The British Israelization of the World
Jerusalem by William Blake
CANAANIZATION = the extermination , by divine decree ,of the other who does not surrender fully to you
The British Israelization of the World.
The first Israel is not the country that was founded in the beginning of the 20th century by the Jewish Zionists , the real great Israel was founded in the 16th century, when the White Anglo Saxon settlers set foot in Plymouth, in what they called :”the Canaanite land’ . These same settlers who landed on the shore of what will be later known as North America , called this land on which they set foot : “Israel of God”, and they started building on it their settlements while considering themselves God ‘s chosen people whom God has favored among other nations and given them the right to usurp other people’s land after suppressing its original population .
This is not a legend, but the true story of the Israeli state and the real historical origins to this gender of states that go back to the foundation of the United States of America and Canada by the European invaders. The European invaders stole the land from its real owners and expelled the Native Indian inhabitants who were living peacefully on their territories, cultivating the fields and celebrating their rituals on a land they inherited from their ancestors more than five thousands years ago. These original, peaceful, civilized nations had no idea of the dark future that was awaiting their coming generations after the landing of the pilgrims on their land to establish their sacred Israel and practice all kinds of violations like: killing, slaughtering, enslaving , massacring , abducting , exterminating physically and culturally , spreading diseases intentionally, spreading the use of alcohol and drugs , breaking treaties and agreements , separating families, kidnapping children, dismantling communities, sterilizing women , humiliating and chasing the natives all over the country .
All these practices made the original inhabitants bereft of everything, deprived of their land, stripped of their language, and their culture , denied their right to live. This is how Great Britain started its Israeli endeavor and vocation, replacing one people by another, and one culture by a different one ,as mentioned by Prof. Munir Akash in his book .
Great Britain had already mastered all these practices and violations through its occupation of Ireland and Wales and it proved even more skillful on the new continent where it surpassed itself in exterminating and eradicating the original inhabitants. Of the 18 millions that populated USA only quarter of a million survived this treatment, this survival only led those who remained to be confined to reservations where poverty, sickness drug use and chaos prevailed.
This is the process of canaanazation, as Prof Munir Akash defines it, ie : the extermination, by divine decree, of the other who does not surrender fully to you. This decree gives the settlers the right to dispose of the others’ property and even body and do as they please in order to satisfy their white God and build his kingdom on earth. The dagger plunged in the heart of our Arab nation that is called Israel, is but one link in the chain of horrible events that started in North America many centuries ago when more than a hundred nations and cultures became extinct thanks to the British colonialists, this eradication targeted the very root of their being, destroying their memory, depriving them of their language and imposing on them the worship of their white executioner and made them thus subject to self hatred and self denial…
As to the other links of the chain of horror, they were manufactured in Hollywood studios, and since the first experiment with Native Indians was so successful, it was compelling to repeat it on the real Canaanite land this time, between the people of Canaan themselves and God’s chosen people, the Jewish Zionists settlers who came in great numbers to occupy Palestine and build their settlements after slaughtering the Palestinians and expelling them from their land, all this in order to fulfill God’s promise to submit the Canaanites to the sons of Israel. This is how the second Israel was founded on Palestinian blood; as an artificial state, with an artificial language, and people from all over the world , with nothing in common but the greed and envy of others’ property..The second crime has been committed for the second time,and the third is on the verge of being committed, while the fourth and fifth are still in the process, because there is no boundary to the colonialists’ greed who cannot survive nor exist except on other peoples’ blood that God is willing to spill for the sake of his chosen people.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Daniel says “Europeans…expelled the Native Indian inhabitants who were living peacefully on their territories, cultivating the fields and celebrating their rituals on a land they inherited from their ancestors… These original, peaceful, civilized nations had no idea of the dark future that was awaiting their coming generations after the landing of the pilgrims…”
Crap. Genocide, torture and many other crimes existed in pre-Columbian America, including the extermination of whole tribes, women and children included, etc. etc. The difference is, Europeans had more germs, guns and people – that’s why they did more harm. See Keeley: http://tinyurl.com/355wurq
The politically correct post-war academic establishment put a lot of effort into denying this, trying to convince us that whitey is uniquely evil. This official narrative cannot be adapted and turned against Jewish supremacy – it is part and parcel of it.
jay really hates the idea that non-white people might have been doing things better than his jp sponsored, all whitey neo-con heroes.
from jay knott’s latest foray into defending the status quo:
“See Keeley”
one of the comments at that link provided by jay:
“CONFIRMING CULTURAL OPINIONS ALWAYS SELLS BOOKS
Writers can always sell books reconfirming Authoritarian personality cultural opinions. The Christians will love it (original sin), the other semitic religions will like it, the video game players, the marines, the military industrial complex.
People who watch Western Movies understand that Indians are violent and cannot understand why even “primitive” people would not step aside and let the invader take their land and allow the murder of their people. Well, the industrial mind has the answer, “they are warlike savages.”
For two million years or so bands of hunter/foragers, averaging 28 people, trod on their migration patterns of harvesting the food as they circulated in the migration pattern. Each year they returned to the same places to harvest. The activity basis of the culture was migrating and harvesting.
This confused academic, citing cherry picked evidence, furthers the civilized story that began with agriculture and empires. The basis of these cultures is warfare, just as the basis of U.S. society is warfare, since the society now produces no industrial products except military weapons. The basis of empire is to steal what others have and one needs a war ideology to do that and the anthropologists who are now in Afganistan helping the war machine kill peasants.”
which puts jay and his “academics” in the correct perspective – neo-cons masquerading their defective biases as those of humans. another review pointed out this keeley used 8 groups of people, from 3 regions, to generalise about all of pre-contact with europeans world history.
from the 70′s on, jp has been very busy, along with their now very subservient bum-pals, the old time corporate fascists, working to stack academia with their propaganda. the basic premise of their propaganda line these aca-prostitutes must follow is that all human nature is predatory and that all human advancement is based upon predatory greed. what this is is basic neo-con (which is jp excusatory mentality) dogma designed to justify their domination.
it’s the intellectualism of foxnews teleprompter readers given degrees in bs.
some bad news for jay and his people:
http://www.rt.com/news/bolivia-ban-coca-cola-581/
“‘End of capitalism’: Bolivia to expel Coca-Cola in wake of 2012 Mayan ‘apocalypse’”
both coca cola and mcdonalds registering total fails. that’s not supposed to happen in modern, civilized societies…jp is literally beside themselves in aghastcity.
the article is interesting despsite the well camouflaged rightwing jewish bias…a problem with all the english language russian webmedia i’ve seen. though it usually is not so buggered neanderthal as one sees in western corporate media.
brilliant insights!
don’t waste too much of your valuable time getting angry with malevolent idiots. i do know that score, and for sure polemic is necessary.
but when the first homo sapiens, whatever and however, began to recognise each other, they would have soon been stopped in their tracks if they had engaged in debate with the dominant tribe of the entire ape clan.
it is much the same today.
people can be dazzled by the present science-based array of destructive material technology. but from an evolutionary perspective these highly destructive powers are akin to the breast-beating roar in the jungle of outraged species bypassed in Nature’s relentless search for more perfect embodiment of spiritual intelligence.
the next step is into a wholly new dimension.
“Another review pointed out this keeley used 8 groups of people, from 3 regions, to generalise about all of pre-contact with europeans world history”.
Right. But that review is not true. You actually have to READ Keeley’s book, and numerous others like it, both pro- and con- Keeley’s position. Random internet surfing isn’t research.
More: “from the 70′s on, jp has been very busy, working to stack academia with their propaganda” – meaning the traditional Western narrative. Nothing could be further from the truth.
The Jewish influence on academia includes the Frankfurt School since the twenties, and Boas and numerous others since WW II. The ‘propaganda’ these Jewish leftist academics defend is anti-Western – they don’t have ‘whitey heroes’ – on the contrary! Mabsout’s article accepts their claims without criticism, as he did previously: http://tinyurl.com/c9jwvmk -
“They contaminated them – intentionally – with diseases ranging from small pox to syphilis – not to forget tuberculosis – which killed 90% of the Native population in the first biological war ever waged…”
There’s no nice way of putting it – the above quote is a pack of lies. The settlers didn’t know what smallpox is.
Claiming that Keeley, MacDonald and other critics of the dominant leftist line in academia are the equivalent of ‘fox news readers’ is illiterate and arrogant chutzpah.
It’s right to publish articles like the above, because it enables countering the p.c. prejudices it contains, which are widespread in this society. I’m not so sure about some of the responses, which are a waste of your space and my time.
jk
“But that review is not true. You actually have to READ Keeley’s book, and numerous others like it, both pro- and con- Keeley’s position. Random internet surfing isn’t research.”
i referenced that short review because it was already at your amazon link and provided a quick overview of what was wrong with the sort of neo-con “scholarship” in that book. a more detailed view of some of what is wrong with keeley’s book, and this type of “scholarship” can be found in this essay:
http://iweb.tntech.edu/kosburn/history-444/birth_of_war.htm
THE BIRTH OF WAR , By: Ferguson, R. Brian, Natural History, 00280712, Jul/Aug 2003, Vol. 112, Issue 6
on keeley specifically:
“In 1996 the issue took a new turn with Lawrence H. Keeley’s book War before Civilization. Keeley, an archaeologist at the University of Illinois at Chicago, compiled archaeological cases of some of the worst violence known, thereby creating the impression that these examples were typical, that humans have always made war. As he told the journal Science, “War is something like trade or exchange. It is something that all humans do.” Here I must unequivocally disagree: in my view the global archaeological record contradicts the idea that war was always a feature of human existence; instead, the record shows that warfare is largely a development of the past 10,000 years.
In the new book Constant Battles: The Myth of the Peaceful, Noble Savage (written with the writer Katherine E. Register), Steven A. LeBlanc, an archaeologist at Harvard University, confidently asserts that wherever good archaeological evidence exists, there is “almost always” evidence of warfare, that “everyone had warfare in all time periods.” LeBlanc has a theory for his sweeping conclusion. Contrary to a commonly held view, he argues, pre-state peoples were never “true conservationists.” They degraded their resources, and as their numbers grew, they suffered food scarcity and were drawn into war. Basically, it’s Malthus with ethnographic detail.”
keeley’s cherry picking is confirmed there. the sort of “scholarship” keeley uses is common among the new neo-con “intellectuals”. these are actually not intellectuals, but advert writers, and the “scholarship” they represent is simply ad copy. they start with a prejudiced assumption then cherry pick data, and also invent data, that will reinforce that pov. it’s not science. it doesn’t use the scientific method. it’s reinforcing an ideology that can be used to warp people into accepting dogma as scientific truth. ie: why i refer to it as advertising.
in real science one gathers and analyses data, then tries to come up with a theory that is based upon what they found. then tests it and looks for errors. with this neo-con “science”, they invent the theory, then look for, or invent stuff to support that theory, and ignore all info that may contradict it. the theory is then made into a dogma which the dittoheads all then run around repeating. exactly like how propaganda is used.
historically, this neo-con scholarship is very much like that used by the nazi establishment during the 30′s and 40′s to support their idiotic aryan race baloney. this stuff is considered laughable now, but the neo-con “scholarship” of today mimics this nazi material very closely in how it is derived and in its phoniness.
“More: “from the 70′s on, jp has been very busy, working to stack academia with their propaganda” – meaning the traditional Western narrative. Nothing could be further from the truth.”
there is no “western narrative” and jp certainly isn’t “western narrative”. that distorts the meaning of my use of the term jp. my use of the term has to do with jp stacking universities with people friendly to the interests of jewish power interests. these can be rightwing, left or centre. for example: a chomsky or a dershowitz.
the fact that jp works diligently to limit what may be taught at uni is well documented. they do this on their own, but frequently, they employ proxies, as well, with or without the proxy’s knowledge of where their “attack” orders originate from.
“The ‘propaganda’ these Jewish leftist academics defend is anti-Western – they don’t have ‘whitey heroes’ – on the contrary!”
that is just plain laughable rubbish.
re:“They contaminated them – intentionally – with diseases ranging from small pox to syphilis – not to forget tuberculosis – which killed 90% of the Native population in the first biological war ever waged…”
“There’s no nice way of putting it – the above quote is a pack of lies. The settlers didn’t know what smallpox is.”
actually, that line from dm is partly true. claiming it is a “is a pack of lies” only shows your own self-imposed ignorance and prejudices. there are a couple documented events where europeans deliberately attempted to infect indians with disease. in 1767 and 1836. possibly also in the 1850′s. but the vast majority of indian deaths due to european/african diseases were not the result of intent, they were result of indian contact with europeans/africans who were sick or recently sick and still carried the some of the disease.
“Claiming that Keeley, MacDonald and other critics of the dominant leftist line in academia are the equivalent of ‘fox news readers’ is illiterate and arrogant chutzpah.”
first there is no “dominant leftist line in academia”, that’s standard neo-con/jp/hannity/limbaugh labeling used to hop up the idiots. you are right, keeley isn’t a foxnews reader, he is more like one of the writer who write the pap those news readers read. people, like you, who buy into this warped neo-con “scholarship, because it confirms their uneducated, prejudiced views about poor whitey and a desire to be subservient to an all knowing ‘boss”, are simply wide-eyed, open-mouthed viewers of foxnews. this neo-con “scjholarship” is an application of tabloid journalism and television “facts” to the academic world to provide a “scientific basis for a hierarchical status quo of elites and exploited subjects. the whole basis of this phony scholarship about man’s innate aggressiveness is to promote a hierarchical society where dominance and exploitation are institutionalised as the norm of human behaviour, to be encouraged and celebrated. it’s almost as dubious as kings claiming they had a right to rule because god intended them to.
The point about Thomas Keeley’s “War Before Civilization” is that it is a revision of what he’d been taught, and what he’d said himself. He’d internalized the dominant Jewish liberal anti-Western line so completely, he referred to Iron Age forts as ‘enclosures’ because he didn’t want to give the impression that Iron Age peoples lived in a state of war. He ignored the piles of human bones in mass graves from pre-Columbian America, because he felt he had to defend the myth of the peaceful Native Americans. And so on.
Then he decided to look at the evidence.
The usual argument used to justify the slaughters committed against the Native Indigenous in the northern continent is that the Natives were already at warfare with each other and had many disputes and were fighting among individuals and tribes and what the white settlers did to them is similar to what they were already doing to each other. This kind of argument does not stand because what the white settlers practiced was genocide and not any other type of war. The Indian warfare among tribes was not a war in the proper sense of the word , they were disputes among tribes caused mostly by slander or some isolated incident and usually were settled by apologizing or by compensating. Something similar we had in the pre Islamite period were Arab tribes would fight over anything- be it a race or a spring of water or cattle – and these wars would last for years without causing significant casualties or damage until they were solved by the interference of some third neutral party . The kind of violence practice by the settlers was unknown to the indigenous culture and was indeed shocking . In fact there is a whole white literature that makes fun of the kind of war the Native tribes launch on each other because – according to prof. Munir Akesh who analysed this symptom :” this war lacked two essential elements :Territorial expansion and killing . The white settlers describe it as a kind of sports or entertainment and not for subduing the enemy for they might fight for seven years without even causing seven deaths ; they rush to the plains and start jumping and dancing calling it fighting and if someone gets injured they both stop the fight and all rush to the help of the wounded “. And again from the same author citing George B Grinnell:”Among Natives, touching the enemy is a vile expression of enmity , and defeating your enemy without injuring is real chivalry . It is a sign of courage and one of the traditions to go to war with no weapon that can hit the enemy from far , for this reason carrying a spear is more chivalrous than using the arrow and taking a small axe is better that the spear, whereas the highest expression of courage is to go to war without weapons at all.” Prof Munir Akesh : The American Genocides : The Right to Sacrifice the Other.
..
Daniel, you attain to the level of prophetic inspiration in your presentation of veritable realities. i admire your self-control, especially in that you never give way to the all-too-obvious temptation to angry invective.
it is a curious serendipity that i had recently beern asking myself questions which led to some very similar conclusions as those you convey in this well-presented article.
Jay, i do admire your resolute empiricism – it has a valid contribution to our ongoing dialectical adumbrations, but why do i get the impression that you expend too much energy suppressing your heart? a powerful mind like yours, unsentimental, but with a good ability to balance, and with the blessing of a wry humour, could contribute so much to the daunting task of collectively elaborating our future in this forgotten little cupboard of the divine Attic. why sacrifice the joy of participating in such a noble enterprise, for the tawdry pleasures of the occasionally tribaly-motivate cynical ejaculation? and, in any case, does that behaviour not simply feed into support for the uncompromising view of Eustace Mullins?
Thanks, ‘etominusipi’. I could chill out a bit, couldn’t I? I’m about to produce one more article – an uncontroversial piece about conspiracy theories – then I’ll give it a break for a while.
“if Zionism, as a shrewd business deal, declares war on mankind…
let it be well aware of all the terms of the contract.”
Shakespearstein: the Merchant of Venice
“an enraged, lustful, or otherwise hypermotivated dog, thus rendered temporarily oblivious to the unfortunate but serious physical limitations imposed by the finite length of its chain, is liable to fall prey to the many ills and misfortunes recognised amongst experienced veterinarians as frequent sequilae to accidental self-strangulation.”
Dr Einbert Alstein M.D (Chicago)
if you are clever you either believe in G_d. or you don’t.
clever people don’t hurt their arses sitting on fences.
so, if you don’t believe in G_d, well you weren’t so clever after all.
so, if you do, really, believe in G_d, then you know G_d will send someone a little cleverer than you to instruct you.
so, by fairly pre-quantum logic,
you ain’t so clever as you thought.
your chance is to realise that…
… before, by one of those strange phenomenological twists that have made reality so ‘legendary’, the handy little niche in a local perturbation of the wave function that even presented you with the choice, simply subverts into whatever is the opposite of existence.
a nuclear weapon is, psychoanalytically, an explosive penis.
Israel possesses in secret several hundred atomically explosive penises that it has stolen from the world.
although they contribute greatly to its militaristic masturbation fantasies, Israel is so ashamed of these explosive penises, that it is afraid to confess to the world that it is in possession of them.
in the end Israeli women must end this morbid and dishonest situation. for their own fulfillment as devoted female slaves of Allah they must and will overcome their pseudo-tribe’s archaic Levitic phallocentricity with its sneering prohibition of the female orgasm. i hope their Palestinian sisters will support them in their struggle to turn their menfolk aside from this addictive but harmful myth of a world-destroying radio-active penis, towards the more gentle and loving conception of the phallus, as a gynophilic, G_d-given and joyful propagator of our collective human future.
My comment is not to argue that what was done to the American-Indian was not wrong or a terrible injustice. My comment is to argue there is not a direct connection between the two (stealing Indians land versus Palestinian land), but there is a direct connection with another huge ethnic cleansing operation the British played a major role in. This ethnic cleansing immediately preceded the Palestinians being pushed off their land and was perpetrated against whom many Jews have claimed was their biggest enemy ever. And I do agree with the statement that “the other who does not surrender fully to you” will be exterminated.
I have posted this argument before, but I’m going to post it here again because I believe to ignore it is to ignore an irrefutable fact.
The following is a PDF file containing copies of the actual letters of years of correspondence between Chaim Weizmann (president of the world’s Zionist Organization and immediately thereafter first President of Israel) and British Prime Minister Winston Churchill. The letters were copied by the historian David Irving during a visit to Israel. He was given permission to do this.
The copies are a little difficult to read, so Mr. Irving made two copies of the September 10, 1941 letter from Weizmann to Churchill. Click on page 25 (on the right of the page) to read this letter. Paragraph two says “Two years have passed since, on the outbreak of the war I offered to His Majesty’s government, on behalf of the Jewish people, the fullest active support of Jews in Palestine and throughout the world” and on the last paragraph page 26, first page 27, writing about the United States, “There is only one big ethnic group which is willing to stand, to a man, for Great Britain, and a policy of “all-out-aid” for her: the five million American Jews. From Secretary Morgenthau, Governor Lehman, Justice Frankfurter, down to the simplest Jewish workman or trader…It has been repeatedly acknowledged by British Statesmen that it was the Jews who, in the last war, effectively helped to tip the scales in America in favour of Great Britain. They are keen to do it – and may do it – again”. Weizmann is asking Churchill to permit and support the creation of a Jewish division (which will later become the Israeli army) to fight against Germany and in return he promises to bring the USA into the war against Germany.
http://www.fpp.co.uk/History/Churchill/Weizmann_Zionists/Weizmann_Churchill_corr.pdf
The letter is transcribed and readable here:
http://endzog.wordpress.com/2012/04/21/deavid-irving-releases-letter-proving-churchills-complicity-with-jews/
In this ten minute segment of his speech, David Irving discusses Churchill’s relationship with the Zionists, the letters and how Churchill was paid to make Germany Great Britain’s enemy.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6BpENdKqu0U&bpctr=1343967280
In 1917 the the USA entered WW I against Germany due to Zionist pressure and in return Great Britain announced the Balfour Declaration and their intent to create an Israeli state on Palestinian land. This was right in the middle of WW I.
Germany never wanted to fight Britain or the USA during WW II and they repeatedly made contact with the British to end the hostilities. Churchill refused and the British and Americans announced the only thing that could end the war was the “unconditional surrender” of Germany so the allies could do what they wanted with the Germans. Over fourteen million Germans were expelled from their territory that they had lived on since at least the middle ages so Czechs, Poles and Russians could settle there. This was 1945 – 1948. Germany’s civilian population was burned alive in the bombing (tens of thousands of people in as little as 20 minutes) in city after city. Israel was created in 1948. You are absolutely correct, “who does not surrender fully to you” will be exterminated.
Mr. Mabsout, please read the letter I describe (or at least the parts I mention and watch at least the first four minutes of David Irving’s speech.
I am aware David Irving is the most politically incorrect historian in the world and has some views about society that were common fifty years ago,but are no longer considered acceptable today, but this has nothing to do with his books on history. Galileo and Kepler were imprisoned and attacked for their views too. If you really want to understand the history, you have to understand Irving. He has not been imprisoned several times for nothing. There is no need to imprison people that don’t know what they are talking about, because their ideas can be shown to be wrong. Irving is dangerous because his historical writings are so accurate and they overturn everything people have been told for so many years.
Please tell me your views of the Weizmann letters Mr.Mabsout.
Many thanks for reposting that I hadn’t seen it previously.
You’re welcome Blake.