Germany’s Jews and Muslims will not be punished for breaking the law-
On July 13, 2012, Chancellor Angela Merkel’s spokesman said that Germany’s Jews and Muslims will not be punished for breaking the law if they carry out circumcisions on young boys. This unusual phrasing recognized the legality of an earlier court ruling. In May, the court of Cologne ruled that circumcision inflicts bodily harm and should not be carried out on young boys, but could be practiced on older males who give consent. The ruling followed a case of a badly hurt boy taken to hospital after an attempt to circumcise him. The opposition to circumcision is wide also in the USA. On June 3, 2011, the Jewish Anti-Defamation League strongly condemned Monster Mohel, a comic book created by supporters of an anti-circumcision movement in San Francisco, saying it contained “grotesque anti-Semitic imagery and themes.” Unluckily, the ADL doesn’t show similar contempt for non-consenting victims of Jewish mutilation practices. The Male Genital Mutilation Bill group is pushing to make male circumcision illegal in San Francisco and has succeeded in getting their controversial measure on the November 2011 ballot. Similar activism exists also in Israel.
That ugly business called “Medical Science”
Many claim that circumcision is a healthy practice. In fact, all research proving that seems to be partial, politically, and financially motivated. More complete studies prove that tampering with male genitalia causes trauma, impaired sexual function and carries well-documented risks. The mutilation is carried out mostly by physicians—or “mohalim” in the case of Jews—that financially benefit from the act; their testimony on the “benefits” is thus worthless and must be seen as an unethical attempt to attract potential clients. The main problem is that when performed on babies, circumcision is a non-consensual mutilation. As the Court of Cologne, I have no problem with grown up Jews and Muslims showing their faith by mutilating their bodies; however, violating and mutilating their babies is not an acceptable option. Let the babies grow up and decide by themselves how to show their faith. Abraham wasn’t a baby when he was circumcised; neither should we.
Circumcision is closely related to experiments on humans and eugenic programs; the latter are attempts to get rid of the “unfit.” Two countries are notorious on this ignoble field: Nazi Germany and Israel (see Israel’s Eugenics Program: Dr. Mengele Blues). Until 1947, there was no code of conduct governing the ethical aspects of human research, though Germany and Russia had national policies on the issue. What we call now “Western Democracies” didn’t care about the issue and in fact were great supporters of eugenic science. In that year, the Nuremberg Code defined ten points regarding the ethic principles for human experimentation. This was a direct result of the Nuremberg Trials that followed the Second World War.
The Nuremberg Code defined the person’s consent to be part of an experiment as “absolutely essential,” while the Declaration of Geneva issued the following year relaxed the condition to “if at all possible.” Defining the regulation of medical research, the Declaration of Helsinki was adopted in June 1964 by the World Medical Association; since then it has undergone various revisions, the last one in October 2008. Though not legally binding, it has been codified in the local legislation of many countries, including Israel. In such countries, a body usually known as a “Helsinki Committee” regulates research on humans. Israel has such a committee in every hospital.
Since circumcision has not been proven to be beneficial, or even safe, the brutal procedure must be considered as experimental and be subjected to the rules governing experiments on humans. The Declaration of Helsinki states that “The subjects must be volunteers and informed participants in the research project” (Article B11). A 8-day old boy cannot be seen as a consenting subject, thus the “doctors” involved in this are nothing but criminals.
That ugly business called “Judaism”
The formal position of Judaism on this issue is determined by the Talmud, a Pharisaic interpretation of the Pentateuch, the Bible’s first five books. The Talmud is brutal in its interpretations. It defines non-Jews as non-humans; it sanctifies the raping of children. Under these circumstances it is difficult to expect a proper behavior by the State of Israel, which has defined itself as “Jewish.” Many times in this website I have commented on the striking similarities between Israel and the Nazi regime. This is true to the extent that the Israel looks as the legal successor of the latter. Dr. Josef Mengele was a German SS officer and a physician in the Nazi concentration camp Auschwitz-Birkenau, where he supervised the selection of arriving prisoners. He continued his research on heredity in that camp, especially in the field of identical twins. Less prominent in Israeli textbooks is the fact that he recruited a Czech named Berthold Epstein, a Jewish pediatrician to help him.
In the book The Nazi Doctors: Medical Killing and the Psychology of Genocide by Dr Robert Jay Lifton, it is claimed that Dr Epstein “was indignant that Mengele ‘wanted to rob him of his soul’” (page 296). Yet, despite this and that he “had extravagant notions of honor,” (same page) he fully cooperated in non-consensual experiments on humans carried out in the camp. “Cooperated” is not the best word to define his despicable actions. He proactively “proposed research on the treatment of noma” (same page) and led non-consensual research on humans. He couldn’t claim being a victim any more than Judas Iscariot. Yet, according to history books, he “had extravagant notions of honor.” Yes, of course he had. Not surprisingly, Jewish doctors who survived WWII joined the Israeli medical system and eventually were an important part of it for years. Ever since, there is a long history of illegitimate experiments on humans conducted by Israel (again, see Israel’s Eugenics Program: Dr. Mengele Blues). Moreover, Israel openly conducts a eugenic program. Dor Yeshorim (roughly “Straightening the Generation” in Hebrew) is the name of a state-program which seeks to reduce the incidence of Tay-Sachs disease, cystic fibrosis, Canavan disease, Fanconi anemia, familial dysautonomia, glycogen storage disease, Bloom’s Syndrome, Gaucher disease, Niemann-Pick disease, and mucolipidosis IV among certain Jewish communities. The Israeli public must carry out genetic tests to diagnose these diseases early in the pregnancy. If a fetus is diagnosed with one of these diseases the pregnancy may be terminated, subject to consent. What’s the State of Israel’s opinion on deaf people? Should they be allowed to be born? Should Beethoven have been forcibly aborted? What about Muslims and Christians? What about people with eyes too close to each other, or with small smiles? Should they live? Finally, what about Jews? And, while dealing with this, who can decide on this? Can a doctor unable to differentiate between good and evil destroy someone else’s life on account of his or her genes?
These are not coincidences, but the inevitable results of a monstrous moral system. Two days before Angela Merkel made her abovementioned statement, Levy Izhak Rosenbaum—an Israeli living in the USA— pleaded guilty at federal court in Trenton, NJ, to illegally brokering kidney transplants for profit in the United States. He charged between $120,000 and $150,000 to help three New Jersey residents find kidneys for transplant between 2006 and 2009. He found donors in Israel through newspaper advertisements. Then he helped arrange the necessary blood tests to ensure a match, and for the donors’ travel to the United States. He also helped donors and recipients invent a cover story to trick hospital staff into thinking the donation was altruistic, and thus legal, rather than an illegal business deal. As the picture shows, he is a Haredi Jew, claiming to be fearful of God, while in fact pursuing financial profits made out of others’ desperation. “A black market where the moneyed sick can buy replacement parts from the less fortunate is not only grim, it apportions lifesaving treatments unfairly, insults donor dignity, and violates the law,” Prosecutor Paul J. Fishman, the New Jersey U.S. Attorney, said in a statement following the sentencing by Judge Anne E. Thompson. Moreover, it is difficult to consider consensual an organ donation by someone otherwise facing hunger. One of the donors, who cooperated with the government in exchange for immunity from prosecution, described to the court that he felt exploited by Rosenbaum. Talmudic Judaism is wrong from “a” to “z,” from “alpha” to “omega,” from “aleph” to “tav.”
Frozen Jewish Hearts
In the last year the complex relations between Germany and Israel have experienced several dramatic events (see Germany Creates New Nuclear Front in the Middle East for a summary) to the extent that a quiet war seems to be going on between these two countries. By its recent court ruling, Germany has shown to have kicked out its Nazi past. No more eugenics, no more violations of people; meanwhile Jewish organizations are raising hell. The Conference of European Rabbis and the Central Council of Jews in Germany have condemned the court decision, saying it won’t be obeyed. “I don’t think that seventy years after the Holocaust a German court would put a parent or a mohel in jail for performing a Jewish religious commandment,” said Rabbi Pinchas Goldschmidt, president of the Conference of European Rabbis and Chief Rabbi of Moscow, told JTA. In his frozen heart, he failed to see his defenseless victim’s pain.
A recent Press report describes the wealthy aristocracy of rabbis that has appeared in Israel over the past few decades, who have “have carefully positioned themselves at the fulcrum of Israeli power and influence.” Their followers are some of Israel’s richest businessmen. These moguls have helped the new rabbinic “aristocracy” to turn their shekels into multi-million-dollar empires.
The rabbis, the article contends, “have become shrewd businessmen themselves,” managing large investments in stocks and real estate at home and abroad — while managing to keep their holdings safe from Israeli tax collectors.
The rabbis achieved symbolic admission to the world of business by the recent inclusion of 13 of the richest rabbis in the list of the richest published Israeli edition of Forbes magazine.
The g-dly business works like this: the rabbis “set up public office hours in their homes to receive Israelis on all rungs of the social ladder, as long as they come with cash. In exchange, adherents receive amulets and little pieces of paper containing the rabbi’s personalized blessing. The most successful rabbis have founded charitable institutions and small religious seminaries, which act as conduits for the incoming cash flow.”An expert on Orthodox Judaism and professor emeritus at Bar Ilan University, Menachem Friedman, says the practice has a tradition:
Religious Jewish businessmen since the 19th century have solicited rabbis’ blessings for cash to ensure their success — though today the sums have reached unprecedented amounts.
Friedman also explains the comfort derived by the faithfully rich (or is it richly faithful) from the rabbinical intercession:
If the market is dangerous and shaky, the millionaires who benefit from that market have less confidence. They need these rabbis to give them that security.
A series of exposes appeared in Israeli newspapers in the 1990s accusing a rabbi of cheating his followers into believing he had no money in the bank, and violently threatening some to pay up.
A national fraud squad investigation, discovered $125 million in his personal account. The rabbi reached a settlement with Israel’s tax authorities to pay a fraction of what he owed in taxes.
“These rabbis are charlatans, swindlers and cheaters. They have no real knowledge. And people eat it up,” said reporter Bar-Moha, who heads Tel Aviv’s journalists’ association.
An Israeli tax official, speaking anonymously because of the issue’s sensitivity, said in the past two years tax authorities have approached some 20 religious figures, requesting earnings reports. Some rabbis have been investigated for tax fraud. No convictions are known, but some have reportedly reached settlements with Israeli tax authorities.
Reached for comment, advisers of some of the rabbis profiled by Forbes either would not comment on the income estimates, or said they were wrong but would not provide other figures.”
Every single shekel brings about true peace,
announced the rabbi Rabbi Yaacov Israel Ifargan’s half-brother, a rabbi himself, at a recent gathering.
In the women’s section, behind a laced divider, sat “The Arbitrator,” Ifargan’s millionaire sister Bruria Zvuluni, a trusted spiritual counsellor who claims to have mediated feuds between Israeli crime kingpins. Though she is not a rabbi, she made it to the bottom of Forbes’ list.”
Copyright © deLiberation 2012
“Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.”
Spanish philosopher George Santayana
The best way to illustrate the assault of democratic totalitarianism on Canada is by way of historical analogy, but therein lies a problem. Learning from this particular history is a dangerous undertaking because our governments and media actively sabotage it.
Instead of being a living, instructive record of our culture, this history has become an ossified relic that we are allowed to look at but not touch. People and events are sealed in a discrete temporal “box”. which is trapped in the morality its time. The historical consequences of this box, the “WWII box”, are what make up our political culture, and gives historical continuity and legitimacy to our government.
As I wrote last time, though, cultures define themselves by what they are not, and Canada, like all the victorious allies from WWII, still thinks of itself as a country that defeated fascism. In other words, fascism defines Western democracy, albeit in negative image. This fact makes the defeat of fascism not only a historical event but also our creation myth.
Even our language reflects the non-rational understanding of the period: “Nazi,” “Hitler” and “fascist” are stripped of intrinsic historical meaning to become quasi-religious expletives that not only reinforce this myth but serve to delegitimize “heretical” scholars. Any historical investigation that might lessen our moral hatred of Hitler and the Third Reich would by extension undermine our founding myth which gave rise to our modern ideals as democratic justice, individual rights and international law.
We desperately need the Hitler/Devil image to define our sense of moral superiority. But even though our founding conceits of good/evil, ally/enemy, democracy/fascism are still assumed to be true, our politics clearly prove that they aren’t. Under Stephen Harper, democracy and fascism have fused into democratic totalitarianism, so at some point the great moral divide broke down. The following table describes the general characteristics of fascism, which today clearly define the regime of Stephen Harper.
Professor Lawrence Britt’s 14 Points of Fascism
1. Powerful and Continuing Nationalism
2. Suppressed Labor Power
3. Disdain for the Recognition of Human Rights
4. Protected Corporate Power
5. Identification of Enemies/Scapegoats as a Unifying Cause
6. Intertwined Religion and Government
7. Supremacy of the Military
8. Disdain for Intellectuals and the Arts
9. Rampant Sexism
10. Obsession with Crime and Punishment
11. Controlled Mass Media
12. Rampant Cronyism and Corruption
13. Obsession with National Security
14. Fraudulent Elections
(For elaboration of these points see The Host and the Parasite—How Israel’s Fifth Column Consumed America, pp. 16-17.)
I’ve previously exposed Harper’s totalitarian propaganda apparat, so Canada’s embrace of fascism has already been discussed to some degree, but it is his omnibus “budget” bill, Bill C-38, that most clearly proves that our democracy is not the opposite of fascism but a product of it. The specific analog is Adolf Hitler’s March 23, 1933, Law to Remedy the Distress of the People and the Nation, better known as the Enabling Act. A brief discussion of its scope and evolution will prepare the reader to see Bill C-38 in its proper historical perspective, but I must ask the reader to ignore ingrained WWII stereotypes, and suppress the Hitler gag reflex to appreciate the true state of Canada’s political culture.
The Enabling Act
In five short articles, Hitler’s Enabling Act usurped the German Republic’s legitimate democratic government to create the Nazi dictatorship. Thanks to Germany’s feeble-minded president Paul von Hindenburg, all financial and political power was now under the absolute control of Hitler’s cabinet; that is, Hitler himself. The Reichstag (the German House of Commons) was rendered impotent, although the façade of democratic continuity was preserved. The Act reads, in part:
Laws enacted by the government of the Reich may deviate from the Constitution as long as they do not affect the institutions of the Reichstag and the Reichsrat. The rights of the President remain undisturbed.
…Laws enacted by the Reich government shall be issued by the Chancellor and announced in the Reich Gazette. …Articles 68 to 77 of the Constitution do not apply to laws enacted by the Reich government.
The aforementioned repealed articles concerned the legislative and oversight authority of the Reichstag and the Reichsrat (Senate). You see the disconnect between democratic appearance and fascist reality.
With the passage of The Enabling Act, Hitler proceeded to attack all political opposition by suspending civil liberties and the right of peaceable assembly, and revoking private property rights, among other things. He did so by using the Act to make permanent the Feb. 28, 1933, Decree of the Reich President for the Protection of the People and State (Reichstag Fire Decree). It was cobbled together quickly to blame communists for the burning of the Reichstag the day previous, but the act was committed largely by Nazis themselves to traumatize the nation and stampede it into accepting the suspension of democracy. (Sound familiar?) For example:
Articles 114, 115, 117, 118, 123, 124 and 153 of the Constitution of the German Empire are suspended until further notice. It is therefore permissible to restrict the rights to personal freedom [habeas corpus], freedom of speech, including the freedom of the press, the freedom to organize and assemble, the privacy of letters, mail, telegraphs and telephones, order searches and confiscations and restrict property, even if this is not otherwise provided for by present law.
Whereas Hitler was surgical and open in his fascist destruction of German democracy, Stephen Harper used ham-fisted subversion. Bill C-38 is a 425-page monstrosity that is not a budget in any honest sense of the word; it’s declaration of war on the authority of Parliament and the rights of Canadians. Virtually without debate, more than 70 pieces of legislation are being repealed or watered down to the point of impotence. No Parliament can seriously debate a tome like this in seven says, yet that is how much time Harper has allotted for debate before he invokes closure.
Hitler came to power when Germany’s democracy was feeble and vulnerable to takeover, but he never won a majority of seats in the Reichstag. He needed the doddering president Paul von Hindenburg to appoint him chancellor and help him kill democracy. Harper does have a majority, but had been amassing personal power during successive minority governments since 2006. Unlike Hitler, though, Harper didn’t need help to usurp a democracy; the stupid Canadian electorate surrendered willingly.
The thoroughly fascist design of Bill C-38 can be seen in the following examples:
• Repealing the Fair Wages and Hours of Labour Act, designed to undercut union wage rates and lessen corporate labour costs. (Britt 2);
• Removing federal contractors from protection under the Employment Equity Act (2)
• Requiring most unemployed Employment Insurance claimants to accept McJobs at levels significantly lower than their professional employment. (4, 8)
• Amending the Food and Drugs Act to give the Minister of Health more personal power to approve the classifications of foods and drugs in the name of “efficiency” (4)
• Amending the Seeds Act and Plant Breeder Rights, and eliminating enforcement of the Product of Canada label; favouring multinational GMO corporations over local farmers. (4, 8)
• Repealing the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act; removing habitat protection from the Fisheries Act, the Species at Risk Act, and the Navigable Waters Protection Act to make resource exploitation more profitable; (4, 8)
• Cutting funding to the Canadian Food Inspection Agency, thus putting us at greater risk for diseases like listeria, mad cow, rabies and toxic poisoning.
• Attacking environmental groups and charities by forcing them to endure constant audits on foreign funding, even though little of their funding is foreign. (5)
• Prohibiting scientists from speaking to the media, especially about global warming (4, 8, 11)
• Serving a foreign power by asserting that a threat to Israel is a threat to Canada. (7, 12, 13)
Canada may not have goose-stepping soldiers parading in its major cities, but the fascism is just as real. Parliamentary democracy is dead. We are in the era of democratic totalitarianism. No continuum of democratic government from 1945 can explain this mutation.
History tells us that the corporatism, anti-labour extremism, militarism, political scapegoating, and censorship of fascist Italy and fascist Germany are alive today in fascist Canada and the fascist U.S.
Much has been written on the bullying tactics of pro Israel Jews, their supporters and how they operate. Groups send alerts to mobilise people into harassing by phone and e.mail, individuals and organisations who provide venues or share a platform with speakers, musicians and authors who say what they (the Zionists) do not want to hear. The fact that Harry’s Place the 2006 Islamic Human Rights – Islamophobia award winning blog has very recently removed it’s banner stating that “Liberty, if it means anything, is the right to tell people what they don
Another liar and all round nincompoop is Hasan Afzal of “Stand for Peace”. A few weeks ago Afzal used Harry’s Place blog to “Call for Action“ against an Islamic conference on how to benefit from Ramadan entitled “The Month of Mercy” – a rallying cry which brought him the help of the English Defence League, Casuals United, The Pink News, Gay Star News and the usual Zionists. Although Hasan Afzal claims that he believes in the right to free speech he obviously stands for exactly the opposite: probably a devotee of the Mossad motto “By way of deception, thou shall do war”, which is no big surprise since he has clearly nailed his colours to the Israeli mast.
We wonder about the longevity of such a career path for those Muslims who take the thirty pieces of silver, Afzal doesn’t really appear to have any attributes outside of Israeli flag waving to make a second career out of. One day Afzal’s handlers will innevitably have to acknowledge that Afzal is a dead ringer for Harry Enfield’s comedy character “Tim Nice But Dim” and that having him as a pro Israel Muslim stooge doesn’t give any credibility to their cause.
On the Stand for Peace website Afzal is still claiming victory over the cancellation of the Al Muntada Organisation’s “Month of Mercy” conference. The truth is that the Management of the Connaught rooms cancelled the event, in any case, after threats by Casuals United and the E.D.L. to protest outside while the local police advised them to do what they need to do to prevent damage to property and staff, which worryingly enough the police didn’t seem to think was a policing matter. The event, in any case went peacefully ahead at an alternative venue.
After Islamophobia Watch and myself “outed” the truth that Hasan Afzal had mobilised groups of far right hooligans through Harry’s Place, there seems to have been a rethink of how best to bully venue providers for those whom they want to silence. Failing to come up with a better plan than mobilising football hooligans and the usual “shock and awe” onslaught of e.mails and calls to the management of venues with bookings for Islamic conferences they are now operating anonymously, presumably to hide the shame of their new alliances.
On deLiberation recently we had a commentator named Damian who seemed very interested, yet very ignorant about Islam and who also transpired to be a regular on Harry’s Place. A search of his comments led me to a site called “The Islamic Far Right in Britain” and guess who the main cheerleader on Harry’s place is? One Damian – we are now awaiting his return to deLiberation.
I have to state here that I have no respect for people who write anonymously. Those who really believe in their views should be able to stand up for their claims. I.F.R.I.B. does not have any names listed nor does there seem to be a contact us option so we don’t know who is the owner of their misinformation site nor do we know who the mysterious Damian is. A quick look through the comments on Harry’s place reveals that Damian is leading a new campaign against Muslims and he is the one posting the numbers and e.mails of the management at a venue in York which is booked to host a four day Muslim holiday and conference for families. I wonder if inciting harassment is actually legal in the U.K.?
Watch this video clip by the organisers of the event described as a peaceful four day retreat and make a judgement for yourself if this looks like a hate filled four days by jihadists or a chance for Muslim families to take four days out of this busy world and enjoy the facilities provided whilst listening to moral guidance from scholars of Islam?
Amazing to discover that these people have little better to do with their time than to create a page about myself with the lie that I suport Female Genital Mutilation. Indeed I do not support F.G.M. and neither does Sheik Haitham al Haddad as they claim, since it is clearly haram/forbidden in Islam. But here the crux of the matter is revealed, we are dealing with people who have zero knowledge about Islam. They are in reality people who support Israel and who realise that Israel has made enemies of all its neighbours who happen to be mostly followers of Islam. Declaring a war on Islam was innevitable with the result that supporters of Israel invest a lot of time vilifying Muslims and Islam. I make no claim to be a scholar myself but certainly Sheik Haitham al Haddad is a leading one in the U.K. and he sits on the Shariah Council. What these people fail to grasp is the difference between the sunna of female circumcision and F.G.M.
I feel sorry for the management at The Thorpe Underwood Park in York as they face a flurry of e.mails and phone calls making ignorant and false claims against Muslim speakers. Surely, after reading the nonsense that they are sent they can only come to one conclusion and that is “why do we allow Muslims in this country”? Surely if the claims were true the police would have to lock up all the followers of Islam? Indeed one wonders if policing is really a job that should be handed over to the Zionists since according to them the leaders in this country have failed in identifying Islam as the biggest threat to humanity in the world.
The reality is that Israel and it’s supporters are the biggest threat to human life and world peace today and those who support it by maligning Islam are really at war with Allah s.w.t. The religious scriptures such as the Quran, the Gospels, The Torah and the books of all mainstream religion without exception condemn the many acts of endless war, of deviant behaviour and atrocities against humans that Israel, its proxies and its supporters engage in.