Titus Livius
The state is suffering from two opposite vices, avarice and luxury; two plagues which...have been the ruin of every empire
Chinese Proverb
Enjoy yourself. It's later than you think.
Labbayka Ya Rasoul Allah لبيك يا رسول الله
by Daniel Mabsout
Monday, September 17th, 2012
It is not just Muslims who were offended. Islam and the Prophet of Islam belong to humanity . The whole humanity has been offended and Man has been offended and attempted at and the culture and religion and dignity of Man have also been offended and attempted at .
This is an offense to all; therefore all are required to take position and to defend the religion and the dignity and cultural and spiritual identity of Man that all religions came in order to promote . This is not just about Islam, it is about the culture of Man and the ethics of Man and everything that relates to Man and no one has the right to desecrate or defile this culture and this religion or to distort in any way the purport of these messages .
For this reason, and in order to respond to this attempt at offending Man , it is necessary that the protests are not restricted to Muslims because they are not the only ones targeted ; members of other religions should share in the protests and take a stand refusing that a community or any community be targeted and offended or any religion slandered and exposed as such.
This protest- on behalf of the majority – will curb the fanatic reaction desired by the ones who designed originally this scheme, and will turn down their plans of igniting religious hatred and conflict between religions . The guilty party should be identified and those standing behind them should be exposed as well and should be held responsible for any repercussions on the social level.
It is not possible and not admissible that these kinds of productions coexist with what they call protection of human rights . Where are the human rights here and where is the dignity of man ? This should not be repeated because this , not only exposes sacred places and religions but also is being used as a tool to interfere in social, cultural and religious coexistence threatening world peace and poisoning the lives of several communities who could- other wise- live peacefully and is finally nothing but a preparation for aggression and genocide and we have seen that through history .
For this reason Sayyed Hassan Nasrullah has called for a demonstration tomorrow against the offense made to Muslims, and has asked the International Community to issue a law that prohibits such slanders like it prohibits any behavior that is anti-Semitic.
To normalize with such slander is not acceptable- according to Sayyed- and to react in the predicted way by furthering social differences is also not acceptable . The author of such slanders should be identified to prevent the protests from being directed against other religions . The International community should assume their responsibilities and also Arab and Muslim rulers . Great pressures should be exerted on those so that they enforce laws and take all the necessary precautions .
Posted by Daniel Mabsout
on September 17, 2012. Filed under America,Human Rights,Religion.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0.
You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
36 Responses to Labbayka Ya Rasoul Allah لبيك يا رسول الله
You must be logged in to post a comment Login
Rehmat
September 17, 2012 at 4:56 pm
I agree with Sheikh Nasrallah. There is nothing wrong to be ‘radical Muslim’.
“The global war on terror cannot be won through counterterrorism alone…The immediate war goal must be to destroy militant Islam and the ultimate war goal the modernization of Islam,” – Dr. Daniel Pipes, the famous anti-Islam Jewish expert on Islam, writing in The Jerusalem Post, April 6, 2004.
http://rehmat1.com/2009/04/02/nothing-wrong-being-a-radical-muslim/
Ariadna Theokopoulos
September 17, 2012 at 7:14 pm
Suggested experiment for American academics:
Publish a statement saying:
“The global war on terror cannot be won through counterterrorism alone…The immediate war goal must be to destroy zionism and the ultimate war goal the modernization of judaism.”
Just for fun, to see what happens.
pgg804
September 17, 2012 at 9:37 pm
I think Ariadna’s sentence makes more sense than Pipes’. When Pipes and the Jewish establishment stops inciting war against Muslims and stops spreading hatred against them in the media they own, then there will be peace. But that won’t happen, because Pipes and the Jewish establishment is Zionist, which means their loyalty is to a foreign country – Israel. They only live in the western countries to steer the industry and economic power of these countries to the benefit of Israel and Jews worldwide. When western countries stop attacking the likes of Iraq and Syria for the benefit of Israel, there will be peace. Until then, westerners will die and rightfully so, for bringing war against Muslims. The west’s crocodile tears at the deaths of Libyans or Syrians during internal struggles in these countries flies in the face of the west’s constant attack on these countries and their civilians. It is surprising the Muslims have not done more to target Jews worldwide.
Just as they have been inciting war and hatred against Arabs for over forty years, before that they incited war against Germans during the 1930′s and 1940′s. The documentary proof is available showing Jews paid Churchill huge sums of money so that he would attack Germany, whose leader was continuously proclaiming he desired not only peace, but an alliance with Britain. At the same time they used their influence to pull the USA into the war for a second time, as I have repeatedly shown by posting the Zionist Weizmann’s letters to Churchill saying the Jews would bring the USA into the war on Britain’s side in return for support for an Israeli army. This is why Jews died in the so called holocaust during WW II. The Jews pushed and paid Briton’s and Americans to drop bombs on Germans and to burn them alive in their cities and ten million Germans died during the war. Millions murdered in their cities and millions of German women were gang raped. The Jews had reaped what they had sewn and Germans began attacking Jews for burning 125,000 thousand Germans alive in Dresden and similar bombings against cities all across Germany.
Hitler makes a speech telling the Jews to stop, or they will pay with their lives:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rn0NQWf3AuU
Here is Benjamin Freedman making a speech in 1961 on how the Zionists brought the USA into WW I on the side of Great Britain, France and Russia against Germany (make sure the speech starts at the beginning).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HhFRGDyX48c
This is the entire two hour speech, including Freedman’s discussion of newly elected John F Kennedy visited the Zionists in New York and promising American military support for any war the Zionists have with the Arabs.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=puECgVo-GqE
pgg804
September 17, 2012 at 11:34 pm
For anyone interested, I will post Freedman’s speech in written form from Paul Eisen’s blog.
http://pauleisen.blogspot.com/2012/09/a-jewish-defector-warns-america.html
Jonathon Blakeley
September 17, 2012 at 9:47 pm
@ Ariadna
A Brilliant. Positive answer. xxx
David Holden
September 18, 2012 at 7:07 pm
nice one AT
Jonathon Blakeley
September 17, 2012 at 7:19 pm
Totally true, that video which I watched for “research purposes” is vile and disgusting purely designed to ignite anger. Youtube (Google) after 6,117,860 views have finaly taken it down.
Insanity …says everything you need to know about ethics at Youtube.
I agree Rehmat, frankly everyone should be more radical, if you are not then you have not been paying attention.
Jonathon Blakeley
September 17, 2012 at 7:34 pm
Correction it is still up on Youtube. Just the orignal has been removed another has replaced it.
Jonathon Blakeley
September 17, 2012 at 8:07 pm
Jonathon Blakeley
September 17, 2012 at 8:36 pm
Fuck me check this shit out…
who_me
September 17, 2012 at 10:18 pm
that bigotted piece of jewish hasbara is a good example of why jewish people should be removed from the world’s media. that piece shows toxic effect their almost ubiquitous bigotry towards muslims and other peoples has on the content of media. rt has been a jewish club since it’s start and this really shows when the slip in bigoted shit like this.
Somoe
September 18, 2012 at 12:35 am
I’m in complete agreement. total hasbara tosh.
Barb Weir
September 17, 2012 at 11:33 pm
Laws against this sort of thing are like laws against shit. You can bury it, treat it in waste treatment plants, ask folks to pick up after their dogs, etc., but it’s still going to happen. Better to avoid stepping in it, but otherwise pay no attention.
Of course it has to be cleaned up, except in wilderness areas, and sometimes we have to pressure our neighbors like YouTube and FaceBook to keep their premises clean. But other than that, let’s not give it too much importance.
pgg804
September 18, 2012 at 12:54 am
I’m glad RT is reporting on the revulsion Muslims feel towards Americans, but what has been covered up is who made the film. When asked, an Israeli Jew named Sam Bacile proudly stated he made the film, but the Jews went ballistic. Jeffrey Goldberg (who served in the Israeli armed forces) flew out to LA immediately to tell Sam Bacile he was not Jewish and that from now on he will be a “militant Christian activist”. That explains why the Jews in the Financial Times wrote in yesterday’s edition that the maker of the film was a “Coptic Christian”. So, the Jews inflame hatred against the USA and then say the Christians did it and this is what the Jewish media will tell the world. This is how they work.
The media claims one of the people involved in the film is a bank fraudster. If that’s not a suggestion of Jewish involvement, I don’t know what is. Next they’ll be accusing Islamic bankers (which prohibits interest) of usury and fraud.
http://www.businessinsider.com/sam-bacile-identity-doubted-2012-9
Somoe
September 18, 2012 at 12:55 am
This is an excellent article Daniel. You make several excellent points. It is quite obviously a deliberate attempt to elicit a reaction from muslims. But as you say you do not have to be a muslim find it offensive. It is important that it is seen to be protested by all faiths, and indeed all people who find such intolerable provocation unacceptable.
Whilst what Barb says is true, about avoiding such shit and paying it no further attention, it should be really astounding that Syrian girl along with The artist Taxi driver get censored on YT, whilst the film that is causing all this offense is still up there getting millions of views, offending ever more people. Stinks like a rotting carcass on a hot summers day – like this is precisely the intention, to stir up a great big hornets nest – Its clear to me that YouTube is enabling this event, designed to ratchet up tensions across the world in the hopes that islamic leaders would declare war on Israel and america, giving Israel the excuse they’ve been seeking for attacking their neighbours, claiming the arabs were the aggressors. It is vital for us all to stand with one another, regardless of faith, in recognition that such deliberately provocative, blasphemous material must necessarily be met with a united resistance by all who care about co-existing peacefully. You make this point very well.
Excellent advice Ariadna, it would be really quite interesting to see how such a statement would be received, eh?
This was done with the intention of causing muslims everywhere to feel outrage and alienated from non-muslims. Is this what Netanyahu has been planning for then? It seems to fit with his timetable for war.
Why haven’t the various governments who have expressed their disgust at the film put pressure on YT to take it down? it begs the question.
Ariadna Theokopoulos
September 18, 2012 at 2:21 am
“It is vital for us all to stand with one another, regardless of faith, in recognition that such deliberately provocative, blasphemous material must necessarily be met with a united resistance by all who care about co-existing peacefully.”
True and well said.
I would remind those who pretend they are defending “free speech” in that revolting piece of garbage how ‘righteously indignant” they all were when the butcher Sharon was depicted in a cartoon as Saturn eating his children.
“Blood libel!” they wailed and foamed at the mouth. Yet that cartoon was a true manifestation of free speech: political speech, indicting a war criminal, not some intentionally provocative religious insult.
Daniel Mabsout
September 18, 2012 at 3:46 pm
There is a question that begs for an answer . Was this the work of amateurs ? or is it part of an all out attack on the whole Muslim world ? This attack has chosen the internet as a means to reach most people especially that the use of the internet after the Arab spring became wide spread which may have been one of the goals of the spring revolutions. This had for purpose a further interference in Arab societies and prepare them for a further colonization .
What holds these people together is Islam and there is an attempt at targeting this cohesive force that is Islam , because this is rooted in Muslims and this is a very effective weapon that they have got . For this reason what was required was to target this strong cohesive force that places Muslims on the map and made possible the victory over Israel and to create a schizm between Islam and other religions with a view to isolate Muslims .
This is not the first time in history that a group of people was targeted demonized , isolated and genocided , this had happened to the native indigenous in the north continent .
Ariadna Theokopoulos
September 18, 2012 at 6:05 pm
“There is a question that begs for an answer . Was this the work of amateurs ? or is it part of an all out attack on the whole Muslim world ?”
It depends what you mean by amateurs. As “film makers” they are amateurs, like those producing videos with recently converted ‘muslims’ turned jihadists. Spielberg would have given higher production values. If that’s what you meant by amateurs then the answer is Yes and Yes.
Daniel Mabsout
September 18, 2012 at 6:39 pm
yes, what i meant is it the work of amateur haters or is it a part of an all out attack
who_me
September 18, 2012 at 6:44 pm
“is it the work of amateur haters or is it a part of an all out attack”
both. the amateurs are being manipulated and used by the professionals to make it look amateur.
who_me
September 18, 2012 at 6:42 pm
the bigoted rt video report that jb posted earlier is similar to the bigoted crap the jewish people at newsweek are spreading about muslim people:
http://thinkprogress.org/security/2012/09/17/857611/newsweek-muslim-rage-islamophobic/?mobile=nc
Newsweek Publishes Islamophobic ‘Muslim Rage’ Cover In Response To Embassy Attacks
so somebody came up with their own article on “muslim rage”
http://gawker.com/5943828/13-powerful-images-of-muslim-rage
13 Powerful Images of Muslim Rage
but what if newsweek had posted a cover like this:
http://www.moonofalabama.org/2012/09/jewish-rage.html
what would the jewish people running the rest of the western media think of that?
Daniel Mabsout
September 18, 2012 at 9:23 pm
@who_me
It is worthwhile mentioning this insistence on behalf of the criminal thugs of the Syrian opposition, this insistence on having the slaughters and massacres filmed and then showed all over the internet even though Islam prohibits mutilations and massacres of victims.
who_me
September 19, 2012 at 10:07 pm
dm
agreed. the “muslims” backed and promoted by jp are about as muslim as the media jp runs is dispensing factual material. like everything else jp promotes to the goys, what it is portrayed as is completely different from what it is.
David Holden
September 18, 2012 at 9:29 pm
a fine article, Daniel, manifesting your usual deep commitment to truth and humane values.
nevertheless, imao, this artistically puerile and ethically vile film extract seems to be a gateway to a particularly murky area where one should tread carefully – for a variety of reasons. one is that we should be suspicious of knee-jerk censorship. though the comparison of you-tube’s treatment of truth-tellers chunkymark and syrian girl compared with the tolerance of the film-extract should be pursued.
likewise, ideologically-motivated rioting, whilst understandable, is not something admirable or useful.
but here is another, perhaps more subtle, reason to look more closely at the nature of the ‘anti-islamophobic’ movement:
http://host.madison.com/ct/news/opinion/column/article_79d6b21d-ef9e-52b6-9570-0a02235abe08.html#ixzz1UAClTqbH
of course there is the old quip:the truth makes strange bedfellows – i hope my virginal reluctance to get into bed with Abe Foxman is not interpreted as anti-semitic or pro-islamophobic.
Daniel Mabsout
September 18, 2012 at 10:22 pm
This is war launched between governments and countries and social groups and not between the people themselves therefore whatever the reaction of the people in terms of Islamophobia or prejudice , they are not the real authors of such attitude or reaction ; they have rather assumed the position of their governments and social groups and have interpreted it in the way they understood .these prejudices are caused by the unsolved conflicts and by the leadership of both camps.
that is why when we have good leadership , prejudice diminishes and the conflicts approach a solution
who_me
September 19, 2012 at 3:24 am
an apnews headline i just saw:
“Anti-Muslim film tests free speech resolve”
ie: the gay jew approach to jewish bigotry.
the problem isn’t muslim extremism, it’s jewish bigotry.
Jonathon Blakeley
September 19, 2012 at 7:17 am
Jewish Bigotry is the Elephant in the Room, Yet they can not see it at all. If Mulsims seem extreme I think it because Jewish Bigotry and racism has made them so.
Jonathon Blakeley
September 19, 2012 at 7:20 am
PLus it is also clear that having failed to ingite a War in the region via Syria, the ZioNazis are betting that HezBollah will attack beucase of the film and provide them with the excuse they need for all out war.
who_me
September 19, 2012 at 7:52 pm
more jewish bigotry:
http://news.yahoo.com/french-weekly-publishes-mohammad-cartoons-075449808.html
“It featured several caricatures of the Prophet showing him naked in what the publishers said was an attempt to poke fun at the furore over the film. One, entitled “Mohammad: a star is born”, depicted a bearded figure crouching over to display his buttocks and genitals.”
see also:
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/09/19/us-protests-france-reaction-idUSBRE88I0JS20120919
and
http://www.islamophobia-watch.com/islamophobia-watch/category/france
for a more complete picture of how jewish control of france is maintaining a bigoted atmosphere there against muslim people. this goes with the wars jp forced france to fight on behalf of its colonial israeli master.
Jonathon Blakeley
September 19, 2012 at 9:32 pm
who_me
September 19, 2012 at 9:55 pm
http://news.yahoo.com/ladies-firsters–why-the-new-sex-segregation-is-great-for-women.html
the author:
“Virginia Heffernan is the national correspondent for Yahoo! News, covering culture and politics from a digital perspective. She wrote extensively on Internet culture during her eight years as a staff writer for The New York Times, and she has also worked at Harper’s, the New Yorker and Slate.”
jp is working hard to destroy the progress made since the 19th century and return the world to the state of exploitation by power that existed then. only the power will be fully in jewish hands this time, with all other cultural groups subordinated to jewish dominance in every sphere.
to do this, jp needs to prevent people communicating and associating together. this separateness is accomplished by promoting antagonisms between groups, as the now well known way jewish people continually promote hate propaganda against muslims and their cultures, and also by encouraging people to separate from each other and erect barriers to their association together. this article is a jewish attack on society of the latter category.
the bulk of modern feminism, as promoted in western media and by western figures, is almost wholly the exclusionary jewish divide and conquer methodology applied to gender relations. in fact, when one sees something like this article promoting divisiveness, it’s almost guaranteed the origin of it is jp inspired, funded, or otherwise a part of their general campaign to divide the goyim and keep them from forming meaningful relationships among each other. this divisive strategy regarding genders also serves to prevent potential challenges to the informal, but very feudal all the same, jewish internal hierarchy. creating division among men and women makes even the most rudimentary opposition movement to jewish dominance scattered and ineffective and can be seen as the base to strategy the other divisive campaigns being run by jp stem from.
who_me
September 19, 2012 at 10:11 pm
“but very feudal all the same”
besides being feudal, this jewish social hierarchy is also quite fascist in the way conformity is maintained.
Ariadna Theokopoulos
September 21, 2012 at 4:28 pm
Spot on, who_me!
Here she touches on a couple of topics dear to jp:
“in the barracks women are living it up. Aung San Suu Kyi, the pro-democracy leader, now sits in parliament in Myanmar.* Women play golf at the Augusta National Golf Club. And, this week, we come to find out Jesus may have had a wife.**
____
* See Jonathon’s post on his useful Nobel Prize Laureate
** Millenary jewish obsession and hate campaign
who_me
September 21, 2012 at 6:11 pm
thanks, at.
i wonder how the gay pride movement would feel if evidence surfaced of a real moses who appears to have been gay…
Daniel Mabsout
September 21, 2012 at 3:44 pm
The sum total of all the physical bodies of humans is the physical body of the Sum Total. The sum total of all the vital forces of individuals is the vital force of the Sum Total. The sum total of all the individual minds is the mind of the Sum Total…The sum total of all the individual intellects is the intellect of the Sum Total .And the sum total of all individual human spirits is the spirit of the Sum Total.
Therefore we are not isolated and “free” individuals but we are sharers also in the cosmic Selfhood , because of that our individual freedom is only conditioned by Our Cosmic freedom . Our freedom is like the freedom of a cell in the physical body , you cannot separate its individual freedom from its Cosmic Will
Daniel Mabsout
September 21, 2012 at 3:45 pm
“Let each man raise
The Self by Soul, not trample down his Self,
Since Soul that is Self’s friend may grow Self’s foe.
Soul is Self’s friend when Self doth rule o’er Self,
But Self turns enemy if Soul’s own self
Hates Self as not itself.
The sovereign soul
Of him who lives self-governed and at peace
Is centred in itself, taking alike
Pleasure and pain; heat, cold; glory and shame.
He is the Yogi, he is Yukta, glad
With joy of light and truth; dwelling apart
Upon a peak, with senses subjugate
Whereto the clod, the rock, the glistering gold
Show all as one. By this sign is he known
Being of equal grace to comrades, friends,
Chance-comers, strangers, lovers, enemies,
Aliens and kinsmen; loving all alike,
Evil or good.” from Bhagavad Gita 6th chapter