A Crime and (No) Punishment
by Daniel Mabsout
Saturday, June 16th, 2012
What is perpetuating the crimes against people in Syria is the misinformation about what is really happening, in addition to the altering of news, ‘the hiding of facts and the lying. All this dubious behavior on behalf of the corporate media and the multiple human rights organizations, is covering for the real criminal on the ground and allowing him to perpetrate his crimes
There is nothing that will encourage a criminal to escalate his criminal actions more than accusing another of the crime he is committing. It is for this reason the crimes against the Syrians are continuing, because most of the media, governments and organizations are attributing the crimes to the ones who did not commit them so as to allow the real criminals to resume their hateful actions.
Nothing prevents organizations like Amnesty International from knowing the truth. The truth is obvious and is not hiding; but organizations like Amnesty, and media outlets like CNN and BBC and others are hiding it. Why are journals like the Independent, for example, publishing the facts as they are? Why does the Independent say that the rebels are coming from neighbouring countries and are being supplied with all sorts of weapons from the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) and Qatar and helped on the ground by the Turkish secret services of Milli Istihbarat Teskilati (MIT)? Why is it that the Independent knows and others do not know? The answer is simple – the others want these crimes to continue and to protect the criminal.
These organizations are very dangerous and are doing the greatest mischief on the ground, playing a game that is very dirty and very threatening. Beneath the garb of humanity and human rights, there is nothing humane in their endeavour, it is all dirty politics and in the great powers’ interests, using the suffering of the people to implement agendas specific to the World Order, which is worst of all.
Today Amnesty is calling for a chat on line concerning Syria. What a shame! As if people’s lives could be argued and debated on line by the ones covering for the criminals and catering for their crimes! They will bring democracy and freedom to Syria the same way they were brought to Palestine, Iraq and Libya. As if anything good could come from the UN or Amnesty or NGOs!
The UN is a warmonger! One only need look at what it did to Libya and to Kaddhafi, and before that to Iraq and Palestine. The observers sent to Syria are walking hand in hand with the armed rebels; some of them are there on a spying mission, trying to track down Syrian army headquarters. Not long ago, the UNIFIL was sent to south Lebanon in order to spy on the Resistance, not to forget the famous Special Tribunal For Lebanon, of the infamous international court, that is accusing Hizbullah of killing Hariri when the primary suspects, who are the Israelis, have not even been questioned or investigated.
Posted by Daniel Mabsout
on June 16, 2012. Filed under Arab Spring,False Flag.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0.
You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
7 Responses to A Crime and (No) Punishment
You must be logged in to post a comment Login
searching
June 16, 2012 at 11:32 pm
There is a very ,very intersting, long article in the latest editions of a monthly
newspaper called Catholic Family News.
The title of the article is :”The UN or Fatima: Whose Peace plan should we follow? ”
The first part of this very long article was published n Jan 2012,second one in Feb 2012.
It is very richly and heavily documented.
You might find it interesting.
Here is a shorter article on the subject of building the world’s domination by the same author. Worth reading.
http://www.catholicapologetics.info/modernproblems/currenterrors/unation.htm
….fragment
“…………..Anthony Sutton, in his book, America’s Secret Establishment, details how the Bolshevik Revolution, the building of the Soviet empire, as well as Hitler and the Nazis were all financed by bankers in Europe and the United States. These men were connected to, or members of, a secret society known as The Order, or The Order of Skull & Bones, which has Illuminati connections.
Major families associated with the Order are the Rothschilds, Guggenheims, Rockefellers, Harrimans, Whitneys, Tafts, Pillsburys, Weyerhausers, and others. Former President George Bush is a member, as was his father Prescott, and George W. is also a member. Through The Order, Illuminist thinking has penetrated every segment of American society, including religion.
The Order gave birth to the League of Nations after World War I; the League of Nations ultimately became the United Nations after World War II. [4]
Did the two world wars just happen? No. Their planning goes back to the late 18th to early 19th Centuries, to Johann Fichte, a Mason with Illuminati connections, who influenced Hegel, who in his turn influenced both Marx and Hitler. Fichte called for a league of nations as the necessary step preceding world government; “but it would come to fruition after enough wars had been deliberately manipulated to cause humanity to want peace at any price.” [5]
Following Fichte’s idea, the Grand Philosopher of Scottish Rite Masonry, Albert Pike, together with Italian Illuminati leader Mazzini, planned three world wars to be deliberately perpetrated by the Illuminati in order to facilitate world government under the guise of promoting peace. World War I would “advance Communism and destroy the czarist Russian regime;” that did indeed happen. World War II was “to involve Great Britain and Germany,” with the ultimate aim “a clash between Fascism and Communism,” which also did happen. The third world war is meant to “pit Judaism against the Muslim world.” The acceptable solution [they hoped] to the global chaos thus engendered would be world government. …………..,”
searching
June 16, 2012 at 11:34 pm
“…Interestingly, Britain issued a three-penny “Victory” postage stamp in 1946 that featured Masonic symbols, thus proclaiming the war a victory for Freemasonry. Note that George Bush, Sr., said the 1991 Gulf War would bring about the New World Order; well, it moved the world in that direction. Now ten years later, his son seems poised to finish the job as Muslim nations are being moved towards World War III. On September 29, Prime Minister Chretien of Canada remarked in New York, “There will probably be a new order in the world that will probably be better than we have now.” [7] Note also that the unprecedented presence of British Prime Minister Tony Blair at President Bush’s address to Congress, declaring war on the Taliban, was sending a signal. Cecil Rhodes, who set up the Rhodes Scholarship, wanted Britain and the United States to run the world government. He formed a secret society linked to international bankers to accomplish this by absorbing the world’s wealth. This society became the “godfather” of the Council on Foreign Relations, which was started and funded by men connected to The Order, and which in its turn begat the United Nations, [8] as we shall see.
Let us fast-forward to Edward Mandell House, an Illuminati agent working for the one-world interests of the Rothschilds, Rockefellers and the international banking community. He became President Woodrow Wilson’s closest advisor. In 1913, he persuaded Wilson to install two planks of the Communist Manifesto, viz., central banking, through creation of the Federal Reserve, and income tax. Next, he used Wilson to initiate the first step in world government. The U.S. was dragged into World War I through a secret agreement of House, and the provocation was the deliberate betrayal of the British ocean liner Lusitania, with Americans on board, to German V-boat destruction. At the end of the war, House got Wilson to propose Fichte’s idea: a League of Nations for world peace. The League was partly funded by the Rockefellers and it was a first step towards establishing the infrastructure of the world government. As well as the Rothschilds and Rockefellers, House and Wilson were also associated with The Order. [9]..”
searching
June 16, 2012 at 11:35 pm
“..Enter the United Nations
The United States didn’t enter the League, and so in 1921 the Council on Foreign Relations [CFR] was founded by the internationalist bankers associated with Rhodes and The Order of Skull and Bones to lobby for American participation. Illuminati agent House was a founding member of the CFR, whose original membership was full of Bolshevik supporters. The CFR persuaded both Britain and the U.S. to accept the Soviet regime. [13]
This union of financiers and Communists illustrates that Communism and capitalism are not sworn enemies. Left and Right mean nothing to Masons. Communism and Fascism are systems of total government power. Both are descended from the Mason Fichtes and his pupil Hegel. Both are monopolies. The international bankers tied to Masonry are also monopolists, who seek to eliminate competition. Hence, it is natural for the bankers to wish to control governments and society, and it is natural for them to embrace totalitarian regimes and make them work for their goal of world control. Marxism, capitalist monopolism and the CFR have the same final objective. [14]
The CFR finally got the U.S. to participate in world government through World War II. By that time the group had control of the State Department. Two weeks after Pearl Harbor, whose bombing led to American participation in the War, the Secretary of State recommended to President Roosevelt that a committee be formed, which became the planning commission of the UN. Of the fourteen committee members, ten were CFR members and the rest were under its control. It was thus the Communist-dominated, Masonic-influenced Council on Foreign Relations, whose origins lie with The Order, that founded the United Nations. [15] It was not founded as a result of the war, but the war was used as a front for its founding—–ostensibly to prevent further wars. In fact, the term “United Nations” was a CFR construction and used as early as 1942. [16]
In 1945, the U.S. delegation at the inauguration of the UN contained forty-seven CFR members. With the Senate’s ratification of the UN charter, the U.S. finally became part of world government. The CFR proceeded to promote the UN in a favorable light through education and the media, to start conditioning the public to accept global government…”
searching
June 16, 2012 at 11:37 pm
“…The NATO bombing of Kosovo was launched without formal UN authorization. The excuse was the usual one of stopping human-rights abuses. Because China and Russia conveniently vetoed UN action, NATO, under the leadership of the Spanish Marxist Javier Solana, acted on its own after the public had been conditioned by the media. Canada’s defense minister, Art Eggleton, stated that this set a precedent of going to war in defiance of the UN Charter [i.e., acting in spite of a veto], but following the principles of the Declaration of Human Rights [i.e., with the indirect sanction of the UN, "to avert humanitarian tragedies"]. The precedent, as Eggleton himself tells us, also means that NATO—–as an extension of the UN—–will now intervene anywhere in the world where it feels it can win; [50] so it’s now considering going to war against a country outside Europe—–Afghanistan—–has has not attacked a NATO member. Obviously the crunch is on to rapidly consolidate the Communist global dictatorship and international warmongering has gone beyond needing official international permission.
The history of Javier Solana illustrates the treachery of NATO, which has supposedly been the primary bulwark against Communist aggression in Europe. Solana was one of the luminaries of the Marxist Spanish Socialist Workers’ Party. Besides much anti-American activity, in 1983 Solana led the opposition to Spain’s membership in NATO. Now, one of NATO’s rules is that the citizens of nations which have declined to participate in its military alliance are not eligible for the post of Secretary General. So NATO broke its own rules in appointing Solana. Clinton and Secretary of State Warren Christopher said it was Solana’s character that was the key in appointing him to head NATO and be in charge of the U.S. troops at its disposal. Of course! Obviously Solana had the right qualifications to set NATO firmly on its new path, which contradicts its mandate of being only a defensive alliance for its own members. Having done his job, Solana moved to the European Union as foreign and security policy chief, and is working to create a European military distinct from NATO. [51]
All United Nations specialized agencies are working to strengthen the UN, to spread its Marxist agenda into every sphere of life. People are won over by self-interest as the UN is painted as the big problem-solver and the guarantor of an earthly paradise, the New World Order. Let’s look briefly at UNESCO [the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization], which
has been described as a “snake pit” by one American Congressman, “where Godless Communism is given a daily forum for . . . psychological warfare against freedom.” [52]
UNESCO spreads the errors of Russia through education and culture. In the 19th Century, Masonry stated that education of children, “protected” against the “disturbing influences” of parents and the Church, is “indispensable” to the establishment of the universal social republic. [53] The leader of the American Communist Party declared in 1936, “Who wins the youth, wins the future of America.” [54] We can apply that slogan to the world…”
who_me
June 17, 2012 at 1:22 am
“Why is it that the Independent knows and others do not know? The answer is simple – the others want these crimes to continue and to protect the criminal.”
don’t be fooled by a few “balance articles” published for credibilty rep, the independent is also promoting aggression against syria. what the independent has done is take over the role of the guardian, now that the guardian has openly embraced zionazism and almost exclusively promotes that line of propaganda. they’re just filling in a propaganda/money making niche left by guardian’s zionazi shift.
Daniel Mabsout
June 17, 2012 at 9:57 am
“Why is it that the Independent knows and others do not know?”
the independent has been mentioned to cite the example of a media that is not supportive of Assad or of Arabs in general but that chose to tell the truth about this specific matter even for one and only time. i mentioned the Independent to show this possibility that Amnesty has been denying to itself.So if Amnesty cannot do its duty about an obvious thing that is within its own jurisdiction then what is Amnesty for? and what is it busy doing now ? But you are right about the Independent , it is drifting more and more to the other side , we noticed this in Lebanon long time ago .
who_me
June 17, 2012 at 10:24 am
Daniel Mabsout
“i mentioned the Independent to show this possibility that Amnesty has been denying to itself.”
amnesty international is rubbish. it began as a propaganda front and has steadily gone downhill from there.