Widgetized Section

Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone

Anthony Lawson: International Bureau of Double Standards (Must Watch)

by Gilad Atzmon
Thursday, May 31st, 2012

This video looks at a CNN documentary (April, 2012 with repeats) about the Iran nuclear issue, and examines the role of the mainstream media in keeping the public uninformed about the real problem-nation in the Middle East: Nuclear-armed, Apartheid Israel.

Comments with abusive or insulting language will not be approved, including accusations of Hate Speech and/or anti-Semitism.

The original CNN programme “A Nuclear Iran: The Expert Intel” was download from the location given, below, but I cannot guarantee how long it will remain available:
http://amanpour.blogs.cnn.com/2012/04/14/special-presentation-nuclear-iran-th…

Interesting link: Iran finance minister: ‘Rest assured’ record oil prices over nuclear sanctions
http://articles.cnn.com/2012-05-20/middleeast/world_meast_iran-nuclear_1_nucl…

Share Button
Posted by on May 31, 2012. Filed under World. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

5 Responses to Anthony Lawson: International Bureau of Double Standards (Must Watch)

  1. searching

    May 31, 2012 at 3:17 pm

    It is very important to show how the public is manipulated by the MSMedia.
    This video does an excellent job in revealing how the MSmedia is twisting, hiding, lying, misinforming the genral audience.
    People have to stop treating anything broadcasted by the MSMedia, especially the news, as the Truth Revealed.
    There is anything BUT the Truth in what they serve to ignorant and foolish crowds.
    Wake up and smell the coffee everybody.
    Cancel your cable TV ,and be very happy about it.
    If you have no idea what to do with the extra money let me know. :)

  2. searching

    May 31, 2012 at 4:37 pm

    Here is an another example of MSM whitewashing propaganda.
    Occult Kabbalah’s queen, a.k.a Maddonna decided to entertain some members of Israeli apartheid in Tel’aviv with her kabbalah’s like music.
    Hearing the news of boycott, kababal’s queen decided to bribe “the other side” , and offer them free tickets to her show, which was also renamed as a “peace concert” just to please some pacifists.
    Most of the Israeli “peace activists” swallowed the bait, accepted the free tickests, and made theselves a lovely photo with kabbalah’s queen right in the center.
    Imagine queen Madonna going to Nazi Germany in 1943 with a concert for all Nazi members, and inviting about 600 representatives/prisoners of concentration camps in an effort to restore “peace” and “justice”.
    After the concert Madonna would go whenever she had planned to go, Nazi’s would do their Nazi job, and prisoners would go back to camps, waiting for whatever was planned for them by Nazis.
    And Goebbels’s MSMedia would broadcast Madonna’s “peace concert” in all countries occupied by Nazis for the ignorant public to watch and admire.
    Lovely.

    http://mondoweiss.net/2012/05/israeli-peace-camp-reconvenes-to-receive-free-madonna-tix-israeli-anti-occupation-activists-say-no.html

  3. who_me

    June 1, 2012 at 1:36 am

    if the information comes from the jewish run western corporate media, the content is assured to be lies in a most goebellsian way.

    alternative media is not jewish zionist controlled at least has a sporting chance of not being lies. though being able to tell which alternative media is not covertly zionist takes practice.

    • who_me

      June 1, 2012 at 1:37 am

      “alternative media is not jewish zionist controlled”

      alternative media that is not jewish zionist controlled

  4. who_me

    June 1, 2012 at 1:58 am

    another example of how the jewish zionist “enlightenment” has taken the worst of media criminality and made it mainstream, to match the mainstreaming of a political barbarism more at home in the 19th century, than in the 21st. again, thanks to jewish zionists leading the way.

    http://petras.lahaine.org/?p=1899

    When the Respectable Become Extremists The Extremists Become Respectable: Colombia and the Mainstream Media

    Introduction: By any historical measure, whether it involves international law, human rights conventions, United Nations protocols, socio economic indicators, the policies and practices of the United States and European Union regimes can be characterized as extremist.

    By that we mean that their policies and practices result in large scale long-term systematic destruction of human lives, habitat and likelihood affecting millions of people through the direct application of force and violence. The extremist regimes abhor moderation which implies rejection of total wars in favor of peaceful negotiations. Moderation pursues conflict resolution through diplomacy and compromise and the rejection of state and paramilitary terror, mass dispossession and displacement of civilian populations and the systematic assault on popular sectors of civil society.

    The first decade of the 21st century has witnessed the West’s embrace of extremism in all of its manifestation both in domestic and foreign policy. Extremism is a common practice by self-styled conservatives, liberals and social-democrats. In the past, conservative implies preserving the status quo and at most tinkering with change at the margins. Today’s ‘conservatives’ demand the wholesale dismantling of entire social welfare systems, the elimination of traditional legal restraints on labor and environmental abuses. Liberals and social democrats who in the past, occasionally, questioned colonial systems have been in the forefront of prolonged multiple colonial wars which have killed and displaced millions in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya and Syria.

    Extremism both in terms of methods, means and goals has obliterated the distinctions between center left, center and rightwing politicians. Moderate opponents to policies subsidizing a dozen major banks and impoverishing tens of millions of workers are called the “hard left”, “extremists” or “radicals”.

    In the wake of the extremist policies of public officials, the respectable, prestigious print media have engaged in their own versions of extremism[1]. Colonial wars that devastate civil society and materially and culturally impoverish millions in the colonized country are justified, embellished and made to appear as lawful, humane and furthering secular democratic values. Domestic wars on behalf of oligarchies and against wage and salaried workers, which concentrate wealth and deepen despair of the dispossessed are described as rational, virtuous and necessary. The distinctions between the prudent, balanced, prestigious and serious media and the sensationalist, yellow press have disappeared. The fabrication of facts, blatant omissions and distortions of context are found in one as well as the other….

You must be logged in to post a comment Login