Pages

911

9/11 And the Cover Up

Video By Ryan Dawson

Was Israel Involved in 9/11 Attack?

“Ryan Dawson is clearly stepping into some very dangerous territory here, and I really commend both his courage and his talent. I urge every one of you to take the time to watch this movie.” The Saker

Posted April 14, 2012

orginal source

Share Button

74 Responses to 9/11 And the Cover Up

  1. ariadna April 16, 2012 at 6:56 pm #

    Extraordinary video. Even though I have seen quite a few by now, I find this very powerful. Thanks for posting, Jonathon.
    The most amzaing–well, hard to say what is the absolutely most amazing but one of the most amazing– things is the collusion of the mass media.

  2. searching April 16, 2012 at 7:26 pm #

    here is another example of a recent event that claimed lots of innocent lives ,(Polish preeident’s, his wife and many others) ,that was clearly
    a pre-planned assassination ,but to the public is presented as “an accident”. Even though there is tons of evidence against this ” accidental accident”.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H0x1rTYeQos

    • Jonathon Blakeley April 16, 2012 at 8:02 pm #

      Yes I saw this < stunk of foul play. I thought the Russsian’s had some motive. Weren’t Polad allowing USA missile to be house on Polish land against Russia’s will.

      • searching April 16, 2012 at 10:23 pm #

        It is pretty complex issue. First everbody blamed the Russians as it happended on the Russian soil. But it looks like it maybe even more “secret”.
        Kaczynski and his governement were not likable by the EU, and the ECB,IMF and some other forces.
        We have to look at certain “events” in the context of pursuit/desire to install the global government (NWO).
        One of the major steps is to destroy, once strong economically and independent Europe, bring it down to its knees.
        Bring the level of poverty and conflicts and uncertainty to the level of the poorest ,3rd world countries.
        Same thing with the USA and Canada.
        Next (or rather along the line) step is to start the war with Iran and some other muslim countries.
        Evil people, evil plans, ignorant, indifferent , impotent public made mostly of fools, cowards and usefull idiots.

        • Jonathon Blakeley April 16, 2012 at 10:31 pm #

          Aah… the International Mafia Front as Max Keiser likes to call them. The IMF… we need to get rid of them. They are part of the problem not the solution.

          • searching April 16, 2012 at 10:44 pm #

            Not too many people know that the late president, Lech Kaczysnki, and his wife Maria invited 73 children from Gaza to visit Poland for a few weeks in June 2009.
            He sent his presidential plane to Egypt to get the children, and did a lot of diplomatic “gymnastic” in order to make sure that the children may come ans stay.
            Here is a video of his late wife ,Maria Kaczynska welcoming the children in the Presidential Palace in Warsaw.
            http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fFxKhrq_PQ8
            Children enjoyed the visit very much, received a lot of love and care, were on the catholic TV Trwam program and had reaaly good time there.
            Who’ve heard about it???

          • ariadna April 17, 2012 at 3:20 am #

            Beautiful. What other presdient and first lady did this?
            Eshche Polska ne zginela!

          • searching April 17, 2012 at 12:52 pm #

            Jeszcze Polska nie zginela, but ..it became a province,a part of the multi-national State , formally known as The European Union ,(which is a prelude to the future, one -global-state aka NWO )
            By signing Lisbon Treaty Poland ,like all other european nations, lost its independance and sovereignity.
            Now Poland has a bunch of traitors, opportunists, cowards and fools who are in charge of the country. And they do an excellent job in destroying it .

          • ariadna April 17, 2012 at 1:05 pm #

            The only country in that area fighting to maintain its independence and refusing to change its constitution to hand over control to the EU seems to be Hungary. Predictably the presstitution profession in the West is busy writing about Hungary slipping ‘away from democracy’ and veering into a dangerous right-wing path of nationalism …

          • searching April 17, 2012 at 1:21 pm #

            exactly. Hungary has guts, and they have a terrific leader, Victor Orban.
            How dare he is to disobey the Almighty European Union?? Hhe is messing up with their plans, and sooo many people support him.

          • who_me April 17, 2012 at 3:49 am #

            some info i had not seen before, searching, as that kraut on laugh in used to say, very interesting. :) do you have any links supporting the info about the kaczynski-imf marriage spat?

          • searching April 17, 2012 at 1:25 pm #

            who_me,
            do your homework. i know what i am talking about.
            I ‘ll give you hint. Slawomir Skrzypek the president of the National Bank of POland (NBP), died along with Lech Kaczynski on 04.10.2010

          • ariadna April 17, 2012 at 1:54 pm #

            The part about not finding any bodies or luggage in the wreckage was stunning. Was that ever explained and was the burial symbolic then? Also strange that all European leaders cancelled their attendance of the funeral ceremony at the last moment.
            Putin would have had to be in on the cover-up if not on the whole thing then?

        • Somoe April 16, 2012 at 10:35 pm #

          ‘Evil people, evil plans, ignorant, indifferent, impotent public made mostly of fools, cowards and useful idiots.’
          A very astute summary of the state of affairs.

          Your analysis of the Polish ‘Accident’ and how it fits into the NWO, seems quite on the money to me.

      • who_me April 17, 2012 at 3:52 am #

        “I thought the Russsian’s had some motive. Weren’t Polad allowing USA missile to be house on Polish land against Russia’s will.”

        that sopunds like something right out of mi6 murray’s mouth. you should know better. crashing that plane on russian soil makes about as much sense as iran doing israeli diplomats in india recently.

        remember paul wellstone? who did he piss off?

  3. Jonathon Blakeley April 16, 2012 at 7:58 pm #

    I know there is lot of 9/11 stuff out there. But this is IMO by far and away the best analysis of this most difficult subject.

    If we are serious about Truth, Justice and Peace then 9/11 is the biggest pack of lies out there and such it should be our duty to get the truth out and demand justice for this most heinous of crimes.

    So far the mainstream media have remained willfully ignorant to discussing or debating 9/11. So we best get busy otherwise they will outlaw discussion of 9/11 just like the Holocaust. Then we will all become 9/11 deniers and treated like heretics once again.

    I am not a denier, I am a truth seeker & 9/11 standard story is a pack of Lies from beginning to end and I am happy to deny those lies because the truth shall set us free.

    Truth Justice & Peace

    • aemathisphd April 16, 2012 at 8:30 pm #

      “So we best get busy otherwise they will outlaw discussion of 9/11 just like the Holocaust. Then we will all become 9/11 deniers and treated like heretics once again.”

      Yet here is this Web site, where people — by name — discuss the Holocaust…

  4. Loren Franklin April 16, 2012 at 8:15 pm #

    Who are you going to believe, these eye witnesses, or the Mossad…er…President Bush…opps…the US Government…wait a minute…maybe the Pentagon? Certainly all these eye witnesses are conspiracy nuts.

    How can you possibly believe ordinary people when your government has told you what to think? Next you’ll be saying that this was planned by Israel in an effort to get that half-wit George Bush to green-light the wars in the middle east.

    You must believe your government at all costs. Big brother has your best interest in mind. Go back to your internet porn, your ipods, and your television programing. Let Big Brother take care of all your thinking for you. Sleep sheeple — sleep and let Israel take care of you.

  5. aemathisphd April 16, 2012 at 8:20 pm #

    Virtually every claim made in the above video is addressed here:

    http://www.911myths.com/html/dancing_israelis.html

    Any thinking person reading so easily performed a refutation of the above should be immediately suspicious of tales of conspiracy.

    • who_me April 17, 2012 at 3:55 am #

      you israelis really hate that finger when it gets pointed at you, for a change.

  6. aemathisphd April 16, 2012 at 8:24 pm #

    Jeez, it took me literally two seconds to disprove the very first allegation here:

    http://www.911myths.com/index.php/A_slip_of_the_tongue

  7. Jonathon Blakeley April 16, 2012 at 9:12 pm #

    I have looked at your links Andrew and they do not look to convincing to me.

    Answer me this Andrew who benefitted from 9/11?

    Shortly after 9/11 guess what Israel began building the security barrier, which became a wall with it they took more land. And the Palestinian all became terrorists. I am sure it was all just a conicidence.

    • solar April 17, 2012 at 2:16 pm #

      ‘I have looked at your links Andrew and they do not look to convincing to me.’

      A textbook lesson in ‘I will believe what I want to believe because I want to believe it, facts be damned.’

      One could almost call it Blakeleyism.

  8. aemathisphd April 16, 2012 at 9:27 pm #

    Three points, JB:

    (1) Of course you’re not convinced. I didn’t expect you to be. I showed you that the Cheney “quote” was ripped from its context. A retarded monkey could see that. But you couldn’t.

    (2) On “cui bono”:

    http://www.urban75.org/info/conspiraloons.html

    See #4.

    (3) What you’re engaged in with Israel is what’s called a post hoc propter hoc fallacy. Look it up. Now, I’m sure that what you wrote above you believe to be the truth, but Israel was doing certain things long before 9/11, and your ignorance of that fact doesn’t change history.

  9. Jay Knott April 16, 2012 at 9:46 pm #

    ‘Cui bono?’ is a logical fallacy. It rains. Farmers benefit. Israel didn’t benefit from September 11th 2001 anyway. US support went from 100% to 100%.

    The 9/11 truth movement claims that Mossad, or the CIA, are clever enough to employ hundreds to murder thousands of US civilians, damage the Pentagon, destroy three major commercial buildings, and cause trillions of dollars of economic damage, and make it look like someone else did it, but not clever enough to figure out that a few amateur physicists looking at Youtube can see that there must have been explosives in those buildings – look at how fast they fell down! And jet fuel doesn’t burn that hot! And what about the airforce being stood down? And the pet goat… etc. etc. etc.

    The 9/11 truth ‘theory’ doesn’t benefit Palestine solidarity. I’ve stood outside an AIPAC convention trying to persuade ‘troofers’ to take down their signs: ‘Israel did it’, which tend to deter people with a grasp of logic. We need more people like that. It’s better to stick to things you can prove Israel did – taking US money to do ethnic cleansing, and stirring up Islamic extremism – than claiming it does things for which the evidence is wanting.

    • ariadna April 17, 2012 at 1:52 am #

      ‘Cui bono?’ is a logical fallacy. It rains. Farmers benefit.”

      Your example is a fallacy of bad faith. Rain is not the effect of human agency. When you ask Cui bono?Cui prodest? you always refer to HUMAN deliberate acts. You know that, I am sure, which is why I consider this bad faith on your part.

      ” Israel didn’t benefit from September 11th 2001 anyway.”

      You are contradicting none other than Bibi himself. He said it was good for Israel because… now Americans understand what terrorism is.
      More than that it benefited Israel immediately and enormously. Aid to Israel was upped by Bush generously (wasn’t it $30 bil extra over the next 10 years?)–our “ally” in the fight against “turr’rists,” the Dept of Homeland Security was set up, Chertoff (needs no introduction) was placed in charge, American companies of middling-to-large size immediately set up “security awareness and preparedness seminars” each of which was held at the cost of tens of thousands of dollars by the best security experts in the world: Israelis flown in to carry out their teaching mission.
      Airports were outfitted with new security control machines made by a company with Israeli-American ownership, in which Chertoff had a major financial interest. Most importantly critics of Israel’s brutal ethnic cleansing were silenced. “Muslim” became a swear word.
      Palestinians were repeatedly–in that false video–shown to be terrorists, cheering American deaths. Israel could do no wrong, whatever it did to those “terrorists.”
      Myopia or bad faith, Jay?

      “The 9/11 truth movement claims that Mossad, or the CIA, are clever enough to employ hundreds to murder thousands of US civilians, damage the Pentagon, destroy three major commercial buildings, and cause trillions of dollars of economic damage, and make it look like someone else did it, but not clever enough to figure out that a few amateur physicists …. etc”

      The CIA and/or the Mossad are clearly “clever” enough to cook up videos showing Bin Laden ever younger in each successive video, and clever enough to push those pathetic videos with the Gadan/Cohen fundamentalist swearing death to the US and Israel, clever enough to send anthrax that can only come from Fort Dettrick selectively to bothersome senators, yes, apparently that’s how clever they are. Are you saying these things are too dumb for Jews?

      “The 9/11 truth ‘theory’ doesn’t benefit Palestine solidarity.”

      The truth about 9/11 benefits EVERYBODY. Trying to persuade anybody to shut about it because you consider it outside the grasp of your logic is the only illogical thing.
      Israel’s thumbprints are all over 9/11; to claim otherwise is to willfully ignore them. Your claim about absence of proof is probably what you’d say about USS Liberty.
      The truth about 9/11 would benefit Americans first, who badly need to to wake up but it clearly benefits Palestinians as well because the total submission of the American government to the ZPC (Petras’ excellent term which encompasses more than AIPAC) illuminates America’s collusion, in fact complicity–to their national tragedy at the hands of Israel.

      • ariadna April 17, 2012 at 2:05 am #

        How could I forget?!?
        How could I forget the biggest benefit reaped by Israel: the beginning of the wars on its behalf. Act I: Iraq.

        • who_me April 17, 2012 at 4:04 am #

          well said, ariadna. the only “country” 9=11 benefited was israel. the profits went to a lot of scum, but outside of israel, those scum made the lot of those living outside israeli worse. from economic to political, we are all worse off because of zionist oligarchical power games here.

  10. Jonathon Blakeley April 16, 2012 at 9:56 pm #

    Tell you what Jay, I will ask some Palestinians what effect 9/11 had on them? I will ask them to comment.

    • ariadna April 16, 2012 at 10:22 pm #

      “I’ve stood outside an AIPAC convention trying to persuade ‘troofers’ to take down their signs: ‘Israel did it’, which tend to deter people with a grasp of logic.”

      Amazing… He was concerned the signs might offend AIPAC…. imagine the consequences of AIPAC being, you know, “deterred”…
      His mental world is sealed airtight and there are no mirrors

  11. Jonathon Blakeley April 16, 2012 at 10:11 pm #

    The 9/11 truth ‘theory’ doesn’t benefit Palestine solidarity

    That is the biggest pile of nonsense I have heard in some time. Oh and who made you the guardian of Truth and “Palestine Solidarity”.

    I thought you were American Jay? yet you are confident enough to dictate what benefits the Palestine Solidarity movement.

    Have’t we been here before?

    • Jay Knott April 17, 2012 at 12:04 am #

      Jonathon – “I thought you were American” – wrong, and irrelevant. When the 9/11 geniuses say their ‘findings’ DO benefit the Palestine solidarity movement, do you ask about their nationality? Do you accuse them of ‘dictating’? I haven’t said anything about ‘what effect 9/11 had’ on Palestinians. And Ariadna – we weren’t trying to convince the AIPAC attendees, but the general public!

      • ariadna April 17, 2012 at 2:01 am #

        One more thing to clarify:
        You stood outside the AIPAC convention and tried to convince the demonstrators to take down the “Israel did 9/11″ signs in order “to convince the general public” of … what?

        • Jay Knott April 17, 2012 at 3:12 pm #

          Ariadna – I said to some of the protesters I’d prefer it if they didn’t hold up signs saying “Israel did it”, so we could concentrate on the task in hand, not random theory-mongering. It doesn’t matter how many engineers say something – science is not a democracy. Of course no skyscraper had collapsed like that before – people generally don’t fly planes full of thousands of gallons of fuel into them. I could write ‘Logic 101′ followed by ‘The scientific method from Popper to Kuhn’, but you know what Dorothy Parker said about horticulture…

          • ariadna April 17, 2012 at 3:22 pm #

            I’ll ask again: What was “the task in hand”? What greater truth were you about to teach “the general public” that you did not want the message distracted by the topic of 9/11?

            “It doesn’t matter how many engineers say something – science is not a democracy.”

            I guess you don’t know much about science then. Given established qualifications and expertise of the experts, peer review is exactly that: a democracy. If six reviewers say “it’s bogus” and two claim it is correct, you go with the 6, especially when the two are unable to come up with anything except ANTI-SCIENTIFIC explanations.

            If you wrote Logic 101 in the manner in which you defend the official conspiracy theory you would be laughed at.

          • aemathisphd April 17, 2012 at 3:50 pm #

            How many peer-reviewed pubs support the controlled demolition hypothesis? One? The one by Jones?

          • ariadna April 17, 2012 at 4:56 pm #

            Have you picked the three researchers/engineers whose qualifications you (for sure an expert) wanted to check? Waiting to hear on that.

          • aemathisphd April 17, 2012 at 5:15 pm #

            Oh, for Christ’s sake…

            Just choose three fricking researchers or say you won’t. I asked you first. You don’t get to shift the burden.

    • Loren Franklin April 17, 2012 at 1:20 am #

      Of course it benefits the Palestinians. If the truth is told about their oppressors, they loose face on a world-wide scale, and their crimes against humanity are brought into full focus. And could it be more obvious that it is not just Palestinians that would benefit? Every target the Mossad has would benefit.

      Let the Palestinians speak for themselves, we Americans have plenty to answer for, and have no right to dictate truth to anyone.

    • solar April 17, 2012 at 2:19 pm #

      ‘Oh and who made you the guardian of Truth and “Palestine Solidarity”’

      … says the self-appointed guardian of Truth and Palestine Solidarity.

  12. Somoe April 16, 2012 at 10:24 pm #

    It seems there are many who choose to deny the truth of the evidence presented. In my opinion, none of the links supplied by Mathis nor the shockingly dismissive content of Jay Knott’s last comment are very convincing reasons to doubt the evidence collated in this video – to say there is a lack of evidence seems to me beyond logic and quite willfully ignorant.

    • aemathisphd April 16, 2012 at 10:42 pm #

      Really? Do you agree that the “quote” from Cheney was taken out of context?

      • Loren Franklin April 17, 2012 at 1:22 am #

        Cheer-leading for Cheney? And you put a PhD at the end of your name? Is this a joke?

        • who_me April 17, 2012 at 4:06 am #

          LOL

        • aemathisphd April 17, 2012 at 4:17 am #

          Not cheerleading for Cheney; pointing out an obvious lie in the video above not five seconds into it. Learn to pick up on context.

          • solar April 17, 2012 at 2:21 pm #

            This is one of those ‘excluded middle’ things – if you think the troofers are full of delusionary crap (which they most decidedly are), then they call you a neo-con.

            Just like, if you’re bothered in any way by Hamas sending rockets from Gaza into the schoolyards of Sderot, you’re an ‘arch-zionist fanatic’.

      • Somoe April 17, 2012 at 9:20 am #

        well if you want to argue the point, the fact that Cheney can’t even remember who is being discussed, speaks volumes in itself. For Saddam Hussein and Usama bin Laden read ‘scapegoat’ – the man can’t even remember which is which!

        What about WTC7 Andrew, what do you make of that? What about all the rest of the evidence cited in the video or is the Cheney quote your main beef here?

        • aemathisphd April 17, 2012 at 11:46 am #

          I’d say it was a slip of the tongue. They were talking about 9/11. Did you read the context? If not, you should. Or you’d better be very sure you never make such slips yourself.

          As for WTC7, see:

          http://www.debunking911.com/pull.htm

          • ariadna April 17, 2012 at 12:57 pm #

            If you really believe that WWC7 collapsed neatly in its footprint like the other two because it was somehow “weakened,” your capacity to suspend rational thinking is huge.
            Amazing that you don’t realize at all that sharing this belief (vehemently at that) exposes you to pitying ridicule, or more likely you don’t care because it is they–in your view–who are all–one of your favorite words– ‘morons.’

          • aemathisphd April 17, 2012 at 1:27 pm #

            And your opinion is based on your years of experience as a structural engineer?

          • ariadna April 17, 2012 at 1:49 pm #

            It is a dumb question, can’t believe you don’t know it is dumb but rather you are so arrogant that you think the others are incapable of noticing it.
            We make our own opinions every day based on believing one set of experts over another. You need to have the reasoning capacity to weigh the plausibility of one scenario vs another.
            If you choose to disbelieve the HUNDREDS of INDEPENDENT architects and engineers (experts in structural engineering, materials resistance, metallurgists, etc) –not officially hired to concoct the official fairy tale–and instead choose to believe the official story, which asks you to ignore your own common sense, silence your basic knowledge that no skyscraper has EVER collapsed in its own footprint because it was “weakened,” and basically to believe that some basic laws of physics were suspended for this event, then I can only conclude that you are vested in supporting it and have little regard for your own reasoning power and common sense or, again, given your arrogance, for the intelligence of others to whom you profess to believe this nonsense.
            PS. I suppose Silverstein saying on TV “They told me we had to pull it down” was a misspeak or maybe “taken out of context.”.

          • aemathisphd April 17, 2012 at 1:55 pm #

            (1) Please name three of these engineers of whom you speak.

            (2) You didn’t read the link I posted clearly; they discuss this matter of Silverstein saying “pull it.”

          • ariadna April 17, 2012 at 2:28 pm #

            I misspoke. There are not hundreds of architects and engineers but ONE THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED. Take your pick from the bones who speak in this video:

            http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yIOC1J44RYw&feature=player_embedded

            Also read some more:

            http://www.ae911truth.org/

            or better not… it may make you uncomfortable.

          • ariadna April 17, 2012 at 2:30 pm #

            typo: take your pick from the ones who speak

          • ariadna April 17, 2012 at 2:48 pm #

            Addendum for aema:
            Numbers don’t mean a thing, of course, 1500 engineers and architects can be wrong and a handful can be right, irrespective of who pays the smaller group for their reports.
            The number of Jews among the 1500 is also irrelevant: you know better than most that there are lots of self-hating Jews in every profession.
            As an aside I had no idea Ed Asner was also a self-hating Jew. How sad.

          • aemathisphd April 17, 2012 at 2:56 pm #

            Let’s go with three. Then we can discuss their qualifications.

            You people are really terrible at structured debate…

          • ariadna April 17, 2012 at 3:15 pm #

            Read again slowly:
            TAKE YOUR PICK. Pick 3 from the speakers of the engineers on the video and go. Examine their “qualifications”…

            “You people are really terrible at structured debate”

            You, on the other hand stand out head and shoulders above “you people, and thus do a great service, as a caricature usually serves in highlighting the main features. You’re a poster boy of brain-washing.

          • ariadna April 17, 2012 at 2:32 pm #

            I saw that silly thing in which Silverstein presents himself as hip to some arcane demolition workers argot—pathetic. You should not let them play with your mind when it is clear they have contempt for it.

          • solar April 17, 2012 at 2:22 pm #

            In other words, all you have is an argument from incredulity.

            Fail.

          • solar April 17, 2012 at 2:23 pm #

            That was directed at Ariadna, not Andrew, incidentally.

            Threading is really not at all a difficult thing to implement, and I’m looking forward to JB finally getting it right.

          • ariadna April 17, 2012 at 2:29 pm #

            Keep quiet, you might appear wiser or at least less… the opposite.

          • Somoe April 18, 2012 at 11:07 am #

            To ‘pull’ a building of that size takes a great deal of planning and preparation and you would like us to believe that this was achieved in a matter of hours in a compromised structure! You really are stretching the credulity of any thinking person way beyond the limit. I’m certain that Loren is right when he says,

            “Mr. Mathis and his ilk are tribally invested in making sure Mossad involvement is white-washed. Think of the hit Jewish people would take in the USA if it were shown to be true, not to mention the rest of the world.”

            So far I remain unconvinced by your ludicrous explanations (hasbara), to discount the evidence presented, and the more willfully ignorant and ‘retarded monkey-like’ you appear in this matter.

            You do Jews no favours with your behaviour, best to join the rest of humanity in resisting this scourge before time runs out and more people die needlessly to serve this monstrous military industrial complex/NWO.

    • Loren Franklin April 17, 2012 at 11:05 pm #

      I agree with you, Somoe. If even one forth of the allegations are true, then the whole Government story is a lie. Mr. Mathis and his ilk are tribally invested in making sure Mossad involvement is white-washed. Think of the hit Jewish people would take in the USA if it were shown to be true, not to mention the rest of the world. “Shockingly dismissive” might be an understatement, when considering what is at stake if the points made in the video are actually true: and I think they may well be true. What a disgusting bunch of people, to do these kinds of things.

      • Jonathon Blakeley April 17, 2012 at 11:58 pm #

        When Zionuts get wound up and froth at the mouth spitting Talmudic Babel at some person or subject, it is usually a good sign that their must be some substance to the claims being made.

        Alan Dershowitz has recently denoucned MJRosenberg for being an extremist forcing him to resign from his job. What was his crime?

        He used the term “Israel Firster”

  13. who_me April 17, 2012 at 6:19 am #

    “Do you agree that the “quote” from Cheney was taken out of context?” from “enema”

    typical jewish zionist attempt to create a strawman to argue against.

    • aemathisphd April 17, 2012 at 11:42 am #

      No, moron: A strawman would be my trying to impute an opinion to you and then arguing against it.

      What I’m trying to do is keep people on subject.

      Now it’s your turn to lob some “gay” smear at me. Go ahead. People like you do this because if you had to face your opponents in real life, you’d fetch a beating.

      • ariadna April 17, 2012 at 12:22 pm #

        ” “gay” smear’?! Tsk, tsk! To consider it a smear you must be either homophobic or a self-hating gay.

        • aemathisphd April 17, 2012 at 12:40 pm #

          See you next Tuesday.

          • ariadna April 17, 2012 at 1:01 pm #

            Don’t threaten me.

        • who_me April 18, 2012 at 6:25 am #

          ariadna

          “To consider it a smear you must be either homophobic or a self-hating gay.”

          self-hating gay – lol

    • ariadna April 18, 2012 at 1:20 am #

      He is one of he best. Thanks!

Leave a Reply