Footer Pages

drone spending

How to get rid of enemies and excess allies

drone spending

Yesterday’s report in the Los Angeles Times about the U.S. plan to rid itself of uncomfortable allies in Syria illustrates once again that drones are the answer to almost any problem.  This is because – except for tsunamis and volcanoes – people are almost always the problem, and drones (AKA Unmanned Aerial Vehicles or UAVs) are designed to eliminate them.

Haven’t you ever wished that someone didn’t exist?  A drone is the answer.  Remember, the U.S. constitution protects the right to bear drones (they are arms, you know), and we need to thank our own president for setting the example for their use.  I wish I had had them in school to deal with a particular rabbi’s daughter that was always calling me a slut and pointing out that my family didn’t keep a kosher kitchen.

The proposed use in Syria is particularly inventive, because the idea is to eliminate some rebel allies rather than the government that the U.S. wants to overthrow.  The U.S. has said that it would refrain from using its own weapons against the government, but it never gave that assurance to its allies.

The allies in question are al-Qaeda and its affiliates, which are doing a wonderful job on behalf of the U.S., Saudi Arabia and Israel by killing folks whose beards are not long enough, such as women and children.  Despite performing this service, these fine fellows are not asking “how high?” when instructed to jump, which is a matter of concern to the U.S.  Drones are therefore a way of keeping their numbers down and making space for others that are more willing to prove that Middle Eastern men can in fact jump.

Without drones, the problem might become more acute, because Saudi Arabia has been shipping ever larger numbers of volunteers from its prisons and torture chambers to Syria, provided that these stalwart individuals have close family members that remain in the tender care of Saudi protection.  The U.S. drones are therefore a means of preventing overpopulation of these allies while assuring that there are enough of them to continue killing the Syrian population and occupying Syrian government forces.

This is very popular with the Saudi government and other members of the Gulf Cooperation Council, like Israel.  It allows them to appear to support Islamic militant movements while ridding themselves of elements that would almost certainly want to end corruption and privilege, which everyone agrees is necessary for modern democratic societies like the GCC monarchies, Israel and the U.S.

Meanwhile, the drone manufacturers are very enthusiastic to show that their product is versatile, i.e. not just for spying on friend and foe, nor merely the killing of enemies, but for the destruction of inconvenient persons of any description.  Brokers report that stocks of manufacturers like General Atomics, which specializes in drone manufacture, are increasing rapidly in value and that savvy investors are making a killing.

, , , , , , ,

3 Responses to How to get rid of enemies and excess allies

  1. Ariadna Theokopoulos March 17, 2013 at 4:13 pm #

    An unbalanced report, as yours invariably are, BW.
    With just a modicum of good will and objectivity you might have included at least one plus to your comments about the drones, i.e., the bonanza it brings to the American job market:

    http://www.ga.com/career-opportunities

    and the marvelous opportunities it provides to combine building a career in a qualified job with the expression of one’s patriotism (for what else is the desire to protect the greatest democracy on earth from its enemies, external or internal?).

  2. Ariadna Theokopoulos March 17, 2013 at 4:36 pm #

    BW also seems unable to understand with maturity a dire exigence of real life, namely, that sometimes your allies just happen to be worth more dead than alive:

    CARACAS, March 17 (Reuters) – Venezuela’s acting president urged U.S. leader Barack Obama to stop what he called a plot by the Pentagon and the Central Intelligence Agency to kill his opposition rival and trigger a coup before an April 14 election.

    Nicolas Maduro said the plan was to blame his opponent’s murder on the OPEC nation’s government and to “fill Venezuelans with hate” as they prepare to go to vote following the death of socialist leader Hugo Chavez.

    Maduro first mentioned a plot against his rival, Henrique Capriles, last week, blaming it on former Bush administration officials Roger Noriega and Otto Reich. Both rejected the allegations as untrue, outrageous and defamatory.

    “I call on President Obama – Roger Noriega, Otto Reich, officials at the Pentagon and at the CIA are behind a plan to assassinate the right-wing presidential candidate to create chaos,” Maduro said in a TV interview broadcast on Sunday.

    Maduro, who is Chavez’s preferred successor, said the purpose of the plot was to set off a coup and that his information came from “a very good source.”

  3. Barb Weir March 17, 2013 at 4:39 pm #

    You are not the first to call me unbalanced, @, and good will and objectivity are an illusion. I spent one night with Will, and he wasn’t that good, let me tell you. As for objectivity, he objectivised me as much as anyone, and it didn’t help.

    In any case, I thought I covered the economic benefits of the drone industry, and especially to the shareholders of the manufacturing companies, who are much more important than the minions that work in the plants. Don’t you agree?

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: