The example I quoted from the Guardian may not agree with your analysis of Israel, or mine, but that doesn’t mean it’s planted. You need to learn to test your theory against the evidence, not vice-versa.

1. It’s not “American files” — it is diplomatic cables mostly and here you have us believe that the diplomatic chatter had time for what kinds of pills Christina Kirchner takes or whatever other NON-news about all other countries and never once gossiped about the chosen navel of the universe? Never once about the most grobian of all statesmen?!?
2. Your example from the Guardian is unfortunate for your thesis–looks more like a plant than even the MSM planted articles—it is ALL bout the PA, in the vein of ‘let’s not blame Israel for stealing land and moving people, it’s the PA insisting they do it. ‘
That’s a hasbarat™ line, Jay, take it from a stalinist.

There is unity in the oppression. There must be absolute unity and determination in the response.

I don’t find this a very motivational.

I’m glad not everyone on deliberation.info thinks Julian Assange is ‘controlled opposition’ just because he doesn’t agree with every detail of their analysis of the world, as some articles, and in particular, comments, have:

http://www.deliberation.info/assange-patsy-fool

Contrary to what some of the commenters allege, Wikileaks has published material detrimental to Israeli interests – see this from the Guardian for example – http://tinyurl.com/5v9885e – But it hasn’t made exposing Israel or Jewish power a priority. Perhaps that’s because there isn’t much in secret American files about it. It’s not a secret – the Lobby in the USA operates more or less in the open.