it’s never mentioned if the terrorist is jewish, but always very prominantly mentioned if the victim of a terrorist was jewish.

1. White terrorists are called “gunmen.” What does that even mean? A person with a gun? Wouldn’t that be, like, everyone in the US? Other terrorists are called, like, “terrorists.”

2. White terrorists are “troubled loners.” Other terrorists are always suspected of being part of a global plot, even when they are obviously troubled loners.

3. Doing a study on the danger of white terrorists at the Department of Homeland Security will get you sidelined by angry white Congressmen. Doing studies on other kinds of terrorists is a guaranteed promotion.

4. The family of a white terrorist is interviewed, weeping as they wonder where he went wrong. The families of other terrorists are almost never interviewed.

5. White terrorists are part of a “fringe.” Other terrorists are apparently mainstream.

6. White terrorists are random events, like tornadoes. Other terrorists are long-running conspiracies.

7. White terrorists are never called “white.” But other terrorists are given ethnic affiliations.

8. Nobody thinks white terrorists are typical of white people. But other terrorists are considered paragons of their societies.

9. White terrorists are alcoholics, addicts or mentally ill. Other terrorists are apparently clean-living and perfectly sane.

10. There is nothing you can do about white terrorists. Gun control won’t stop them. No policy you could make, no government program, could possibly have an impact on them. But hundreds of billions of dollars must be spent on police and on the Department of Defense, and on TSA, which must virtually strip search 60 million people a year, to deal with other terrorists.

Informed Comment, 9 August 2012

http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/lookout/judge-asked-reconsider-gag-order-movie-theater-shooting-114639357.html

Is it because of who his daddy is?

http://antiwar.com/blog/2012/07/31/sudan-hand-over-bush-and-blair-and-well-hand-over-omar-bashir/

“CNN’s Christiane Amanpour asked Sudan’s Ambassador to the UK, Abdullahi Alazreg on Monday whether Sudan will hand over the country’s president, Omar al-Bashir, who has been indicted for war crimes by the International Criminal Court. Alazreg responded by saying that Sudan is “willing to hand over whomever, provided that America hands over Bush and the United Kingdom hands over Blair.”

I must say, it’s a fair point.”

Could it be that watching mass slaughter in movies and television shows produced by Israelis has something to do with it?

Could it be the celebratory way that torture and murder have been spoken of in the Israeli controlled press for the past 12 years?

Could it be psychic control by Israelis because they needed an incident to stop coverage of Joe Arpaio declaring he had proved Obama’s birth certificate was a computer generated fake?

All three are involved, but for an incident of this magnitude that goes so deeply against how people are socialized, I think it had to be psychic attack. Like they did to the man who they had murder Anna Lundh.

That would explain the Colorado shooter’s psychiatric problems too. One of the signs of psychic attack is psychiatric problems as the victim, who has been taught all their lives that telepathy is not real, tries to deal with the foreign thoughts the psychic attack is putting in his mind.

lack of anything even remotely resembling a soul. that’s what.

and the usual loyalty to israel and jp, that goes hand in hand with a total lack of a soul.