Widgetized Section

Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone

A Culture of Violence

by Dr. Paul J Balles
Friday, February 15th, 2013

constitutional rights  to bear armsAmerican gun owners and the National Rifle Association (NRA) have been called “gun nuts” (a variation on “crazies”).

Discussions of guns and who owns them or lobbies for them arise every time there’s a mass murder, like that of the children in Connecticut recently.

Leading the discussions on the major American news networks are reports of the terrible losses naturally felt by the families of the victims, followed by recalling the tragic histories of family suffering after previous mass shootings.

After the required dedication to survivors is paid, the media moves on to necessary talks about what needs to be done about “gun control” for the future.

Depending on the latest type weapon, the discussions revolve around ways to limit the sales and use of especially unnecessary assault weapons or excessive cartridges.

Recognizing that there must be an element of insanity involved in a mass murder, we question what tests or standards need to be applied through background checks.

While all of this is going on, gun owners stock up on more guns for their personal collections; and rabid anti-government voices utter threats they fear from the government.

well-regulated-militia?Meanwhile, the NRA babbles on with slogans like “Guns don’t kill people; people kill people”. They hoot and howl that more people should own guns to protect themselves.

This week, a Gallup poll reported that “U.S. gun ownership varies most strongly by gender — 45% of men versus 15% of women personally own guns. Being married and from the South are also major predictors of gun ownership — 64% of Southern married men own guns.

According to author and film director Frank Schaeffer “The battle over gun control has exposed a truth the mainstream media is apparently too shy to mention: A bunch of far-right, white, mostly Southern, paranoid extremists are preparing for armed revolution and apocalypse.”

Journalist Steven Hsieh reveals NRA’s “massive list of enemies posted on the organization’s site takes crazy to another level.”

They include Doctors, Poets, Women, 90s Boy Bands, Greeting Card Companies, Churches, Pro Football Teams, Actors, CEOs and Interior Designers.

Google the NRAs Ten Top Enemies to view the names of the vast legion of people who have–at one time or another–taken issue with the NRA.

The scenarios usually boil down to arguments about whether the NRA’s critics are trying to take away the U.S. Constitution’s Second Amendment rights.

The NRA has been making this argument for so long that most Americans–ignorant of the amendment’s history–tread very lightly on this issue.

guns

The NRA has a lot of money to spend on lobbying and propaganda for the $12 billion firearms industry.

They’re a threat to anyone suggesting regulation. Thom Hartmann reported that two GOP Congressmen wanted to impeach Obama over gun reforms.

Not only has the Second Amendment been touted as an important public right, making many believe that they’re safer owning guns; Henry A. Giroux has observed that “Violence is deeply rooted in American culture.

gun display

Thom Hartmann reveals that the Second Amendment’s ratification was to preserve slave patrol militia:

…every Southerner of the era knew the simple answer: Well regulated militias kept the slaves in chains.

Few Americans have bothered to learn the history of the Second Amendment and they have been brainwashed by gun nuts.

It’s unlikely that much useful legislation about gun use will ever get passed; and it’s likely that reactions to mass murders will subside.

It’s a sad day when a country is ruled by a belief that “packin’ a pistol”–or worse an assault weapon– is some kind of macho protection.

Share Button
Posted by on February 15, 2013. Filed under America,Ideology,Politics. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

One Response to A Culture of Violence

  1. Deadbeat

    February 18, 2013 at 2:24 am

    It is clear from the article that Dr. Balles fails to understand the basis for the 2nd Amendment. In this article by David E. Vandercoy Professor of Law, Valparaiso University School of Law clearly states

    [T]he Second Amendment was to protect each individual’s right to keep and bear arms, and to guarantee that individuals acting collectively could throw off the yokes of any oppressive government which might arise. Thus, the right envisioned was not only the right to be armed, but to be armed at a level equal to the government.

    Dr. Balles uses ad hominem and innuendo to build his fallacious arguments rather than facts and history. He sites of all people Thom Hartmann who is an extremely dubious source. All one has to do is examine Thom Hartmann censorship of Kathleen Christenson or anyone for that matter who bring up the issue of the Israel Lobby and Jewish power in America to understand Thom Hartmann’s true allegiances. And since the loudest voices against the 2nd Amendment are Zionists like Dianne Finestein, Charles Schumer, and Barbara Boxer one can then see the hypocrisy of citing Thom Hartmann.

    It is also insulting that Hartmann smears the 2nd Amendment with slavery especially since the circles he chooses to protect and defend — Jewry — were the major capitalists and beneficiaries of the Trans-Atlantic slave trade.

    Also it is quite interesting that Dr. Balles fails to mention the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) large procurement of ammunition to be used against the American people and the history of DHS founded by Zionist Joseph Lieberman in the wake of 9-11 and operated by fellow traitor Israeli Michael Chertoff. DHS has been embroiled in controversy by giving large contracts to Israeli firms like Chertoff Rapidscan that is radiating American travelers.

    Dr. Balles see only one kind of “violence” but ignores the violence planned and perpetrated by Jewry against the American people. Under these circumstances a strong 2nd Amendment may be the only thing that will protect the goys from a government ruled by Jewry.

You must be logged in to post a comment Login