Pages

AIPAC

Welcome to the Jewnited States of America

Washington May 9th, The U.S House of Representatives passed new legislation that confirmed Israel’s complete control of America.  Carried by a staggering 411-2 votes the new law ensures the complete cooperation between America and Israel and in particular agrees to ensure that Israel has maintains a distinct military advantage over any potential threats, be they real or imagined.

The legislation specifically recommends that the United States provide Israel with

Air refuelling tankers, missile defence capabilities, and specialized munitions.”

 “There needs to be a clear understanding by all those who would threaten Israel that the United States stands with her, because it is in our – the United States’s – security interest to do so, and because it is morally and ethically the right thing to do as well,” Hoyer said. House Minority Whip Rep. Steny Hoyer (D-Md.)

Doing the right thing for the wrong reasons.

Is it right for the Jewnited States of America to support the 51st state of America, Israel even though it is half way around the world? Even though Israel is a lunatic racist state that threatens all its neighbours in the region.

This vote is a testament to the broad, bipartisan support of the American people for bolstering the ties between the U.S. and our ally Israel,” the AIPAC statement said.  “The United States benefits greatly through enhanced cooperation with Israel, and this bipartisan bill recommends new avenues for the U.S.-Israel relationship to grow and strengthen in the fields of missile defense, homeland security, energy, intelligence, and cyber security.”

When they say “American People” what they really mean are the AIPAC bribed politicians. Clearly Jewish Power controls America, Britain and much of Europe though lobbies, banking and media interests. That is why the Palestine problem is unresolved, because Politicians have been bought off and serve Zionist agendas. So what to do? We are the 99% and they are the 1%, we out number them. Yes they have power, weapons, money, media and politicians in their back-pockets, but we are the majority and we must continue with the struggle. The main political parties in most of our countries are now all Zionist controlled.

The Politicians lie, the media maintains and reinforces the lies, the Police & Armies enforce them.

One possible answer is the Liberation of the American people from the forces of Zionism that have descended upon that land. I do not think change will come to Israel unless its paymaster changes its ways. The only hope I see is if the people of America rise up against that Zionist regime that rules them, and once more start to live by the principles of justice, freedom and equality for all. But it is not just America that should rise up against Zionism, what we need is a global revolution against Zionism.

 

Share Button

,

97 Responses to Welcome to the Jewnited States of America

  1. Ariadna Theokopoulos May 10, 2012 at 2:12 pm #

    Great post!
    Great illustration too.

    “Rise like Lions after slumber
    In unvanquishable number —
    Shake your chains to earth like dew
    Which in sleep had fallen on you —
    Ye are many — they are few.’
    Shelley–The Mask of Anarchy

  2. pgg804 May 10, 2012 at 9:11 pm #

    I hope I am wrong but I’m afraid the only thing that will remove their stranglehold on American society is the economic downfall of the USA, which appears to be gradually happening. The USA’s health care system is way behind other advanced countries, our schools are not educating our students (except for our universities that allow a large number of foreigners in) and the US economy no longer produces jobs for its college grads. As in every other country, when that country suffers a catastrophe the people in charge will be blamed and will suffer the consequences.

    But I’m afraid their stranglehold on much of Europe is almost as strong. However, that may change too if the US falls.

    Maybe then they will migrate to China and get control of the media there.

    • Ariadna Theokopoulos May 10, 2012 at 11:55 pm #

      Unfortunately when the worsening is gradual people adapt to increasing misery, like the proverbial frog in the pot on the stove, until it is too late.
      Too late would be when the police state is such a formidable and well-oiled machine that no serious social upheaval can occur. We may be there already.

  3. Jonathon Blakeley May 10, 2012 at 9:38 pm #

    Anarchy that is what I am into, not the kind of anarchy that the media like to go on about, filled with riots and apocalyptic looting. Rather the self organising fractal anarchy of Nature.

    • Ariadna Theokopoulos May 10, 2012 at 11:50 pm #

      The 2nd law of thermodynamics

  4. solar May 11, 2012 at 12:36 am #

    JB: ‘Clearly Jewish Power controls America, Britain and much of Europe though lobbies, banking and media interests.’

    Fulminate about The Jew much, Blakeley?

    Every now and then I pop in to see whether the anti-Semitism here has gotten any more blatant. Clearly, it has.

    • Ariadna Theokopoulos May 11, 2012 at 12:56 am #

      Which part of the ‘fulmination’; do you disagree with, Sunshine?
      The locations, the affected areas or all of it?

    • Ariadna Theokopoulos May 11, 2012 at 1:01 am #

      Better pop the cork on a Magen David bottle and celebrate:

      http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article31280.htm

    • pgg804 May 11, 2012 at 2:05 am #

      Rather than insulting him with that slur why don’t you show us where he is wrong. I think the evidence he provides is pretty strong, but you can read the bestselling book “The Israel Lobby” by Harvard and University of Chicago professors Walt and Mearsheimer that argues the same thing. Its not just an article, but an entire book.

      In this interview a congressman tells the interviewer how the Jewish Lobby destroyed his political career. There are other congressmen that have had the same thing happen to them and every other congressman and senator are aware of what is expected of them.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NpAs3Ze6N9I

      Historian David Irving describing the global vendetta against him by Jews. You have to read this to believe it.

      http://www.fpp.co.uk/bookchapters/Global/Vendetta.html

      Here on US television, after David Irving discovered Josef Goebbels’diaries in Moscow and published a book about his findings they argue Irving should be censored and prevented from publishing his book in the USA.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fdxTsWXZdFc

      I think a good argument could be made that they believe they have the right to censor and destroy anyone whose opinion they don’t like and they believe that they and only they have the right to rule.

      • Ariadna Theokopoulos May 11, 2012 at 4:01 am #

        The Irving clip is terrifying

      • Roy Bard May 11, 2012 at 6:02 am #

        “Rather than insulting him with that slur why don’t you show us where he is wrong”

        Don’t expect Solar to do anything but troll and smear. He is incapable of putting forward an honest argument.

        • solar May 12, 2012 at 12:03 am #

          Your Indymedia career, Bard, shows that you couldn’t spot an honest argument if it were busy sawing off your left leg. But you’re always very happy to hang about obvious anti-Semites and could never quite understand why others aren’t.

          • Jonathon Blakeley May 12, 2012 at 12:12 am #

            Oi Sunshine…

            Why don’t you just get lost and go bother someone else.
            We are anti-Zionism dummy not anti Jews that is racism, don’t you know anything.

          • Ariadna Theokopoulos May 12, 2012 at 1:25 am #

            But just for balance it should be noted that the tenses in his conditional clauses are correct (…”if it were”), an impediment for the late eldon. I like to be fair.

          • solar May 12, 2012 at 3:09 pm #

            JB says: “We are anti-Zionism dummy not anti Jews”

            That is what you tell yourself, sure. But you continually demonstrate the opposite.

            JB also says: “Clearly Jewish Power controls America, Britain and much of Europe though lobbies, banking and media interests.”

            JB obviously needs to start reading what JB writes, so that he doesn’t keep making a fool of himself on the anti-Semitism issue.

          • Roy Bard May 12, 2012 at 5:35 am #

            So solar, are you going to “show us where he is wrong” or just “troll and smear”?

          • solar May 12, 2012 at 3:13 pm #

            In your case, Bard, I may as well be talking to a tree. You’re the blindest of the blind when it comes to anti-Semitism, you’re actually proud of your inability to learn what anti-Semitism is, and you have been for years. That makes this site perfect for you.

          • Ariadna Theokopoulos May 12, 2012 at 3:17 pm #

            I agree. If he were a tree he would be an olive tree–a totally anti-semitic genus that must be uprooted.
            I have sent money to Israel’s “Uproot an Olive Tree Today and an Orchard Tommrow” campaign. Have you put your money where your mouth is?

          • Laura Stuart May 12, 2012 at 3:58 pm #

            I thought Solar had been eclipsed? On parole perhaps.

          • Ariadna Theokopoulos May 12, 2012 at 4:26 pm #

            Maybe you are confusing him with two others, who shall remain nameless. Their absence is keenly felt but I do my best to speak for them from time to time.

          • solar May 13, 2012 at 2:06 pm #

            Neither. Wandered away because the anti-Semitism of the site’s editor. Wandered back to see whether your little echo chamber did what echo chambers do, which is to spiral into utter ridiculousness. It has. Though your claim that chopping off a thief’s hand is a better punishment than putting him in jail probably took some time to top, JB’s latest and rawest anti-Semitic blasts have done finally done so.

          • Ariadna Theokopoulos May 13, 2012 at 2:14 pm #

            “your little echo chamber did what echo chambers do, which is to spiral into utter ridiculousness.”

            Those “bells” are torturing you again?

          • Jonathon Blakeley May 13, 2012 at 3:48 pm #

            Ha Ha ha

            Oo I am so so sorry Sunshine. I used the Jew word in a critical context, have I offended you. How dreadfully remiss of me.

            I think you are mistaking me for someone who gives a f**K!

          • Roy Bard May 14, 2012 at 12:18 am #

            Put simply, I don’t agree with your definition of anti-semitism. However, no doubt once you start engaging with the arguments and actually stating a case maybe you’ll write something that makes me review my whole understanding of the issue.

            Or more likely you’ll carry on being a rude and objectionable poster and get your account disabled.

          • solar May 15, 2012 at 1:21 pm #

            One of the funny things I see when I wander out into the wokka-wokka-land Atzmonian wing of the leftier-than-thou is people who have so little sense of what anti-Semitism actually is, their definition becomes so nebulous and rarified and theoretical that it floats away and doesn’t apply to actual humans anymore, with the very funny result that they can’t name a single living anti-Semite. Ask them, and they go erm, erm errrr….

            Can you, Bard? Can you name an actual living anti-Semite? Blakeley couldn’t. Eisen couldn’t. Can you? Or have you too tried to solve the anti-Semitism problem by simply redefining anti-Semitism out of existence?

            As I recall, your preferred dodge is to suddenly pretend — bing! — you haven’t the slightest idea what anti-Semitism means, oh no no heavens no, not the slightest, as if it’s some kind of intractable problem in eleven-dimensional quantum mechanical chromodynamics. You will spare us *that* dodge, I hope?

            The problem with your stance is that it’s so transparently evasive. As long as you can pretend that the question of anti-Semitism is so innately inscrutable that it can never be worked out to the last detail, and as long as you can pretend that until that last detail is worked out that *nothing at all* can be said on the topic, then you have spared yourself any investigation the possibility that you are in fact defending coarse anti-Semites after all.

            The question is an exceptionally simple one. Can you name one living anti-Semite, Bard, or have you spun yourself in such circles on the topic that you cannot?

          • Ariadna Theokopoulos May 15, 2012 at 1:45 pm #

            “people who have so little sense of what anti-Semitism actually is”

            Why don’t you tell us, sunshine.
            A clear, concise definition.

          • Roy Bard May 15, 2012 at 2:59 pm #

            “Can you name one living anti-Semite, Bard”

            Sure. The toe-rag who trolls every Palestine post on Indymedia with comments like the first one on this article.

            Definitely an anti-semite in my book, and almost alive at that…..

          • Jonathon Blakeley May 15, 2012 at 3:13 pm #

            OI Sunshine… we done this already.
            Mel Gibson is pretty anti-semitic so they say.
            Plus we also decided on Eisen’s article “We are all anit-semites now” that we are all anit-semite.

            Gunter Grass according to Many Zionuts is anti-semite, for what for being critical of Israel.

            We are not dodging, it is you who are the dodgy one. The insult of being anti-semite has so little value now I am amazed you bother with it.

            You really need to go and get some more Troll training. You just are not even slightly credible anymore.

  5. Ariadna Theokopoulos May 11, 2012 at 3:11 am #

    In his customary understated style and vague beating about the bush, Max Keiser speaks about the financial doings in USrael:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qSTqFbr033g&feature=player_embedded

  6. Jonathon Blakeley May 11, 2012 at 8:46 am #

    Max is great, I love the way he gets so animated. BUt his point is simple. Why are the Banksters not getting locked up?

    Because the politicians have been bought and are totaly corrupt. The Top of our society which should be an inspiration to us all are in fact the opposite.

    The elite are the worst of the worst. Vile greedy & totally without compassion. The rich have become well paid monsters who are largely immune for any wrongs that they may do.

  7. Chester May 11, 2012 at 12:58 pm #

    I had to laugh at the Take a Poll question here

    http://www.jewishtribune.ca/

    (bottom right)

    The question is

    “Does the high incidence of antisemitism concern you?”

    Possible answers: Yes, No, Don’t know.

    Probably the most loaded question since “Have you stopped beating your wife?”

    Lovely people.

  8. Jay Knott May 11, 2012 at 2:52 pm #

    I don’t think this is a particularly good article. It exaggerates when it says ‘Jewish power controls America, Britain and much of Europe’, and it doesn’t explain how an ethnic minority can have so much influence (you could probably put forward a good case for ‘Jewish media’, but not ‘Jewish banking’).It fails to isolate the electoral system as a major vehicle of Jewish power (politicians have to grovel more than the heads of intelligence and the armed forces).

    Having said that, the allegation of ‘anti-semitism’ is irrelevant. If you said a minority of Anglo-Saxon Protestants controlled America, it would be evaluated for its truth or falsehood, not how it makes poor WASPS feel about themselves. It should be the same with Jews. If ‘Solar’ could refute the article factually, he would. But he can’t, so he’s reduced to saying it’s politically incorrect.

    • Jonathon Blakeley May 12, 2012 at 8:16 am #

      Jay it is no exaggeration to say ‘Jewish power controls America, Britain and much of Europe’. Take a look around at the wall to wall hasbara. Have you switched on a Television recently.

      How can a small ethnic minority have so much influence?

      The Book of Esther, Money, Power and lets not forget ritual mutilation of babies genitals for tribal programming.
      —————————–
      The Initiation Society is the oldest Anglo-Jewish organisation. Founded over 250 years ago, it has existed to to ensure the highest medical and religious standards for bris milah (circumcision) amongst our mohelim (practitioners). The Initiation society works in close contact with the London Beth Din and all of our mohelim have undergone formal training in the medical and halachic (religious) aspects of bris milah.
      http://www.initiationsociety.org.uk/
      ——————————–

      “Zionism is but an incident of a far reaching plan,” said leading American Zionist Louis Marshall, counsel for bankers Kuhn Loeb in 1917. “It is merely a convenient peg on which to hang a powerful weapon.”

      Also btw Jay you might want to look up Goldman Sachs it seems they are quite influential in running Europe these days. Their unelected stooges are in power in Greece and Italy. Goldman Sachs also put their man at the head of the European Central Bank.

      Not everyone at Goldman Sachs is Jewish but Goldman came from an Ashkenazi Jewish family,
      Samuel Sachs was also Jewish.

      Current Key people at Goldamn Sachs
      Lloyd Blankfein = Jewish (Chairman & CEO)
      Gary Cohn (President & COO)= Jewish
      David Viniar = Jewish

      • Deutsche Bank Chairman of Management Board
      • Josef Ackermann – Jewish
      • JP Morgan Chase Chairman/CEO
      • James Dimons – Jewish
      • JP Morgan Chase CFO
      • Douglas Braunstein – Jewish
      • JP Morgan Chase Vice Chairman
      • Steven Black – Jewish
      • UBS Group CEO
      • Oswald Grübel – Jewish
      • UBS Group COO
      • Urlich Körner – Jewish
      • Federal Reserve Chairman
      • Ben Bernanke – Jewish
      • Federal Reserve Vice Chairman
      • Donald Kohn – Jewish
      • Federal Reserve Board of Governors
      • Frederic Mishkin – Jewish
      • Federal Reserve Board of Governors
      • Randall Kroszner – Jewish
      • Tresury Deputy Secretary
      • Neal Wolin – Jewish
      • Treasury Chief of Staff to Secretary
      • Mark Patterson – Jewish
      • Treasury Deputy Assistant Secretary
      • Matthew Kabaker – Jewish
      • Treasury Counselor to Secretary
      • Lewis Sachs – Jewish
      • Treasury Counselor to Secretary
      • Gene Sperling – Jewish
      • Treasury Counselor to Secretary
      • Lewis Alexander – Jewish
      • Treasury Counselor to Secretary
      • Richard Siewert – Jewish
      • Treasury Assistant Secretary for Financial Institutions
      • Michael Barr – Jewish
      • Treasury Assistant Secretary for Financial Markets
      • Mary Miller – Jewish
      • Treasury Acting Assistant Secretary for Financial Stability
      • Timothy Massad – Jewish

      but as we know you don’t have to Jewish to be a Zionist….

      • Ariadna Theokopoulos May 12, 2012 at 2:02 pm #

        Don’t confuse us with data, especially when they are the wrong set of data, Jonathon.

        Yes, these big movers, shakers and grabbers work in cahoots
        but Jewishness is not a relevant trait.
        It’s ALOPECIA. It stares you in the face when you look at their photos: most of them are bald or balding. They come from a long line of baldies and grew up with stories of discrimination of ostracism endured by their parents.
        Western society has always looked down on bald men. Language reflects it in the slurs hurled at them: “bald as a coot,” “cue ball,” etc. If you know anything about religions at all you know that Moses is always represented with a full mane, Jesus with flowing tresses, Allah is not represented at all (what did his burnous hide?) and Buddha has quite a fancy chignon on top of his head.
        Modern society has not stamped out this bigotry and large corporations have in fact cynically profited from it. When the history of anti-alopecia will be written (and I am thinking of it) it will be noted who appeased and who collaborated with the anti-alopecionists, like the giant pharma corporation Upjohn, which has made more profits from selling Minoxidil than from cortisone.

        Does their baldness in and of itself make them smarter as a group? Yes, it is quite likely, because they are more highly educated. When you are a minority shunned and shunted away by society, you retreat into learning and banking.
        Ironically you may even become a mogul in the cosmetic industry selling hair care products and be recognized for your merits by your co-alopecionists who elect you as the President of the World Alopecia Congress.

        It looks like you waded into an issue that is far more complex than you can handle and falsified it by oversimplification and bias.

        • Jonathon Blakeley May 13, 2012 at 12:26 am #

          Hmmn I cant comment on baldness myself being akin to a yeti in my hairiness. But its a definitely interesting thesis I like it, I think bald men may over-compensate … like short men.

          Lloyd Blankfein is Bald , Short & Jewish… and CEO of Goldman Sachs and maybe a little bit Special.
          He famously once said that he was “doing God’s work”

          nice work if you can get it…

      • Jay Knott May 12, 2012 at 5:42 pm #

        Jonathon: “Also btw Jay you might want to look up Goldman Sachs it seems they are quite influential in running Europe these days.”

        You can’t prove a hypothesis by accumulating examples which conform to it. What you have to do is:
        - show that Jews are in controlling positions in a majority of banks
        - show that these banks sometimes behave differently from banks not controlled by Jews
        - show that where this behaviour differs from ordinary capitalist behaviour, it benefits Jewish ethnic interests

        This kind of analysis has already been done re. academia and Hollywood – I’m not aware of a similar rigorous review of Jewish influence in the financial industry. Capitalism tends to select for ability, not “give my nephew Moshe a job”. That’s why WASPness declined on Wall St.. The disproportionate no. of Jews in the industry could just be a matter of ability. Think ‘Nobel Prizes in Physics’.

        • Ariadna Theokopoulos May 12, 2012 at 7:17 pm #

          I give you a B for effort.

          “show that Jews are in controlling positions in a majority of banks”
          Are you being sarcastic and I am missing it again? Go and google all the major banks.

          “show that these banks sometimes behave differently from banks not controlled by Jews”
          First show which major banks are NOT controlled by Jews. Then show how it would be possible in a banking environment controlled and [de]regulated from the top by Jews (see the Fed) for any bank to “behave differently.”

          “show that where this behaviour differs from ordinary capitalist behaviour, it benefits Jewish ethnic interests”
          Where does the loot grabbed by Goldman Sachs, Chase, etc go? To buddhist temples?

          “Capitalism tends to select for ability, not “give my nephew Moshe a job”. That’s why WASPs declined on Wall St… The disproportionate no. of Jews in the industry could just be a matter of ability.”

          That’s a nice supremacists thought but you have to enjoy it with the like-minded.
          If “ability” is what pushed Jews up in controlling positions in banking then you are saying that the banking collapse is attributable only and only to greed and dishonesty. That’s a thought…
          Are you also saying that the Goyim got pushed out of Wall Street because they are less intellectually endowed and so we don’t have the opportunity to see if they would be just as dishonest and greedy?

          “Think ‘Nobel Prizes in Physics’.”
          That’s another nice supremacists thought. Or should I say “trope” in the memory of dearly departed aema?
          Let us set aside the objection to measuring scientific value by the prizes awarded, although I recall a scientist (the discoverer of insulin, I forget his name), who was not given the Nobel Prize because of campaigns against him on the criterion of his “anti-semitic views”).
          Let’s look at the Nobel Prizes in physics:
          Between 1900 and 1940, 3 of the laureats were Jews (Einstein, Lippmann and Michelson)
          Between 1943 (none were given in-between) and 1983 –same time stretch as above– 15 of the laureats were Jews–maybe I missed some.
          Did the Jews become so much smarter since Einstein’s time or how can we explain it? Or maybe once they arrived in control of the academia they promoted each other, gave each other preferentially the means and resources to achieve more?
          Your racust and tribal argument can also be made very well by whites, asking why there so few black Nobel Prize laureates in sciences. Gee, why?!?

          • Jay Knott May 12, 2012 at 10:49 pm #

            Ariadna: “First show which major banks are NOT controlled by Jews.” No, it’s Jonathon’s article, the onus is on him.

            “You are saying that the banking collapse is attributable only and only to greed and dishonesty”. I didn’t say anything about the banking collapse at all. Looks like the normal up and down of capitalism to me. Did crises never happen before the Jewish upsurge?

            And cut the hectoring tone, if you please. Don’t try to politically correct me.

            Saying disproportionate representation of an ethnic group COULD BE the result of ability is not ‘supremacist’. You sound like the anti-
            racist left, trying to blackmail me, by saying that asking if Jewish achievement is partly due to ability, is like asking why few Africans get Nobel Prizes in science. You KNOW that’s because of racism. I don’t. Neither did the co-discoverer of DNA, James Watson. He got fired because he offended the p.c. mob.

            Having said that, you do hint that you have an explanation of Jewish achievement other than ability. It may even be right. You’re a sharp lass, and if you can stop sounding like Mrs. Mao, you might be able to convince me, and who knows, a few other people.

          • Jonathon Blakeley May 13, 2012 at 12:29 am #

            Jay I will do some more research and get back to you.

          • Ariadna Theokopoulos May 13, 2012 at 12:52 am #

            “You’re a sharp lass, and if you can stop sounding like Mrs. Mao, you might be able to convince me”

            You’re not a dimwitted lad yourself, Jay but I can’t convince you, I can only rebut you.

            A: “First show which major banks are NOT controlled by Jews.”
            J: No, it’s Jonathon’s article, the onus is on him.
            Not at all. Logic dictates that if someone says most strawberries are red and you say no, there are many navy blue ones as well, it is more economical for you to produce a navy blue one than for him to bring you a large enough number of red ones to satisfy you.

            J: I didn’t say anything about the banking collapse at all. Looks like the normal up and down of capitalism to me.
            Did crises never happen before the Jewish upsurge?
            A: This was the biggest transfer of wealth EVER in modern times. This was no “downturn.” It was a highjacking or, as Max Keiser put it it was a controlled demolition, the 9/11 of finances, but no swarthy boys with box cutters were involved:
            http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sS65bA4kKVE&feature=player_embedded
            You may withdraw the “normal up and down” if you wish to avoid having it quoted back to you.

            J: Saying disproportionate representation of an ethnic group COULD BE the result of ability is not ‘supremacist’.
            A. Sorry, it is. Saying Jews are disproportionately represented by a VAST margin in finances, media, and politics is due to their superior abilities is supremacist. To accommodate the notion that an ethnic group representing less than 2% gets to control virtually 100% of the finances, more than 90% of the media, etc only by diligence and special talent and ability only you MUST be a fierce supremacist.

            J: You sound like the anti-racist left, trying to blackmail me, by saying that asking if Jewish achievement is partly due to ability, is like asking why few Africans get Nobel Prizes in science.
            You KNOW that’s because of racism. I don’t. Neither did the co-discoverer of DNA, James Watson. He got fired because he offended the p.c. mob.

            A. When you get mad you get reckless or … sincere? You are in effect saying that I am “blackmailing” you to say the “politically correct thing” –i.e., blacks are NOT genetically inferior–but you are brave enough to resist blackmail and thus state that even a luminary like the Nobel Prize laureate in molecular biology stated that blacks are inferior but, I take it, the maoists of PC hounded the brave man and made the octogenarian relinquish his administrative responsibilities as Chancellor, upon which he resigned.
            It would have been a bit awkward to lead an institute of learning and research where blacks are admitted after having said: “I am gloomy about the prospect of Africa; all our social policies are based on the fact that their intelligence is the same as ours–whereas the testing says not really.”
            [I met both of them, by the way, and it is just a personal impression, not "data," but while I found Crick as tall morally and intellectually as he was physically, Watson was truly a detestable human being, which needless to say takes nothing away from his brilliance as a molecular biologist.]

          • Jay Knott May 13, 2012 at 3:37 pm #

            You can’t complain of a scientist not getting the nobel prize because of alleged anti semitism, and at the same time join the p.c. anti Watson chorus by repeating distortions of what Watson actually said.

          • Ariadna Theokopoulos May 13, 2012 at 4:18 pm #

            No distortion involved. That’s what he said. Inform yourself.
            He believed that non-whites, and women incidentally, are inescapably inferior in intellectual endowment–a conviction that he, as any other private individual should be free to hold and espouse. It did neither him nor science any harm since it did not interfere with his and Crick’s insight into the structure of the “golden molecule.”
            As the Chancellor of a learning institution, however, it is hard to claim that was only a “PC” problem.
            I think you may want to try to puzzle concepts in and of themselves, rather than peering at them through the labels of “PC” vs “non-PC.”

          • Jay Knott May 13, 2012 at 5:07 pm #

            The BBC blatantly lied about what he said. Your use of the term ‘supremacist’ is a bit vague – you can’t be a supremacist in general. If an academic says Jews are smarter, he’s called a white supremacist. If he says Africans are less so, same. It’s damned if you do and damned if you don’t.

          • Ariadna Theokopoulos May 13, 2012 at 5:46 pm #

            If an academic says Jews are smarter, he’s called a white supremacist.

            That’s obviously wrong. Jewish supremacists are precisely that: jewish supremacists.

          • Jay Knott May 13, 2012 at 7:42 pm #

            Ariadna – I know an academic whose tenure is threatened because he claims a Jew/white/black intelligence gradient. He’s not Jewish.

            I don’t believe his theory, but I do defend freedom. I think your distinction between what Watson could say as a scientist, as an official, and as a citizen is too nice. It would make him schizophrenic. And I don’t think you can defend firing Watson because of ‘racism’, and ask the establishment not to fire people for ‘anti-semitism’. And I think the reason you preferred Crick is because of his accent.

          • Loren Franklin May 15, 2012 at 9:57 pm #

            Isn’t it also interesting that IQ testing that is slanted toward assessing the memetic endowments and intellectual acumen/capabilities of certain individuals of certain cultures, would actually show them scoring higher than people who who are not the cultural target group of such tests? IQ tests that are used to asses and compare intellectual abilities, are never designed to deal with the variant cultural attributes of those taking the tests: conditions that could effect the outcomes.

            A test that is designed to asses the abilities of a child from a strong family, who was lavished with attention, food, schooling, and all the befits he/she could tolerate, is not going to be a fair indicator of cross-cultural intellect when used to compare said individuals IQ with the IQ of a child from Africa, or one from an improvised background in American.

            IQ tests are culturally targeted when they are made. A person could design an IQ test for the Yanomami Tribesmen of the Amazon, developed in his own environment, which many of them would score very highly in. You could give that same test to an Ivy League Jewish Nobel Prize winner, and he would test as mentally retarded. While this may be an extreme example, until tests are designed that are not culturally advantageous to one people, in expense of others of different cultural or economic backgrounds, they are not good indicators of cross-race intellectual capabilities.

            And yes, Jay, saying that Jews are smarter that Gentiles is racist. The burden of proof is yours, since the statement is yours. You must prove it, by demonstrating the eugenics program that the Jews undertook to develop this smarter “race” of people. How were the dumber individuals culled out of the population, so that the smarter could be used in the breeding program? Where did this eugenics program take place? Where is the documentation? And how was this even possible in the short span of time that Jews and Gentiles have been partially separated? You supremacists, Jay, are the ones who the burden of proof falls on when making claims of heightened intelligence for Jewish individuals; as well as claims of lesser intelligence for Black People.

          • Ariadna Theokopoulos May 16, 2012 at 12:26 am #

            Chancellor is an administrative position. You deal with students some and you arbitrate a lot of squabbles among the faculty over parking spots on the campus.
            Primarily, however, it is like a hunting trophy on the wall of a lodge: bragging and prestig for the institution that gets to put your name at the top of its stationery. He resigned his administrative duties (or was persuaded to) for reasons that should not need this much belaboring. No, he did not need to be schizophrenic just as supremacists Jews need not in order to abstain from what Gilad brilliantly calls “celebrating their symptoms.”
            All he and they need is AWARENESS that the given racist worldview is repugnant to most people (some of whom, like Pauling or Perutz, were as smart as he/they, no need to take his “tests” to prove it).
            He and they should settle for satisfying their symptom itch among intimate like-minded racists.
            His racism did not, as I said, impede his ability to decipher–with Crick, Wilkinson and Rosalind–the ACGT alphabet. He could have continued his reserach there without being a chancellor but it is nice to hope that he might have had a spasm of embarrassment.
            The comparison you make between an overt and vocal racist being relieved of his administrative responsibilities and someone labeled an “anti-semite”and hounded out of one and the next job in academia is–to use a nice word–disingenuous.
            I find it hard to believe you would consider Finkelstein an anti-semite. I actually don’t know what your definition is.
            I liked Crick for his accent and much more. I did not like Perutz’ accent at all but he was a wonderful human being. Watson is brilliant scientist but a racist and mysogynist prick.

          • Jay Knott May 17, 2012 at 2:41 am #

            Loren Franklin is libeling me when he says:
            “And yes, Jay, saying that Jews are smarter that Gentiles is racist. The burden of proof is yours, since the statement is yours.”
            I have never said that Jews are smarter than Gentiles. In fact, I specifically said, of someone who does, “I don’t believe his theory”.
            “You supremacists, Jay, are the ones who the burden of proof falls on when making claims of heightened intelligence for Jewish individuals; as well as claims of lesser intelligence for Black People.”
            I have never made any such claim. I am not any sort of ‘supremacist’.
            This is exactly what happened to Watson – p.c. hysteria led people to attribute to him things he never said.
            Be more careful before writing libels, Loren.

          • Jay Knott May 19, 2012 at 2:54 pm #

            Ariadna – to be an administrator in US academia you need more than a ‘spasm of embarrassment’. Contrast what happened to James Watson with the reinstatement of Richard Brodhead as president of Duke University. In 2006, when three white students were falsely accused of rape by a black woman, the administration told them not to get lawyers, and 88 academics said they were guilty, because they were “exemplars of the upper end of the class hierarchy, the politically dominant race and ethnicity, the dominant gender, and the dominant sexuality”. Unlike Watson, members of the 88 are still being promoted. See the blog ‘Durham in Wonderland‘.

            US academia is a sewer of political correctness. That’s why it fired James Watson, the greatest living biologist. They would have fired Darwin too.

      • solar May 13, 2012 at 2:02 pm #

        There goes JB obsessing about Jew bankers again. Notice the bells that fail to ring for him.

        • Ariadna Theokopoulos May 13, 2012 at 2:11 pm #

          What’s with you and the “bells”? Have you had a traumatic learning experience recently:

          http://www.dogchatforum.com/dog-puppy-ring-bell-go-out.htm

          • solar May 13, 2012 at 5:34 pm #

            Does the quite common English idiom “does this thing a bell” ring a bell for you? Apparently not.

            JB is adding to his ever-growing stack of straight-from-Stürmer rhetoric about the Jew a new fulmination about Jew bankers. The bell it rings among those who have the slightest knowledge of the history of anti-Semitism — well, it can’t ring JB’s bell, because he’s too ignorant of the history of anti-Semitism to know that he’s recapitulating it, that he’s become what genuine anti-racists oppose.

          • Ariadna Theokopoulos May 13, 2012 at 6:00 pm #

            So Jonathon came up with a new “fulmination” — Jewish bankers.
            You point out that a similar accusation did dog Jewish bankers in the past, back when they had grabbed about 150 out of about 163 German banks.
            If you think that it was talking about it that led to you know what, that not talking about it now will make everything good and safe, and if it is Jonathon who started it all then we should by all means ask Jonathon to stop.
            Jonathoooooon, stop! Stop making solar hear those blasted bells.

        • Jonathon Blakeley May 13, 2012 at 5:38 pm #

          @solar Who runs Goldman Sachs?

          • solar May 13, 2012 at 9:19 pm #

            Let me guess. It’s the Jews.

            Really, you’re embarrassing yourself with your Jew-obsessed version of reality. It’s time you got your head out of your Jew-obsessed arse already, before you make this site look any worse than it already does.

  9. searching May 11, 2012 at 3:39 pm #

    we can talk and debate, but in the meantime Alex Jones on his infowars.com warns everybody of the possibility of the civil/domestic war, that may become a reality very ,very soon.
    ALL THE FACTS are showing it. http://www.infowars.com/high-level-insider-dhs-preparing-to-start-a-civil-war/

    Nigel Farage warns that a similar thing may happen in Europe. Maybe thay try to coordinate it??http://www.infowars.com/farage-we-face-the-prospect-of-mass-civil-unrest-in-europe/

    • Jonathon Blakeley May 12, 2012 at 8:29 am #

      The soner we can convince the “Good Police” (if there any left) to arrest the Bankers and politicians the better. If we can do it without civil war then that would be great.

      But the powers in control are not goining give in easy. So a popular global revolution looks likely.

      As long as we buy this “Austerity Crap” we are doomed to continued debt slavery.

    • Jonathon Blakeley May 12, 2012 at 9:23 am #

      Farage is exactly right thanks searching.

  10. Ariadna Theokopoulos May 11, 2012 at 5:14 pm #

    Alex jones earned his pay for the day by getting this”confidential info” form a “high-level insider” which keeps Americans frightened and serves to justify tightening the screws on surveillance. More drones…
    Alex Jones–gatekeeper:

    Alex Jones: Hollywood is owned by Arabs.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rDiqfFJP6ds&feature=related

    not “healthy” to exaggerate Jewish power in the US
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y87SHOlw86Q&feature=endscreen

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ge8BpFI0RPA&feature=related

    • searching May 11, 2012 at 5:23 pm #

      We’ll live we’ll see.
      It is actually not even his opinon (although he shares it), but of a guy who was invited. The guy is giving facts. You may like them or not, believe in them or not , but facts are facts.
      Personally, I do hope that he is wrong.
      I would love for him to be wrong.
      But my gut feeling says me something different.
      I lived through a marshal law in Poland.
      One day you wake up ,and there is nothing on TV except a military announcing a marshal law.
      Tanks on the streets, people arrested ( my father was)smell of the tear gas in the air ,and this terrible feelings of fear, dispair,uncertainty and anger.

      • Ariadna Theokopoulos May 12, 2012 at 3:11 am #

        You’re an optimist.

        That presupposes that there would be a NEED for marshall law in the US. The US is not Poland. Or Hungary (about which the increased shrill accusations of “dangerous nationalist chauvinism” against Orban make you think a little coup for regime change might be in the works, after which marshall law would be needed because those Magyars are obstinate).

        The marshall law was declared in Poland because the rulers feared a concerted mass revolt.
        In the US, which is becoming close to a police state without much grumbling, there is no targeted discontent: one third of the populace blames all their problems on republicans, one third on democrats and the rest have no opinion or blame the illegal immigrants and the ‘islamic terrorists” for their problems.
        If there will be any local, isolated upheavals they will be characterized as –take your pick– ‘race riots,’ or the work of white supremacists. Above all there are always The American Idol, football and the Enquirer to keep them distracted and Fox News to keep them informed of what they need to know.
        Why impose martial law when its aims have been achieved without it?
        Shills like Alex Jones, who busts a gut if anyone wonders if 9/11 was an inside job with Israeli involvement, talk about it because it is good to keep the sheep frightened.

        • searching May 12, 2012 at 7:56 pm #

          I agree with you.
          Majority of Amercians are brainwashed impotents. Easy to manipulate, easy to lead on, easy to seduce with a piece of cr.p as long is nicely wrapped.
          This nation is doomed.
          That’s what happens when you have to much of the” goodies”, too much of so called freedom, to much of tv and MC Donald, and too much of corrupted leaders, whom you trust nonetheless.
          The sad part is..I live on this sinking boat, and I am not happy to watch it sinking.

    • Jonathon Blakeley May 12, 2012 at 9:27 am #

      Alex Jones is perhaps another example of “controlled opposition” much like Omar Barghouti.

  11. searching May 11, 2012 at 5:28 pm #

    errata: martial law
    here is a short video about martial law in Poland on 12/13/1981
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8RF4LDkgWyw

  12. searching May 12, 2012 at 12:48 pm #

    I’ve just saw this video at Gilad’s web.
    It is a must watch one.
    Worth putting on a main.
    Let as many people as possible see it.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=6owO2iyQGho

    • Ariadna Theokopoulos May 12, 2012 at 2:31 pm #

      Samples of her activities:

      Whitnum ran for a Senate seat in 2010 from the State of Connecticut.
      Whitnum advocated lobby reform with a critical focus on the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) stating, “AIPAC had a strong hand in pushing for the Iraq War, and AIPAC has fully infiltrated our election process, AIPAC is the reason why senators and members of Congress consistently vote $2 billion a year to Israel — a country that is not impoverished. We need that money here at home for our own crumbling infrastructure.”…
      She lost the nomination to Richard Blumenthal.

      As a candidate she has written four bills, one of which is the Prosecute Settler Violence Bill, which would permit the U.S. Department of Justice to prosecute American citizens who commit acts of violence in the “forceful taking of the homes, farms, and land of the … Palestinians.

      In November 2011 Whitnum filed a federal lawsuit against the Town of Greenwich and Peter Tesei, First Selectman, for allowing a Bar Mitzvah at the Town Hall, citing the First Amendment Establishment Clause.

      Whitnum sent out a press release in February 2012 responding to Joe Leiberman’s Enemy Expatriation Act (HR-3166), stating that if anyone were a “enemy combatant” it would be Joe Lieberman for his role in the 2002 Wehrkunde Conference. Whitnum states that Lieberman and Paul Wolfowitz pleaded with the European community for war in Iraq. Whitnum, in her press release calls Lieberman’s action as “renegade” and “treason.

      With this record she could not be elected dog catcher anywhere in the US.

      • searching May 12, 2012 at 8:09 pm #

        Brave, honest and smart women.
        That kind of people DOES NOT get elected. Those who decide will not let her go through.
        The American public is too idiotic to understand what she is talking about.

        • Deadbeat May 13, 2012 at 9:04 pm #

          I think you are a bit harsh and pessimistic about the American people regarding what they know. The real problems is indoctrination, atomization, and the pseudos on the Left and Right.

          Zionist are in complete control of the political economy meaning they control access to the means of life. Most American relied on debt to make up for decades of neoliberalism that was instituted to deal with the hyperinflation caused by the Oil Boycott of the 1970′s influenced by U.S. support for Israel.

          In addition Zionists controls the means of communication and major and alternative news.
          Most Americans understand something is wrong and those who seek information outside the MSN will fall into the waiting arms of Alex Jones and Amy Goodman.

          Those who are trying to cut through the bullshit have an uphill battle with the Zionist so firmly in control and entrenched bu the truth remains on their side. This is on of the reasons people like Joe Lieberman is hellbent on restricting access to the Internet.

  13. searching May 12, 2012 at 8:28 pm #

    Here is a small update of what is going on in POland as we speak.
    Yesterday, in Poland, our so- called Congress (sejm) passed a law that prolonged retirement from 65 to 67 years old.
    Some of the Solidarity members protested in front of the Congress in Warsaw.
    They blocked the exist for the congressmen to leave the buidling.
    The clip below shows like one of the congressmen (Niesiolowski), exceptionally rude, disgusting persona, tried to sneak out using a different door. Solidarity people blocked the exit and one can hear people shouting at the congresman some lovely epithets.
    Thief, traitor, a piece of ..sh.t,swine are one of the nicest that were thrown at his direction. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3MPCC20SkKU&feature=player_embedded#!

  14. Jonathon Blakeley May 13, 2012 at 3:58 pm #

    I want to make the following points.

    Israel is a racist state for Jews.
    In fact as Deek Jackson said recently you might as well call it “JEWLAND” because it is for Jews only.

    As such I feel perfectly comfortable criticising Jewish Power in America and Europe that supports the vile racist regime of JEWLAND.

    If that makes me an anti-semite in some peoples view, then great, I am more than happy with that.

    • Ariadna Theokopoulos May 13, 2012 at 4:29 pm #

      Ok, but your problems are not over. Now you have to ask your self if you are “PC” or not.

      • Jonathon Blakeley May 13, 2012 at 4:35 pm #

        NO I am not PC, nor do I care.

        • solar May 13, 2012 at 5:35 pm #

          He’s a bigot and proud of it.

          • Jonathon Blakeley May 13, 2012 at 5:46 pm #

            You do not frighten me.

            Jewland’s days are numbered, Zionism is looking more and more ludicrous with each passing day. Very Soon people are going to rise up and take back their goverments.

            Blowback is a mother.

          • solar May 13, 2012 at 9:17 pm #

            Not trying to frighten you, you poor pathetic little creature. If I wanted to do that, I’d point you to some facts, rather than the harebrained conspiracy crap you take so seriously. Then you’d do what you always do when confronted with actual fact: skulk away silently.

            Instead, I’m just letting you know how far over the edge and out into space you actually are.

          • Jonathon Blakeley May 13, 2012 at 9:51 pm #

            A conspiracy is where pople get together and plot malicious acts. I do not think all Jews are doing this.

            DO I think that some Powerful Jews are plotting malicious acts which favours their own tribal loyalities at the expense of others. … hmnnn, YES.

            Evidence…

            Berni Madoff.
            Jonathan Pollard
            Alan Greenspan
            Larry Silverstein

          • solar May 13, 2012 at 10:16 pm #

            And now comes the list of Jewish bad guys.

            Really, stop and take a breath, JB, before you turn into even more of a parody of the crusading anti-Semite.

            There are plenty of bad guys with plenty of power and plenty of cash all over the world. But you, JB, are obsessed with the ones of only one particular ethnicity. That one particular ethnicity which you find yourself so fixated upon, the one particular ethnicity this site focuses on almost exclusively.

            Why is that, JB? What is it about the possibility that there are bad Jews in the world that so completely fixates you to the near exclusion of all other possible bad people? What is it that, when you find something bad has happened somewhere, drives you to try to find a way to find not just a bad guy but a Jewish bad guy to pin it on?

            Answer that question, JB, and you will suddenly understand just why this site is generally considered an anti-Semitic cesspit.

          • Jonathon Blakeley May 13, 2012 at 10:34 pm #

            Not true, I am pissed off with the Chinese Government and the appalling treatment of the Tibetans. I have been researching this of late and was going to report on it.

            I’m against injustice Wherever it comes from.
            I don’t agree with all Muslim stuff that Laura posts. We got injustice here in the Britain too.
            But smear away at me.

            You have called me a conspiracy nut, anti-semite, surely you going to go for the hat-trick. You know you want to.

          • solar May 13, 2012 at 10:48 pm #

            Yes, Larry Madoff is a bad guy. Can you find anyone who says he isn’t? But you haven’t just called him bad. You’ve specifically labeled him as someone Jewish who schemed to benefit Jews for “tribal” reasons. And that ignores the fact that he defrauded a lot more Jews than he benefited. Why, then did you name him? Was he being “tribal” when he defrauded other Jews?

            Could it be that you brought him up the way you did exactly because he fits the old stereotype of the corrupt Jewish banker defrauding the gentiles, that stereotype the Nazis so reveled in, and which all sorts of Europeans before and since have found appeals to their prejudices about the Jews? Could it be not the facts — which you have apparently gotten wrong anyway, in your implication that Jews weren’t also defrauded — that matter to you, but the way you can invoke the name Madoff to substantiate your prejudices about Jews, make them seem “true” and justified?

            Now, yes, true, you are getting your facts from people like Gilad Atzmon and Paul Eisen, both of whom freely lie and alter facts when those facts contradict their anti-Semitic narratives. And you don’t know even a bit about the long thread of anti-Semitic rhetoric they’re drawing upon, so you — unlike the majority of Atzmon’s readers — can’t see it for what it is. But if you open your eyes just a bit more you’ll see that just because the Beeb and Rupert Murdoch are getting the facts wrong it doesn’t mean Atzmon and Eisen are getting them right.

          • Deadbeat May 13, 2012 at 11:24 pm #

            Actually that just a small list of Jewish bad guys. The list is much larger because it is not just a list of individuals it is a POWER CONFIGURATION that includes organiation especially the heads of major Jewish organizations (Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations)

            The problem is ideological, behavioral, and the indoctrination of this supremacist ideology amongst a group of people hellbent on dominating society.

            The fact is that Zionism is in complete control of the U.S. political economy and no amount of inverted rhetoric can hide that fact.

            In fact the inverted rhetoric is part of the psychological conditioning needed for the front line defense of Jewish supremacy.

          • Real Semite May 14, 2012 at 1:23 am #

            dear solar,
            do you have a drop of semitic blood in your body?

          • Deadbeat May 13, 2012 at 9:06 pm #

            Jewish supremacism is being challenged and the “anti-Semitic” smear is losing its potency. More people are aware that the Semites are ARAB and that Israel is the most anti-Semitic place on the planet.

          • Jonathon Blakeley May 13, 2012 at 9:26 pm #

            AYe the old smearing tactic is back-firing big style now. I also think the term Israel just reinforces their deluded God-given rights. Truth is the kingdom of Israel was a long time ago. What we have now is very different it is JEWLAND. A homeland for racist jews to flock to. Israel is just another Brand, like the Holocaust. I will not buy into their marketing.

            They may call it “Israel” but it once was called Palestine, but now it is neither it is a facade, a sham, a folly unto their vast arrogance.
            JEWLAND, a bit like DISNEYLAND but with Military checkpoints and not so many laughs.

          • Ariadna Theokopoulos May 14, 2012 at 2:41 am #

            Stop wailing about “anti-semitism,” sunshine.
            This Jew says there is none left. Zip. Zilch. Zero.
            He counts the Jews in positions of influence, power and money in the US and is bewildered by how many there are and then he wonders why with all this money and power American Jews suffer from the inability to be happy. Anhedonia.
            Looking over their shoulders, worrying, babbling about the holocaust. He thinks the state of being a Jew is such an unhappy place that many Jews are almost opting out:

            http://www.jewishworldreview.com/joe/aaron101007.php3

          • solar May 15, 2012 at 1:25 pm #

            Ah, so one Jew somewhere said something somewhere and therefore it must be true of all Jews?

            Gee, no bigotry there.

          • Ariadna Theokopoulos May 15, 2012 at 1:47 pm #

            “so one Jew somewhere said something somewhere and therefore it must be true of all Jews?”

            So you’re saying we should discount everything you have to say about ‘all jews”… no problem. Done!

          • deLiberation May 15, 2012 at 4:37 pm #

            Well Sunshine (AKA Solar)…

            You are like record that has got stuck in anti-semitic groove and
            you are about as welcome as a fart in a Spacesuit. So we are deleting your account. Please don’t come back.. No really.. just get lost. Say hello to Mathis & Eldon at the next HasbaraRat indoctrination sessions.

            And finally….
            this one is 4 you Solar.. Panel

            http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZedhoqYdfTM

          • searching May 15, 2012 at 6:40 pm #

            traditionally, a bye bye song from me as well.
            :)

            http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cwoIeD0CgOg

  15. Jonathon Blakeley May 13, 2012 at 11:00 pm #

    Ok all very interesting stuff.
    Back to the thread.

    JEWNITED STATES of AMERICA

    AIPAC & BICOM run USA and UK politics not 100% but enough to have major influence.

    This new law is really just accelerating plans for war that seems well rehearsed.

    and now this.. essentially the defence miisile system USA is supplying to ISRAEL, guess what they may actually be more like offensive systems.

    “…Since then, the Obama administration transferred $205 million to Israel, as an addition to the yearly $3 billion in military aid that the U.S. gives Israel. In April, Panetta announced that the Congress had approved an additional $680 million for Israel’s Iron Dome anti-missile system; this was approved on the second week of May. Next week, Panetta and Barak will probably announce additional $300 million in U.S. aid for the development of the Magic Wand and Arrow 3 anti-missile systems. Oddly enough, this attempt to further terrify the American and Israeli people will take place while Iran and the P5+1 (the five permanent members of the United Nations Security Council—Russia, China, the United States, France and Britain—plus Germany) meet in Baghdad; this time an agreement defusing the tensions between the Western powers and Iran is expected to be achieved. This is an odd timing for speeding up what is usually presented as “defensive weapons.” Hence, the explanation for this is …”

    http://www.roytov.com/articles/additionalfunding.htm

    • Deadbeat May 13, 2012 at 11:57 pm #

      It is more than AIPAC. There is a trend amongst the pseudo-Left (Medea Benjamin of CODEPINK in particular) to get out in front of this “blame AIPAC” narrative. AIPAC is the most visible and most powerful of the Zionist lobbies however this is really a smokescreen stunt by Benjamin as her schtick is to narrow the focus and to highlight ONLY “progressive” Jews criticizing ONLY AIPAC.

      James Petras focus is on the Zionist Power Configuration and does not limit Zionism to “support of Israel”.

      The threat to humanity is INTERNATIONAL Zionism. The goal of Zionism is the complete domination of humanity. This goes well beyond anything I ever heard from the Left who job it is to narrow the field as well as focus.

      It is a game where people are pawns within an oscillating context whereby the “extreme” Left is bounded by Noam Chomsky, Amy Goodman, and the Trotskyites and now the Zionists are muscling in on the Right with Alex Jones and his Bilderburg canard. The aim is to keeps the public focus away from the continuing encroachment and expansion of Jewish supremacy at all cost.

      This is the Amy and Alex Context of Alternative News. “Mainstream media” with an “alternative” twist. Their role is to capture the dissatisfied; those who THINK they are too “smart” to be “fooled” by Brian Williams and Katie Couric. Those who think they are “smarter” and more “cleaver” than the “sheeple”.

      The problem is for people like “solar” is that the dissatisfaction can’t be contained anymore. The Internet at this point in time has become an information equalizer. This is why Lieberman and his Zionist cohorts are enlisting Hollywood to go after “piracy” as the first step in curtailing Internet access. Their ultimate goal is to do to the Internet like what was done to radio and television — introduce licensing and other inhibitors to free access and free information.

      They know that the TRUTH is their biggest enemy and that is why Zionists aim to control the media everywhere. The Zionists want an INDOCTRINATED public and that is why they’ve position Amy and Alex to work the edges — and BOTH are WELL REWARDED for doing so.

      I’m sorry Alex co-opted the term “infowars” because that exactly describes the situation and Alex is on the frontlines as foe and not friend. However because Alex is positioned on the Right he has a tougher time proving his credibility because the Right ironically has been fighting against Zionism for much longer than the Left where the Zionists dominate and their followers are the most indoctrinated.

      For the Left to have any credibility the pseudo-Left must be purged. Our weapon is TRUTH.

  16. Jonathon Blakeley May 15, 2012 at 10:13 pm #

    Hey Loren Dude *waves*

    Good to hear from you… good point about IQ. IQ, and intelligence measuring seem quite easily to become another form of supermacism of an academic nature.

    That is what Mathis was all about. He was just into beating people with his PHD. Why is it so called “smart” people have to keep on telling us how smart they are. That is one thing i dont like about Finkelstein. He is very much an academic supremacist, he discounts anyone who is not a scholar.

    According to our white western scales we are so much smarter than native aborogines or amazonians who just don’t get our IQ tests. Are we really smarter or are they>?

    • Loren Franklin May 15, 2012 at 11:54 pm #

      (Waves back) Well, we in the west certainly have acquired more knowledge in the context of our culture. And if you test an individual who has all the benefits that culture has to offer, against an individual who has far less, then a disparity would seem to arise, regardless of innate capabilities. But the test only tests a very narrow interpretation of what is true intellect, and that tested product is culturally biased to a point of being meaningless for cross-ethnic comparison.

      I do agree that a person who brings his PhD into a debate, or one who mentions how much money he makes a year, is saying his self-assumed upper status lends credence and authority to his point of view. It’s folly, of course, because most people understand that a PhD is no guarantee of capabilities, as a person can have a PhD in a thing that does not even exist. Generally speaking, the intelligentsia is a herd of individuals who all read the same materials, and arrive at the same conclusions; while serving the same masters: those who control the purse strings that fund academia.

      Solzhenitsyn said — and I’ll paraphrase — that the true intellectual is a person who studies the same materials as the herd, but then goes on to become a true individual in his/her thinking, breaking from the herd and embarking on a journey that the herd must some day follow. The herd hates true intellectuals, and does its best to destroy them; only to end up agreeing with them in the end.

      Bringing your PhD into an internet chat-room is a sure indication of herd status. True intellectuals can rarely remember which corner they threw their PhDs into once they left school.

      • Ariadna Theokopoulos May 16, 2012 at 1:20 am #

        “if you test an individual who has all the benefits that culture has to offer, against an individual who has far less, then a disparity would seem to arise, regardless of innate capabilities.”

        One of the greatest American writers (whose anti-war writings are successfully excluded from school textbooks) used this very same idea in his wonderful “Captain Stormfield’s Visit to Heaven.”
        In Twain’s imagined heaven an illiterate English cobbler who had lived in the Middle Ages is Shakespeare’s and Homer’s object of adulation and boundless respect although the man had never composed a single line in his earthly life and never learned to read.
        The reason is that in Heaven what is rewarded is not achievement–which depends in good measure on opportunities–but potential.
        Had the cobbler only had the right opportunities, he would have been a greater poet than both in Heaven’s unerring estimation.

  17. Somoe May 16, 2012 at 12:07 am #

    I agree with Loren that intelligence is fashioned by the culture and environments that it inhabits. In this modern, developed western environment intelligence has come to be a cerebral affair, very much academically centred – drawing from, but not integrated with, the environment around it, whereas aboriginal intelligence is a much more holistic affair, integrated with all the systems that support its existence. It is consciousness connected to creation in ways that the developments of modern life have destroyed for most in the west.
    Take away all the modern amenities, like electricity, the internet, satellites, supermarkets and I think I know whose intelligence would support survival more effectively!

    • Loren Franklin May 16, 2012 at 2:33 am #

      You are right when you say environment, Somoe. That is the key word. Success in one’s environment and life should be of greater determination when deciding an individuals, or cultures level of intellect. Imagine a test — one that was specific to the cultures environment — that was designed to measure not only memetic acumen, but emotional intelligence; knowledge of hunter/gathering/planting/harvesting in natural surroundings; fashioning tools and implements necessary for success in one’s environment; knowledge of music; story telling to pass on culture and mores, common law and common social skills, to name only a few.

      A true test of IQ does not exist, as what comprises true and full intelligence is ignored. IQ test makers tend to flatter themselves by creating tests that make them shine, while completely ignoring the wisdom of life, and what is needed to sustain it. You speak of Native people, which makes me think of all of our ancestors who lived and prospered in the paleolithic era. Imagine the knowledge base they acquired and maintained — that allowed them to survive as hunter/gatherers. They possessed as much knowledge about their world, in their way, as we posses about our world, in our way. Many no longer even have the skills for surviving without electricity and hydrocarbons. That enormous body of knowledge has been lost; replaced by television, the nanny state, and the strip-mall.

      Imagine an IQ test created for one of your paleolithic ancestors, then imagine how much knowledge that era’s genius must have had of the world around her/him, and what valuable people they were to the tribe.

  18. Ariadna Theokopoulos May 19, 2012 at 4:20 pm #

    Jay: “”US academia is a sewer of political correctness. That’s why it fired James Watson, the greatest living biologist. They would have fired Darwin too.”
    ——————-
    They might have fired Darwin. But never a Dershowitz.
    Who is in charge of PC? WHO? The likes of Daniel Pipes.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n8VcRODqwXU

Leave a Reply