Footer Pages

This is Not Pork

 

This is not pork,”

said William Daroff, Vice President for Public Policy for the Jewish Federations of North America.[1]

He was referring to the fact that the US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) awarded 97% of its 2012 allocation for nonprofit grants to Jewish organizations.  According to Daroff, the DHS makes the allocations based upon threat levels.  The threat toward Jews is apparently much higher in the US than the threat toward Arabs or Muslims, for example, who are much more loved and protected in American society.

The program prefers recipients that have the “highest risk of terrorism-related activity due to their ideology, beliefs and mission.”  Most of the groups that received the awards support the mission to displace Palestinians from their homes and lands, and to settle Jews in their place.  Because of non-cooperation and even resistance from the Palestinians themselves, DHS apparently feels that the grants are necessary to protect the Jewish groups that support this ethnic cleansing activity.

The allocation may seem disproportionate, given the number of Jews in the total population, or even compared to crimes committed against other groups, such as Muslims and Arabs.  However, it is consistent with Jewish representation in Congress, as measured by votes on measures sponsored by the largest and most powerful “Jewish” lobby, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC).  Congressional legislation written by AIPAC typically passes by margins approaching 97%.

In addition, Israel typically gets at least 97% of the aid funds it requests in the US budget, regardless of cutbacks in other areas, such as health, education and welfare.  Furthermore, on a per capita basis, Israelis receive close to 97% of all U.S. foreign aid.  The DHS allocation is therefore not unusual.

DHS considers the grants to be a small price tag to pay for the security of the community that provides and organizes a disproportionate amount of support for (and control of) elected officials.  In fact, the grants help to assure that their recipients can support the groups in Israel that deliver a second “Price Tag” in the form of burning, defacing and vandalizing Palestinian churches and mosques, without fear of the same happening to them in the US.

It is therefore the gift that keeps on giving.

 

 

[1] Yes, he really said that.

Share Button

, ,

5 Responses to This is Not Pork

  1. who_me July 6, 2012 at 1:53 am #

    “This is not pork,”

    it’s not, it’s mutual handjobs.

  2. searching July 6, 2012 at 3:42 am #

    In the meantime we are being constantly poisoned by those diabolical forces
    http://www.freedumbnation.com/?p=2803
    “..The slurred revelations confirmed suspicions that Evergreen (International Aviation) is part of the major crap dump on the planet. Chemtrails made up aluminum, barium and other ingredients contribute to respiratory ills and change the acidity of the soil.

    Evergreen works from over a 100 bases and employees 4,500 people. Delford Smith privately owns the company. They admittedly “perform” for the CIA.
    Evergreen was given a no contest bid that gave them all the facilities in Marana, Arizona that previously belonged to CIA’s Air America (Pinal Air Park, Arizona).

    The security at the Pinal site is said to be as severe as that of Area 51. It is run as a military base where one lost pilot got an armed escort immediately off the operational base. The 10 year pilot said it was nothing like anything he has ever seen.

    Evergreen International Aviation brags of their planes that have 7 times the capacity of other fire fighters. One can carry 20,000 galleons. Firefighting … Right … and next we will be told the chem trails are to prevent global warming as millions more are advancing to an early death.

    Evergreen International Aviation has exemptions from the law that are advertised on their web site. They can fly anywhere and not stay on a designated route. Has CFR members paved the way? People like Philip Lader and John Wheeler III … they were in a position to do just that.

    Evergreen’s public relations (propaganda) spokesman is handled by WPP run by Council on Foreign Relations member Philip Lader. He worked under the present head of the CIA … Leon Panetta as White House deputy of staff under Bill Clinton.”

  3. etominusipi July 6, 2012 at 4:05 am #

    mark but this flea, and mark, in this,
    how little that, which thou deniest me, is…

    Andrew Marvell (C17)

    (nowadays better known for his comix, Speidermann, etc.)

    alongside the more than 2000 known species of flea there is a relatively little-studied mutation ctenocephalides hominis altruisticus which is unlike its fellows in several ways, of which two are particularly noteworthy:

    firstly, remarkably, it can communicate using a form of the language of its host.

    secondly, and because of discussions with its representatives held by means of an audio-enabled electron microscopes, this species has explained that its reputation as a parasite is quite undeserved. in fact, according to its spokesfleas, the entire efforts of this species are devoted to assisting with human blood-pressure regulation. what little blood it requires itself is devoted entirely to the high evolutionary purpose of self-perpetuation.

    what all sub-species of cten. hom. alt share in common is a peculiar susceptibility to a delusory belief that they will one day be able to dispense with their so-called hosts . this condition, identified by Ferenczi as the syphonapteric delusion goes together with a rather more pernicious psychosis, rooted in a steadfast refusal to acknowledge the parasitic nature of its adaptation to its peculiar niche….seers among the number of these remarkable wingless insects have prophesied that the Almighty will create for this purpose a new physiological organ, known to ordinary worshippers as the promised gland

    oh!!! wtf!!!my g_d!!!!

    sorry, my mistake, i thought i was on a literary zoology blog i regularly subscribe to. unfortunately i don’t know how to delete my post. a googolplex of apologies all round.

  4. Ariadna Theokopoulos July 6, 2012 at 5:42 am #

    I think it’s he same one Linnaeus described under another name which escapes me at the moment. He noted it had a proboscium several times larger than its body which enabled it to be a prodigious sucker. He described it as “parvum sed insatiabilis,” and said it was hard to separate from the host but nimbly moved from one host to the next on its own when bodily fluids ebbed.

  5. Blake July 6, 2012 at 10:05 pm #

    Could you imagine the outcry if Muslims got just 10% of the grant but because its self chosen rosens nobody can say nada.

Leave a Reply