The world order must act and for that it needs agents and instruments of action. The task is huge and it needs a huge army, the Army is there and also the weapons are there, all sorts of weapons, but there are actions the armies will not do, or will only do reluctantly and with repercussions.The US army has committed atrocities -no doubt- by the standards of any army; these are considered atrocities that should not have happened, that is why they were leaked to the media in order to deny the fact that they were normal and natural and insinuate that they were a deviation that needed to be checked. A regular army has a set of moral principles that are there, and even if the army will not abide by them, any deviation is considered as such and is not really praised, and could even be sanctioned, as happened to some US soldiers in Iraq or – previously – in Vietnam when the atrocities committed by US soldiers were denounced and exposed. Due to this, the world order wanted to carry on the evil job of genociding humanity- but needed something other than a regular army, something that has no moral code, that will be free to act and let loose from any obligation towards humanity. This is how assassins’ schools probably started, they originated from this certain need the world order felt -at a certain moment of history – to breed a species of devils, or specially trained killers, specialized in killing, that can kill anyone anytime and anyplace with whatever means or weapons without suffering any psychological, moral or emotional set back, and out of their own freedom and with no obligation on others..
Organizations like Black Water did not spring from the need to meet security requirements as pretended, but from this need to have someone- other than the regular army -that could carry on special secret missions that involve massive killing and slaughter and which break the laws of humanity; someone anonymous that will assume the job out of obsession with killing and with his role as a killer, someone who cannot be identified nor located easily in case of retaliation or set back; some one that can turn the filthy job of killing into a clean one, behind which no one specific is found or identified, no definite organization, except the floating name –maybe- of al Qa’ida. This cleanliness of the job is most important, it makes the crime look as if committed by an occult power, transcendental, beyond reach, that no one can have access to, that no one can challenge or defeat; a super hidden power that could not be revealed, equal- in this -to the blind destiny that rules and strikes without thinking or discriminating, without memory or remorse, a machine functioning with the proper mechanism fed with the proper reaction to move when necessary.
There is no doubt that the US and allies have invented the biggest assassin human machine that ever existed. And along with the researches that developed the killing air drones, and those that discovered and developed the viruses and bacteria that attack human beings and spread diseases, were conducted studies – of a different kind – carried on by specialized centers and researchers, that analyzed –extensively-the human and social behavior in all its complexity for the purpose of designing – to perfection –the future killing assassins who will carry on the difficult job of doing away with the portion of humanity targeted by the world order. It is not an easy task to design such a person that will kill without motivation, who attempts at human life not in order to serve his country or his ideology or to defend himself or his land, but who kills because he has the desire and inclination to do.
Whether Arab, Latin, Anglo Saxon or God knows what, the future assassin must- definitely – undergo a brainwashing, maybe a sort of identification with a special divinity to whom everything is permitted and whose acts are not accountable and who – because of this – they can dispose of human life without fear. These are the assassins that will be in charge of the major task of liquidating humanity as assigned by the world order. Whether he looks Muslim or bearded, with his face is covered or not, this is not the real identity of this assassin, his identity is that of an assassin even if the world order wants you to identify him as a Muslim or a terrorist- as they say. For us- he is nothing but a killer that has graduated from the assassins’ schools of USA because these killers are school graduates, they have diplomas probably and licenses: licenses to kill and slaughter and come out clean of all this, and you can be sure, they believe in what they are doing.
These schools-are not functioning alone, they are assisted –as well–by multiple research centers that work day and night on the human psyche to obtain the best results for the best product. As for the ground of application and practice of these theories and concepts of the human psyche, there are non other than Guantanamo and Abu Ghraib and the multiple underground prisons that US intelligence is monitoring -all over the world -through local and foreign agents.
These are the places where the extent of human suffering is studied and the extent of human violence is measured by means of torture and deprivation and humiliation practiced on mostly innocent victims who have been chosen at random, from poor countries, from the streets of Baghdad or Basra, or from the villages of Afghanistan and Baluchistan -after being accused of crimes they did not commit-. They are going to be used as guinea pigs who will have to feed- unwillingly- and provide material for the researches conducted by the bloody masters of this world who have decided to do away with humanity and have- for this purpose- mobilized science and man and built schools and prisons.
Benjamin Netanyahu acknowledges facts and defines them “legal”
The affair known in Israel as “Bibi-Tours” is nearing its end. Netanyahu was formally interrogated in March; this was the final stage of the formal investigation. Now everything is ready for issuing a decision. Israel State Comptroller Micha Lindenstrauss is expected to retire before October 2012, the date being subject to the nomination of his successor by the Knesset. Before retiring, he must issue a final report on the most important probe of his career. If he concludes that Netanyahu committed criminal offenses, he will pass his findings on to the Attorney General and Netanyahu may find himself facing criminal charges. This is bound to happen in August. In June, his report is already being prepared; Benjamin Netanyahu has already seen its draft. Netanyahu’s ominous silence announces an imminent storm.
“Bibi-Tours” is the name given to several luxury trips abroad that Benjamin Netanyahu and his family made in the last decade, during his terms as finance minister and opposition leader. Netanyahu’s attorneys provided the comptroller’s office with documents, receipts and invoices related in a bid to prove that nothing improper was done; yet, even Netanyahu confirms the basic facts. These are very odd, to say the least. The events were first exposed by Raviv Drucker on Israel’s Channel 10; in 2011, Netanyahu filed against them a libel suit that is still underway. Following these minor fights, the comptroller decided to probe the funding for Netanyahu’s trips abroad, and his campaign in the Likud primary.
Drucker claimed that Netanyahu had accepted funding from private American businessmen for trips for himself and his family while in public office. In August 2006, during the Second Lebanon War, Benjamin Netanyahu, his wife, and one of their sons traveled to London on a trip funded by both the Knesset and Israel Bonds. Encouraged by their success, the following month they traveled to the USA, while the trip was fully paid by two different organizations. The comptroller added to these events the private campaign donations that Netanyahu received for the 2005 Likud Primaries; sadly, he had forgotten to report them to the state comptroller, as required by law.
Thank You, America!
It is easy to read about Bibi-Tours and dismiss the entire event as another minor-corruption case of a politician. Yet, it is deeply related to the USA support of Israel. The banality of evil: in order to function it needs to supply its servants with food and resources. How does this work for the State of Israel, which was defined as a terror inflicting organization? Many will shout now “Rothschild!” and forget the entire issue. It is true that rich Jews—so rich that nobody knows how much money they have or where they have hidden their assets—contribute generously to the State of Israel, but that’s a secondary source. Most contributors are unsuspecting gentiles. Fortunately for Israel, the Talmud doesn’t recognize their right to property.
The State of Israel Bonds are debt securities issued by the Government of Israel through a company known as the Development Corporation for Israel (DCI), which is located in New York. Since its first issue of bonds in 1951, the company collected over thirty billion dollars (non-amortized value). Since the Persian Gulf War of 1991, it has been collecting funds at a rate of over a billion dollars per year. For a small country like Israel this is big money. Where does this money go? The vast majority of it is used for strategic installations. The list includes: the National Water Carrier, the ports of Haifa, Eilat and Ashdod, the railway network, the Hadera Power Plant, the Ben Gurion International Airport, the Dead Sea Works and more. In fact, the bonds have been used to construct much of the country. This list is so impressive that is easy to forget its latest addition: Bibi-Tours. Some of Benjamin Netanyahu’s luxurious trips abroad before he became Prime Minister were funded by Israel Bonds.
Where does the money for the bonds come from? Half of the American states are invested in these bonds. The U.S. government already funds Israel generously through civilian and military help given every year. The parallel funding by the states creates a second level of support. None of these was ever put to vote. The American people are not asked if they want their money to fund wars and violence. The U.S. government downplays the whole issue; try getting accurate data and you’ll see what I mean. May I ask President Obama, why the American government allows its states to finance the luxurious trips of an Israeli politician?
I failed to obtain an answer from Benjamin Netanyahu on the issue. Yet, reliable sources related to this website have confirmed having heard him summarizing these events during a private conversation: “Thank you, America!” Netanyahu said with a charming smile and an impressive baritone, while gently tapping on his always expanding belly.
The Dollar Account Affair
“Bibi-Tours” strikes a chord within Israel’s collective memory. The current political map (see Shaul Mofaz Walks to Canossa) is the result of a similar affair known as the “Dollar Account Affair.” In 1977, the exposure of an illegal US Dollar bank account held by Israeli Prime Minister’s wife Leah Rabin, led to Rabin’s resignation from the government and his replacement by Shimon Peres. The Labor Party never recovered from the event, to the extent that nowadays it faces imminent disappearance.
On March 15, 1977, Haaretz journalist Dan Margalit revealed that a joint dollar account in the names of Yitzhak and Leah Rabin, had been opened in a Washington, D.C., bank during Rabin’s stay there as Israel’s ambassador (1968-73). The account was never closed following Rabin’s return to Israel. At the time, this was not allowed by Israeli law. Instead of imposing a minor fine, Attorney-General Aharon Barak—later to become Justice—announced that he would prosecute the Prime Minister, coining the phrase “Buzaglo Test.” This meant that a leader must be held to the same judicial standards as an ordinary citizen. Leah Rabin explained that she alone had operated the account, but Yitzhak Rabin accepted joint moral and legal responsibility. At first, it was thought that the sum in the account was $2,000, below the allowed $5,000 limit. Yet, after an investigation, it was found that the maximum deposit in the account had been around $20,000. Following Rabin’s resignation, he was not tried, but he and his wife paid hefty fines.
Since then, Rabin’s resignation is seen in Israel as the epitome of public responsibility. Nowadays, a similar behavior by Benjamin Netanyahu is inconceivable. Netanyahu has a very expensive house to take care of in exclusive Caesarea; he can’t allow himself to stick to nonsense Buzaglo Tests.
Can the looming decision of State Comptroller Micha Lindenstrauss be predicted? In the wild reality of Israel, where several oligarchic gangs literally fight one against the other, this is difficult. Nobody—except Shimon Peres and the Shin Beth—imagined that the Attorney General would force the Prime Minister Rabin to face trial for a minor offence. Yet, it has happened. Is there anything in Micha Lindenstrauss past that can hint regarding his attitude towards the Bibi-Tours Affair?
The career of this former judge turned state comptroller is rather dull. Do you want to read about a Traffic Court Judge? No? I thought so. Yet, his name is well known for a scandal in his past. When he was President of the Haifa District Court, he acquitted the suspects in the gang rape of a fourteen year-old girl in Kibbutz Shimrat; that happened despite existing clear evidence, and that some of the culprits had admitted to the rape during their initial interrogation by the police. His rather questionable decision was reversed by the Supreme Court. Would such a man—oblivious to the pain and misery of a girl—care about illegitimately used funds, when the source of the money was mainly American and not Israeli? “Thank you, America! Thank you, America!” Netanyahu keeps saying, a wide Cheshire-cat smile on his face, and one fat hand tapping his ever expanding belly. “Thank you, America!”
Mubarak’s Egypt backed Fatah against Hamas. Now, the shoe is on the other foot as Egypt goes to the polls to choose a president
writes Khaled Amayreh in Hebron…
The trial and conviction of former Egyptian president Hosni Mubarak and his interior minister, Habib El-Adli, earlier this week have reverberated through the Palestinian political street, drawing conflicting reactions from Palestinian factions, each according to its ideological and political orientation.
Palestinians have been following up rather closely on developments in Egypt ever since the start of the 25 January Revolution that toppled the Mubarak regime, which was widely considered at Israel and America’s beck and call.
A clear polarisation is noticed between the Islamist and secular nationalist camps, particularly Hamas and Fatah.
Other smaller Palestinian factions, such as the leftists and liberals, are displaying marked ambivalence, having to choose between erstwhile historical and ideological foes on the one hand and a resurgent regime in the style of ex- president Mubarak on the other.
Hamas, the Islamic liberation movement, is the ideological daughter of the Muslim Brotherhood, Mubarak’s long- standing foe that now stands at the forefront of post-Mubarak forces and effectively controls the first parliament after the revolution.
Moreover, Hamas doesn’t hide its preference for Mohamed Mursi, the presidential candidate of the Muslim Brotherhood who will contest a run-off election with Mubarak’s last prime minister, Ahmed Shafik, on 16-17 June.
Hamas and most Palestinians view as a gigantic disaster the possible success of Shafik, “snatching” the presidency in Cairo from revolutionary hands.
“God forbid this would send us backward to the Mubarak era; it would be depressing to even entertain the idea. The election of Shafik would be good news for Israel and the Jews, and bad, I would say very bad news to every patriotic Arab and Muslim, not only in Palestine and the Middle East but all over the world,” said Fathi Imran, a prominent Islamist leader in the Bethlehem region.
Imran, who spent over 10 years in Israeli jails for his political activities against the Israeli occupation, said the rectification of the revolution’s course in Egypt is not only a matter of concern only for Egyptians, but for the entire Arab and Muslim world.
“When Egypt is down, we are all down and we will all suffer, but when Egypt is prosperous and strong, so will we be. The fact that Israel has been visibly disappointed by the dramatic collapse of the Mubarak regime speaks volumes. In a nutshell, Mubarak was an ally and servant of Israel and the United States.”
This is not how Fatah, the ruling party in the West Bank, views the former Egyptian regime and the man who was at its helm for over 30 years.
Officially, Fatah stands neutral between Shafik and Mursi. However, it is clear that Fatah’s heart lies with anti- Ikhwan (Brotherhood) forces. The reason for this somewhat strange attitude has nothing to do with any special infatuation on Fatah’s part with the symbols of the former Egyptian regime.
Fatah and the Palestinian Authority [PA] leadership are calculating that Mursi might well win the upcoming elections and do not want to alienate in earnest the Muslim Brotherhood, as this would harm Fatah,
argued Talal Okal, a prominent political analyst.
“On the other hand, most Fatah leaders believe that if Mursi became president of Egypt, that would not auger well for Fatah, especially its power struggle with Hamas.
“Hamas is highly likely to benefit, politically and psychologically, from the presence of its ideological colleagues at the helm of power in the most important Arab capital.”
A MAJORITY FOR MURSI: Despite the sharp polarisation between Fatah and Hamas, it seems that a comfortable majority of Palestinians favour Mursi over Shafik.
An Internet poll of some 17,500 web- surfers by the Maan News Agency showed that 53.5 per cent would vote for Mursi while 39.5 per cent would cast their votes for Shafik. About seven per cent said they were undecided.
The informal but probably indicative poll shows that most Palestinians are hopeful that the Palestinian cause would stand to benefit from an Islamist or quasi-Islamist government in Egypt.
It is likely though that a united front against Shafik, including Mursi, the Nasserist candidate Hamdeen Sabahi and the moderate Islamist candidate Abdel-Moneim Abul-Fotouh, would significantly reduce support for Shafik and could put an end to his election chances.
Meanwhile, reconciliation between Fatah and Hamas is effectively awaiting the outcome of the run-off round between Shafik and Mursi on 16 June. The two parties are not saying so openly, but scrutiny of the Palestinian political scene reveals that the elections will certainly impact the reconciliation process between the secular Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO) and Islamist Hamas.
The two groups reached a series of agreements and understandings of late, creating a general impression that a final reconciliation was in the offing, if not readily at hand.
However, mutual suspicions, and even accusations and recriminations, continue to prevail over the Palestinian political arena.
What is more is that a solid majority of Palestinians no longer believe optimistic statements about the nearness of reconciliation from Hamas and Fatah leaders.
Some Palestinian analysts believe that the next Egyptian president will not be able to do much in terms of reuniting Fatah and Hamas or delivering the Palestinians and their just cause from the tentacles of the Israeli occupation. Such analysts argue that the president-to-be will be too busy dealing with complex domestic issues in Egypt.
However, there are those who think that no Egyptian leadership — especially in revolutionary Egypt — can afford to treat the Palestinian issue as secondary. One of the factors that tainted Mubarak’s rule and hastened its demise was its obsequious stance vis-à-vis Israel during the Zionist state’s all-out blitzkrieg against the Gaza Strip in 2008-09.
Many Egyptians, Arabs and Muslims link wanton Israeli massacres of Palestinian civilians, using the latest weapons of death, such as white phosphorus to the times of the Mubarak regime, not criminalising Israeli violence.
Source: ahram weekly
An interview with the family of detained Palestinian footballer and hunger striker Mahmoud Al-Sarsak:
On July, 22, 2009, Palestinian National Team soccer player, Mahmoud Al Sarsak, bid farewell to his family as he had finally obtained an Israeli permit allowing him to cross Erez checkpoint in the north of Gaza and enter the West Bank. The 22-year-old player, at the time, was heading to Balata Refugee Camp to join the Palestinian National Soccer Team and to train there. The overwhelming happiness that overcame the young Palestinian athlete as he was issued the permit, describes his mother Khaldiya Shalabi, has turned into a curse of misery for him and his family.
Mahmoud was detained and has imprisoned without charge or trial since the. In protest Mahmoud joined the recent prisoner’s hunger strike, and has now gone over 80 days without food.
According to Ma’an:
After 80 days on hunger strike, Mahmoud al-Sarsak is at immediate risk of death and must be hospitalized immediately, an independent doctor said Wednesday.
Until Wednesday, Israel’s prison service had refused to allow independent doctors to visit al-Sarsak, who is being held at Ramle prison clinic.
Physicians for Human Rights – Israel were able to send a doctor to visit al-Sarsak on Wednesday after petitioning an Israeli court for access…..
Al-Sarsak, a professional soccer player, has experienced extreme loss of muscle tissue and drastic weight loss. The 25-year-old is frequently losing consciousness and suffers memory lapses, the doctor said. He is also at risk of pulse disruptions that are endangering his life.
Whilst Ramzy Baroud notes that:
Palestine’s soccer ranking at 164th in the world is testament not to any lack of passion for the game, but to the constant Israeli attempts at destroying even that national aspiration.
The examples of Israeli war on Palestinian soccer are too many to count, although most of them receive little or no media coverage whatsoever.
On June 8th a solidarity demo was held outside the UK Department of Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) in London to try and raise Mahmoud’s profile.
The Evening Standard newspaper last Friday published what is truly a very alarming story. The following headline is sure to cause maximum panic just weeks ahead of the Olympic Games.
Mosque near Olympics site in ‘terror link’ investigation
The same story by the B.B.C. with a headline slightly more in touch with the reality of the situation but with only slightly less of the sensationalism contained in the Evening Standard
‘Mosque’s terror links’ investigated by Charity Commission
The Mosque being accused here of having “terror links” is Masjid al Tawhid in Leyton, East London. The Mosque is literally overlooking the Olympic site and therefore the person who made these allegations knew very well the panic and fear that his allegations would produce.
Residents of London are already nervous after it was revealed that thousands of military, security and police officers with a massive array of weaponry will be surrounding the Olympic site – read here a Sky News analysis on the war ships, helicopters, drones, missile launchers on rooftops etc that will ensure we are “free from danger” during the Olympics.
I personally do not feel safe at all, being a resident of London I am only too aware of the devastating results that armed police can have on unarmed civilians. For example the killing of Jean Charles de Menezes and Mark Duggan which sparked last summer’s riots or the shootings at Forest Gate. If our police and military have been sharing training with the Israelis again we could all be doomed. Actually a good question is, just how did the justice system become so corrupt that our police enjoy the same impunity and zero accountability for killing civilians as the Israelis do?
The man who made the serious terrorism allegations is Dr Usama Hasan, you can watch him being interviewed by the B.B.C. here. I have previously written about Usama Hasan and how he deviated from mainstream Sunni Islam setting himself on a trajectory which now sees him working against Muslims and Islam read my article here. Usama Hasan is now fully Zionised and conversant in the typical Zionist tactic of scaremongering about potential terror attacks to create fear of Muslims and Islam. I think I might have been slightly wrong to previously accuse Usama Hasan of taking the Queen’s shilling to become a soldier in the “War On Islam” – I was wrong, in my opininon these days he is probably paid in Shekels.
For non Muslim readers I feel it is necessary to explain some background on how mosques in the U.K. function. My own local mosque in Finchley is a prime example of how Muslims import the concept of dictatorship and corruption from “back home”. Once in possesion of positions on the committee or board of trustees men will do almost anything to stay there. I say men since mosque committees remain a purely male domain. We all followed the Arab revolutions on T.V. but if you think Hosni Mubarak was difficult to shift you cannot imagine how deep the roots under the thrones of “elected” mosque officials in Britain go. In cities with large Asian populations leadership runs on tribal lines but in Finchley according to our President at our recent A.G.M. we are “better educated” and mosque membership consists of mostly professional Muslims. Democratic dictatorship by the educated – and with a smile. Our President is proud and confident that with so many accountants on the committee we can be sure that the mosque accounts will be kept well balanced. We were instructed that they are very worthy of this trust by the President himself. I do wonder though about the bigger trust which is to carry the message of Islam and provide guidance to the community somehow I doubt they are up to it.
This rise to the professional classes is mostly down to the hard work and dedication of parents who came to this country and worked extremely hard running Asian restaurants or similar businesses and who were rightly so proud when their offspring went to university. Many of these offspring managed to absorb the worst of cultural practices from “back home” and adopt some of the worst of our culture as well. Islam is the only path that we should be treading yet the evidence of confusion is apparent in the actions of mosque committees up and down the country. Inviting Mike Freer our local openly pro Israel, pro Gay Marriage and therefore anti Islam M.P. to come and advise us in the mosque against the will of many in the community and beyond is just such an action. Finchley Mosque and Mike Freer saga here here and here .
In Leyton Mosque dictatorship and corruption manifested itself in the previously very respected Sheik Suhaib Hasan father of Usama stubbornly defending his son’s right to continue imposing himself on the congregation as Imam. With Usama Hasan’s deviant views which were unacceptable to the majority of Muslims inevitably a growing movement against him was established. The end result of mosque committees who insist on going against the will of the community – both in Finchley (read here) and Leyton (read here) were headline grabbing “Death threat” headline news – such “washing of dirty linen in public” is something particularly hated by our community. But would our leaders ever learn to listen?
The only tried and trusted method of silencing dissenting voices in U.K. mosques is exactly the same method as kept Mubarak et al in position for decades elsewhere. First get into place, possibly by staging a coup then impose a “democracy” on your own terms. Reduce the community’s ability to vote you out by restricting membership to those who you personally accept after a long probationary period or even better invite only those to join who you can be sure will vote for you. Secondly change the Constitution to narrow opportunities for any further coups or takeovers. If you can stifle discussion in the mosque, restrict membership and voting rights you should be able to stay “President for Life”! Out of the 800 or so people who pray in our mosque on Fridays there are perhaps 60 who are members of the association and only half of those turned up to the A.G.M. this gives an indication of the lack of real democratic practice and community involvement in how a mosque is run.
One of the highlights for me of the recent A.G.M. in Finchley was the accounts for the previous year being explained in detail and which we were told now contain no expenditure for the rather ominous category of “security”. I take that as a good indictation that any dissenting voices to the will of the committee have now been dealt with permanently! Persistant dissenters can be banned, the more faint hearted just give up and go to another mosque but the sad result is a “pray and go” mosque. People come at prayer time and leave quickly afterwards, not the true function of a mosque which should be run as a community centre. As if we did not have many problems in our community like youth crime and other issues to deal with, but you will find the mosque door locked during the day just like the church over the road and we know very well how many empty churches are being sold up and down the country.
To cut short what could be a very long story, Masjid al Tawhid in Leyton has been paralysed for years by a power struggle among the trustees over the deviated beliefs of Usama Hasan and the wish of the majority in the community to have him removed as Imam and trustee. Where you find an Imam or leader who preaches what is to mainstream Muslims considered deviation from the true message you will get increasing complaints, when they are not listened to which is often the case, then you get loud and angry complaints which after some time escalate into protests and very angry scenes. Mosques run along tribal or dictatorship lines are very bad at listening to complaints, with many elected representatives forgetting that they are there to serve the community.
Years of paralysis in the trusteeship of Masjid al Tawhid was finally resolved recently by outside arbitration where Usama Hasan stepping down from any role in the mosque was part of the agreement. However, and here is the massive sting in the tail – whilst Usama Hasan agreed to step down and really he must have known that his departure was innevitable, he was already very nastily sending a letter to the Charity Commission claiming that the mosque was a place for potential terror plots. As if that was not bad enough he foolishly implicated Sheik Haitham al Haddad in this, despite the fact that Sheik Haitham had been a mediator in the long dispute over mosque trusteeship, his role as arbitrator agreed by both sides. Just to make Usama Hasan’s claims even more ridiculous Sheik Haitham al Haddad sits on the Shariah Council with Usama Hasan’s father. Is Usama Hasan implying that his own father is a trustee of a terrorist mosque?
The Zionist methodology of “guilt by association” is how Usama Hasan implicated Sheik Haitham into this so called potential terror scenario by saying that the underwear bomber Abdulmatallab had listened to talks by Sheik Haitham. So what about the thousands of Muslims who also listened to Sheik Haitham and didn’t allegedly try and blow up airplanes? Abdulmatallab’s own notes give no hint that anything he might have heard spoken by Sheik Haitham had radicalised him in any way. Evidently Usama Hasan realised the ridiculousness of his claims as by the time he was interviewed by the B.B.C. he had dropped his allegations against any individuals.
Finally to cap it all Usama Hasan has now dropped his request for an enquiry, probably realising that it was very evident to everyone that it was an act of pure spite and vindictivness on his part, but to save face the so called “extremism think tank” called the Quilliam foundation that Hasan works for have taken up the request for Masjid al Tawhid to be investigated. Read all about it on Islamophobia Watch website here. But for the public who have already read the sensationalist headlines, the damage to the reputation of Leyton Mosque and of the Muslims who pray in it, is already done.
A very sad episode indeed which can only serve to take away any shred of credibility, not as an Imam because he had already lost that, but perhaps as a person with even an ounce of integrity that Usama Hasan might have had left.
I really hope these claims by Usama Hasan and the Quilliam foundation are not laying the foundations of a cover story for a huge Olympic False Flag Operation.