Pages

South African massacre was the tip of an iceberg

This article by Maeve McClenaghan was originally published by The Bureau of Investigative Journalism under a Creative Commons License

* * * *

Mining

The perils of mining come in many forms
(Image: Flickr/Lianne Greef)

As televised images of blue-uniformed police, coldly opening fire on striking workers in South Africa ricocheted around the world, one could not help but be reminded of the state repression that permeated the apartheid struggle of earlier decades.

Since that time, South Africa has built itself a reputation of stability and prosperity, in contrast to many of its neighbours. But that image of stability is now being called into question. The Marikana massacre has awoken the world to a state of civil unrest in South Africa, with recent events marking the highest peak of protests since the end of apartheid eighteen years ago.

On August 16, workers from a platinum mine in Marikana, owned by London-listed mining company Lonmin, were on strike over wage and labour conditions. An armed police unit arrived and opened fire on the striking workers, killing 34 and injuring around 80 more.

Last night five experts on South Africa gathered at the Frontline Club in London to discuss the Marikana massacre and its repercussions. Was this a flashpoint moment that could spark a revolution or just another tragedy amid a sea of bubbling discontent?

Contagion

The Lonmin workers have now resolved their strike, after the company agreed to a pay increase. However the protest and its violent put-down ignited a wave of similar strikes across the South African extractive industries.

Just yesterday police shot at striking workers with rubber bullets at the Bokoni platinum mine. Meanwhile gold producer AngloGold Ashanti suspended its operations in the country when two-thirds of its workforce went on strike last month.

According to reports in the Financial Times Anglo American Platinum fired 12,000 illegally striking miners last month and gold producers Gold Fields are threatening the same to thousands of their striking employees.

In some cases, the reasons for the unrest are clear. Workers in the mining sectors are faced with appalling conditions and low wages. Many companies are turning to contract labour, allowing them to side-step the rights afforded to permanent employees. Add to this the fact that many miners have no choice but to stay in the companies’ single-sex hostels where, according to South African journalist Terry Bell, ‘workers are stacked in bunks like so many artifacts in a museum.’

Many put up with the conditions out of desperation; unemployment in the country is around 40%

State repression

However, the horror of the Marikana massacre came not just from the conditions faced by labourers, but by the violent way the protests were put down, leading many to question how the police came to react the way they did.

The police unit sent to disperse the Marikana crowds was a specialist squad trained to tackle armed heist gangs. It was sent into Marikana armed with live ammunition.

Jonny Steinberg, a lecturer in African studies at Oxford University, explained to the Frontline Club audience that the level of repression shown by the police could be a sign of President Jacob Zuma stamping his authority over an increasingly fractured country and government. In December Zuma will face a fight for re-election as leader of the African National Congress party (ANC).

‘This paramilitary outfit arrived and turned on protesters. That was a policy decision that happened because Zuma allowed it and wanted it to happen,’ Steinberg said.

The country’s police commissioner backed his force, announcing to the press that the police had nothing to apologise for.

State of the unions

But the politics of this struggle go beyond party political lines: companies and trade unions are locked in an incestuous relationship of their own.

The extractive industry has never been the cuddliest of employers, and it often rests on the trade unions to protect the rights of South Africa’s mining community. Unfortunately the lines between unions and companies have become blurred.

Take for example Cyril Ramaphosa, the trade unionist responsible for building up the National Union of Miners (NUM). Since leaving his role at the union the well-known South African figure has become a lot closer to the industry he used to attempt to regulate. Ramaphosa’s company the Shanduka Group holds 9% of shares in Lonmin, the London-registered platinum miner at the centre of the Marikana protests. The former trade-union leader now sits on the mining company’s board.

James Motlatsi is another case in point. He too was a president of NUM before joining the board of AngloGold Ashanti. He now is chairman of the board of platinum miners Platfields.

The union’s reaction to Marikana has incensed some. Audrey Brown, a producer on BBC Focus on Africa told the audience at the Frontline Club that the NUM’s head excused the police brutality as sending out a strong message ‘that they will not let the country descend into chaos’. Brown added: ‘That was an announcement I heard with speechless horror.’

The problems go beyond an overlap between industry and unions. Structural hierarchies of unions can lead to the sector undermining itself. Despite the different range of skilled labour needed in the extractive process only one union is permitted at the bargaining table: NUM.

Disillusionment is clear. In an apparent move away from the formal unions, miners are now reportedly forming ad hoc workers’ representative groups.

Long term effects

The repercussions of strikes in the extractive industries could have consequences long after the workers return to work.

‘A lot of companies are putting their plans for further investment [in South Africa] on hold,’ said Natznet Tesfay, head of Africa forecasting at Exclusive Analysis.

Ratings agencies Moody’s and Standard and Poor have both downgraded South Africa’s rating since the shootings.

Meanwhile, Steinberg predicted the shootings would shake up voting patterns in the country. Traditionally poor, black citizens have voted en masse. Steinberg predicts the events of Marikana will change that, disenfranchising those voters further. Instead, he argued, the middle classes, who have previously been less inclined to vote, may take up the fight and register their horror at the strike-repression through the ballot box.

A nation at war with itself

In his book Who Rules South Africa, Paul Holden predicts that two million South Africans are involved in some sort of low level protest each year. Indeed, 2012 has brought with it the highest number of protests per month since apartheid.

While the bloody violence of Marikana alerted the world to the miners’ protests, nearly every day there is another skirmish, as the people of South Africa voice their discontent. Unfortunately, sometimes it takes the death of dozens for their voices to be heard.

Watch the Frontline Club debate here.

Sign up for email alerts from the Bureau here.

Share Button

, ,

4 Responses to South African massacre was the tip of an iceberg

  1. who_me October 20, 2012 at 1:46 am #

    one should realise that fascists don’t surrender power. a peaceful transition from fascism to normality can not occur. whenever such is stated, and becomes the majority line, it is certain that there was no exchange of fascist power for that of decency, but instead, a switcharoo of the frontbois representing fascist power.

    there is only one way to remove fascists from power. scare the turds enough they run away to some other fascist hellhole. or kill them.

  2. Warren Metzler October 20, 2012 at 6:05 pm #

    Here again we have a major misinterpretation of a world event, because the author is obviously coming from a leftist view of life. I agree the Marikana strike deaths were abhorrent. But that the miners then used those deaths to form a cooperative, and then on their own obtained an agreement with the mine owners, which was superior to any agreement obtained by any union in recent history, is an inspiring sign that the regular electorate of South Africa are waking up to the embracement of personal freedom and personal responsibility in choosing and achieving one’s personal destiny. Which is a mindset necessary for a whole society to develop an authentic free enterprise, secular, democracy. Nowhere in history has any population made strides toward more optimal living without lots deaths and destruction. I point you to the American Civil War. It is the essence of the saying “phoenix rising from the ashes”.

    I predict this strike will latter in history be seen as the birth of a major new increase in South African citizen freedom.

    • Ariadna Theokopoulos October 21, 2012 at 5:19 am #

      “a leftist view of life.”

      Explain life seen from the left, please.

      “the regular electorate of South Africa are waking up to the embracement of personal freedom and personal responsibility in choosing and achieving one’s personal destiny. Which is a mindset necessary for a whole society to develop an authentic free enterprise, secular, democracy.”

      Is that how it works in Israel, for example?

    • Roy Bard October 21, 2012 at 12:16 pm #

      The Marikana settlement may come to be seen as the beginning of the shrugging off of sold-our bureacrats – however South Africa has had a thriving informal economy for decades – clearly there can be no so-called free market when the wealth and resources are concentrated in the hands of a few individuals and a bunch of multinationals.

      Is it ‘rightist thinking’ to pretend that there is wealth hidden under trees, and that hard working South Africans are too lazy to get off their arses and pick it up?

Leave a Reply