Update: Another Version (Translation)
|As his eminence stresses that the Palestinian cause is a central one, Hezbollah Secretary General, Sayyed Hasan Nasrallah, says that the resistance can turn lives of millions of Zionists into real hell. Nasrallah threatens “hell” if Israel strikes LebanonNasrallah threatens “hell” if Israel strikes Lebanon
Commemorating the International al-Quds day, Hezbollah held a ceremony in Beirut’s southern suburb, in which Sayyed Nasrallah addressed crowds, stressing that the resistance would defend the country against any Israeli attack, and would not wait for any permission to do so.His eminence noted that the price of this attack would be very expensive to the extent that “we can talk about tens of thousands of killed.”
Hezbollah S.G. affirmed that the issue of al-Quds “is over all disagreements”, adding that the Islamic Republic has been committed to the Palestinian cause. Concerning the events in Lebanon in the last two days, Sayyed Nasralla said that Hezbollah following the abduction of the Lebanese pilgrims in Syria had asked people to go out of streets. However his eminence stressed that now after three months of the abduction, the condition in the country was over control of Hezbollah and Amal Movement.
Sayyed Nasrallah also slammed media channels for their performance, saying it was “catastrophic” especially regarding the responsibility towards the kin of the abductees.
ABOUT THE OCCASION: AL-QUDS
Sayyed Nasrallah stressed on the importance of making al-Quds the central cause, saying that it is over all disagreements within the Arabs and Muslims.
“We meet today in al-Quds day which Imam Khomeini had chosen as an international day in the last Friday of the holy month of Ramadan,” his eminence addressed crowds.
“Imam Khomeini chose this day for al-Quds in an indication that this spiritual condition that we live in Ramadan should be concentrated in the favor of al-Quds.”
Concerning Hezbollah’s stance towards al-Quds, Sayyed Nasrallah wanted to “reassure the enemy and the friend that the issue of al-Quds and Palestine is over all disagreements, and our faith in it would not be shaken.”
His eminence said that the Israeli enemy has been working on judaizing al-Quds, as he noted that the issue of al-Quds is an issue of consensus within the Israelis.
“Zionists agree upon al-Quds and they are working on judaization of it, while the Arabs are not agreeing upon this cause,” his eminence noted.
He said that the occupation has been building settlements and trying to force the Palestinians out of their land.
“One of the causes of the poverty among the Palestinians is the racial wall which the Zionist have built, while the Arabs are sinking in the quagmire of their divisions and disagreements,” his eminence added.
ZIONIST ENTITY AND IRAN THREAT
Talking about the changes within the region, Sayyed Nasrallah said that the Israeli enemy was first concerned over the revolutions across the Arab world, but then, when the crisis started in Syria, the Zionist entity was more comfortable, his eminence said further. “During the last two years, when the Arab world witnessed several changes, the Israeli enemy was concerned and they considered that the strategic danger on them was high.”
“Following these events, the Israeli enemy is standing aside, looking forward to developments with delight,” Sayyed Nasrallah added, noting that there are some sides who are exploiting Iran’s stance over the Syrian crisis in order “to create enmity between the Arab countries and the Islamic Republic.”
Hezbollah S.G. also tackled the recent threats by the Zionist entity over a strike against the Islamic Republic.
“In the last months the Israeli staged unprecedented escalation towards Iran, Syria or even Lebanon. This escalation is built on the last developments taking place in the region.”
Sayyed Nasrallah said that Israel’s problem with Iran is that the Islamic republic is committed to the Palestinian cause and al-Quds.
“The Zionist entity is mulling Iran attack and there is disagreement between the military institutions and the political ones. The base of this disagreement is not moral, but it’s over the utility of this military action and the price which Israel would pay,” his eminence noted.
“Why Israel is mulling the attack?” resistance leader wondered, adding: “If Iran was weak or coward the Zionist entity would not hesitate to attack the Islamic Republic.”
“Based on information and not analysis Iran’s response to any Israeli attack would be stunning and very powerful,” Sayyed Nasrallah said adding that the Israeli attack on Iran would be “the golden chance that the Islamic Republic has been waiting for years.”
“ABLE TO CHANGE ISRAEL’S PHASE”
On the Israeli threats against Lebanon, the resistance leader was clear: the resistance can reach any target in the occupied territories and is able to change the phase of Israel.
“We can turn the lives of millions of Zionists to a real hell and we can change the phase of Israel,” Sayyed Nasrallah said.
“I say to enemy: the war against Lebanon is very, very, very… expensive!”
“In the year of 2006 there were two idiots (Olmert and Peretz) who committed an idiocy, bringing a huge defeat for Israel. And today I say to the Zionists that you have two other idiots: Netanyahu and Barak and if they committed an idiocy especially concerning Iran attack then it would be the end of Israel.”
Sayyed Nasrallah also tackled Mecca summit which took place two days ago. His eminence considered that there were some positive points which were announced at the end of the summit which was called by the Organization of the Islamic Cooperation (OIC).
Sayyed Nasrallah welcomed the announcement of establishing a center for dialogue between Islamic sects. However his eminence said that the first step for this dialogue to succeed is to stop the accusations of unbelief by some sects to others, noting that the Saudi Arabia should stop funding some satellite channels.
He noted that what has been going on in Syria is aimed at weakening Palestine.
Sayyed Nasrallah said that Syria should have been invited for the OIC meeting.
“CATASTROPHIC PERFORMANCE OF MEDIA”
On the issue of the abducted Lebanese pilgrims, Sayyed Nasrallah said that at the first Hezbollah decided not to talk in the case and to let the Lebanese authorities do their duty.
His eminence slammed the media’s performance regarding the issue of the abductees, saying it was “catastrophic.”
Posted on August 17, 2012 |
Last month, the European Union turned down Israeli request to declare Lebanese Islamic Resistance group Hizbullah “a terrorist organization”.
“There is no consensus for putting Hezbollah on the list of terrorist organisations,” said Cypriot Foreign Minister Erato Kozakou-Marcoullis, whose country currently holds the rotating EU presidency.
As a result, some paranoid Zionist idiot by the name Nicholas Kulish whined at The New York Times (August 15, 2012) that thousands of Hizbullah members and supporters in Europe raise money that is funneled to the leadership in Lebanon. However, he did not mentioned if the the amount funneled to Hizbullah leadership is greater than US$6-14 billion funneled to Israel each year by the US government, Israeli lobby groups and Israel’s supporters.
Nicholas Kulish also claim that had EU declared Hizbullah a terrorist organization, it would have “destroyed Hizbullah”. In other words what 30,000-strong Jewish army could not achieve during the 34-day war in 2006 – EU’s declaration would have done it. First of all, Hizbullah doesn’t receive money from EU but Israel does. Furthermore, Hizbullah’ main backer, Iran is under EU’s several ‘Crippling Sanctions‘. To prove his case against Hizbullah, Nicholas Kulish, quoted several sources from the US State Department and European think tanks – all Zionist Jew individuals.
The EU is not an ‘honest broker’ when it comes to Israel-Arab conflicts. Most of the EU countries are ruled by Zionist-controlled politicians who would rather let Arabs pay for the Europeans’ past crimes against Jewish communities which were expelled 108 times from European countries. Furthermore, several polls had proved that a great majority of Europeans still don’t trust Jews – and therefore, they would not accept Israeli Jews back.
A 2003 poll conducted by Taylor Nelson Sofres/ EOS Gallup Europe in October 2003 among 15 EU countries showed that 57% of participants considered Israel to be the greatest threat to world peace. Early this year, Israel lobby group, Anti-Defamation League (ADL) released the results of its survey among EU countries. It showed that great majority of participants considered Jews more loyal to Israel than the countries they live in. Hungary (63%) topped hatred toward Jews and Israel followed by Spain (53%), Poland (48%), France (45%), Austria (28%), Germany (21%) and UK (10%) among the ten EU countries polled. A 2011 survey conducted among eight European Union (EU) nations by Friedrich-Ebert Stiftung, a prestigious Berlin-based think tank, associated with German Opposition Social Democratic Party (SDP), had found that 72.2% of Polish people believed that “Jews try to take advantage of having been victims during the Nazi era”. 68.1% Hungarians and 49.8% German participants agreed with Polish view.
On August 14, Hizbullah members and supporters celebrated the ‘Victory Day’. The event signifies Hizbullah victory over Israel in Summer 2006. It was the 5th Israeli war on Lebanon. Since then the Zionist entity did not attack Lebanon. The Resistance won for the second time. Hizbullah is not just a Shia resistance group as the western and Salafi-Wahabi propagandists like people to believe. In reality, Hizbullah, is a national resistance movement which have members and supporters from all sectors of Lebanese population, Shias, Sunnies, Christians and even atheist Ba’athists.
In November 2010 – Dr. Franklin Lamb wrote that Israel doesn’t know how to defeat Hizbullah.
”The skills that Hizbollah fighters used to force repeated errors by Israeli forces during the July 2006 war, and although not widely reported, during its 18 years of occupation of Lebanon (1982-2000). Errors, that the Israeli Winograd commission called “ the worst kind of mistakes and failures of the ground forces.” Among the examples still discussed in Dahiyeh, and presumably in Tel Aviv and Washington, include the Hizbollah forces routing of the Israeli “elite” Golani, Egoz and Magland Brigades at Maron al Ras on the Lebanese-Palestine border between July 25-30, 2006,” wrote Dr. Lamb.
“Increasingly during the 33 day July 2006 War, Israeli forces refused orders to advance against Hezbollah fighters, happily opting for 14 day jail sentences for failure to obey orders. Concerning IDF recruitment and AWOL problems, according to IDF Captain Arye Shalicar of the IDF Recruitment Fraud unit, it is US taxpayers who foot the bill for eight companies of private investigators recently hired to track down Israeli draft dodgers. The popular social networking site, Facebook, is being used to track down thousands who lied about being religiously observant and seeking to avoid facing Hezbollah,” added Dr. Lamb.
“Hizbollah, has smashed the myth of Israel’s invincibility, broken the barrier of fear, increased the popular demand for resistance, exposed the fake peace process and rejected appeasement, acquiescence and surrender. Hezbollah forces taught the world that Arabs can and will liberate Palestine because they possess the qualities and acumen to do it. The kings and the presidents in the region, who for six decades chose their thrones over Jerusalem quake as does Israel,” says Dr. Lamb.
Eye on The Enemy: Debate on Attacking Iran Governs “Israel”
Gantz: We Must Be Prepared for Multi-Front War
Ahamdinejad: Zionist Regime An Insult to Humanity, Must be Removed
Sheikh Qaouk: Resistance Only Strategy to Guarantee Liberation of Occupied Lands
Al-Moussawi: Resistance Arms Remain as long as “Israel” Occupies Land
100,000 HITS IN 100 MINUTES CRASHED THE SITE. WE DON’T KNOW YET IF GENUINE INTEREST OR DENIAL OF SERVICE ATTACK. OUR BRILLIANT WEBHOSTS HAVE QUADRUPLED THE RESOURCE, BUT IF YOU CAN HELP TAKE THE STRAIN BY REPOSTING I WOULD BE VERY GRATEFUL.
I returned to the UK today to be astonished by private confirmation from within the FCO that the UK government has indeed decided – after immense pressure from the Obama administration – to enter the Ecuadorean Embassy and seize Julian Assange.
This will be, beyond any argument, a blatant breach of the Vienna Convention of 1961, to which the UK is one of the original parties and which encodes the centuries – arguably millennia – of practice which have enabled diplomatic relations to function. The Vienna Convention is the most subscribed single international treaty in the world.
The provisions of the Vienna Convention on the status of diplomatic premises are expressed in deliberately absolute terms. There is no modification or qualification elsewhere in the treaty.
1.The premises of the mission shall be inviolable. The agents of the receiving State may not enter
them, except with the consent of the head of the mission.
2.The receiving State is under a special duty to take all appropriate steps to protect the premises
of the mission against any intrusion or damage and to prevent any disturbance of the peace of the
mission or impairment of its dignity.
3.The premises of the mission, their furnishings and other property thereon and the means of
transport of the mission shall be immune from search, requisition, attachment or execution.
Not even the Chinese government tried to enter the US Embassy to arrest the Chinese dissident Chen Guangchen. Even during the decades of the Cold War, defectors or dissidents were never seized from each other’s embassies. Murder in Samarkand relates in detail my attempts in the British Embassy to help Uzbek dissidents. This terrible breach of international law will result in British Embassies being subject to raids and harassment worldwide.
The government’s calculation is that, unlike Ecuador, Britain is a strong enough power to deter such intrusions. This is yet another symptom of the “might is right” principle in international relations, in the era of the neo-conservative abandonment of the idea of the rule of international law.
The British Government bases its argument on domestic British legislation. But the domestic legislation of a country cannot counter its obligations in international law, unless it chooses to withdraw from them. If the government does not wish to follow the obligations imposed on it by the Vienna Convention, it has the right to resile from it – which would leave British diplomats with no protection worldwide.
I hope to have more information soon on the threats used by the US administration. William Hague had been supporting the move against the concerted advice of his own officials; Ken Clarke has been opposing the move against the advice of his. I gather the decision to act has been taken in Number 10.
There appears to have been no input of any kind from the Liberal Democrats. That opens a wider question – there appears to be no “liberal” impact now in any question of coalition policy. It is amazing how government salaries and privileges and ministerial limousines are worth far more than any belief to these people. I cannot now conceive how I was a member of that party for over thirty years, deluded into a genuine belief that they had principles.