BanksyPalestineBarrier

Why the Facts of 9-11 are Suppressed


John McMurtry – Why the Facts of 9/11 are Suppressed
Published on Oct 28, 2012
Re-uploaded as it was taken down from google videos.
Video found @ http://archive.org/details/mcmurtry

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_McM…

At first I thought the “9-11″ event was merely allowed to happen like PearlHarbour. But the facts showed that only U.S. capacities could explain thelogistics of the otherwise physically impossible execution of the crime — fromthe near free-fall acceleration of the fire-proofed buildings into theirfootprints and the absence, inaccessibility and removal of evidence, to thedetailed police-state law ready to apply. On the other hand, some evidence, suchas the F.B.I. reports not followed up on and the many people led to believebeforehand that there was a foreign plane attack coming, ensured that peoplewere ready to believe that only an alien conspiracy could explain the event. Moral outrage would be directed at jihadist Arabs and at U.S. intelligence anddefense forces for not doing enough in time. In fact, this was the veryscenario proposed before 9-11 by the man who came to be the head of the 9-11Commission. But the immediate historic transformation of the powers of the BushJr. administration was the most dramatic effect of the 9-11 event. Itsapotheosis of power from near political dead-end to master saviour andsuperpower leader above question was mythical in proportions. It completelyreversed the rising public smell of corruption from Enron, the biggestfinancial backer of Bush Jr., which was then imploding as a giant energy-futurescrime that had bankrupted California. It reversed the unprecedentedillegitimacy of a president by stolen election and vote repression who had arecord of alcohol and cocaine addiction and cultural illiteracy. It diverted all eyes from the inside-dealing of federal oil and energy policy being determined by oligopolist corporations with V-P Cheney behind closed doors andfrom financial scandals whose records were destroyed by the WTC collapse. Themetamorphosis of the Bush Jr. administration from national disgrace to exaltedand limitless command was the most miraculous reversal of fortune in politicalhistory. But it received no press or political attention. It was if the past had never happened but disappeared down the memory hole.

In fact, it was taboo to identify the one-way benefits. The mutation of Bush Jr., hiding out on his Texas estate for months after the 2000 lost-but-won election, to an all-powerful “War President” overnight had a staggering effecton the rapidly rising international and domestic opposition against the illegal president. The Nixon-age Cheney-Rumsfeld duo as revolving-door CEO’s in charge of a new supranational program of war was unlikely to get much support before 9-11. But it was now in full-spectrum motion with “terror alerts” around the clock as justification for martial laws and formerly unacceptable invasions. Overnight the strategic objectives of the PNAC vaulted into absolute poweracross borders, and the Bush oil-military-and-money party was the solebeneficiary in the U.S. The rapid slide downwards in financial security of the 99% was not worthy of comment. The social security of public programs was inline for still more attacks. Bush’s extreme-right conviction that the RooseveltNew Deal was “an aberration” he wanted to eliminate was not mentioned. Instead, in perfect convenience, all field of meaning was occupied by “the terrorist threat” and how to war against it. Cui bono? — the first forensic question atany murderous crime – shouted from every circumstance and consequence. But itwas unspeakable in public. The “war administration” could do and did anythingit chose — from privatizing the military to putting everyone on terror alertsto torture chambers across continents to a rule of fear in the U.S. the like ofwhich had never been seen before. Most of all, the supreme moral goal and thecovert U.S. state were released from any question or impediment. Everything tha thappened after 9-11 was consistent with them and the known plan of “fullspectrum dominance”. As Brzezinski and the PNAC had themselves observedbeforehand, the plan had not been politically feasible then. Now the supremevalue objective had its moving war machine in action into the Middle East andCentral Asia. A supranational police state was being formed at home and abroadto “protect America’s interests” – in particular the oil-energy bases theprivate transnational money-sequence system and its armed forces ran on. 37 Itlooked remarkably like fascism being built after the Reichstag Fire in 1930′sGermany.38 In fact I later debated Michael Albert on Z-Net on this institutional analogue when he and his illustrious friend Noam Chomsky were dismissing 9-11″conspiracy theory” along with the media — not noticing that the ultimateconspiracy theory was the official one which was refused examination. But Itook the Albert-Chomsky argument at its word, and argued that the “9-11″ eventwas institutional all the way down and had a disturbing precedent in the lastfascist turn of the West including Bush’s grandfather as a Nazi money manthrough the Union Banking Corporation. Albert might as well not have read aword.39 Everyone on the U.S. Left as well as Right seemed to be of one mind –the “ruling group-mind”. Its nature is blocking against all reason and fact.40The official conspiracy theory of 9-11 was a paradigm of the group-mindphenomenon and the media unspeakable at once. Only others could have a”conspiracy theory”. The official theory was final fact, although the mostimplausible conspiracy theory of all. Locked in the thrall of the group-mind,even a strictly legal meaning of a central category of criminal law — acriminal conspiracy, prosecuted all the time in the U.S. – was now taboo inconnection to 9-11. No scientific finding is allowed through this mind-lock. Aclosed Orwellian circle is constructed. All not believing the officialconspiracy theory are reverse-accused as believers in a conspiracy theory. The official conspiracy theory is, simultaneously, assumed as the opposite of what it is. Double-think — holding contradictory thoughts in the mind as the samein meaning – is normalized as given. Such is the ruling group-mind on 9-11. Thesupreme moral objective and its strategic planning depend on this reverseoperation and its group-mind cement to succeed. It is a deep psychologicaldisorder that is not decoded, but is invariably used in the larger disorder ofwhich it is a signature pathology. As the individual liar relies on a defensemechanism of aggressive accusation to switch the tables to protect and advancehis own interests, so too at the covert state and corporate media level. Rulinggroupmind, reverse-accusation operation, and the ruling interests they serve all seamlessly interlock. The conditioning is so pervasive it succeeds in beingexperienced as an act of individual belief with no option. Because the massmedia’s lights of publicity fall only on what is consistent with the officialconspiracy theory and attack all that does not conform to the ruling story, themechanism of delusion is locked in. This is why payroll journalists whootherwise seem progressive abuse those who see through the delusion– in partbecause they are hired not to think beneath the hook of selling copy; partlybecause exposing the moral truth on 9-11 is a fast way to get isolated insideany corporate milieu; and, most basically, because stepping outside of theruling group-mind on any life-anddeath matter brings anathema and perhapssocial annihilation. When we recognise these Journal of 9/11 Studies Volume 35,February 2013 constraints on free inquiry, we had better understand why so manywho are normally not duped by official cover stories shy away from forensic andcausal understanding of 9-11. They sustain the group-mind morale across partiesinside the bonds of the absurd. This is why almost no-one would follow throughthe motive and causal investigation of the most important single event of theera. In the end, one worries about English-speaking culture’s incapacity tothink about the perpetual war and dispossession system of which 9-11 is atrack-switch override of prior blocks to the supreme value objective. Totalcontrol of world human and natural resources and their organisation for thetransnational money-sequence system has been vastly advanced by 9-11 to crushall human rights standing in the way, from habeas corpus and due process toprotection from war-criminal aggression to seize other societies’ most basicsovereign means of production. The carcinogenic disorder advances from strengthto strength, recurring at another level in the “financial 9-11″ of 2008. It even more centrally dispossesses the world to serve the “supranational sovereignty” of private money-sequence world rule with no committed lifefunction. Behind them both lies the ultimately regulating supreme value systemwhich cumulatively overruns and devours world life and life means as its globalizing feeding cycle. Observe that every step of the global worldcorporate-rights system conforms. 41 At the level of the 9-11 process itself,the primary oil-war-and-banking beneficiaries of 9-11 and the 9-11 wars profithugely, however ruinously – all in accordance with prior invocation of “acatastrophic and catalyzing event” to enable just what has happened. Leadingthe fall of the rule of life-protective state and law is the complete erasure ofthe first forensic questions of all criminal investigation – greatest motiveand benefit, capacity to commit the crime, concealment of facts, and continuousfalse reports. Each and all remain effectively stricken from the record of the”free press” and all official accounts.

Share Button
24 replies to this post
      • What should we believe?

        To whom is this nonsensical question directed ?
        .
        9/11 what really happened is only known by those who comitted the crime & they aren’t saying.
        .
        Obviously Judy Wood “Where did the Towers Go” has the best suggestions so far.
        .
        Secret Pentagon weapons such as the “Pentagon Tesla Direct Energy ” weaponry suggested by Judy Wood was probably used as cars were flipped & toasted blocks away from Ground Zero .
        ,
        See Susan Lindauer (CIA asset)in her saying that within the CIA EVERYONE knew something was going down on 9/11.
        .
        Educate yourself perhaps.

  1. AE911Truth Evidence Goes to Court Feb 25, 2013

    On February 25, in the small town of Horsham in the United Kingdom, there will be a rare and potentially groundbreaking opportunity for the 9/11 truth movement. Three hours of detailed 9/11 evidence is to be presented and considered in a court of law where the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) will be challenged over the inaccurate and biased manner in which it has portrayed the events and evidence of 9/11.

    Over the last 16 months, BBC has been challenged strongly by individuals in the UK over two documentaries that they showed in September 2011 as part of the tenth anniversary of 9/11, namely ‘9/11: Conspiracy Road Trip’ and ‘The Conspiracy Files: 9/11 Ten Years On’. Formal complaints were lodged with BBC over the inaccuracy and bias of these documentaries, which, according to 9/11 activists, was in breach of the operating requirements of BBC through their ‘Royal Charter and Agreement’ with the British public.

    This document requires BBC to show information that is both accurate and impartial. These complaints were supported by the US-based educational charity Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth (AE911Truth), which submitted detailed scientific evidence to BBC to buttress the complaints. The evidence focuses in particular on the confirmed free-fall of WTC 7 and NIST’s 2008 admission of this fact. In addition, over 300 AE911Truth petition signers supported these complaints by sending letters to BBC, requesting that BBC show this evidence to the public.

    http://theuglytruth.wordpress.com/2013/02/23/the-911-truth-movement-goes-to-court-in-the-uk/

  2. does any organisation keep track of which videos are removed from You-Tube in a dodgy way? that would generate a pretty good negative of useful information. to combat this the forces of stupidity would have to remove other vids to add noise to the picture. this would also leave a detectable fingerprint. i think a lot of valuable forensic evidence of this type should be gathered and publicised. the more pressure the more likelihood of forcing further errors. we must shed this old leftie thing and coordinate the detective work. the liars are in the weak position despite their grubby little fingers on levers of power. their time has gone. existentially they are dead meat. soon it won’t just be horses contaminating your Cornish patsies.

    • That would be a very interesting report. I myself often run across revisionist WW II videos being removed from youtube or the owners account being cancelled and in some cases a “warning” that the video is supposedly offensive.

      And then we also have some government’s blocking certain video’s from being viewed in their countries. On February 13 some Germans wanted to commemorate the victims of the bomber attack on Dresden in WW II and the government tried to stop the commemoration and blocked these videos.

      http://www.youtube.com/eslebespanien

      4,000 police stopped the mass funeral march, but Germans could not see it because this channel was blocked in Germany

  3. Mr. Frank Scott who writes some good articles, mostly from a Marxist perspective, loses a lot of credibility and respect, by ridiculing people who have done research on 9/11.
    I’m not a highly educated person, but I find it pretty easy to totally deny the official conspiracy theory of 19 Muslim fanatics, armed with box cutters and directed by a cave dweller in Afghanistan tricking the $40 Billion /year U.S. Intelligence agencies the most advanced military on earth, not once, but four times that fateful day. The official story is so inadequate and far fetched that there must be a different one.

    Frank Scott seems incapable of supporting people who have done credible research on a different theory. Or maybe he just doesn’t give a damn. Either way, that is unfortunate.

  4. using terms like “credible research” does not make the research credible to everyone…

    “credible research” establishes – beyond a shadow of a doubt for anyone but a person incapable of logical reasoning – that six million jews were murdered in gas chambers in world war two, and one jew was resurrected from the dead some time before that…

    duh?

    do you need any more “credible research” than what reveals dreadful photos and films of emaciated bodies in horrible piles? six million right there!

    or a tomb found empty by those who went back after three days? isn’t that”credible research” to back up the resurrection story?

    both of those stories are believed,by hundreds of millions, and many of them are world renowned experts and have – gasp! – college degrees!!!!!

    unfortunately many who cannot accept material reality but must seek fiction, however miraculously clouded with belief in “credible research” as an escape – and some among them practice forms of hopefully unconscious and unintended racism by denying the ability of “arabs” or “people in caves” to be as murderous as those brilliant euros who have been butchering them for quite some time – i can only refer to biblical explanations which make as much sense as stories of mysterious pentagon death rays wielded by sinister forces, um, within the pentagon – and which infantilize the real danger of jewish power exercised on behalf of the jewish nation in palestine by reducing it to fancying that everything that happens in the universe is the result of four jews sitting in a room in tel aviv or new york and deciding what’s what and where it will all happen…

    people who think they are “chosen”, whether by god, race, or to understand a plot-conspiracy-fable only clear to very special people who study very special research to come to very special conclusions that defy logic and material reality, except for the chosen few , are unfortunately part of the problem, not the solution…

    no offense meant,really, but jesus loves you, happy yom kippur , and sholom etc…

    fs

    • Here’s some credible research for you Mr. Scott … NIST change their stance in 2008 to confirm that Building 7 did in fact fall at Free Fall speed.

      What this admission by NIST means is a confirmation of the research and diligence of AE911 that the only explanation of Building 7 collapsing at free fall speed was a controlled demolition.

      This information was not widely reported in 2008 for the obvious reason because it would have raised questions of Jewry’s involvement in 9-11.

      This is what the “Left” for the most part want to suppress. Therefore I am not surprised by your false labeling of 9-11 truth researchers as “not credible”.

      Look it up for yourself Mr. Scott and then reconsider your political ideology. I have because it is quite obvious now how the Left today is nothing more than a tool of Jewry.

    • Not so fast Jay, hadn’t you noticed Frank Scott is one of them there satirists? Irony and all that. So maybe it’s still just you and Mathis alone on the “911 we believe!” trip.
      btw the Professor never did come back and clean his large share of the obscene graffiti off the wall.

      • Gilad Atzmon when he was with deliberation phoned me one day to ask why we were running a 9/11 story? He dis-approved strongly with us exploring 9/11 or even questioning it. He advised me to leave it well alone. At the time i thought it was very strange he would defend 9/11, Laura Stuart, Khald Am etc

        • @JB
          Could you expand on your comment.
          Why would Gilad dis-approve of questioning 9/11, when the event had such a zionist stink emanating from it?
          Didn’t a zionist own the towers, Building 7 etc?
          What was Gilad’s reason(s) for advising you to leave it well alone?
          Laura Stuart is a friend of Gilad? I doubt Khalid Amayreh is though.
          Although friendly, Gilad didn’t give a lengthy leaving statement, that I’m aware of, so it’s hard to say what his reasons were.
          .
          August 6, 2012 at 7:42 pm
          “I have had enough of it..
          Good luck with deliberation”
          Gilad Atzmon
          http://www.deliberation.info/personal-attacks-on-contributors-by-jonathon/
          .
          A few months before deLiberation Info started, Gilad wrote this on his web site;
          September 2, 2011
          “Introduction: The following piece is a commentary I wrote and circulated amongst friends on the 15th of September 2001, just four days after 9/11. At the time I didn’t regard myself as a writer. I was a jazz musician preparing for the publication of my debut novel.
          During that time I didn’t know a single editor, journal or media outlet. My commentary was circulated on the net via emails. Eventually, nine months later, it was published by Counterpunch. This commentary was, in fact, my first attempt to comment on world affairs, ethics and politics.
          I am slightly embarrassed about some of my early formulations. I want to believe that I am a better writer now. I am certainly more succinct and yet, I somehow managed to predict, already then, in September 2001, that the fate of the west was doomed and the collapse of Anglo-American strategy was inevitable. This paper is ten years old but its message may even be more devastating today.”
          http://www.gilad.co.uk/writings/gilad-atzmon-the-end-of-innocence-revisited.html

          • I think he was concerned with his Jazz/writing sales not wanting to upset them by being seen as a conspiracy nut. He viewd 9/11 peeps as conspiracy nuts. He told me to stay away from it – “That wy leads to madness” he said.

            He said he would leave if Laura did and he did.

          • @JB
            “AT the end of the day he was more concerned about sales…”
            Like the old saying goes; You can take Gilad out of the jews but you can’t take…etc ;)
            Nah, only jokin’. He said something in an interview back in January 2013 that eluded to a change probably brought about by overload. For him, previous to the April 2012 telephone conversation you refer to, the thought of also researching 911 could’ve been too overwhelming, that maybe he was wisely recognising but also unintentionally projecting his own limitations.
            If he needs to gain a better state of equilibrium in his life, then fair do’s to him.
            Here’s the piece from the interview;
            “I know how to produce an angry solo. It bonded me with Coltrane through Palestine. I did it now for 10 years. I invented this Arabic-Israeli jazz, whatever you want to call it. I know how to play a Gilad Atzmon song in D minor. It takes me naturally to this Coltrane thing. I can make another 25,000 albums like that. But with Songs Of The Metropolis I didn’t want to. Before this I had created a safe territory. But as an artist I thought ‘If I don’t move now I will get stuck.’ This album moves me away from the boring political. How many times can I talk about Palestine, about being an Israeli? That would be the same solo, the same rant and I can’t do that anymore.”
            http://www.gilad.co.uk/songs-of-the-metropolis/2013/1/26/jazzwise-deserted-cities-of-the-heart-by-andy-robson.html

  5. So are you telling me that you belive the official conspiracy theory? I mean we are asked to belive that all the black boxes vanished in the inferno, but one of the Muslim highjackers passport was found in the rubble. I don’t have to be among the ‘chosen’ to reject that out of hand.

    Do you have a better theory yourself? I’m interested to know, because I think it’s important.

    Some very major changes since 9/11 and not for the better.

  6. from Press TV
    Published on Mar 4, 2013

    Philip Marshall was killed in a black operation over confessing to having worked with CIA drug smugglers and the potential exposure of 9/11 secrets. In the background to this, former US National Security Agency Officer Wayne Madsen says the 9/11 investigative author Philip Marshall and his children were killed in a “black ops hit” by the CIA, dismissing the suicide hypothesis. Marshall was afraid of being silenced for his revelations about 9/11, Madsen said, noting that a side door the investigator never used was wide open when his dead body was found. Marshall believed the former US President George Bush had pulled off the 9/11 attack to foment a government coup. In his fourth book, he was supposed to disclose blockbuster information.

    Press TV has conducted an interview with Dr. Kevin Barrett, an American author and political expert in Madison, Wisconsin, to further discuss the issue. Barrett is joined by Lee Kaplan, investigative journalist from Berkley.

Leave a Reply