http://www.voltairenet.org/Syria-A-Russian-messenger-missile

Syria: A Russian messenger missile

http://english.ruvr.ru/2012_06_18/78477111/

Russian Navy squadron to sail to Syrian port

“Pentagon finalizes “Contingency Plans” for Syria Invasion”

i’m guessing the only thing holding the zionazis back from letting loose their american quisling is the coming american election. i’m doubtful most americans can be fooled into another war without a substantial false flag cover to hype up their stupidity again. failing such a false flag op, open war against syria would probably make it difficult for the jewish zionists/capitalist fascists to falsefy yet another election in the usa.

but maybe not, the depths of american gullibility and stupidity are infinite.

Yeah Media Lens are quite interesting in showing how coy the media are being when it comes to acknowledging that Houla wasn’t nearly as clear as they initially said it was.

SYRIA: Killing Innocent Civilians as part of a US Covert Op. Mobilizing Public Support for a R2P War against Syria.

“Humanitarian War Criminals” in High Office: Was the Houla Massacre Ordered by the Western Military Alliance?

Some funny business about the the massacre that happened last Friday near Homs too (not sure about the town’s name just now) which now appears rather suspicious. A UN mission got there eventually (not before coming under fire and delayed by sources unknown) but found no bodies. These were supposedly loaded on trucks and driven away. That speaks again of a well prepared and co-ordinated action, and we must again ask – Cui bene?

What is also interesting is that the noise level about bombing Iran has died down considerably even as the noise and chatter about Syria has increased. Chances are the two are connected: a decision must have been made to try and topple, or at least weaken, Syria first, then go after Iran next. The advantage of first going after Syria is that this will help sever a route for arming Hezbollah and may weaken Lebanon as well.

The other obvious aspect is the near-scrupulous absence of saber rattling from Israel with regard to Syria. Yes, they bring attention to Assad’s ‘atrociities” but avoid saying much of anything about the so-called “rebels’ (now also known as “activists”). The claim is always made – seemingly in complete coordination across the board – that israel has reservations about who might follow Assad, cf. the devil you know, etc. Truth is, Israel has not the slightest worry about who may or may not follow Assad, as long as the latter is gone. Chaos in Syria is as good as any. They must be pretty sure they can handle any potential threat from islamist (salafist) terrorists. Which can only mean that they have assurances from the salafist “handlers” (Saudi Arabia, probably) that they are able to “control” whatever radicals they unleash. What I am saying is that I see Israel’s finger-prints all over the Syria campaign and even more so, I see evidence of trying to hide those finger-prints with mambo-jumbo and some hiding behind the UN skirts. Israel must have been also assured that the UN is “under control” and, most importantly, they must have reached some understanding with Saudi Arabia – somewhere under the surface, probably mediated by the US.

Finally, and most significantly, it is amazing how well coordinated the MSM is after every incident in Syria. It’s like someone(s) have their talking points and press releases all ready to hand out within minutes of anything reported. That’s how it was in the case of Houla. The Guardia, for example wasted no time in reporting the claim from “activists” and the BBC was all too quick to upload that photo (again supplied by an “activist”) of body bags that the sharp-eyed original photographer immediately identified as his photo from Iraq, circa 2003. This indicates to me at least, that BBC (like all other MCM outlets) had their press releases handy and were all too glad to attach a photo to it, with no verification.

Luckily for us all, so far, Russia and China are steadfast. And for good reason too – they know perfectly well – at least as well as we all do – what this is all about. They also realize that a neocon “success” in Syria means they are next.”

Russian naval ships may set out for Syria

Predictably, the crypto-Zionists made much of that quote from Maariv ‘showing’ Israel is white supremacist: http://tinyurl.com/bn55g99

Which doesn’t mean you’re wrong, of course… . Why you’re wrong, is that the Western countries have changed immensely since WWII. ‘The America axis’ – what’s that? In 1918, the British Empire was openly, unashamedly racist. The last relic of this was dismantled in 1994 in SA. I doubt if there have ever been societies less racist than modern Britain and the USA. We flagellate ourselves with anti-racist guilt daily. The only racism allowed is Jewish racism. This is NOT white supremacy.

The reason I ‘struggle to see that the adventures in Iraq and Afghanistan were aimed at regaining control’ is that it’s too vague. Why change from backing Saddam Hussein to overthrowing him? What’s the point in ‘controlling’ Afghanistan rather than simply negotiating with the Taliban, as the Pakistani elite sensibly did? Are there plans to ‘regain control’ over other countries, like India, Zimbabwe and Palestine? Why not?

What changed? 9/11. And Jewish supremacists took advantage of it. I struggle to see how you can adapt traditional leftism to oppose it.