Widgetized Section

Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone

The end of the world as we know it?

by Jonathon Blakeley
Friday, June 1st, 2012

Good news peeps, there is and end, or at least a merging…. Andromeda galaxy mashup in 4 billion years time according to some dodgy looking boffins.

It makes you wonder though…

Where Do We Come From?

What Are We?

Where Are We Going?

Utopia or Dystopia? Does anybody really care?

Is Utopia doomed as the cynics say ?

If all life was extinguised from Earth would our spirits move to another star system.? It makes you wonder..

 

Share Button
Posted by on June 1, 2012. Filed under Culture,TV,World. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

17 Responses to The end of the world as we know it?

  1. Ariadna Theokopoulos

    June 2, 2012 at 3:07 am

    Nice image of utopia you picked. Did you know to go straight to Gauguin or did you have to google specifically “Men to women ratio: 1:10″?

    • Jonathon Blakeley

      June 2, 2012 at 9:39 am

      Well Gaugin is a fave of mine. Women’s culture is a good thing, as I am fed up with Men’s culture. Just lucky with the ratio

  2. searching

    June 2, 2012 at 3:27 am

    There is a visible and invisible world.
    We trust scientists that there are atoms, electrons, neutrons, photons, fractals etc. even though we don’t seem them with our own eyes.
    Why can’t we trust priests ,true believers that there are invisible , eternal Powers, good and evil, who rule the invisible world ,and are interconnected /have influence with our visible world, even though we don’t see them?
    Here is something to watch that confirms that.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zPZYVZEHiO8

    • Ariadna Theokopoulos

      June 2, 2012 at 4:06 am

      “We trust scientists that there are atoms, electrons, neutrons, photons, fractals etc. even though we don’t seem them with our own eyes.”

      Not true. You need to update your ideas about science. We don’t “trust” them. It is not a matter of faith. They convince us with rational arguments and proofs.
      No, you can’t see the atoms of coffee when you stare at your coffee cup but yes, YOU CAN SEE AN ATOM of coffee or anything else. You just need a scanning tunneling microscope.
      I don’t know what you think a fractal is but you can see a “fractal” every time you look at a snowflake or the outline of a shore.

      “Why can’t we trust priests”
      Why should we trust them? They are humans and many are crooks. Why not an unmediated relation with deity? Do you believe God will not receive you unless a priest gives you a letter of recommendation?

      Every time you say about a video that it will “CONFIRM” or “PROVE” something, especially a statement that the reader considers erroneous to start with, it is a serious disincentive to even open it.

      • searching

        June 2, 2012 at 4:38 am

        “They convince us with rational arguments and proofs.”
        There are many rational arguments and proofs against , for example,darwin’s theory, but, i assume ,that you still hang on to it, in spite of lack of evidence.
        Your mind gets you only to certain point.
        You are not able to check everything what science has to say.
        You trust , believe in the science, and many of “scientific” theories has been proven wrong, many will. So ..you do rely on faith more than you think.

  3. searching

    June 2, 2012 at 3:38 am

    here is a very intersting move to watch
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PYSmV2FlHDw&feature=player_embedded
    I rememeber whan I was studying anatomy, physiology etc, I was literally in awe seeing how complex, but at the same wonderfully arranged everything is in our bodies.
    And immune system is just a beauty. Very, very complex one. We think that we know sooo much, while in reality, we known Nothing or almost nothing.
    The simplest nucleus in ONE of our cells, (and we have trillions of them in our bodies), contains enough info to be put in about 30 volumes of Britannica encyclopedia. One nucleus. One.

    • Ariadna Theokopoulos

      June 2, 2012 at 4:09 am

      “We think that we know sooo much, while in reality, we known Nothing or almost nothing.”

      Riiiiight.

      “The simplest nucleus in ONE of our cells, (and we have trillions of them in our bodies), contains enough info to be put in about 30 volumes of Britannica encyclopedia.”

      You are probably confusing “nucleus” with “molecule,” specifically the DNA molecule. What’s only in a nucleus could be put in a telegram.

  4. who_me

    June 2, 2012 at 4:17 am

    ““Why can’t we trust priests””

    because they bang young boys, and then go on about the evils of homosexuality. that’s why. :D

    • searching

      June 2, 2012 at 4:29 am

      I can not definately trust your opinion of a satanist :)

      • who_me

        June 2, 2012 at 4:50 am

        searching

        just reading the words i write here leaves you vulnerable to satan. to be safe, you should have your priest perform an exorcism on you.

  5. searching

    June 2, 2012 at 4:21 am

    Nucleus contains DNA so Dna is a part of nucleus. You dont seem too know too much of it even though you want to appear like you do.
    And yes, whatever you know about whatever you do know is nothing compare to the whole wealth of knowledge that surrounds us.
    How about being a little humbler Mrs know-it-all?

  6. searching

    June 2, 2012 at 4:27 am

    “What’s only in a nucleus could be put in a telegram.”
    Really??
    So you don’t know too much about it at all.
    Unless you telegram is thousands of pages long.

  7. who_me

    June 2, 2012 at 4:28 am

    “The end of the world as we know it?”

    “Cyber-attacks “bought us time” on Iran: U.S. sources”

    http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/06/02/us-usa-iran-cyberwar-idUSBRE85100N20120602

    generally, it happens when wrong is promoted as right and those in the wrong brag about it without conscience or challenge. when “jewish morality” takes over.

    • Ariadna Theokopoulos

      June 2, 2012 at 4:33 am

      I thought it interesting that after Israel dropped all kinds of clear hints almost boasting that they have done it, the US jumps in and says “we did it.” What’s that all about? Didn’t they work out paternity claims before going public?

  8. who_me

    June 2, 2012 at 4:46 am

    “What’s that all about?”

    in a word, chutzpah. the israelis do the crime, brag about it, then have their quislings publicly take the rap for the crime, for them.

  9. Jonathon Blakeley

    June 2, 2012 at 9:42 am

    rumours have also been circulating that STuxnet made things much worse at Fukushima.

You must be logged in to post a comment Login