by David Holden
Tuesday, September 11th, 2012
a 46 minute video was uploaded on Jun 18, 2012 by joefriendly, who describes it as follows:
Flight data recorder expert Dennis Cimino, a commercial pilot with more than 2000 flying hours, reveals that the US government’s claims about a flight data recorder found at the Pentagon from Flight 77 are fraudulent, with zeros instead of the plane’s identification number and flight number! The recorder did not come from an airliner but was apparently created at a workbench and was also lacking data that an actual flight would have, such as mandatory barometric adjustments and even any record of the cockpit door opening. The talk was given June 17, 2012 at the Vancouver 911 Hearing.
the video was cited in a recent (Friday, September 7th, 2012) Veterans Today piece about the Vancouver Hearing, by Jim Felzer.
somewhere in the comments section at the end of Jim’s article, there is a very interesting exchange, initiated by a shrewd question from Stewart Ogilby. this question should be of interest to all those puzzled by one curious piece of the 911 jigsaw:
this was a large sum, even given the monstrous size of the US ‘defense’ budget ($700 billion in 2010).
immediately below: on 911 the Evil Sorcerer of Abu Ghraib announces that the Pentagon is functioning. click for an enlargement and study the faces.
many people seem satisfied with the simplistic explanation that the ziocons, with advanced knowledge of September 11th, thought September 10th an excellent day to announce bad news – amidst general hysteria and panic the 2.3 trillion would be buried beneath the pulverized concrete and twisted or molten steel in the footprints of the demolished twin towers and building 7. so indeed it was. but the spirit of Hercules Poirot, channelled by Stewart, has put zose leetle grey cells to good use yet again in introducing the idea of a rather more fiendish scheme, and one both more flattering to, and better-suited to the admirable and deservedly-renowned ingenuity of, the perpetrators.
from Stewart Ogilby
September 7, 2012 – 5:49 pm
Jim, Let us postulate that the release of that Pentagon budget discrepancy only a day before 9/11 could easily have prepared a cover story for the presence and “deaths” of special financial people at that location. To verify deaths, or more precisely, to verify and document previous lives of alleged victims and the existence of their surviving families ought to take merely a fraction of the time and effort spent on other aspects of the huge 911 media hoax. That taking this time and effort seems to have escaped competent domestic 9/11 researchers is curious. Ought not a close look be taken at alleged victims and surviving families of that day’s entire media charade? The light is beginning to dawn, is it not?
from Jim Fetzer
September 7, 2012 – 8:46 pm
You are suggesting that the casualties at the Pentagon might have been killed separate and apart from the events of 9/11, in particular, the staged attack on the building, which was merely a “cover story”? I must admit that this thought has never crossed my mind. I am not especially good at doing that kind of research, but I know a couple of others, including Dean Hartwell, who might want to follow up. Thanks.
from Jim Fetzer
September 7, 2012 – 10:22 pm
Dennis Cimino has asked me to add this response from him to your post:
Stewart, what happened at the Pentagon is the ‘core’ of 9/11. The stuff that took place in NYC that day was merely a PsyOp to support the waging of war on Iraq and Afghanistan for the zionists who control the U.S. and who have serially, more than one time now, taken more than 2.3 TRILLION dollars (twice since 9/11 this has occurred, as well) of American’s taxpayer’s dollars and repatriated that money to support Israel for the Rothschilds. This is ‘why’ the events of 9/11 were mostly window dressing to cover up and obfuscate the facts that Cynthia McKinney brought to light in the hearing on the Hill the day before, roasting Dov Zackheim’s sorry zio ass, as well as the bimbo Controller who couldn’t answer Cynthia even a little bit about why the Pentagon lost track of so many TRILLIONS of dollars.
This serial looting has been going on a long time but until Cynthia McKinney’s ‘surprise’ hearing about the looting by Israel, it was never a necessity to do this kind of operation.
It is my professional opinion that 9/11 occurred fundamentally to utterly destroy the United States finally by the gutting of the last vestiges of any civil liberties we had left, under the Bush regime, and the ‘emergency’ necessity to do something like this was in the fore immediately after McKinney aired that out on Capitol Hill the day before.
Their hands were forced. Israel was in a position where it’s looting of the U.S. Treasury was fully exposed by McKinney’s work and investigatory findings.
The Pentagon was the PRIMARY TARGET of 9/11. The other stuff is merely sauce for the goose.
If you look at how greedy these zios got, Howard Krongard and his brother at the C.I.A., buddies of Frank Lowy and Larry Silverstein, did the PUT OPTIONS on AAL and UAL stock holdings, but these transactions were traceable back to the C.I.A. and Krongard’s I.P. address at C.I.A. Sitting at his comfortable armchair, this zio murderer sought to enrich himself on the blood of those to be murdered by his agency on 9/11/2001.
The Cynthia McKinney hearings forced them to do the operation ahead of schedule. Virtually the entire operation was to obfuscate and to cover up the fact that Israel had been siphoning and still is siphoning money out of the United States via the back channel which is the Pentagon budget.
But per your very adroit question regarding the casualties at Pentagon, nobody can be assured of shit. The DoD has a gun to its TREASONOUS HEADS and will go to any and all lengths to protect Israel, and that means, faking victim identities to propel the concept that 19 arabs with box cutters could do this to America that day without any NORAD interference of any kind.
When our indictments are fully made public, you’ll see why and we are in fact very on top of WHO did this.
Thanks for your comments,
Dennis’ viewpoint is interesting, though i don’t think 911 was a rushed job. his study of the bogus FDR (flight data recorder) is a fine piece of detective work.
the official narrative of 911 may be compared to a large house of cards. the structure is flimsy enough to begin with, but as cards have had to be altered or removed, it has become flimsier still. take away just a single structural ‘card’ and a whole section of the edifice comes tumbling down. indeed such a sudden and devastating collapse looks like a controlled demolition, though nanothermite and micronukes are not required here – just a sudden breeze, or even a a flatulent congressman’s accidental fart, would do the trick.
there are many weakest links.
the bogus FDR is one of them.
the whole dancing Israelis saga, and Chertoff’s role in the release of arrested Israelis, which has given us the unforgettable catchphrase: our purpose was to document the event, is another.
the ejected debris.
the rapid shipping off of the 911 steel, via a sayanim business channel
etc. etc. we all have our favourites.
a very weak link indeed is the missing Pentagon CCTV data. it is well-known that the FBI collected all circumambient CCTV footage of the Pentagon “attack”. i believe there were something like 82 separate records. so why no released video evidence? it is true the five belatedly released frames are evidence of a kind, they are evidence of the continued cover-up! but really, is there any possible innocent answer to this question? national security? erm…no. this credibility gap looks more conspicuous, and and the sulphurous fumes which emanate from it smell ranker, with every day that passes.
the task of stemming public rejection of (derision at) the official narrative*, with the complicity of the MSM, may be likened to an attempt to maintain the integrity of a large dam constructed entirely from an inadequate mix of mud and twigs. under the impact of a flash flood of information the dam is now is springing leaks at an alarming rate. at such a rate, indeed, that there are simply not enough venal fingers to stop up all the holes. in any case it is an unfortunate circumstance that the ziocons and their lackeys have less fingers to spare than normal human beings, as many ziocon digits are already irretrievably stuck in a variety of lucrative pies.