Pages

angry2

Is the Angry Arab an Anti-Racist Racist?

We have noticed that As’ad Abu Khalil (AKA Angry Arab) is critical of our writer Gilad Atzmon, whom he labels as an anti Semite and a racist.

Angry Abu Khalil failed to substantiate his accusations against Atzmon. Needless to say we also have never found a single anti-semitic or racist argument or statement in Atzmon’s writings.”

In the last few days, to our great surprise, we became aware that Angry Abu Khalil is constantly engaged in racially driven theories and his terminology is openly racist. Khalil refers to and interprets people according to the colours of their skin. He is clearly obsessed with White Men and White Europeans . The Angry Abu Khalil web site is saturated with racist remarks and biologically determinist statements. For instance in his blog post  White Man and Paul Newman  Angry Abu Khalil writes “the White Man  is not a racial category–or it is not merely a racial category but also a political and epistemological category.” Not only Angry Arab agrees that ‘White Man’ is partially a racial category, he even goes as far as  linking skin colour with political stand  and epistemology. The meaning of it is clear. Angry Arab is a racist  and a biological determinist.   It is more than likely that when Abu Khalil accuses Atzmon for being a ‘racist’ he actually projects from within himself.

For some peculiar reason Angry Abu Khalil portrays himself as an anti-racist. The truth of the matter is more unfortunate. Like his Anti Zionist Zionists (AZZ) allies, Angry Arab is an Anti-Racist Racist (ARR). It is far from surprising that like his Marxist Jewish allies, Abu Khalil was critical of Mearsheimer’s and Walt’s study of the Israeli Lobby. ARR Abu Khalil is basically a racist Zionist collaborator. He is a Sabbath Goy.

The following is an open letter to Angry Abu Khalil by Palestinian activist Sami Ibrahem.

LETTER TO AN ANGRY ARAB

Dear As’ad Abu Khalil

The Angry Arab

I am writing this letter as a comment on your speech in Birmingham University February 2012.In your speech you refereed to the occupier power in Iraq,Afghanistan and Palestine as a white man i feel this is racist and offensive language against all white people. As you know yourself a lot of white people joined the struggle in south Africa against the Apartheid regime. Recently I’ve noticed you posted on your blog an attack on Mr Gilad Atzmon and I quote:

” People have been asking me about him a lot as of late: in the UK and the US. I make it very clear: this is somebody that we should reject from the pro-Palestinian advocacy movement. He is anti-Jewish and his offensive language against Jews and Judaism should be categorically rejected. I would put the name of Israel Shamir in the same category. Anti-Semites belong to the Zionist side, and not to our side. “ Posted by As’ad Abu Khalil 28.February 2012.

Surely you have no right to dictate to us on the pro- Palestinian advocacy movement especially after you failed to present any evidence for your alleged accusation. Secondly you started your quote ‘people have been asking me about him a lot’ and my question to you why people would ask you about Mr Atzmon ?

Dear Mr Abu Khalil can I remind you of a quote by the Nazi minister of Enlightenment Joseph Goebbels in regard to spreading lies and propaganda about other.

” There comes a time when you just have to shake your head in amazement”. Joseph Goebbels, the Minister of Enlightenment and Propaganda for Adolph Hitler, and acknowledged as one of the most brilliant propagandists in history was correct when he said…

“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.”

Today we see Goebbel’s doctrine repeated by The Angry Abu Khalil a man of no professional integrity.

Yours Sincerely

Sammi Ibrahem

Share Button

2 Responses to Is the Angry Arab an Anti-Racist Racist?

  1. who_me March 24, 2012 at 4:28 am #

    The “angry arab” is a typical zionist orifice. racist comes with the territory. they wouldn’t have ever considered giving him a soap box if he hadn’t internalised their prejudices and offered up the requisite ‘oles.

    on a less inflammatory note, “angry arab” picks up where “where’s raed” left off. they provide the lube…

    • who_me March 24, 2012 at 4:32 am #

      ..the lube to make the wars for israel less objectionable to the liberal conscience.

Leave a Reply