Noam Chomsky / US Version of BHL
by Daniel Mabsout
Saturday, September 22nd, 2012
Long time no see , no hear , this does not mean that eminent professor Chomsky was idle, there he goes lecturing people and students about the situation. This time, the dull professor -whose dullness is meant to mislead and misinform – reveals again his true affiliations and devotion, except that now he sounds more like a revolutionary rather than a US patriot or a Zionist Jew .
Certainly his beard has grown and Mr. Chomsky of the multi folded agenda and multiple tendencies- ranging from moderate left to Zionism- is now expounding his views about Syria., We had to wait long before our erudite expert grant us the pleasure of hearing his last statements , but it was worth while waiting because what we heard taught us more about the eminent professor than about Syria .
You have to admit that the eminent professor has been a riddle for a long time. A Zionist unusual figure armed with knowledge , objectivity and notoriety rather than nuclear weapons and bully . A mild Jew who would go to the length of denying the holocaust if this had for effect to increase his fans among Arabs and Muslims and cause him to win the hearts of some lost Palestinians .
The Zionist professor who- according to his soul mate- Finkelstein -of the staged lectures with cries and tears- became a Zionist as early as he learned how to put on his trousers , is now standing with the Syrian revolution against the so called dictatorship of president Assad .
Mind you, the smart sneaky professor – as appears in his statement – does not want- in any way- to be associated with the NATO group who is triggering the Syrian events and backing the so called opposition on the ground , because, such an association, would not look good on the record of the free thinker and mild leftist he pretends to be.
For this reason, we see the eminent professor casting himself aside and presenting himself as a supporter of the so called Syrian revolution declaring that this is in antagonism with the US administration who is backing –according to him – the Syrian dictatorship .
Really ! We are here in the presence of real erudition in the form of political Zionist manipulations that we are supposed to believe, and political maneuvers in which we are to partake . Of course the US administration could not be revolutionary ; therefore-if revolution there is- then US administration is on the side of dictator, and if revolution is true and it is so – according to Chomsky – then Chomsky is on the revolutionary side against the US . This is neither erudition nor free thought , nor moderate left , this is utter Zionism dressed in something else; this is the kind of reasoning Chomsky must have learned and taught at the linguistic department of the MIT.
There is logic in the reasoning except that the first premise is false , if there were revolution then all the reasoning would have been correct, and Chomsky could have kept his good place and the US administration would have to back the dictator. But there is no revolution in Syria, and the US is interfering by way of armed hired thugs paid by gulf countries and trained by the CIA in Turkey in order to operate a regime change . This makes this reasoning a well formulated trick and turns Chomsky into a US version of Bernard Henry levy.
Posted by Daniel Mabsout
on September 22, 2012. Filed under Dissidence,False Flag,Politics.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0.
You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
6 Responses to Noam Chomsky / US Version of BHL
You must be logged in to post a comment Login
who_me
September 22, 2012 at 8:13 pm
chomsky supported the zionazi attack on libya, as well. some pacifist, eh?
another example of jewish people working to destroy opposition to the jp/corporate fascist alliance. what makes chomsky, and his allied fake leftists, so repugnant is their dishonesty. they know full well the extent the death and destruction that their masters are bringing this world, and they promote it all the same. they put every effort to conceal these crimes in order to promote them among decent people.
they are no different than charles manson inside.
pgg804
September 22, 2012 at 11:30 pm
My beliefs are in complete agreement with the article. I think the idea that the US government is supporting Syria is ridiculous. The way I see it, the terrorists that are attacking Syrians and their government are state sponsored terrorists; the USA is a state sponsor of terrorists. That does not mean that Assad doesn’t have blood on his hands, but he certainly can’t have more blood on his hands than Bush II.
I don’t know how many Arabs admire Chomsky for what he said about the holocaust, but if Chomsky “denied” the holocaust he has at least one German as a fan. I’ll admit I know very little about him, but I do like some of the things he has said.
pgg804
September 22, 2012 at 11:32 pm
He looks Amish in this photo.
fool me once...
September 23, 2012 at 12:04 am
Hi Daniel, when you say;
“Finkelstein -of the staged lectures with cries and tears” does that mean he was in on some faking of dissent/emotional contrivances from the audience during his lectures, possibly to raise his profile?
Is this new information? Will you expand? cheers
Daniel Mabsout
September 23, 2012 at 8:13 am
This has been repeated more than once in his lectures that is why many people said that this was staged in order to produce the desirable effect when you have standing and screaming in the middle of a university lecture and having Finkelstein putting them right back to their place saying that we will not allow people opposing what he saying iand bringing in the subject of the holocaust.
The way this has been set is to show that Zionists could be scolded and even silenced about the holocaust and apt to sit and listen about the holocaust and even convinced of what could be said about this holocaust. After that they would have to listen to the Palestinian testimony regarding the Palestinian plight as Goldstone listened to the testimony of Palestinians in Gaza which brought tears to his eyes . We thought then that- even as a Zionist- Goldstone could behave as a hguman being regarding this matter embracing the Palestinian view point .We were wrong.
pgg804
September 23, 2012 at 2:17 am
I used to correspond with Finkelstein and I believe he is genuine; I believe he says what he believes. He is also open to people with differing points of view, with one exception. He believes the holocaust story as it is told and he is not interested in debating that.
In my opinion Finkelstein started speaking out for Palestinian rights long before it was popular in the west. He also wrote some books critical of the Jewish lobbies and I believe he is the man most responsible for exposing the “holocaust Industry”; how Jews have used the Holocaust for monetary profit and to enhance Israel’s power and make it immune from any criticism. He might be doing better now, but a few years ago he was released from his teaching position at De Paul University and denied tenure despite being one of the most popular professors at the university and one of the few that had published some widely read books (widely read outside the USA; mostly ignored within the USA). For a while he was living alone in a small apartment in Brooklyn with little or no income. I was one of the many people that wrote to the head of the university protesting his denial of tenure and then release from his teaching position. He is probably doing better now.
The statement “Finkelstein -of the staged lectures with cries and tears” is a good description of at least one of his speeches. In one speech he said he doesn’t want today’s Jews to profit off the suffering of Jews in the 1940′s and then he says he lost his whole family in the “Holocaust” except for his parents who both survived concentration camps. He got emotional and it may have been put on, but I can forgive him if it was. He has been exposed to the same every day propaganda as everyone else, so he believes most of what is said.
As I said, I used to correspond with him, but the last time I heard from him was before I defended the historian David Irving against someone who had criticized Irving in a letter to Finkelstein. So, he’s a 100% believer in he holocaust.