http://www.abc.net.au/unleashed/4017816.html

However I do agree that Paul primary contribution has been educating the public about the Federal Reserve.

“and then the pseudo’s entered with their “Anybody but Bush” mantra torpedoing the once in a lifetime opportunity.”

they needed a new slogan, and that’s what they came up with. i used to listen to pacifica back during the 80′s and 90′s and they would use similar tactics to push democrats. between elections, they would cover independents, but near election time, they would stop that, and put the majority of their coverage on the democrats and republicans. the mantra then was the independent has no hope of winning, so people must vote the lesser of two evils. at the time, i didn’t know what had happened at pacifica during the 80′s, but they had been taken over by zionists and corporate allied stooges. it was done slowly, and behind the scenes. a character named david salniker was the tool used to bring pacifica under the ziofascist umbrella.

what was done to nader by the zionist “left” is now being done to paul by the zionist right. an interesting commentary by raimondo on this recently:

http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2012/05/17/what-does-ron-paul-want/

Exactly! That pretty much sums up my experience with the pseudo-Left during the 2004 Nader campaign/Green Party experience. The Greens had the best chance of becoming a viable 3rd party challenge to the Democrats and then the pseudo’s entered with their “Anybody but Bush” mantra torpedoing the once in a lifetime opportunity. Their actions left the Greens damaged, weak, disrupted and ineffective. Apparently from my reading they’ve done the same to the Palestine Solidarity Movement as well.

then the cryptos saunter over to the nearest jewish zionist owned bank and cash their checks.

This is why none of the Left-wing journals that I once frequently read ever mentioned anything about fractional reserve banking nor every spoke about usury. I noticed that Paul Krugman was interviewed on Democracy Now this week promoting his new book conflating deficits with “spending” and advocating the government borrow more money to stimulate the economy. What he fails mention what government borrowing is essentially workers paying rich jewish financiers to lend the government money at interest for exploitative jobs. What a racket!

which deserves as wide a viewership as possible:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hSwMgLUkOt0

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tclPNuurEjk&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WfnoevvP7nk&feature=relmfu

attack on Greg Felton in the Q & A portion
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ueYwAHBztnE&feature=relmfu

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fciGuTYMXyc&feature=relmfu

“The Right’s embraces social competition that leads to all sorts of contradictions and dysfunction. This is what eventually breaks down societies. The role of the pseudo-Left is to do its best to conceal and deflect away this kind of analysis.”

yup, the pseudo left is like this lot:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o_12E1EN6fs

when things look down, they charge in to the rescue, but one ends up more powerless and despondent than before they appeared. unfortunately, they are not the ones who top themselves. they stand by with sympathetic looks while those who looked up to them take their advice and top themselves. then the cryptos saunter over to the nearest jewish zionist owned bank and cash their checks.

I believe that the Left needs to be critique especially the pseudo-Left and the phonies who co-opt those tenants in order to serve their own nefarious agendas. But the critique, IMO should properly and accurately communicate the true tenants of the Left and not misreport them.

What expose the Right, as you point out, are their contradictions. The Right’s embraces social competition that leads to all sorts of contradictions and dysfunction. This is what eventually breaks down societies. The role of the pseudo-Left is to do its best to conceal and deflect away this kind of analysis.