Footer Pages


Hit me, I’ve Not Been Naughty Enough

The author of Philosemitism and Brutality, Andrew Hamilton, expresses some strong views positing a sado-masochistic relationship between the Jewish culture and the “whites” in America. Unlike others who describe gentiles as the dominated majority who lost the competition to a tribal community endowed with better networking,  superior drive, intelligence a.s.o., Hamilton thinks the white gentiles actually admire and adore the Jews (as the masochist who loves his sadist) for their brutality, superior to theirs. This may not apply to the whole mass of white gentiles but if it does obtain among the those in the upper echelons (who arrived where they are because of their own brutality and greed) it is sufficient to enhance the success of Jewish power.

So, Jewish culture is like any other, only… more so?


(* Editors note N.B.> Please note Andrew Hamilton’s article makes some interesting points but goes too far in collectively blaming all Jews. Some Jews certainly do succumb to this kind of brutality but he could have been more nuanced in his analysis. Having said that, it is not without merit. )


Excerpted from…

Philosemitism &Brutality

Gentiles, all Gentiles (well, almost all), love the Jews. More than that, they worship them. Why?

There are many reasons, but one is Jews’ innate brutality.

As Sigmund Freud, following French psychologist Gustave Le Bon, wrote in Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego (1922), a group “respects force,” and “What it demands of its heroes is strength or even violence.It wants to be ruled and oppressed and to fear its masters.”

What are a few things virtually synonymous with Jews?

Communism and the murder of tens of millions in Russia and Eastern Europe, “unconditional surrender,” the Morgenthau Plan, the development of the A-bomb to destroy Central Europe, terrorism, Zionism, Irgun, the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF), Mossad, contemporary war-making, endless foreign intervention and “revolutions from above,” the “Russian” and Jewish mafias, “American” mobsters like Dutch Schultz, Louis “Lepke” Buchalter, and Meyer Lansky, Murder, Inc., the ADL, SPLC, JDL and JDO, AIPAC, the US Justice Department’s Office of Special Investigations (OSI), disgusting decades-long persecutions of Ernst Zündel, John Demjanjuk, and dozens of other innocent people, assassination, torture, political correctness, “hate speech” and “hate crime” laws, replacement migration, and arbitrary imprisonment or reputational and financial ruin for exercising one’s freedom of speech or thought.

Strip away the Persecution Myth, the preposterous fairy tale of the “poor, persecuted Jew,” and one is left with Jews as they really are: wealthy, powerful, domineering, self-centered, greedy, lying, cruel, indifferent to the suffering and rights of others, socially, educationally, financially, politically, and ethnically advantaged, racist, top dog, intolerant, violent, mass murdering, genocidal.

Jews are the Bully writ large, quasi-psychotic, not right in the head. (One of their famous gangsters was nicknamed “Bugsy” for that reason.) Paradoxically, this fundamental disconnect from reality enhances rather than detracts from their power.

Jewish behavior is not constrained by internal morality or external laws. And no de facto countervailing power exists.

When present in sufficient numbers, and their power becomes consolidated, Jews distort both state and culture.

The state becomes little more than a Jewish instrument or tool, a criminal enterprise vested with the veneer of authority. The governments of the world, including transnational and international organizations, are thereby delegitimized. Force and power supplant organic forms of authority.

In the Jewish-Gentile dynamic, Jews represent the masculine principle, whites the feminine, Jews the brutal sadists, whites the adoring masochists. The greater the psychological, emotional, and physical abuse the victims suffer, the more admiring they become. And it is no false adoration.

Whites are demure, available coquettes in the presence of the psychologically commanding Jew.

Fear of the Jews

Closely related to the same Jewish evil is a diametrically opposite response: “fear of the Jews.” Some whites fail to challenge Jewish attacks upon their race, culture, religion, customs, laws, liberties, or persons not because they love Jews, but because they fear them.

Such fear is well-grounded.

Therefore, one might mistakenly imagine that, in general, fear motivates professions and acts of devotion, while secretly abhorrence trumps fealty.

But it seems likely that genuine love for and worship of Jews is a much greater contributor to Jewish success and power than fear.

Still, there remains the issue of widespread ignorance due to lies and censorship. Most whites are probably completely unaware of the truth about Jews.

If they knew it, would they hate them?

Jews assume so. That’s one reason rigid censorship goes hand-in-hand with Jewish power. (Totalitarianism is also innate to them.)

But simply because Jews are convinced the truth would harm them does not make it so. Jews entertain many crackpot notions. Conceivably, currently clueless whites could respond to the truth with heightened adoration.

Yet Jews think not. Perhaps they’re right. At any rate, censorship has become obligatory. It’s good for the Jews!

read more

36 Responses to Hit me, I’ve Not Been Naughty Enough

  1. searching May 19, 2012 at 8:11 pm #

    I think Abe Foxman from ADL would have a hard time to deal with that?? 🙂
    On one hand Andrew Hamilton praises Jews as being the toughest of the tough ones, the most powerful , wealthy, domineering, intelligent,ethnically advantaged etc group,
    on the other hand, he claims that Jews are the most self-centered, greedy, lying, cruel, indifferent to the suffering and rights of others, racist, top dog, intolerant, violent, mass murdering, genocidal group etc.
    Which one to choose???
    Praise or condemn??

  2. searching May 19, 2012 at 8:18 pm #

    they also introduced more “complex”, bought by many brainwashed gentiles form of censorship called Political Correctness.
    It’s a censorship offered in white gloves.
    Yet. Very soon the white gloves may turn into bloody gloves.

  3. Ariadna Theokopoulos May 19, 2012 at 8:26 pm #

    If you assume that domineering, wealth acquisition and being “the toughest of the tough” are worthy of praise and admiration you, as a “whitey” prove his contention.

  4. Jonathon Blakeley May 19, 2012 at 9:01 pm #

    Great article. There does seem to be a massive S&M streak running through American-Zioculture. You only have to look at the Abu Graib pictures to see the S&M symbols of leashes and masks or any Tarantino film.

    Incidentally has anybody ever read any Marquis de Sade. Big thick books, you could use them as door-stops. Bizarre, not for me I read a bit then got bored, in my Library days….

    I feel I must quote from the Queen of ZioPop – Madonna. AKA MDNA

    (Spoken) Come over here!

    Some girls, they like candy, and others, they like to grind,
    I’ll settle for the back of your hand somewhere on my behind.
    Treat me like I’m a bad girl, even when I’m being good to you,
    I don’t want you to thank me, you can just spank me. Mmm.

    Some guys like to sweet talk, and others, they like to tease,
    Tie my hands behind my back and, ooo, I’m in ecstasy.
    Don’t slobber me with kisses, I can get that from my sisters,
    Before I get too cranky, you better…


    Like hanky panky [hanky panky],
    Nothing like a good spanky [good spanky].
    Don’t take out your handkerchiefs,
    I don’t wanna cry, I just wanna hanky panky.
    Like hanky panky [hanky panky],
    Nothing like a good spanky [good spanky].
    Don’t take out your handkerchiefs,
    I don’t wanna cry, I just wanna hanky panky guy.


    Please don’t call a doctor, ’cause there’s nothing wrong with me,
    I just like things a little rough and you better not disagree.
    ‘Cause I don’t like a big softie, [no], I like someone mean and bossy,
    Let me speak to you frankly, you better…


    Oooo, yeah.


    What about? Yeah. That’s an interesting…
    My bottom hurts just thinking about it.

    [She wants you to] Treat me like I’m a bad girl,
    [She needs you to] Even when I’m being good to you.
    I don’t want you to thank me [Don’t thank her], you better…


    [Hanky panky] Oooh, yeah
    [Good spanky] Get the picture?
    [Don’t wanna cry, I just wanna]

    That’s the way I came into this world,
    The doctor said, “Lady, she’s a beautiful girl.”
    He gave me a spanky and the doctor smiled,
    So give it up, honey, ’cause I want it.
    [Hanky panky, good spanky, don’t wanna cry, I just wanna]


    You have all been very naughty.
    & you will get what you deserve.

    Sounds like austerity to me.

    • Ariadna Theokopoulos May 19, 2012 at 9:18 pm #

      “You have all been very naughty.
      & you will get what you deserve.
      Sounds like austerity to me.”

      Great point.

  5. Jonathon Blakeley May 19, 2012 at 9:04 pm #

    Of course then there was also Britney Spears as a “schoolgirl” singing “Hit me baby one more time”

    WTF was all that about. ??

  6. Jonathon Blakeley May 19, 2012 at 10:54 pm #

    The more I think about this, the more I think it is an accurate analogy for the Jewish Political dynamic. The impression I get is that European and US politicians are scared of what Israel may do (the Samson option is continuously being threatened) and of Jewish power in their own countries.

    Thus they play the role of the masochist, & Israel and Jewish power the role of the Supremacist Sadist, the Holocaust® being the perfect guilt trip to make us Gentiles submissive and compliant. But it is for our own good.

    Its also reminds me of the “Stockholm syndrome” where hostages or sexually abused develop empathy to the ones perpetuating the abuse.

    Question: Was 911 a role play game of Israel Spanking the USA and USA letting it, whilst pretending it was Muslim terrorists?

    • fool me once... May 20, 2012 at 4:26 am #

      “(the Samson option is continuously being threatened)”
      Do you mean the idea of starting to bring the house tumbling down when the two main supporting “pillars” are destroyed by Masons, oops, I mean Samson? hmmmm…..

  7. Jonathon Blakeley May 19, 2012 at 11:28 pm #

    Philo-Semitism or Judeophilia…

    Friedrich Nietzsche, described himself as a “anti-anti-Semite”

    • Ariadna Theokopoulos May 19, 2012 at 11:39 pm #

      wikipedia, bless their little jewish hearts, says:
      “The concept is not new, and has been avowed by thinkers such as Friedrich Nietzsche, who described himself as a “anti-anti-Semite”,
      but it has perhaps recently become a growing phenomenon. ”

      The last line is part wishful thinking and part self-delusion by a long shot

  8. Jay Knott May 20, 2012 at 12:11 am #

    Ariadna – “What are a few things virtually synonymous with Jews? 1. Communism and the murder of tens of millions in Russia and Eastern Europe…”

    The first point in her list is wrong, and I can’t be arsed to go through the rest. The Jewish/Communist correlation has some truth in it, but it has been wildly exaggerated. The Bolshevik Party wasn’t exceptionally Jewish, and out of the top three leaders, the one Jew got the ax.

    This is not Ariadna’s best article. But I’m grateful to her for saving me the trouble of reading Hamilton’s book.

    • Loren Franklin May 20, 2012 at 2:53 am #

      “The Jewish/Communist correlation has some truth in it, but it has been wildly exaggerated.”

      Very true. Because many of the leaders of the October Rev. were Jewish, the whole mess is blamed on Jews. Jews were a small minority. The Bolsheviks who were not Jewish were very much capable of acting out their own criminality. Crime and murder has never depended on a Jewish presence, it all took place long before there were Jews to blame. But it does work well for those who like to blame Jews for all the problems of the world. The real problem is, you have to ignore the other 95% of the multi-ethnic Bolshies to buy into this canard.

      “This is not Ariadna’s best article. But I’m grateful to her for saving me the trouble of reading Hamilton’s book.”

      You said a mouthful there. It sounds about as interesting as toilet paper. But quite likely not as useful.

      • Ariadna Theokopoulos May 20, 2012 at 3:23 am #

        You seem to have a love and hate relationship with stereotypes: on the one hand you keep stringing the platitudinous PC streotype of the “must not generalize” variety and on the other you have a jerk reflex to any criticism of Jewish culture or indeed the use of the word “jew.”
        It could be a simple fallacy of logic.
        Let us try to simplify this:
        A. The overwhelming majority of white men between 25 and 50 years of age are NOT serial killers.
        B. The overwhelming majority of serial killers are white men between 25 and 50.
        Both statements, as you probably know, are correct and statistically proven.
        If I make statement “B” I don’t expect you to to get all hot under the collar and say/imply that I blame/hate white men between 25 and 50.
        Apply it to the case in hand:
        A. Most Jews ( a few millions) in the Soviet Union were neither in the leadership of the CPUS or of the repressive apparatus.
        B. In both, however, the vast overrepresentation of the Jews is not under dispute by anyone who knows anything about the history of SSSR.
        No, they did not do all the nasty deeds alone, but they do bear a heavy burden of responsibility.
        Deal with it.

        • Loren Franklin May 20, 2012 at 3:56 pm #

          I have no problem dealing with it. And I have been aware of those facts for many years. I think the real problem is that deLiberation is a Jewish hate site, and I don’t hate Jews. Though I am not Jewish, any attempt I make at bringing a bit of sanity to the discourse is going to be met with the same hatred that you people have for Jews. So it really is best for me to stay away, and let you all fester in your own beliefs, which I don’t share.

          I know I won’t be missed, but I will wish you all the best anyway, and hope that at least a few of you will be able to rise above the stupidity of your Jew hatred and see humans, and the world they occupy for what it is.

          Bye all.

          • Ariadna Theokopoulos May 20, 2012 at 4:17 pm #

            “I think the real problem is that deLiberation is a Jewish hate site, and I don’t hate Jews. Though I am not Jewish, any attempt I make at bringing a bit of sanity to the discourse is going to be met with the same hatred that you people have for Jews.”

            Bollocks. More explicitly, pathetic, self-conceited bollocks.

          • Roy Bard May 20, 2012 at 5:12 pm #

            “any attempt I make at bringing a bit of sanity to the discourse”

            is going to be entirely negated by your boring hissy fits 🙁

            Enjoy your own rank projections while you’re gone

          • searching May 20, 2012 at 5:28 pm #

            Loren ,
            The fact that you ARE VERY, VERY IGNORANT on the subject of Jewish participation in organizing and carrying on the Russian Revolution means that you should just be quiet on the subject because you make a TOTAL FOOOL of yourself.
            Study the subject, read and listen about it, and then try to say something that actually has some meaning.
            And don’t act like a 5 years old who doesn’t like the fact that nobody wants to play by his/her rules.
            For starters, here is a movie for you to watch.
            For all of you for that matter.

          • searching May 20, 2012 at 5:57 pm #

            “I think the real problem is that deLiberation is a Jewish hate site, and I don’t hate Jews.”
            I don’t hate Jews as Jews as well.
            I don’t hate people general.
            I actually like all good, honest ,decent people, no matter their race, religion, ethnicity etc.
            But I hate people, who plotted and are plotting the gloom and doom for many.
            People, who are EVIL, who want to destroy everything that I value and love.
            People, who want to divide the whole humanity, create wars, control , demoralise, enslave as many of them as possible.
            Many of them, so called Power Elite happen to be of Jewish origin. And it is a fact that, if you want to be honest to yourself, you’ll have to acknowledge.
            So it is not about hating Jews per se, it is about showing that some, very powerful , demonical Jews, (with a help of many shabbas goyim) are plotting a gloom and doom for the whole civilisation, for you too as well.

          • deLiberation May 20, 2012 at 6:28 pm #

            @Loren Franklin
            Total nonsense. You are projecting your own delusions on us all. Goodbye.

          • fool me once... May 20, 2012 at 7:01 pm #

            “I think the real problem is that deLiberation is a Jewish hate site, and I don’t hate Jews.”
            If that’s what you truly believe Loren, then contrary to your song, you don’t understand. Some opinions here may seem to go against the grain and ruffle feathers, well good, there’s a lot of heavy shit going on in the world and people want to understand and explore it.
            As I read your comment, an image of a man sat beneath a golden chinkapin tree next to his banjo came to mind. He was sobbing, holding a piece of deep furrowed bark tight to his chest. Tears cascaded down his face like the Whistling Bird rapids, soon evaporating on the incalescent summer noon.
            A Red-throated Loon appeared and perched on a decaying Dogwood log close to the man. He stopped crying and listened to the Loon cooing as a zephyr brought Lavender scented bursts from the Tualatin Valley……
            Meanwhile over a million Palestinians remained brutally imprisoned by the Jewish run Jewish state, in the concentration camp called the Gaza Strip……but never mind eh? The so called “jew hate” you incorrectly perceive is mainly the frustration of people who care deeply about injustice and wish to vent off a little – no harm in it really, is there?
            When you give up, you lose everything – your mountainside retreat privilege protects you from that outcome, doesn’t it?

          • deLiberation May 20, 2012 at 7:26 pm #

      • Roy Bard May 20, 2012 at 8:18 am #

        “…many of the leaders of the October Rev. were Jewish”
        “Jews were a small minority”
        “you have to ignore the other 95% of the multi-ethnic Bolshies to buy into this canard”

        Does this say that Jews were over-represented in the leadership?

  9. Ariadna Theokopoulos May 20, 2012 at 12:39 am #

    1. Andrew, not Ariadna, it was not my statement.
    Nevertheless it is correct as stated: “synonymous with” — in a vast number of people’s minds. Ask some Ukraineans whom they hold responsible for the Holomodor.

    2.” The Bolshevik Party wasn’t exceptionally Jewish”— it could not be, there were not that many Jews in Russia to make for a majority in the Party, but in the LEADERSHIP of both the Party at all levels and of the REPRESSIVE apparatus, a resounding yes.
    Shall we go through the tedium of making lists again?

    3. It is not my article. I consider it very interesting, however, and original.

  10. who_me May 20, 2012 at 1:47 am #

    “Nevertheless it is correct as stated: “synonymous with” — in a vast number of people’s minds.”

    the same folks hold muslims to be synonymous with terrorists. for the most part, it’s the same propaganda, created by the same sorts, and the same sorts believers continue to buy it.

    who are the sorts dispensing these fairy tales? who benefits from it?

    there’s your answer.

  11. Loren Franklin May 20, 2012 at 2:41 am #

    Andrew Hamilton must be a Stormfront go-to guy.

    • Ariadna Theokopoulos May 20, 2012 at 3:48 am #

      If you go by –perish the thought–stereotypes and labels you may suspect Gilad and Paul of being such “go-to guys” as well–you’d be shocked to see what sites pick up their writings.

  12. Ariadna Theokopoulos May 20, 2012 at 2:54 am #

    The Holomodor is not a fairy tale and the Jewish role in it is pretty well established: Muggeridge, in his reports on the holodomor to Manchester Guardian, said that the mass starvation was imposed largely by Jews. Lazar M. Kaganovich is often identified as an architect of the policy.

    Subtelny in his Ukraine: A History, says: “Jews were . . . disproportionately prominent among the Bolsheviks, notably in their leadership, among their tax- and grain-gathering officials, and especially in the despised and feared. . . secret police [emphasis added]”); by 1937, Jews were only 5.7 % of Soviet party members, but “formed a majority in the government.”
    Slezkine in The Jewish Century says the secret police was “one of the most Jewish of all Soviet institutions.”
    Arno J. Mayer in Why Did the Heavens Not Darken? says “As of the late twenties . . . a disproportionate number of Jews came to hold high posts in the secret police and to serve as political commissars in the armed services. They were appointed to high-level and conspicuous positions which called for unimpeachable political loyalty.”).

    • who_me May 21, 2012 at 9:23 pm #

      “The Holomodor is not a fairy tale”

      as it is portrayed mostly in the west, it most certainly is a fairy tale. the same sort as all the other goebellsian horseshit one finds about their rivals. the holomodor of the western rightwing/zionist propagandists, and adopted by many of the crypto zionist “left”, is about as accurate a representation of that famine (or rather, that culmination of a series of famines dating back more than a decade) as the disney stories based upon brothers grimm tales are accurate representations of those works.

      the jewish influence could be responsible for many of the failings of the soviet “communists”. jewish culture and religion is really quite distant from leftwing thought, and is actually very rightwing in nature. much the same as most christian cultures, especially catholic ones. people brought up as rightwing bring their influences with them, subconsciously and also overtly to varying extents, even if they reject those influences. having a lot of jews deciding policy among the soviets might have been the vector that changed soviet communism into the rightwing hierarchical state capitalism it became.

      also, the jews influencing soviet policy were not the same as the jews influencing western country. these were not rothschildes, but the enemies of the rothchilde sorts. for example, you claim jews made up most of the top soviet hierarchy. i don’t doubt that. but during the purges, it was this top hierarchy that mostly got the axe. that means jews had to be also disproportionally the killed, since the percentage killed of these positions is too much to have been only goy victims. this sort of extreme infighting one doesn’t see among the western jewish poligarchy. they stick together in ways the soviet jews did not.

      the view of zionism and israel also show significant difference among soviet jews and western jews.

      so jewish influence of the ussr is not really the same as jewish influence over the western power structure. i’m not saying soviet jews were better or worse, or defending their role in things, just pointing out they and western jews had some serious differences between them and some things applied to explain how things turned out in both regions should be adjusted accordingly. atzmon’s work of jewish traits and behaviour patterns is invaluable in looking at jewish roles in history because he looks at the root of these behaviour patterns.

  13. Blake May 20, 2012 at 2:10 pm #

    You do get the exceptions though. I have met quite a few humble jews who want nothing to do with “Israel” but on the whole I would have to agree.

  14. Blake May 20, 2012 at 2:49 pm #

    Not forgetting that Old Polish Proverb of course: “The harder a Jew hits you, the louder the Jew screams.”

  15. Somoe May 21, 2012 at 9:16 am #

    I think the problem here is that Andrew Hamilton does refer to the Jews as a collective, and whilst I understand it is directed at disproportionate Jewish power there is a real danger of it appearing to be directed toward all Jews and as we know, Jews are individuals like all others many of whom do not ascribe to the brutal ways of those of Jewish power and to suggest they are is wrong. However if we look at the behaviour of ‘the Jewish State’ we see all of the qualities mentioned in Hamilton’s writing and I have to agree that his analogy of a sado-masochistic relationship is spot-on.

    The rampantly defensive and fearful Jewish ideology has created societies that abhor the idea that collective victimisation of Jews should ever occur again. Hence, the ‘anti-semitism’ label is ever looming to stamp out objections to the Jewish supremacy in economics and politics the evidence for which is overwhelming. Andrew Hamilton, by not identifying clearly, as Gilad does, that it is the Jewish ideology being criticised, falls into the trap of being perceived as a ‘Jew hater’.

    I think it is a great shame that Loren has decided that Deliberation is ‘a Jew hating site’, because it most certainly is not. It is a valuable asset to the world that needs somewhere to share views, ideas, and discuss opinions that many wish to silence and as such is a valuable chance to explore and understand.

  16. searching May 21, 2012 at 2:25 pm #

    are your a spirit of banned cosmo, solar or Mathisphd??? Which one??

  17. Ariadna Theokopoulos May 21, 2012 at 6:27 pm #

    NOTE on the Editors’ note:
    While I agree with the Note I wish to add that this is a “special” problem.
    It explains why so many critics of Jewish cultural identity/Jewish Power (except for Gilad) prefer to avoid altogether the word “Jews” and use “zionists” instead, although it only one genus of the species, so to speak.
    Here is why it is a special problem:
    You can, for example, talk about American projection of power in the world and say “Americans have a cowboy mentality” and just about everybody understands that you are not talking about every Tom, Dick and Harry in the US, but about those in the American Power who are in a position to make and implement policy (and also to brainwash a large number of Toms, Dicks and Harrys to go along). No need for disclaimers.
    But you cannot use the word “Jews” to refer to Jewish Power/supremacist mentality unless you explain in parentheses and footnotes that you do not mean all the Jews.

    • Jonathon Blakeley May 21, 2012 at 10:42 pm #

      I agree with you Ariadna The “J” word is verbotten when used as an adjective and in a critical way.

      People are very paranoid about using the “J” word. Substituting the “Z” word does not solve the problem either.

      But as the article says this is because of the fear of Jews that has been created by their Lobbies and ideology. The Jews Special Victim status combined with their “Chosen-ness” gives them near total immunity from serious criticsm.

    • Jay Knott May 22, 2012 at 5:26 pm #

      Very insightful comment by Ariadna.
      We say “the British conquered India”
      “the Americans bombed Vietnam”
      “the Germans…”
      but not “the Jews…”
      To stop this racial discrimination, we can either stop using generic terms like “the X’, altogether, or we can say “the Jews are ethnically cleansing Palestine” etc.. I favor the latter.

      Phrases like “the British exterminated the Tasmanian Aborigines” are more precise than they sound. It wasn’t just the ruling class, with the white trash as victims. To some extent, the poor participated. To the extent that a proletarian identified as British in the 19th century (or today), to the extent that he supports the crimes of his rulers, he is party to those crimes. Its the same with Jews.