BanksyPalestineBarrier

How Tony Greenstein turned me into an anti-Semite

Tony_Greentein

Recently Tony Greenstein had this to say on his blog:

Unlike the Zionist movement we expel racists. The Zionist movement takes racists and fascists, people like Glenn Beck, to their bosom. That is the difference.

Elsewhere on the very same blog he outs me as an anti-Semite in large green type:

MeanSwine

In January I decided to ask him why I was being called an anti-Semite:

Tony

You’ve publicly declared me to be an anti-semite (http://azvsas.blogspot.com/2011/07/indymedia-uk-three-years-on.html) and yet I am absolutely clear that people of Jewish origin are not a mono-thought clique, and that there is no common position shared by all Jews on any issue whatsoever.

So, what it is that makes me a racist?

Answer came there thus:

FTP,

Yes I probably did declare you were an anti-Semite on the basis of an unqualified support for Gilad Atzmon who certainly generalises about Jews. The context if you will remember was the Hunters of Goliath, which blamed the victims of the holocaust for their own demise equating their ‘unpopularity’ with that of Israel today.

Do you still agree with those positions because that is anti-Semitic? Atzmon not only generalises about a Jewish ideology he subdivides Jews into 3 absurd categories and terms Jewish anti-Zionists (his main target).

Do you also find Israel Shamir an inspiring figure, because he was/is a full blooded anti-Semite and fascist.

Racism is much more than simply people sharing a common belief/ideology. Conspiracy theories are only one aspect of certain forms of and racism.

If you can be arsed the whole interaction can be read here but suffice to say, no evidence of any racist statement or action by me is produced.

A few days after that interaction, he complained to Indymedia that a lie about him had appeared on the newswire, and demanded that it be taken down.

I emailed back

So Mr. Greenstien

Why not remove your claim about me from your blog. The one thayt isn’t hidden (and therefore doesn’t google) but is openly displayed and does google?

ftp

And bingo!

If you accept that your defence of Atzmon three years ago was a mistake then of course I am happy to retract the accusation.

So, all I had to do to stop being an anti-Semite was to denounce Atzmon.

I am used to being smeared by Zionists, but Tony Greenstein insists he is an anti-Zionist. It seems to me that the charge of anti-Zionist Zionist (AZZ) levelled against him by Atzmon is strengthened by his remorseless and relentless campaigns of smearing against anyone who he disagrees with.

I’m pretty thick skinned, and I’m damned if I am going to denounce Atzmon in order to stop being attacked myself. I grew up with censorship, in a country which even saw fit to ban the kid’s book Black Beauty and I have no respect for people who tell me what I can read, or watch or listen to.

I have no interest in being part of any kangaroo court which is set up to stab people in the back. I, and many others, do not believe that Atzmon is a racist, and therefore I am not prepared to denounce him, disavow him, nor any of the other actions that are demanded by some sections of the pro-Palestinian ‘Solidarity’ movement.

But, I do wonder how many people have felt forced into silence to avoid harassment from characters like Greenstein and Gabriel Ash, who have made any kind of rational debate on the issues raised almost impossible.

Knowing Wright from Wrong

It would be great if those who are gleeful at the exclusion of Ann Wright from the Estelle would take a moment to write down what she is guilty of. It appears to be that she refused to denounce Greta Berlin of whom she wrote:

I have known Greta Berlin and have worked with Free Gaza for several years. In neither word or action have either Greta or members of the Free Gaza movement been anti-semitic. They challenge Israeli policies, but that is not anti-semitic.

If the reason is simply her refusal to denounce Greta Berlin, or to lie and say Greta is anti-semitic when Ann believes she is not, then there appears to be no justifiable reason at all for her exclusion.

According to the Zionist site Harry’s Place:

This movement is presently splitting: into the antisemites and those who oppose these specific instances of antisemitism.

In the time I have been around the pro-Palestinian solidarity movement, I have not encountered anybody who holds Jews en-masse responsible for what is happening in Palestine, and neither have I encountered any racism towards Jews.

It is time that there was an open and honest discussion about these allegations of anti-Semitism that are coming from within the movement. But for as long as characters like Tony Greenstein and Ash are abusing the term and smearing activists with whom they disagree, such a discussion is nigh on impossible.

And committed and effective activists will be driven out. Which is a development that Zionists might welcome with open arms, but one which true anti-racists who value liberty and justice should not!

Share Button
13 replies to this post
  1. Tony Greenstein seems to use tactics which i observed at close quarters in the Trotskyite left. although i know nothing about his background it would not surprise me to learn that in former days he was a member of the WRP or SWP.

    whatever is the case about that, such people are always enthusiastic denouncers of those with whom they disagree. and ‘credentials’ are everything, which goes hand in hand with the ‘guilt by association’ method of judging people, and the phenomenon of ‘witch-hunts’.

    one might attempt to delineate a psychopathology of ideological solipsism. genetic technology may one day empower such individuals, since they would ideally like to be at the head of a movement of people who are clones of themselves.
    this is cognitive dissonance gone mad.

    i love the diversity of human beings, and i can empathise with people even though i think their actions are wrong or even despicable in objective terms. one of the prices that must be paid for this universal sympathy is that i have to accept that people i like may have views i strongly disagree with, whilst, on the other hand, i must recognise there may be something of value in people whom for one reason or another i do not like (even people like Greenstein and Foxman).

    ‘hate the sin, but not the sinner’ is an old truism that has much value in assisting us to avoid the trap of narrow-minded bigotry.

    in fact the notion of chosen-ness, with the inevitable moral exceptionalism that brings in its train, is not confined to zionist tribalism. it can be observed in many political, religious and other sects (e.g. programmatic movements in the arts). one readily detectable symptom is that the members of any chosen group is that they love manifestos and lists of people who are proscribed, excommunicated or disavowed. in the worst case scenario the rejected are declared non-persons – there may even be fatwas against them and any who associate with them. the way Haredis spit at people in the street is to me contemptible but i am pleased that at least i am capable of making an imaginative attempt to understand their sordid inner lives, whereas they are quite incapable of understanding me. similarly the Wahabi/Salafi strain of Islam (in no way are these people really Muslim) shout and scream the most when they are denouncing sufism.

    in the case you have discussed in your post Greenstein is the Salafi, whereas you and Gilad are the sufis in this analogy.

    another symptom of many forms of sectarian bigotry is the urge to proselytiza. this does not apply so strongly to bigotry and chosen-ness based on ethnicity.

    when Jehovah’s witnesses call at my door, i am happy to chat with them – they are fellow human beings whose somewhat perverse commitment is of interest to the psychologist in me. but they cannot take the same interest in me – their only goal is to get me down to Kingdom Hall and swell their ranks.

    but sectarians do not wish to understand either themselves or those they choose to regard as their enemies.

    they may be very learned, but their hearts are dysfunctional. sufis call such people externalists which is very apt. Jesus levelled the same accusation against the Pharisees:
    Then spake Jesus to the multitude, and to his disciples saying,

    the scribes and the Pharisees sit in Moses’ seat:
    all therefore whatsoever they bid you observe, that observe and do; but do not ye after their works: for they say, and do not.
    For they bind heavy burdens and grievous to be borne, and lay them on men’s shoulders; but they themselves will not move them with one of their fingers.

    But all their works they do for to be seen of men: they make broad their phylacteries, and enlarge the borders of their garments,and love the uppermost rooms at feasts, and the chief seats in the synagogues,and greetings in the markets, and to be called of men, Rabbi, Rabbi.

    But be not ye called Rabbi: for one is your Master, even Christ; and all ye are brethren.
    And call no man your father upon the earth: for One is your Father, which is in heaven.
    Neither be ye called masters: for one is your Master, even Christ. But he that is greatest among you shall be your servant.

    And whosoever shall exalt himself shall be abased; and he that shall humble himself shall be exalted.

    But woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye shut up the kingdom of heaven against men: for ye neither go in yourselves, neither suffer ye them that are entering to go in.
    Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye devour widows’ houses, and for a pretense make long prayer: therefore ye shall receive the greater damnation.

    Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye compass sea and land to make one proselyte; and when he is made, ye make him twofold more the child of hell than yourselves.

    Woe unto you, ye blind guides, which say, Whosoever shall swear by the temple, it is nothing; but whosoever shall swear by the gold of the temple, he is a debtor!

    Ye fools and blind: for whether is greater, the gold, or the temple that sanctifieth the gold?
    And, Whosoever shall swear by the altar, it is nothing; but whosoever sweareth by the gift that is upon it, he is guilty.

    Ye fools and blind: which is greater, the gift, or the altar that sanctifieth the gift? Whoso therefore shall swear by the altar, sweareth by it, and by all things thereon. And whoso shall swear by the temple, sweareth by it, and by him that dwelleth therein. But he that shall swear by heaven, sweareth by the throne of God, and by him that sitteth thereon.

    Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye pay tithe of mint and anise and cummin, and have omitted the weightier matters of the law, judgment, mercy, and faith: these ought ye to have done, and not to leave the other undone.

    Ye blind guides, which strain at a gnat, and swallow a camel.

    Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye make clean the outside of the cup and of the platter, but within they are full of extortion and excess.

    Thou blind Pharisee, cleanse first that which is within the cup and platter, that the outside of them may be clean also.

    Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye are like unto whited sepulchres, Acts which indeed appear beautiful outward, but are within full of dead men’s bones, and of all uncleanness.Even so ye also outwardly appear righteous unto men, but within ye are full of hypocrisy and iniquity.

    Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! because ye build the tombs of the prophets, and garnish the sepulchres of the righteous,and say, If we had been in the days of our fathers, we would not have been partakers with them in the blood of the prophets.

    Wherefore ye be witnesses unto yourselves, that ye are the children of them which killed the prophets.
    Fill ye up then the measure of your fathers. Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell?

    we may not know who it was that said this, but we do know it comes from antiquity. how much validity has it lost with the passage of time and the rise of new technologies of exploitation, mendacity, destruction and the persecution of the innocent and defenceless?

  2. Well Roy, this is my take on your question:

    i know theese jewish marxists from within. i was one of them. my oldest and best friend, now a retierd professor, allways took my side in the fight within the jewish “peacegroup”. we split after we decided to write an article together to help the jews to find a way away. he insisted and wrote about the jewish entlightment and that it was possible to combine with a “jewish and democratic state”, while i came to the conclusion that the only thing is to give up the shit. and, he is a good guy and not stupid :) last time i met him over a dinner, we spoke about the “russian revolution*” moses hess and karl marx and more. we agreed on every singel fact, but he then told me, thats why he wants to remain a proud jew. we really were brothers.he has no chucpah, no “anti-Semitism”- smear and that shit … he is not the kind of feiler or greenie.

    sometimes i think that the maxist jews are more jews than the rest … they also are in fact the best fighters for the jewish group, because they are – in the same person – both tribal and humanistic, and thus get support from both left and right.

    remember, i was permitted to writh groundbraking articles in the two biggest dalys i sweden, because i was a jewish marxist, at least that is how i was seen upon…

  3. I wonder if this Gabriel Ash is the same archangel who called me an anti-Semite on the blog Jews Sans Frontieres, under an article about the protests against president Ahmadinejad at the Durban conference on racism in 2009.

    Gabriel claimed the people who disrupted Ahmadinejad’s speech were ‘white’, and that this is significant. He implied the disrupters were white racists. I asked: Isn’t it possible that they are Jewish, too? And isn’t it possible that this, too, is significant? – given that Ahmadinejad’s speech was anti-Israel. The comment was deleted. This was Gabriel’s response:

    I don’t know who deleted your comment, but I sure don’t have a problem with that and will continue to delete your white supremacist cant… I am sorry that it hurts so much, but you are white. Glad that you found a way to avoid taking responsibility for white domination by blaming “the Jews”.

    He does the opposite – like Greenstein, he avoids discussing Jewish supremacy by trying to amalgamate it into ‘white domination’. But the last ‘white domination’ state was abolished over 20 years ago. Jewish apartheid continues.

    • Yes I believe that is who it is. They are a component in the PC. tribal nexus EI.JSF.MW. He was involved with attacking an acquaintance of mine, while he had been updating his blog from Gaza, along with Max Ajl who swears he is not a Marxist. Can you guess what their beef was? JSF have a particular grievance against Gilad Atzmon as Im sure you know.

    • BTW this is a particularly vexing tactic. Benjamin Doherty of EI was posting smart ass tweets in reference to some of the people who are upset about the Greta Berlin thing along the lines of ” Standby for white males with grievances critiquing the movement or something along those lines Im paraphrasing. I inquired as to his race and gender knowing full well how absurd what he was saying is. But it is very, very common in a certain milieu. Of course he wouldn’t engage with me.

  4. You cannot discuss with “jewish marxists”. The concept is like the “jewish and democratic state”. It is tes and antites in the same context – contradictornary. It is better to dismantel their doublestandards and racism, and try to eliminate their influence in the palestinian soldatity movement and more.

    • “You cannot discuss with “jewish marxists”. The concept is like the “jewish and democratic state”.”

      i believe george carlin described the problem somewhat when he mentioned “military intelligence” was a contradiction of terms.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sDkhzHQO7jY

      (fmo should be around momentarily to point out carlin has associated with jews :D )

      jewish marxism is an oxymoron. especially since marx was anti-jewish and his theories are diametrically opposed to jewish ways of thinking, IE: cooperative/communal rather than hierarchical/exploitative.

  5. greenstain (his duplicity) is a good example of why antisemitism does exist. that sort of jewish jp/israeli quisling in anti-zionist disguise brings down all jews because they are so loudly prominent in the discourse and so cravenly dishonest.

    like with deshoshitz, greenstain creates antisemitism in those who would never had considered it otherwise.

    another result of their dishonesty is that it gives credence to the fascist far right freakshow, who use the sort of depravity as represented in the persons of jews like greenstain and dershoshitz to paint the left as the same thing by associating it with jews. so they further the fascists who blame jews for everything left, and further the zionazis, who are their natural allies.

    • a bit irrelevant, but sort of amusing in relation to greenstain. several years ago a russian gentleman i worked with gave me a language “lesson” on some russian terms. he was explaining the difference between the terms дермо and говно. both mean shit, he said, but говно is really nasty shit – “green shit”, he said. ;D

      говноstein.

Leave a Reply