Footer Pages

Anna Ardin’s Police Statement

If Assange is ever extradited to Sweden, the danger is that the evidence against him will be held entirely in secret. ALthough published in Sweden, the evidence so far has not been published in the UK except for some extremely selective quotes designed to damage Assange as much as possible.

This is (in translation) the full Swedish police statement arising from Ardin’s interrogation and approved by Anna Ardin. I gave it here without comment. Some further analysis of Ardin will follow in a later post, along with Sofia Wilen’s full statement.

I will however note here the fact that, following this statement, Ardin did produce a condom split across the top to police as evidence. However forensic examination showed not only that there was none of Assange’s DNA on the condom, but that it had never been worn by anybody.

It is impossible to put on a condom and leave no microscopic traces of the fact.

That does not of itself make Ardin’s story untrue. This is her statement:

The chief interrogator rings claimant Anna Ardin (hereafter ‘Anna’) for the purpose of conducting an interrogation because of the event described above (‘rape or sexual molestation at Tjurbergsgatan 36 up to 2010-08-14 12:00′).

Anna says she’s worked as a press secretary and political secretary for Sweden’s christian social democrats – the brotherhood movement. Anna says she was involved in organising a seminar that was to take place on 14 August where Julian Assange had been invited in as a lecturer.

Because Anna would be out of town 11 – 14 August she lent her flat to Assange. But Anna returned to Stockholm already Friday 13 August because she had a lot of work to do for the seminar. Anna and Assange have never before met personally but only had contact via mail and the telephone.

The Friday in question Assange and Anna went out and ate dinner together. They’d agreed that Assange would go on living in Anna’s flat despite her coming home a day early. After their dinner on the town they went back to Anna’s flat and drank tea.

In answer to a question Anna says that neither she nor Assange drank alcohol that evening. When they sat and drank tea Assange began caressing her leg. In answer to a question Anna says Assange earlier in the evening had not made any physical approaches save now which Anna initially welcomed. But it felt ‘uncomfortable from the get-go’ as Assange was rough and impatient. According to Anna, ‘everything happened so fast’. He ripped off her clothes and in conjunction with this pulled at and broke her necklace. Anna tried to put some clothes back on again because things were going too fast and it felt uncomfortable but Assange immediately took her clothes off again. Anna says that she thought she actually didn’t want to go any further but it was too late to say ‘stop’ to Assange when she’d ‘gone along with it this far’. She thought she ‘could blame herself’. So she let Assange fully undress her.

Then they lay in the bed. Anna was on her back and Assange was on top of her. Anna thought Assange wanted to immediately put his penis in her vagina which she didn’t want as he didn’t have a condom on. So she tried to twist her hips to the side and squeeze her legs together to prevent a penetration. Anna tried several times to reach for a condom which Assange stopped her from doing by holding her arms and prying open her legs and trying nevertheless to penetrate her with his penis without a condom. Anna says that in the end she was ready to cry because she was pinned and couldn’t reach a condom and thought ‘this might not end well’. In answer to a question Anna says Assange must have known she was trying to reach for a condom and he was holding her arms to stop her.

Assange asked after a while what Anna was doing and why she was squeezing her legs together. Anna then told him she wanted him to put on a condom before he entered her. Assange released her arms and put on the condom Anna got for him. Anna felt a huge unexpressed reluctance from Assange to using a condom which led to her getting the feeling he didn’t put on the condom she’d given him. She therefore reached down with her hand to Assange’s penis to check if he’d really put the condom on. She could feel that the edge of the condom was where it should be at the root of Assange’s penis. Anna and Assange resumed having sex and Anna says she thought ‘hope it’s over soon’.

Anna notices after a while that Assange withdraws from her to fix the condom. Judging from the sound, it sounded to Anna like Assange took the condom off. He entered her again and continued the act. Anna again checked his penis with her hand and again felt the edge of the condom where it should be and so let the sex continue.

After a while Assange ejaculates inside her and thereafter withdraws. Anna saw that the condom didn’t have semen in it when Assange took it off. When Anna began moving her body she noticed how things were running out of her vagina. Anna understood rather quickly that it must be Assange’s semen. She pointed this out for Assange but he denied this and told her it was she who was wet with her own juices. Anna is convinced that Assange, when he withdrew from her the first time, deliberately broken the condom at the tip and thereafter continued the sex with the resulting ejaculation. In answer to a question Anna says she didn’t look closer at the condom, if it was broken as she thought, but she says she thinks she still has the condom at home and will look at it. She says that even the bed sheets used on that occasion are most likely still in her hamper.

After the above mentioned incident Anna says she and Assange didn’t have any more sex. Yet Assange went on living with her up to and including Friday 20 August. According to Anna Assange made sexual overtures every day after that evening when they’d had sex. For example by touching her breasts. Anna rebuffed Assange on all these occasions and Assange accepted it. On one occasion, Wednesday 18 August, he’d suddenly removed all his clothing on his lower body and thereafter rubbed his lower body and his erect penis against Anna. Anna says she thought this was strange behaviour and uncomfortable and had therefore moved down to a mattress on the floor and slept there instead of up in the bed with Assange. The next night Anna stayed with a friend because she didn’t want to be around Assange because of his strange behaviour. She even pointed out after Wednesday 18 August that she didn’t want Assange staying any longer in her flat which he didn’t respond to until Friday when he took his things and returned her flat key.

In answer to a question Anna says Assange lived with her but they hardly slept together because Assange was up at night working with his computer. She mostly got up in the morning about 07:00 when he went to sleep.

In answer to a question Anna says she knew of Sofia when she’d been in contact with Anna before the above mentioned seminar and been part of the audience. According to Anna Sofia had purchased electrical cables for Assange and been with Anna and Assange at the lunch after the seminar. Anna noticed Assange flirted with Sofia during the lunch and understood that they’d afterwards begun some sort of relationship when Assange rang Sofia later in the evening when he was at Anna’s at the crayfish party.

She received an email message from Sofia Friday 20 August where she wonders if she can reach Assange as she had something important to tell him. Anna understood immediately what it was about and contacted Sofia who then told her what had happened to her, that she and Assange had had sex and that he didn’t want to use a condom etc. Sofia wanted to follow this up with the police and Anna decided to follow along, foremost as support.

Anna says she already heard from several sources that Assange ‘chases all women who cross his path’. Considering Assange’s reputation Anna felt it very important that they used a condom the time they had sex, that is the day before the seminar.

Anna says she’s felt terrible after the occasion when she and Assange had sex. Foremost because of the worry she’d been infected by HIV or some other STD. Anna says she freely consented to have sex with Assange but she couldn’t have let it happen if she’d known he didn’t have a condom. Anna has been in contact with the health centre and been given a time for tests next week. Anna approves of the police having the results of these tests.

Anna does not want any help from the crime victims unit but will get back to us if she feels it’s necessary.

Interrogation read back and approved.

10 Responses to Anna Ardin’s Police Statement

  1. Ariadna Theokopoulos September 5, 2012 at 1:37 am #

    Why let him skate on the smaller offense of rape when this is worse:
    “Anna says Assange lived with her but they hardly slept together because Assange was up at night working with his computer”

    the insensitive pig!

    • etominusipi September 5, 2012 at 5:44 am #


  2. etominusipi September 5, 2012 at 5:42 am #

    Friday 13th (hmmm!) – drank tea (what kind of tea? psycho-active or herbal?) – it was too late to say ‘stop’ (not so, according to another police report it was only 9:35 pm. according to Swedish law it is possible to say ‘stop’ until 10.00 pm) – Anna tried several times to reach for a condom (condoms evidently scattered at convenient places around her flat, just in case?).

    just a few of many things in this report, and in the whole sorry tale, that arouse my suspicions. both Assange and Ardin are narcissists, and both have some past ‘form’ with alphabet agencies. Spielberg no doubt has the film rights.

    not so much a honey trap. more like a saccharine/aspartame compound, to be consumed with extreme caution.

    it also appears that Sweden deserves an accolade – already justly renowned for its advanced approach to social hygiene this legendary country is the Southern Poverty Law Centre of the sex legislation world. it should award the Nobel Peace Prize to itself, for once.

    so come on, Sweden! don’t be so modest. stop hiding your light under a bushel. and open those fucking legs! goddammit!

  3. Jonathon Blakeley September 5, 2012 at 8:25 am #

    lol … This statement reads like something Barb Weir would knock up. It’s pure comedy, i will be back later when time allows exercise my humour gland.

  4. Jonathon Blakeley September 5, 2012 at 1:15 pm #

    Is it really Rape when you give your accuser a key to your flat. Really British Justice is a joke, Sweden and the USA are not much better.

    • Ariadna Theokopoulos September 5, 2012 at 6:46 pm #

      Clearly you need some sensitivity seminars. Have you never heard that “No means ‘no’ ” even after the fact? Days, weeks, years after the fact, it does not matter.

  5. Jonathon Blakeley September 5, 2012 at 1:23 pm #

    When Anna began moving her body she noticed how things were running out of her vagina.

    That will have been the Wiki-Leak.

    • etominusipi September 5, 2012 at 2:46 pm #

      😉 …

  6. Ariadna Theokopoulos September 5, 2012 at 2:40 pm #

    Craig Murray, even though not commenting here, undoubtedly posted this to defame the rape victim, slyly using her own testimony to do it. It does not surprise me one bit to see the men commenting on this thread showing equal hostility to her. Men are blind to the tender aspects of her personality that come through loud and clear to me from this deposition.
    For one thing this is a sentimental girl for whom souvenirs mean a lot (as the blue dress did for Monica Lewinsky):
    “she still has the condom at home and will look at it. She says that even the bed sheets used on that occasion are most likely still in her hamper.”

    For another, men do not accept that there are many kinds of “rape.” This one had a component of the variety called “disappointment rape,” as evident from the example I cited earlier and from her cri de coeur, “hope it’s over soon.”

    As for eto’s outrageous slur on Sweden, I will note that Sweden’s congress with the US and NATO is never anything but fully compliant and cooperative, if not eager.

  7. etominusipi September 5, 2012 at 4:55 pm #

    Ariadna, thanks yet again for pointing out the error of my ways. if truth be told i had a certain unease that the ailment male chauvinism, (MC), which troubled me in youth (localised, fortunately, to a region near the upper thighs), had begun to bother me again. apparently even the most advanced medical treatment can never entirely rid the sufferer of the viral vector which provokes the symptoms – however, like malaria it may lie dormant for decades, and this is about the best one can hope for. a friend who is a consultant geriatrician has informed me that it is MC which is responsible for the lower life expectancy of males, compared with females.

    i do now see that i had totally misjudged Anna Ardin. i think this was partly because one of the many photographs on the internet of this wronged and humiliated woman bore an uncanny resemblance to the English Member of Parliament Louise Mensch, who arouses in me a strong and utterly irrational sense of loathing and despair. obviously this is no excuse for my unsympathetic post, but rather something i should have taken as an early warning sign that my MC was beginning to rear it’s ugly head again.

    the points you make about Anna’s sentimental preservation of mementoes like a split condom and a soiled bedsheet are good ones. she is obviously a very loving person, whose only fault is excessive sympathy for others, particularly men in positions of power or authority.

    although i do not believe he should go to prison, Assange clearly behaved like a complete cad, and Anna was obviously distracted from the ecstatic transports of love-making by the need to continually put her hand on the base of his penis to check that he had not once again removed the condom he had been so reluctant to put on in the first place. one hopes, given his evident insensitivity as a lover, that she was able, during the course of these investigatory hand-movements, to give herself a little clitoral stimulation which might at least have granted her some minimal quota of erogenous satisfaction from this otherwise dismal encounter.

    her loving and forgiving nature is exemplified in the fact that, in spite of all this, she did not ask him to leave her flat and find somewhere else to park his disease-ridden body. i can hardly bear to imagine her chagrin when she discovered that he had also been fucking her best friend, whilst callously taking advantage of Anna’s hospitality, and even using her electricity to power his computer for several hours every night.

    the slur of Sweden in my comment was also an ill-judged and ungenerous gesture. it is quite evident that the Swedish police have acted with great sensitivity and tact throughout this whole sorry affair.