool me once...
December 23, 2012 at 5:45 pm
@Eric
comment;
I bet that made you snarf.
Just to keep you “up-to-date” with AT’s
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=shot+my+wad
Eric Blenheim
December 23, 2012 at 6:41 pm
Thankyou for that, I would not want to lose track of what is going on.
Ariadna Theokopoulos
December 23, 2012 at 6:42 pm
Always the patient teacher, never running out of “wad,” especially with the wadless…
Merry Christmas, fmo.
fool me once...
December 23, 2012 at 7:31 pm
and a Merry Christmas to you AT
Eric Blenheim
December 24, 2012 at 4:16 pm
And a Merry Christmas to you both too, fmo and Ariadna.
fool me once...
December 27, 2012 at 6:53 pm
Apologies, a belated MC to you Eric.
Eric Blenheim
December 19, 2012 at 4:24 am
Correction to my comment: David Cameron’s mother is not provenly Jewish, though she may possibly be a ‘Maronite’ type crypto-Jewess, or of ‘converted’ Jewish ancestry, which is not entirely unlikely given the great deal of Jewish blood in his ancestry, and the extreme devotion that David Cameron demonstrates towards Israel and the Jewish faith.
Current and past Rabbinical opinion is that even though a Jewish person may have converted to another religion, such as Christianity, in order to gain entrance to some country like England, or Spain for example, in the past when Jews were banned from entering those countries, that person never stopped being Jewish, and a great many Jews are currently practicing as Christians today, some even with the full knowledge of their true Jewish roots, from generations past. After all, he does and says just about everything in his political life exactly as a Jew does. And, as they say, ‘If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, then it is a duck’.
Ariadna Theokopoulos
December 19, 2012 at 12:50 pm
“a great deal of Jewish blood in his ancestry”
When you say this, do you mean:
a. volume (in ml)
b. percentage of
— whole blood
— platelets?
I read somewhere that there is a “jewish factor” (JF)in blood that opposed the “Christmas Factor” –the latter known as Factor IX
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Factor_IX
The JF under electron microscopy reveals Star of David-shaped corpuscles.
Eric Blenheim
December 19, 2012 at 5:04 pm
That is a good one.
fool me once...
December 19, 2012 at 8:14 pm
“That is a good one.”
Just out of curiosity, were you acknowledging a perceived 911 in Roman numerals reference Eric?
“Christmas Factor” IX
“jewish factor” XI
http://www.jewishgenetics.org/?q=content/factor-xi-deficiency
Eric Blenheim
December 20, 2012 at 8:31 pm
You make me smile.
Ariadna Theokopoulos
December 18, 2012 at 8:11 pm
“a full Jewish mother”
just for clarity: are you using “full” here in the sense of buxom?
Eric Blenheim
December 18, 2012 at 9:16 pm
snurf snurf
fool me once...
December 18, 2012 at 11:12 pm
@EB
Just so we’re all understanding one another’s terminology, did you mean to write – snarf, as in;
verb:
“to expel liquid (or, more rarely, food) out one’s nose by laughing in the middle of a swallow.”
or snurf, as in one of these;
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=snurf
Eric Blenheim
December 19, 2012 at 2:38 am
I have always thought ‘snurf snurf’ to represent cartoon laughter, and it certainly used to mean just that, so I am not up-to-date with my knowledge of current urban slang use. I think maybe I should just have said ‘tee hee’.
Jay Knott
December 19, 2012 at 2:26 pm
‘Snurf snurf’ is demographically specific: viz.co.uk
David Holden
December 18, 2012 at 8:40 pm
modern scholarship, evidently drawing from the deep well of philophical methodology popularised in the 19th century as Humpty-Dumptyism, elucidates the matter thus:
floating or empty as the antithesis of full
floating signifier or empty signifier is a term used in semiotics to
denote a signifier without referents, such as a word that doesn’t point to any actual object or agreed upon meaning.
Claude Lévi-Strauss originated this term,[1] where he identifies terms like mana (magical mystical substance of which the magic is formed), or oomph (American slang term for flavor in the figurative sense)[2] “to represent an undetermined quantity of signification, in itself void of meaning and thus apt to receive any meaning”. Daniel Chandler defines the term as “a signifier with a vague, highly variable, unspecifiable or non-existent signified.” [3] As such a “floating signifier” may “mean different things to different people: they may stand for many or even any signifieds; they may mean whatever their interpreters want them to mean.” Such a floating signifier – which is said to possess “symbolic value zero” – results necessary to “allow symbolic thought to operate despite the contradiction inherent in it”.[4]
The notion of floating signifiers can be applied to concepts such as race [5] and gender, as a way of asserting that the word is more concrete than the concept it describes, where the concept may not be stable, but the word is. It is often commonly applied to non-linguistic signs, such as the example of the Rorschach inkblot test. Roland Barthes, while not using the term “floating signifier” explicitly, referred specifically to non-linguistic signs as being so open to interpretation that they constituted a “floating chain of signifieds.” [3] For example the American flag is at once a signifier of the geographical nation it represents, of patriotism to that nation, of the nation’s set of governmental policies, and/or of the ideologies associated with it, such as liberty. Depending on the context, the flag can carry either positive or negative significance.
The concept is used in some more textual forms of postmodernism, which rejects the strict anchoring of particular signifiers to particular signifieds and argues against the concept that there are any ultimate determinable meanings to words or signs. For example, Jacques Derrida speaks of the “freeplay” of signifiers: arguing that they are not fixed to their signifieds but point beyond themselves to other signifiers in an “indefinite referral of signifier to signified.”[3]
1. Claude Lévi-Strauss, “Introduction à l’oeuvre de Marcel Mauss” in Mauss, Sociologie et Anthropologie, Paris, 1950
2. Oomph definition”. Thefreedictionary.com.
3, Chandler, Daniel. “Semiotics for Beginners”. aber.ac.uk.
4. Jeffrey Mehlman, The “Floating Signifier”: From Lévi-Strauss to Lacan, Yale French Studies, No. 48, French Freud: Structural Studies in Psychoanalysis. (1972), pp. 10-37.
5. “Race: a Floating Signifier? Stuart Hall speech”. caffeine_sparks.
fool me once...
December 20, 2012 at 10:25 am
@DH
.
“Humpty-Dumptyism”
An elliptical, cyclical, deLiberical, pre-apocalyptical, Yuletide sabbatical comment
http://www.deliberation.info/reinventing-the-middle-east-lexicon/
David Holden
December 21, 2012 at 3:18 pm
good piece by EW, very appositely cited here by FMO
Ariadna Theokopoulos
December 21, 2012 at 2:28 am
David always makes it sound so simple, doesn’t he? Well, it isn’t.
I am not knocking accessibility of ideas and language. Without it you end up with only a following of scholars weighted down by a big bunch of deciphering keys like the “sereno” of old Madrid.
Derrida and the grammarian gang would have us believe that anyone in our so-called postmodern world can highjack a pig of a word and make it fly.
Yes, such pigs fly all the time but the porcine sky traffic is not chaotic.
Schopenhauer described the “will to mean.”
The weak, and they are many, will happily trot under the banner of the Word of the Day. But who made the banner? Betsy Ross? No, it is the Semantically Strong who decide what the word of the day means, it is they who have the power to bend semantics to their will.
David Holden
December 21, 2012 at 3:44 pm
Blake
December 29, 2012 at 6:46 pm
Only 12% of Tory members expect Cameron to win a majority at next election
http://conservativehome.blogs.com/thetorydiary/2012/12/only-12-of-tory-members-expect-cameron-to-win-a-majority-at-next-election.html