Footer Pages


Who does ‘Agent Cameron’ work for?

‘Agent Cameron’, as one of my friends calls him (you’ll see why in a minute), made the following speech to Jewish fundraisers in London this week.

I’m so fizzing with rage and so ashamed that I can hardly bring myself to write about it. Such a performance must have been scripted by Israeli spin-meister Mark Regev’s office, or by some spotty student just awarded a Hasbara Fellowship by The Israel Project and now appointed Communications Director at Number 10.

Nothing surprises me any more.

The dinner guests were no doubt laughing all the way home. And Tel Aviv will be cock-a-hoop. Their willing fool, their top-ranking pimp, their prime-ministerial stooge is firmly on-board, and Israel’s crimes in the Holy Land will continue to be rewarded.

Marvel at Cameron’s words and throw up.

He came from nowhere with no track-record and, with Jewish money behind him, suddenly burst upon the political stage in Britain as leader of the Conservative Party. His only claim to fame up to then was that he’d been schooled at Eton and the notorious Bullingdon Club for badly behaved rich kids. It was only a matter of time before he became prime minister.


David Cameron in Israel as a young man. Photo from the Conservative Friends of Israel Website

What’s truly worrying about our prime minister’s latest grovel is this statement: “

There is no contradiction between being a proud Jew, a committed Zionist and a loyal British citizen.”

Ye gods! How can someone who is committed to a foreign military power like the Zionist entity possibly be loyal to Britain or any other level-headed country? Cameron’s bizarre words give his game away… he’s a self-declared Zionist and, from his remarks here, a rabid Israel-firster putting Israel’s interests, no matter how unlawful and menacing, ahead of the interests of the UK and allowing us to be drawn into conflict with Israel’s enemies such as Iran.

How many more of our young men will have to shed blood, limbs and life to satisfy the crazed ambitions and friendships of our politicians?

Iran of course is no enemy of Britain but soon will be if we persist with economic sanctions that needlessly hurt the Iranian people and repeat the suffering we inflicted on Iraq’s women and children for 12 years.

Israel on the other hand has hundreds of nukes, won’t sign the non-proliferation treaty (Iran has done so) and won’t submit to UN inspection and safeguards. It should of course automatically forfeit its membership. Yet Agent Cameron turns a blind eye and is comfortable about rewarding Israel for its mega-crimes. He even provides a safe haven for its criminals. He’s a Blair Mk2, profoundly ignorant and a menace to our country and to the rest of the world.

Readers could have fun with the abominable speech. Scrub my remarks if you wish and Insert your own, then mail them to ‘Agent Cameron’ and his constituency chairman, Lord Chadlington: .



Stuart Littlewood

19 October 2012

David Cameron’s Speech at Annual dinner of United Jewish Israel Appeal

Monday 15 October 2012

“With me, you have a Prime Minister whose belief in Israel is unbreakable and whose commitment to Israel’s security is non-negotiable.

I will always stand by the Jewish people. And it is humbling to be here tonight and to be called a friend.

Here in this room, we have many of the people who are determined to build the strongest possible relationship between Britain and Israel.

The business leaders who have taken our trade to well over $8 billion a year and made Britain the second biggest export market for Israel in the world. [1]

The scientists who are taking forward an ambitious programme of joint research as part of the UK-Israel Life Sciences Council, which includes no less than four Nobel Prize winners.

The leading academics who are helping to forge new partnerships between Manchester and the Weizmann Institute, Oxford and Ben Gurion, Cambridge and Tel Aviv.

The hi-tech specialists who are making a reality of the UK/Israel Tech Hub – the first of its kind in the world. [2]

And, of course, our two ambassadors – Matthew Gould and Daniel Taub who are doing so much to help build this partnership between our countries.


Mick, Doug – you have made an inspirational contribution and I am sure that everyone will want to join me in paying tribute to your leadership and hard work over these past few years.

I am a big admirer of what the UJIA does both here in Britain and in Israel. Let me explain why. First, the Jewish community in Britain is a role model for successful integration because you understand that as well as being part of a community with a common faith you are also part of a wider community – that of our country.

You epitomise the philanthropic spirit that is so central to Jewish teaching and which sees so many Jewish people give generously – not just to Jewish charities but to all charitable causes.

And through your support for Jewish youth movements and educational programmes for young people at both Jewish and mainstream schools and through your Summer Tours to Israel for 16 year olds and gap year students [3] you continue to show each new generation that it is possible to be both a proud Jew steeped in the values of the Jewish people and a proud British citizen.

Yes, you can love this country, take pride in its history, celebrate its Olympics, even cry with its football fans every other year. There is no contradiction between being a proud Jew, a committed Zionist and a loyal British citizen. [4]

In the past, governments allowed a flawed state multiculturalism that said we should encourage different cultures to live separate lives, apart from each other and the mainstream.

I don’t subscribe to that. And neither do you. I believe we have to end the passive tolerance of segregated communities behaving in ways that run completely counter to our values.

Let’s be clear what that means. It means getting preachers of hate out of our country. It means proscribing organisations that incite terrorism. And it means zero tolerance for any form of anti-Semitism, especially on our campuses.

And to those in Britain’s universities and trades unions who want to boycott Israel and consign it to an international ghetto, I say not only will this Government never allow you to shut down 60 years worth of vibrant exchange and partnership that does so much to make both our countries stronger [5] but I also say this: we know what you are doing – trying to delegitimise the State of Israel – and we will not have it. [6]

I’m a fan of what you do in Israel too. The focus you have given to the Galilee has ensured that UJIA’s funding reaches those communities that most need it.

And the projects you’ve supported touch the lives, not just of those directly involved, but of all Israel. The medical school in Safad which teaches Jews and Arabs alike. Western Galilee College, where more than 30 per cent of the intake is Arab, and almost half of that Arab women. Or, of course, the high school in Shlomi. There in the shadow of the hills from which Hezbollah launched its missiles [7] you brought an army of teachers and the hope of a new generation.

That is the vision, strength and courage on which our future depends. And that is what the UJIA is all about. Now, tonight I want to talk about three key steps to secure Israel’s future.

Standing up to Iran. 

Seizing the opportunities presented by the Arab Spring and the spread of democracy in the wider region. And making the hard choices needed to resolve the conflict with the Palestinians.

Let me take each in turn.

First, Iran. Let’s be clear about the facts. Iran is flouting six United Nations resolutions. The Regime’s claim that its nuclear programme is intended purely for civilian purposes is not remotely credible. [8]

And it has shown its violent agenda by exporting terror and violence to Iraq, to Syria, to Gaza, to Lebanon and to many peace-loving countries across the world. [9]

Iran is not just a threat to Israel. It is a threat to the world. [10] Now there are some who say nothing will work – and that we have to learn to live with a nuclear armed Iran.

I say we don’t and we shouldn’t.
But at the same time I also refuse to give in to those who say that the current policy is fatally flawed, and that we have no choice but military action. A negotiated settlement remains within Iran’s grasp. [11]

But until they change course, we have a strategy of ever tougher sanctions. Just today, Britain has secured a further round of new sanctions through the EU [12] Foreign Affairs Council. And these relentless sanctions are having an impact no-one expected a year ago. [13]

They have slowed the nuclear programme. Iranian oil exports have fallen by 45 per cent. That’s 1 million fewer barrels a day and $8 billion in revenues lost every quarter. [14]

The Rial has plummeted– losing around half its value between May and September. Inflation is soaring – thought to be as much as 50 per cent. [15] And the Iranian Regime has had to establish an economic austerity taskforce to manage the pressure they have brought on their own people. [16]

Most significantly, there are signs that the Iranian people are beginning to question the Regime’s strategy with even pro-regime groups protesting at the actions of the Government.

It’s mind boggling that the leaders of a nation so rich in oil have succeeded in turning their country into a banana republic [17] desperately trying to put rockets into space while their people suffer.

The Iranian regime is under unprecedented pressure and faces an acute dilemma. They are leading their people to global isolation and an economic collapse. And they know it. [18]

They know too that there is a simple way to bring sanctions to an end. By giving the international community the confidence we need that they are not and will not develop a nuclear weapon.

I have said to Prime Minister Netanyahu that now is not the time for Israel to resort to military action. Beyond the unpredictable dangers inherent in any conflict, the other reason is this:

At the very moment when the Regime faces unprecedented pressure and the people are on the streets and when Iran’s only real ally in Syria is losing his grip on power a foreign military strike is exactly the chance the Regime would look for to unite his people against a foreign enemy.

We shouldn’t give them that chance. We need the courage to give these sanctions time to work.  But let me also say this. In the long term, if Iran makes the wrong choice, nothing is off the table. A nuclear armed Iran is a threat to Israel. And a threat to the world. [19] And this country will work unwaveringly to prevent that from happening.


Let me turn to the changing events in the wider region. I have no illusions about the dangers that political transition can bring in the Arab spring countries.

And I understand why instability can be a great cause for concern. I understand how dark things were for Israel when surrounded by enemies on every border. And I understand how Israelis feel when gas masks are handed out to families; and car parks are converted into bomb shelters.

But I passionately believe that what we are seeing through the Arab Spring need not be a new threat to Israel’s security. Democracy and open societies are not the problem – they can be a big part of the solution.

Yes, there are those who believe that in a volatile region only an authoritarian strong man can maintain stability and security. But when brutal dictators suppress their people in the name of stability, the end result is a region is that more dangerous – not less. [20]

More dangerous because these regimes abuse the Palestinian cause to smother their own people’s hopes and aspirations, dealing with frustration at home by whipping up anger against their neighbours, Israel and the West. And more dangerous too, because people denied a job and a voice are given no alternative but a dead end choice between dictatorship or extremism. [21]

Now, of course, many fear that elections can open the door to Islamist parties whose values are incompatible with truly open societies. But the answer is not to oppose elections. The answer is to respect the outcome of elections. And then judge governments by what they do. [22]

For example, there are big questions facing President Mursi in Egypt. We want to know if he will live up to his commitments to protect the rule of law for all citizens, defend the rights of minorities and allow women to play a full part in society. And I challenged him personally on these points when I met him in New York last month.

But when he re-launches Operation Eagle to try and do something about the lawlessness in the Sinai, we should welcome that. And when he goes to Tehran and speaks the truth to that regime about its despicable actions in Syria in support of Assad, we should welcome that too.

But if the Islamists attempt to undermine the stability of other countries or encourage terrorism instead of peace and conflict instead of partnership then we must and will oppose them. And that is why we will not waver from our insistence that Hamas gives up violence [23] and that the rockets from Gaza must stop. Hamas must not be allowed to dictate the way forwards for Israelis and Palestinians.

Of course, the Arab Spring presents huge challenges. But if we can show the strength and courage to engage with new democratic governments, their chance to establish the building blocks of democracy, fair economies and open societies offers the greatest opportunity for stability and peace in a generation.

That brings me to the Palestinian Territories and the peace process. We can’t advocate democracy and open societies in one breath and then cite the need for stability as an excuse for why the Palestinians shouldn’t renew their democracy too.

It’s now seven years since Palestinians voted for a President and six since parliamentary elections. The Palestinian leadership needs to refresh its mandate and show it has the consent of its people, starting with municipal elections later this month. And it needs to resolve the situation in Gaza and restore to Palestinians a unified, leadership [24] able to deliver peaceful resolution of the conflict with Israel.

So Palestinian reconciliation and Palestinian elections are key points on the path to peace – because without consent there can never be credible negotiation. [25]

It will require great strength and courage to take the hard choices needed to resolve the conflict with the Palestinians. [26]

And let me say this: I know it takes two to negotiate. So let me tell President Abbas something very clearly there is no path to statehood except through talks with Israel.  [27]
So if the Palestinian plan is simply posturing with the UN rather than negotiating with Israel, Britain will never support it.

And let me say this to the Palestinians too. Britain will never support anyone who sponsors a football tournament named after a suicide bomber who killed 20 Israelis in a restaurant. We will not tolerate incitement to terrorism. [28]

But in the search for peace both sides have to make hard choices. And just as President Abbas has followed through his commitment to non-violence with real progress on the West Bank so Israel needs a real drive to improve life for ordinary Palestinians.

That means more support for economic development in the West Bank, relaxing restrictions on Gaza [29], ending the demolition of Palestinian homes, and yes, it means meeting Israel’s obligations under the Roadmap and under international law to halt settlement building. [30]

Britain’s position will not change. Settlements beyond the green line are illegal.

I know how hard the concessions needed for peace can be. But the truth is, time is running out for a two state solution – and with it Israel’s best chance to live in peace with its neighbours.

Brett, in your introduction you said that support for Israel was in the DNA of the political party I lead. It is. But I believe it is in the DNA of the country I lead [31] too.

That is why Britain will always stand by Israel, protect Israel, and work with Israel on the path to peace. [32]

I long for the day when I can come to a dinner like this and not have to talk about the threats to Israel. I long too for the day when making statements in support of Israel is as unnecessary as going to see President Obama and saying I support America’s right to exist.

For now, Israel will continue to face acute threats and a hard road to peace. But with strength and courage we can, together, stand up to Iran. We can, together, seize the opportunities presented by the spread of democracy in the wider region. And we can together take the hard choices needed to resolve the conflict with the Palestinians. [33]

So let me conclude by wishing you all a slightly belated shana tova and let us hope that it will be a sweet year for the British Jewish community and the Jewish people in the State of Israel. And one which brings us closer to the peace and security for Israel that its people so richly deserve.” [34]



[1]   So we have considerable leverage.



[4]  The Zionist entity is a foreign military power – how can you be a true Zionist and a loyal British subject?

[5]  Just exercising discretion and choice. Are you planning to rob us of that?

[6]  Israel is doing a fine job of delegitimising itself.


[8]  Is that what the intelligence agencies are saying?


[10]  Is that what the intelligence agencies are saying?

[11]  Why is the onus on the Iranians?

[12]  It is still unclear what Iran has done wrong.

[13]  Why aren’t you making friends and trading with Iran? That’s the classic and civilised way to influence other nations.

[14]  That’s going to hurt their women and kids.

[15]  Again, that’s going to hurt their women and kids.

[16]  No, YOU brought that pressure on their women and kids quite needlessly.

[17]  Such a silly remark from a leader whose country, the UK, is stuck in recession even without sanctions.

[18]  Britain has been trying for decades to isolate Iran. Remember what did Britain do to Mossadeq’s fledgling democracy? Remember the sanctions, blockades and overthrow? A recent study in Fallujah found that more than half of all babies born between 2007 and 2010 had a birth defect. US forces spent months denying the use of white phosphorus in the city before it was revealed by one of their own internal magazines (see ). In Basra, where Britain led the attack in 2003, the number of birth defects was a shocking seventeen times higher than prior to the invasion. “In the past seven years, the number of malformed babies born increased by more than 60 per cent; 37 out of every 1,000 are now born with defects.” And how many times has a British foreign secretary or prime minister visited Iran since 1979, the year of the Revolution?

[19]  Not nearly as threatening as nuclear armed Israel which refused to sign the non-proliferation treaty and submit to inspection and safeguards.

[20]  Not forgetting brutal occupiers who suppress other peoples in the name of ‘security’.

[21]  Like the Palestinians?

[22]  That would make a nice change – what chance did Britain give democratically elected Hamas to show how they could govern?

[23]  Why? Self-defence against a brutal occupier is their right. When will Cameron insist on Israel giving up violence and withdrawing to 1949 borders?

[24]  And Britain, the US and the UN need to restore to the Palestinians a unified territory on internationally recognised borders with unfettered movement of goods and people.

[25]  There can be no peace under occupation or blockade.

[26]  No, only common decency.

[27]  That path leads nowhere. The correct path is through justice and law, not lopsided talks with the oppressor.

[28]  But who are the terrorists and who are the freedom fighters?

[29]  Relaxing restrictions? You mean ending restrictions and restoring unfettered access and movement.

[30]  And don’t forget all Israel’s other obligations under international law. Reuters today report that Israel announced another 800 homes on stolen land in  the West Bank. Hagit Ofran of the Israeli anti-settler group Peace Now, said construction could begin within a few months. “The government could stop the process before building begins but is taking advantage of the upcoming elections in order to set facts on the ground and will make the possibility of peace with the Palestinians even harder to achieve,” she said .

[31]  Nonsense.

[32]  What “path to peace”? You haven’t yet mapped out a credible path.

[33]  That’ll be the day!

[34]  What they richly deserve is something else entirely.

, , , , ,

26 Responses to Who does ‘Agent Cameron’ work for?

  1. Somoe October 19, 2012 at 10:52 pm #

    How many british people realise that their government is filled with ‘friends of Israel’ and this ‘prime minister’ is a zionist puppet – just as the last one was and the one before him, happy and willing to do the zionist entity’s bidding – seemingly regardless of what that may necessitate…! And oblivious to how ridiculous it is to say,

    “There is no contradiction between being a proud Jew, a committed Zionist and a loyal British citizen.”

    The speech itself sent me into an apoplectic fit – that sickening, arse-licking hasbara also made me want to hurl, just as Stuart predicted.

    Quite a torrent of utter drivel that makes me wonder, Why do millions of british people accept this idiot for a leader? It is about time he and the rest of the Friends of Israel were forcibly removed from government for their zionist leanings – because these leanings quite clearly influence their actions in favour of Israel – regardless of its actions and behaviour and Israel’s leaders are insane and uncontrolled.

    This speech is proof – if his actions weren’t enough, of his compromised allegiance to Britain’s best interests, he definitely commits himself to Israel’s interests and security – and clearly, if we are to believe this grovelation he would put British lives in jeopardy to protect Israel, regardless of what the ethics of the matter are. Surely this stance is wrong? Such statements are highly unethical for a leader. I’m sure i’m not alone when i say I really don’t like having this man as pm of britain – he is a lunatic! In fact i don’t feel that the government reflects the will of the people of this land at all… (and they(the mps) are not troubled by it because they know that they serve not the interests of the people but those of the monarchy, the rich and powerful elite and the corporations and themselves of course). These zio-nutters need to be removed from office before they can execute the next phase of their plan.

    And the hasbara about Iran!!! Eye-poppingly galling! I cannot believe the sheer idiocy of drawing attention to Iran violating 6!!!! UN-resolutions. How utterly ludicrous – how dare he completely overlook Israel’s track record with regard to UN resolution violations of countless resolution after resolution, all completely treated with utter contempt by Israel who have blamed their non-compliance on their enemies in nearly every instance! Is Cameron completely stupid?

    The sad truth is that relatively few british people realise the dangers we all face with these zio-puppets at the helm of british affairs because many still rely on the zio-run msm for their news – which of course would never draw attention to that fact. Few know about Cameron’s allegiance to another state, that most of the conservative party have zionist leanings and funding, and even more concerning many in the other parties are similarly compromised, the zionists have taken control of the government of Britain – entirely .

    I’m interested to know what the british public make of this speech given that this slop of zionist slurry likes to think he speaks for the british people. I applaud all those who make it all the way to the end without taking a break. Personally i had to stop from time to time, it was all a little too much for me – all that hasbara all at once… too much!

    • Blake October 20, 2012 at 1:13 pm #

      The arrogance of the man believing he has a mandate to speak for all 60 million Brits. That is very Zionista in itself. Their propagandists do that all over the show.

  2. Somoe October 19, 2012 at 11:12 pm #

    Thanks Stuart, for taking the time and making the effort to reveal the treachery of our zionist governance. It is important that they are seen for what they are. Zionist agents.

    • David Holden October 20, 2012 at 1:52 am #

      the fawning and hate-filled lies of an incompetent lickspittle, spoken in flattering tones to a self-congratulatory audience of soul-dead palm-greasers, thieves and pornographers have the much the same worth in the Ears of the Almighty as would some imaginary words expressing the solipsistic theology of a piece of disease-ridden dog-excrement obsessed with the mistaken idea that it is the Lord of Creation.

      of this man, and of all his ilk, to say

      “there is no truth in him”

      would be an undeserved compliment.

      at least Benjamin Disraeli climbed up his greasy pole. the modern crew are like tapeworms that have entered through the anus of a fourth-rate demon and slither their way up its lower intestine feasting on degraded filth as they go.

      it is no surprise that to read this revolting tripe makes decent people retch.

      • Somoe October 20, 2012 at 8:55 am #

        supreme eloquence as ever, David!

        • David Holden October 21, 2012 at 9:57 am #

          thx Somoe. i endeavour, when attempting portraits, to do justice to the sitter. it is harder when, as in Cameron’s case, there are no individual features to emphasize. 😉

          • David Holden October 21, 2012 at 10:08 am #

            the only use of the Camerons and Blairs is that the utter spiritual darkness they and their kind cast over the world makes truth appear bright and sparkling by contrast – just as the Lesser Heavenly Glories – the Moon and Stars – become visible only at night. there is a lovely Facebook page dedicated to Rumi which i would recommend to anyone as an antidote to the weasel words of Satan’s spawn.

          • Somoe November 1, 2012 at 10:31 am #

            How utterly beautiful! Thank you David 🙂 It is one of most uplifting FB pages i have read.

          • Ariadna Theokopoulos October 21, 2012 at 12:11 pm #

            Der Man ohne Eigenschaften… only not innocuous like Musil’s but noxious

    • David Holden October 20, 2012 at 1:52 am #


  3. who_me October 20, 2012 at 1:02 am #

    we need more exposes of these jp connections and betrayals – in every country. jp maintains their power by staying in the shadows.

    jp=the public relations aspect of fascism

  4. Ariadna Theokopoulos October 20, 2012 at 1:33 am #

    Great to read you again, Somoe.
    It is indeed barfing material, Agent Cameron’s speech. For his diction (the script was provided to him) he’ll be rewarded with another trip to the Yad Vashem and the Wall soon.
    I hope David Holden takes Stuart Littlewood’s recommendations to provide, not the kind of comments that he, SL, suggested, but the kind of translation David is so skilled at providing from hasbara.

    • Somoe October 20, 2012 at 9:15 am #

      Thank you, Ariadna 🙂
      I second your hopes DH provides the kind of hasbara translation he does so masterfully. Always original and brilliantly acute.

  5. James October 20, 2012 at 9:09 am #

    It’s now official – there’s been no actual shortage of Holocaust Survivors :

    Quote from The Holocaust Industry by Norman G. Finkelstein of the City University of New York, published by Verso in the year 2000:
    ‘The Israeli Prime Minister’s office recently put the number of “living Holocaust survivors” at nearly a million.’ (page 83)

    I’ve checked out the six volumes of Churchill’s Second World War and the statement is quite correct – not a single mention of Nazi ‘gas chambers,’ a ‘genocide’ of the Jews, or of ‘six million’ Jewish victims of the war.

    Eisenhower’s Crusade in Europe is a book of 559 pages; Churchill’s Second World War totals 4,448 pages; and De Gaulle’s three-volume Mémoires de guerre is 2,054 pages.

    In this mass of writing, which altogether totals 7,061 pages (not including the introductory parts), published from 1948 to 1959, one will find no mention either of Nazi ‘gas chambers,’ a ‘genocide’ of the Jews, or of ‘six million’ Jewish victims of the war.

    CODOH – Committee for Open Debate of the Holocaust – breaking the power of taboo

  6. James October 20, 2012 at 9:10 am #

    Zionist trial runs of “6 Million” Holocaust propaganda in 1911 – and 1919

    Max Nordau (1849-1923) was the co-founder of the World Zionist Organization together with Theodor Herzl.

    Have a look at this Max Nordau quote from Ben Hecht’s book ‘Perfidy’ – which is available for free in PDF format at (on page 232 of 261):

    In the Zionist Congress of 1911, 22 years before Hitler came to power, and three years before World War I, Nordau said, “How dare the smooth talkers, the clever official blabbers, open their mouths and boast of progress. . . . Here they hold jubilant peace conferences in which they talk against war. . . . But the same righteous Governments, who are so nobly, industriously active to establish the eternal peace, are preparing, by their own confession, complete annihilation for six million people, and there is nobody, except the doomed themselves, to raise his voice in protest although this is a worse crime than any war . . .” unquote.

  7. James October 20, 2012 at 9:11 am #

    And take a look at the article from The American Hebrew, October 31 1919

    (see attached reproduction below), prophesying a ‘holocaust’ of ‘six million’:

    The Crucifixion of Jews Must Stop!
    By Martin H. Glynn
    (Former Governor of the State of N.Y.)

    From across the sea six million men and women call to us for help, and eight hundred thousand little children cry for bread.

    These children, these men and women are our fellow-members of the human family, with the same claim on life as we, the same susceptibility to the winter’s cold, the same propensity to death before the fangs of hunger. Within them reside the illimitable possibilities for the advancement of the human race as naturally would reside in six million human beings. We may not be their keepers but we ought to be their helpers.

    In the face of death, in the throes of starvation there is no place for mental distinctions of creed, no place for physical differentiations of race. In this catastrophe, when six million human beings are being whirled toward the grave by a cruel and relentless fate, only the most idealistic promptings of human nature should sway the heart and move the hand.

    Six million men and women are dying from lack of the necessaries of life; eight hundred thousand children cry for bread. And this fate is upon them through no fault of their own, through no transgression of the laws of God or man; but through the awful tyranny of war and a bigoted lust for Jewish blood.

    In this threatened holocaust of human life, forgotten are the niceties.. etc etc etc

  8. James October 20, 2012 at 9:14 am #

    A Jewish scholar defends the “indefensible”

    George Steiner, erstwhile Cambridge professor of English and comparative literature, author of numerous books such as Tolstoy or Dostoyevsky, Language and Silence etc, set out some sobering views in a novel called The Portage to San Cristobal of A.H. (1981). Strangely enough – Dr Steiner is a Jew – he uses his imagination to hypothetically (of all things) ‘give Hitler the chance to defend himself before a Jewish court’, to ‘defend the indefensible’. How on earth can a Cambridge professor, a Jew, in effect defend a man claimed by Jews to be the “greatest embodiment of evil in human history”? What can his argument possibly be?

    In summary [Steiner pp 120-126] permits the accused to give the following defence:

    Point One: “The Nazi race doctrines were but a ‘parody’ of the Jewish doctrine of ‘a chosen people, chosen by God for his own, the only race on earth chosen, exalted, made singular among mankind.. to set a race apart, to hold before it a promised land.’

    Point Two: “The Jew’s addiction to [his version of] the ideal.. It is no accident that Marx and his minions were Jews, that the congregations of Bolshevism – Trotsky, Rosa Luxemberg, Kamenev, the whole fanatic, murderous pack – were of Israel..”
    [Chaim Bermant in his book The Jews devotes a chapter to this aspect of Communism that is hardly generally known. The author, himself Jewish, writes with a certain authority and familiarity concerning his subject and can hardly be accused of the charge of ‘anti-Semitism’ which is usually leveled at anyone who offers any criticism (no matter how justified) of Jews. “No people is so averse to change yet none in recent times has dissipated more of its energy on revolution.. Although Jews formed less than five percent of Russia’s population, they formed more than fifty percent of its revolutionaries..
    “It must be added that most of the leading revolutionaries who convulsed Europe in the final decades of the last century and the first decades of this one, stemmed from prosperous Jewish families.. They were perhaps typified by the father of revolution, Karl Marx.. Thus when, after the chaos of World War I, revolutions broke out all over Europe, Jews were everywhere at the helm; Trotsky, Sverdlov, Kamenev and Zinoviev in Russia, Bela Kun in Hungary, Kurt Eisner in Bavaria, and, most improbable of all, Rosa Luxemburg in Berlin.
    “To many outside observers, the Russian revolution looked like a Jewish conspiracy, especially when it was followed by Jewish-led revolutionary outbreaks in much of central Europe. The leadership of the Bolshevik Party had a preponderance of Jews and included Litvinov (real name Wallach), Liadov (Mandelshtam), Shklovsky, Saltz, Gusev (Drabkin), Zemliachka (Salkind), Helena Rozmirovich, Serafima Gopner, Yaroslavsky (Gubelman), Yaklovlev (Epstein), Riaznov (Goldendach), Uritsky and Larin. Of the seven members of the Politburo, the inner cabinet of the country, four, Trotsky (Bronstein), Zinoviev (Radomsky), Kamenev (Rosenfeld) and Sverdlov, were Jews.”]

    Point Three: “You have exaggerated. Grossly. Hysterically. What were Rotterdam or Coventry compared to Dresden and Hiroshima? Did I invent the camps? Ask the Boers.. To whom did you hand over millions, tens of millions of men and women from Prague to the Baltic? What did [Solzhenitsyn] say? That Stalin had slaughtered thirty million. I was a man of a murderous time, but a small man compared to him. That he perfected genocide [later, of the kulaks] when I was still a nameless scribbler in Munich. My boys used their fists and their whips. I won¡¦t deny it. The times stank of hunger and blood. But when a man spat out the truth they would stop their fun. Stalin’s torturers worked for the pleasure of the thing. To make men befoul themselves, to obtain confessions that are lies, insanities, obscene jokes. The truth only made them more bestial. It is not I who assert these things: it is your own Jewish survivors, your historians, the sage of the Gulag. Who, then was the great destroyer, whose blood-lust the more implacable? Stalin’s or mine? Our terrors were a village carnival compared to his. Our camps covered absurd acres; he had strung wire and death-pits around a continent. Yet Stalin died in bed, and yet you hunt me down like a rabid dog..”

    Point Four: “Zionism was shaped in the image of German nationalism.. The Holocaust gave you the courage of injustice, to drive the Arab out of his home, out of his field, because he was without resource, because he was in your way, knowing that those you had driven out were rotting in refugee camps, not ten miles away, buried alive in despair and lunatic dreams of vengeance.. You used the Holocaust to create Israel.. Should you not honour me who have made your long, vacuous dream of Zion a reality?”

  9. James October 20, 2012 at 9:24 am #

    Dirty Little Secrets – the hidden, awkward origins of World War 2 – the unexpected views of four key diplomats who were close to events

    Just consider the following:

    · Joseph P. Kennedy, U.S. Ambassador to Britain during the years immediately preceding WW2 was the father of the famous American Kennedy dynasty. James Forrestal the first US Secretary of Defense (1947-1949) quotes him as saying “Chamberlain (the British Prime Minister) stated that America and the world Jews had forced England into the war”. (The Forrestal Diaries ed. Millis, Cassell 1952 p129).

    · Count Jerzy Potocki, the Polish Ambassador in Washington, in a report to the Polish Foreign Office in January 1939, is quoted approvingly by the highly respected British military historian Major-General JFC Fuller. Concerning public opinion in America he says “Above all, propaganda here is entirely in Jewish hands…when bearing public ignorance in mind, their propaganda is so effective that people have no real knowledge of the true state of affairs in Europe… It is interesting to observe that in this carefully thought-out campaign… no reference at all is made to Soviet Russia. If that country is mentioned, it is referred to in a friendly manner and people are given the impression that Soviet Russia is part of the democratic group of countries… Jewry was able not only to establish a dangerous centre in the New World for the dissemination of hatred and enmity, but it also succeeded in dividing the world into two warlike camps…President Roosevelt has been given the power.. to create huge reserves in armaments for a future war which the Jews are deliberately heading for.” (Fuller, JFC: The Decisive Battles of the Western World vol 3 pp 372-374.)

    · Hugh Wilson, the American Ambassador in Berlin until 1938, the year before the war broke out, found anti-Semitism in Germany ‘understandable’. This was because before the advent of the Nazis, “the stage, the press, medicine and law [were] crowded with Jews…among the few with money to splurge, a high proportion [were] Jews…the leaders of the Bolshevist movement in Russia, a movement desperately feared in Germany, were Jews. One could feel the spreading resentment and hatred.” (Hugh Wilson: Diplomat between the Wars, Longmans 1941, quoted in Leonard Mosley, Lindbergh, Hodder 1976).

    · Sir Nevile Henderson, British Ambassador in Berlin ‘said further that the hostile attitude in Great Britain was the work of Jews and enemies of the Nazis, which was what Hitler thought himself’ (Taylor, AJP: The Origins of the Second World War Penguin 1965, 1987 etc p 324).

    Etc etc etc etc

  10. James October 20, 2012 at 9:25 am #

    The war began over Hitler invading half of Poland. Within weeks, Stalin invaded the other half. Britain declared war on Hitler, but not on Stalin. Stalin and his Jewish commissar Lazar Kaganovich (see Wikipedia) had killed at least 6 million people in the Ukraine in 1932-3 during the ‘collectivisation of the Kulaks’ program, and this was already known before the war. At war’s end, at the Yalta conference FDR gave the whole of eastern Europe, including Poland, as a gift to Stalin, ‘our’ ally, for helping ‘us’ to fight for ‘democracy’.
    Why is one 6-million all-important and another 6-million completely unimportant?

    Alexander Solzhenitsyn, Nobel Prizewinner and author of The Gulag Archipelago, in a speech in Washington in 1975 had this to say of the Soviet system which was deemed worthy of recognition as one of ‘our’ Allies fighting ‘for Democracy’ against the ‘Dictators’ in WW2:

    “This was a system which, in time of peace, artificially created a famine causing SIX MILLION PERSONS to die in the Ukraine between 1932 and 1933. They died on the very threshold of Europe. And Europe didn’t even notice it. The world didn’t even notice it. SIX MILLION PERSONS!”

    (Alexander Solzhenitsyn Speaks to the West (1978) p 16)

    These unfortunately were the ‘wrong 6-million’.

  11. James October 20, 2012 at 9:44 am #

    Winston Churchill was knighted after World War 2 and buried from Westminster Abbey, perhaps the highest tribute that could be paid to him, while Adolf Hitler has been accorded the status of perhaps the most evil politician in human history.

    WINSTON CHURCHILL in July 1940 – ‘extermination’ :

    “When I look around to see how we can win the war I see that there is only one sure path. We have no Continental army which can defeat the German military power.. Should [Hitler].. not try invasion [of Britain].. there is one thing that will bring him back and bring him down, and that is an absolutely devastating, exterminating attack by very heavy bombers from this country upon the Nazi homeland. We must be able to overwhelm them by this means, without which I do not see a way through. We cannot accept any aim lower than air mastery. When can it be obtained?” [Extract from Winston S Churchill The Second World War (Volume 2 Their Finest Hour Appendix A), Memo from Prime Minister to Minister of Aircraft Production, 8.July 1940].

    ADOLF HITLER in May 1940 – ‘admiration’ :

    Britain and France declared war on Germany, not the other way around. Hitler actually wanted peace with Britain, as the German generals admitted (Basil Liddell Hart, The Other Side of the Hill 1948, Pan Books 1983) with regard to the so-called Halt Order of 24 May 1940 at Dunkirk, where Hitler had the opportunity to capture the entire British Army, but chose not to. Liddell Hart, one of Britain’s most respected military historians, quotes the German General von Blumentritt with regard to this Halt Order:
    “He (Hitler) then astonished us by speaking with admiration of the British Empire, of the necessity for its existence, and of the civilization that Britain had brought into the world. He remarked, with a shrug of the shoulders, that the creation of its Empire had been achieved by means that were often harsh, but ‘where there is planing, there are shavings flying’. He compared the British Empire with the Catholic Church ­ saying they were both essential elements of stability in the world. He said that all he wanted from Britain was that she should acknowledge Germany’s position on the Continent. The return of Germany’s colonies would be desirable but not essential, and he would even offer to support Britain with troops if she should be involved in difficulties anywhere..” (p 200).

    According to Liddell Hart, “At the time we believed that the repulse of the Luftwaffe in the ‘Battle over Britain’ had saved her. That is only part of the explanation, the last part of it. The original cause, which goes much deeper, is that Hitler did not want to conquer England. He took little interest in the invasion preparations, and for weeks did nothing to spur them on; then, after a brief impulse to invade, he veered around again and suspended the preparations. He was preparing, instead, to invade Russia” (p140).

    David Irving in the foreword to his book The Warpath (1978) refers to “the discovery.. that at no time did this man (Hitler) pose or intend a real threat to Britain or the Empire.”

    Hitler saw the tremendous danger posed to Germany by Communism. He appreciated the desperate need to eliminate this threat, a fact that earned him the immense hatred and animosity of the Jewish organisations and the media and politicians of the west which they could influence. After all, according to the Jewish writer Chaim Bermant, although Jews formed less than five percent of Russia’s population, they formed more than fifty percent of its revolutionaries..

  12. James October 20, 2012 at 9:46 am #

    At the end of the First World War, Germany was essentially tricked [see Paul Johnson A History of the Modern World (1983) p24 and H Nicholson Peacemaking 1919 (1933) pp13-16] into paying massive reparations to France and other economic competitors and former belligerent countries in terms of the so-called Treaty of Versailles, thanks to the liberal American President Woodrow Wilson. Germany was declared to be solely responsible for the war, in spite of the fact that ‘Germany did not plot a European war, did not want one, and made genuine efforts, though too belated, to avert one.’ (Professor Sydney B Fay The Origins of the World War (vol. 2 p 552)).

    As a result of these massive enforced financial reparations, by 1923 the situation in Germany became desperate and inflation on an astronomical scale became the only way out for the government. Printing presses were engaged to print money around the clock. In 1921 the exchange rate was 75 marks to the dollar. By 1924 this had become about 5 trillion marks to the dollar. This virtually destroyed the German middle class (Koestler The God that Failed p 28), reducing any bank savings to a virtual zero.

    According to Sir Arthur Bryant the British historian (Unfinished Victory (1940 pp. 136-144):

    ‘It was the Jews with their international affiliations and their hereditary flair for finance who were best able to seize such opportunities.. They did so with such effect that, even in November 1938, after five years of anti-Semitic legislation and persecution, they still owned, according to the Times correspondent in Berlin, something like a third of the real property in the Reich. Most of it came into their hands during the inflation.. But to those who had lost their all this bewildering transfer seemed a monstrous injustice. After prolonged sufferings they had now been deprived of their last possessions. They saw them pass into the hands of strangers, many of whom had not shared their sacrifices and who cared little or nothing for their national standards and traditions.. The Jews obtained a wonderful ascendancy in politics, business and the learned professions (in spite of constituting) less than one percent of the population.. The banks, including the Reichsbank and the big private banks, were practically controlled by them. So were the publishing trade, the cinema, the theatres and a large part of the press – all the normal means, in fact, by which public opinion in a civilized country is formed.. The largest newspaper combine in the country with a daily circulation of four millions was a Jewish monopoly.. Every year it became harder and harder for a gentile to gain or keep a foothold in any privileged occupation.. At this time it was not the ‘Aryans’ who exercised racial discrimination. It was a discrimination that operated without violence. It was exercised by a minority against a majority. There was no persecution, only elimination.. It was the contrast between the wealth enjoyed – and lavishly displayed – by aliens of cosmopolitan tastes, and the poverty and misery of native Germans, that has made anti-Semitism so dangerous and ugly a force in the new Europe. Beggars on horseback are seldom popular, least of all with those whom they have just thrown out of the saddle.’

  13. James October 20, 2012 at 9:47 am #

    Strangely enough, a book unexpectedly published by Princeton University Press in 1984, Sarah Gordon (Hitler, Germans and the “Jewish Question”) essentially confirms what Bryant says. According to her, ‘Jews were never a large percentage of the total German population; at no time did they exceed 1% of the population during the years 1871-1933.’ But she adds ‘Jews were over-represented in business, commerce, and public and private service.. They were especially visible in private banking in Berlin, which in 1923 had 150 private Jewish banks, as opposed to only 11 private non-Jewish banks.. They owned 41% of iron and scrap iron firms and 57% of other metal businesses.. Jews were very active in the stock market, particularly in Berlin, where in 1928 they comprised 80% of the leading members of the stock exchange. By 1933, when the Nazis began eliminating Jews from prominent positions, 85% of the brokers on the Berlin Stock exchange were dismissed because of their “race”.. At least a quarter of full professors and instructors (at German universities) had Jewish origins.. In 1905-6 Jewish students comprised 25% of the law and medical students.. In 1931, 50% of the 234 theatre directors in Germany were Jewish, and in Berlin the number was 80%.. In 1929 it was estimated that the per capita income of Jews in Berlin was twice that of other Berlin residents..’ etc etc.

    Arthur Koestler confirms the Jewish over-involvement in German publishing. ‘Ullstein’s was a kind of super-trust; the largest organization of its kind in Europe, and probably In the world. They published four daily papers in Berlin alone, among these the venerable Vossische Zeitung, founded in the eighteenth century, and the B.Z. am Mittag, an evening paper.. Apart from these, Ullstein’s published more than a dozen weekly and monthly periodicals, ran their own news service, their own travel agency, etc., and were one of the leading book publishers. The firm was owned by the brothers Ullstein – they were five, like the original Rothschild brothers, and like them also, they were Jews.’ (The God that Failed (1950) ed. RHS Crossman, p 31).

    Edgar Mowrer, Berlin correspondent for the Chicago Daily News, wrote an anti-German tract called Germany Puts the Clock Back (published as a Penguin Special and reprinted five times between December 1937 and April 1938). He nevertheless notes ‘In the all-important administration of Prussia, any number of strategic positions came into the hands of Hebrews.. A telephone conversation between three Jews in Ministerial offices could result in the suspension of any periodical or newspaper in the state.. The Jews came in Germany to play in politics and administration that same considerable part that they had previously won by open competition in business, trade, banking, the Press, the arts, the sciences and the intellectual and cultural life of the country. And thereby the impression was strengthened that Germany, a country with a mission of its own, had fallen into the hands of foreigners.’

    Mowrer says ‘No one who lived through the period from 1919 to 1926 is likely to forget the sexual promiscuity that prevailed.. Throughout a town like Berlin, hotels and pensions made vast fortunes by letting rooms by the hour or day to baggageless, unregistered guests. Hundreds of cabarets, pleasure resorts and the like served for purposes of getting acquainted and acquiring the proper mood..’ (pp. 153-4). Bryant describes throngs of child prostitutes outside the doors of the great Berlin hotels and restaurants. He adds ‘Most of them (the night clubs and vice-resorts) were owned and managed by Jews. And it was the Jews.. among the promoters of this trade who were remembered in after years.’ (pp. 144-5).

    Douglas Reed, Chief Central European correspondent before WWII for the London Times, was profoundly anti-German and anti-Hitler. But nevertheless he reported: ‘I watched the Brown Shirts going from shop to shop with paint pots and daubing on the window panes the word “Jew”, in dripping red letters. The Kurfürstendamm was to me a revelation. I knew that Jews were prominent in business life, but I did not know that they almost monopolized important branches of it. Germany had one Jew to one hundred gentiles, said the statistics; but the fashionable Kurfürstendamm, according to the dripping red legends, had about one gentile shop to ninety-nine Jewish ones.’ (Reed Insanity Fair (1938) p. 152-3). In Reed’s book Disgrace Abounding of the following year he notes ‘In the Berlin (of pre-Hitler years) most of the theatres were Jewish-owned or Jewish-leased, most of the leading film and stage actors were Jews, the plays performed were often by German, Austrian or Hungarian Jews and were staged by Jewish film producers, applauded by Jewish dramatic critics in Jewish newspapers.. The Jews are not cleverer than the Gentiles, if by clever you mean good at their jobs. They ruthlessly exploit the common feeling of Jews, first to get a foothold in a particular trade or calling, then to squeeze the non-Jews out of it.. It is not true that Jews are better journalists than Gentiles. They held all the posts on those Berlin papers because the proprietors and editors were Jewish’ (pp238-9).

  14. Blake October 20, 2012 at 1:05 pm #

    I would say “Israel” but he goes with the flow. I recall how he brown nosed Erdogan after the mavi mamara incident.

  15. Blake October 20, 2012 at 1:10 pm #

    I always wondered why Ken Livingston or David Davies were sidelined for him. Reading this great article I know why.

  16. Blake October 20, 2012 at 3:18 pm #

    ‘Govt of billionaires in UK forces 99% to suffer unjust austerity’

  17. mothman777 October 22, 2012 at 1:01 am #

    British PM David Cameron, who acknowledges that he is Jewish, is a hypocrite and a deadly traitor to Great Britain.

    He sucks up to Israel, that is hostile against Great Britain. Israel is not the country he was elected to lead, though you would not think so, with 80% of his government being members of the ‘Conservative Friends of Israel’, with about 80% of the main opposition party also being members of the ‘Labour Friends of Israel’.

    We had a coup d’etat when the traitor Oliver Cromwell agreed to let the Jews back in this country in return for their helping him to gain power in England in 1653, and the Jews have steadily built up a stranglehold over Britain and the rest of the world through the British Empire since then.

    The Queen owns no less than one sixth of the land surface of the entire planet, with her bankers being the Jewish Rothschilds, who are, incidentally, also the Vatican bankers, and the Vatican Bank is the richest in the world it is said.

    Cameron is a racist against all Gentiles, with his statement spoken on TV during the elections proving this: “I will empower UK Jews”. This outrageous statement proves that he does not think that members of any other race except the Jewish race living in Great Britain is fit to occupy any position of influence or power.

    He spoke his nauseating sycophantic oozings in support of criminal terrorist state Israel, even whilst we hear of the insane urgings of Pam Geller, to bomb Europe with nuclear weapons if Iran attacks Israel.

    What is wrong with the Israelis? What is wrong with Cameron? It is totally obvious he is oblivious to any threats against Europe, including Great Britain, and is utterly consumed solely with the security of Israel, even when all Europeans are definitely under nuclear threat from Israel, and not Iran. He is not scared of Israel, he is one of them!

    He could not give a toss if Europe, including the United Kingdom, went up in a mushroom puff of smoke; he would be totally safe elsewhere whilst we all roast, laughing his sick head off with the rest of the bloodthirsty Jews. The electorate are as insane as he is, utterly under his hypnotic spell.

    Geller is merely repeating, in effect, what ex-Israeli Premier Golda Meir stated during an interview to Alan Hart, when she twice stated that in the event of an existential threat facing Israel, that Israel would unleash all it’s nuclear weapons against the whole of the rest of the world in what is known as the ‘Samson Option’, so that we would all die. They cannot stand the thought that any Gentile slaves might survive to succeed them, the ‘chosen’ master-race, even though many of those countries would have been fighting for them under Jewish leadership, such as all the NATO states.

    The latest class of Royal Navy nuclear submarines that Cameron is requesting built, with the first of 7 already having been launched, will no doubt serve only the purpose of the parasite state Israel, and will almost certainly add their firepower to that of the Israeli ‘Samson Option’. Each submarine has missiles capable of killing 80 million people.

    The way the Jews see it, Gentiles are merely animal souls that have temporarily been given a human-like form in order to be slaves for the Jews in more articulate bodies than cattle or sheep. Jews regard Gentile souls quite literally as ‘pig-souls’ in their scriptures.

    If any gentile desires independence and considers himself a free man on an equal footing with the Jews, the Jewish rabbinical standpoint is that such a position is to be regarded as one of hostility against the Jews, and that military action must then necessarily be taken against such offenders, as innocent Germany and Libya have found out to their terrible cost, as innocent Iran will also soon find out too.

    Other senior Israelis have voiced the same threat, including Martin Van Creveld, who has stated that he has no doubt that Israel will in fact take the whole world down with them, further stating that European cities are the preferred targets of choice of the Israeli air force with their nuclear missiles.

    This being the case, why the hell are European leaders all supporting Israel, and why the hell are the Gentile electorate continually voting them into power time and time again? It is because the senior leaders are in the main all Jewish, and because the mainstream media is almost all Jewish, with almost every news reader on television having Jewish names, so they are all suicidally under mass hypnosis, not realizing that their own governments are total traitors, totally hostile against their prisoner populations, who are just waiting to be slaughtered in needless wars, like sheep in a slaughterhouse, unaware what is really going on, with a pathetic and cowardly mentality that does not dare or bother to question events.

    In 1991, in the US, the Jews in the US government enacted the Judaic Noahide Laws, that in effect mean that in time of national emergency, the normal US constitution will be suspended, and guillotines currently installed on military bases throughout the US can then legally be used for the decapitation of all non-Jews whenever they feel like silencing someone who is not Jewish. Yes, you read that correctly.

    The bloodbath of the ‘red’ revolution in 1915 in Russia under leadership of Lenin and Trotsky, will seem as nothing compared to what is to come, and that is from the words of the Jews themselves. This so-called Russian ‘revolution’ took place with mercenary help paid for by 20 million dollars in gold bullion provided by Jewish American New York Freemasons to create a Communist slave state in Russia, ruled by Jews, in which Churches were used to torture and execute Christians, then burned down, whilst Synagogues and Jews were left completely untouched. “Some call it Marxism — I call it Judaism.” (The American Bulletin, Rabbi Stephen Wise, May 5, 1935).

    “The Jewish people as a whole will be its own Messiah. It will attain world domination by the dissolution of other races…and by the establishment of a world republic in which everywhere the Jews will exercise the privilege of citizenship. In this New World Order the Children of Israel…will furnish all the leaders without encountering opposition…” (Baruch Levy in letter to Karl Marx, quoted in Review de Paris, June 1, 1928, p. 574) From the National French library.

    “We Jews, we are the destroyers and will remain the destroyers. Nothing you can do will meet our demands and needs. We will forever destroy because we want a world of our own.” – You Gentiles, by Jewish Author Maurice Samuels, p. 155.

    I do not see any comparable laws being enacted in the UK yet, but then a ‘D’ notice has possibly taken care of that, and prevented any publication about it, if they have been made law here on a similar basis as the US, but secretly.


    Jews believe that the whole world was only made for them alone, and that the souls of gentiles are, quite literally, according to their pseudo- scriptures, non-living, Satanic, pure evil, irredeemable eternal dwellers of the hellish three lower spheres of creation, and that after the Messiah comes, all Gentiles will be exterminated and their souls sent to dwell in hell under the Angel Duma.

    In order for the 10,000 year Pax Judaica of the coming Jewish NWO, the planet must be purged entirely of Gentiles, as it is from the demonic Gentiles alone that all sin and sinful propensity enters into this world. Jews are of God, and totally without sin or sinful propensity according to their insane beliefs. If a Jew commits a sin, that Jew is held to be sinless, as the ‘sin’ is a type of ‘infection’ that has temporarily polluted the sinless pure soul of the Jew. No Rabbi can ever enter hell, even if that Rabbi has raped and killed millions; as he was merely influenced by the sinful propensity of the Goyim. Hence Eretz Israel being a place of legal sanctuary without any extradition treaties with the rest of the world.

    Britain cannot afford to allow Jewish people to remain in office in positions of power and influence any longer, given the stated threat of the Samson Option, which has never been withdrawn, but only reinforced with further threats, and no government in the world has ever questioned the Israelis on this, nor has the western mainstream media ever had the guts to voice any opinion against the Israeli Samson Option policy either.

    This leads us to one conclusion only, that western governments are largely colluding with the Israelis, and are waging unnecessary wars on behalf of Israel time and time again, using Gentile slaves for soldiers, labour, skills, and resources to do this.

    The Jewish fractional reserve banking system means that every time we pay for a house, we pay 30 times back what we borrow, not just 3 times back as we commonly suppose, so we are literally slaves. The current usurious monetary system must be replaced with a non-usurious system, with state community banks underwritten by the state, lending money at zero interest, with bankers paid reasonable wages from the public purse, just as librarians are, with banking no longer being a form of gambling. Germany and Libya succeeded greatly with this, and that is why the Jews smashed them completely. They were no longer the slaves they were intended to be under the Jewish belief system, as Yahweh only gives demonic Gentile animal souls human bodies to be slaves for the Jews and for nothing else.

    Fractional reserve banking is what pays for the illegal wars and mercenary forces acting together with NATO terrorist forces in the Middle East to bring in the Judaic NWO by military force. Al Qaeda is variously reported depending on the conflict or stage of the conflict as working with NATO forces, or fighting against them, being used usually as agents provocateurs to justify invasion of any state the Jewish NWO desires.

    It is time for the delegitimization and dissolution of the illegal state of Eretz Israel, and furthermore for the criminalization and banning of the criminal terrorist cult known as Judaism, which is using the Samson Option to threaten the rest of the world with, in a similar fashion to SPECTRE, the fictional terrorist oriminal organization that is hell bent on world-domination, as written of by Sir Ian Fleming, former real-life spy-master, in a style which clearly points to Israel as the real life offender. If our peoples do this, through genuine politicians, the Jews will have no further criminal bolt-hole from which to terrorize the rest of us with their nuclear weapons and Mossad, or to hide away in, securely, beyond the reach of the law.