A few months ago Mike Freer Conservative M.P. for Finchley and Golders Green, a man in my opinion who is very deserving of the title “Shabbos Goy”, came to Finchley Masjid. Some Muslims objected to this beforehand, however, the Management Committee of the masjid refused to consider the wishes of the Muslims instead insisting that those with a grievance should come and confront Mike Freer directly and not the committee, the result of this confrontation, according to “Mad Mel” made Finchley a “no go area” for non-Muslims. Since Finchley is a beacon of Jewish/Muslim co existance and tolerance this must surely be hysteria on a grand scale and also totally false. Because of his rabidly pro-Israel stance and specifically his actions against Sheik Raed Salah he was not a welcome figure to those Muslims who stand for Truth Justice and Peace.
So let us see exactly what Mike Freer is all about.
Mike Freer stood in the House of Commons and said the following
MP Mike Freer asked Home Secretary Theresa May about the case in the Commons on Monday, accusing Sheikh Salah of having a “history of virulent antisemitism“.
As we now know this is a false accusation since Sheik Raed Salah has been completely cleared of all of the accusations made against him – not only that but the judge said that the Home Secretary was misled by C.S.T. – read all about it here
Mike Freer has been called “a friend” on the C.S.T. website
From the outset, however, it would not have been possible without support from John Mann and the Parliamentary Committee Against Antisemitism. Other MPs from all political parties have also made invaluable contributions, both of moral encouragement and practical input. In particular, Mike Freer and Matthew Offord provided outstanding support whilst they were still Barnet councillors, and then after their election to Parliament.
Mike Freer has also suggested in the House of Commons that the goods into Gaza should perhaps be increased – he does not specify how many calories per day they should be increased to, although according to this analysis the citizens of Gaza get more than they would have in Auschwitz. Anyway, here is his statement:
Mike Freer: Will my hon. Friend update the House on what steps have been taken, and what more can be done, to increase the flow of goods into the Palestinian territories?
Absolutely no reference there to the issue of free movement or the ability to trade with the outside world or rebuild their bombed homes, or goods outward -so caring of Mike Freer. Keep the Gazans on a diet and in prison Mike!
Read here an article I posted on deLiberation previously on Mike Freer’s lack of understanding the difference between legal and illegal with regard to the Israeli settlements
I am grateful to my hon. Friend for obtaining this important debate. It is important that we have balanced debate on the peace talks. Does he agree that a strong Prime Minister goes into negotiations defending the national interest with clear red lines and that that is the secret to good negotiation? Asking one side to give up all its bargaining chips, such as settlements, in advance of negotiations, is clearly nonsense.
Mike Freer came to Finchley masjid a few months ago and went to the media with some wild accusations of being called a “Jewish Homosexual Pig“, Mike Freer is not Jewish, but then no one who was present except him heard it, although there was one man there who got upset and shouted “where is the Jew” he was restrained by his friends. Mike Freer is openly gay according to his profile on Wikipedia but these were not the issues that people were concerned about, it is his political leanings that really are so pro-Israel and anti-Muslim to such a degree that he recently attempted to convince the House of Commons that Netanyahu is demonised and promoted Israel as a “beacon of democracy”
Mike Freer:My hon. Friend makes a good point. Prime Minister Netanyahu is often demonised. I have no doubt that he can be a forceful and difficult character, but would people not want their Prime Minister to be forceful and to stand up for their security when their country was in an almost permanent state of war and they were fielding suicide bombers and missiles fired into their territory?
The hon. Member for Barrow and Furness made the good point that we have to remember that Israel is a beacon of democracy in a part of the world where democracy is in short supply. Religious minorities of whatever shape or flavour have freedoms. Minorities have freedoms, to pursue their religion or their sexuality, and even to stand for Parliament. It does not really matter what shape, colour or religion someone is; they have the ability to follow their beliefs, and that is not seen elsewhere.
Regular deLiberation readers and commentators will have got the measure of exactly where Mike Freer M.P. stands now, we can perhaps assume that he receives his orders from Tel Aviv. I just need to clarify how I can call him a “shabbos goy“, my understanding is that to qualify for this label you have serve Jews for a financial gain or reward. A quick look at “They Work for You” helps us out here with the listing of a donation by none other than Chaim Zabludowicz, ( read an article by Inayat Bunglawala called “Were Liam Fox and Adam Werritty Mossad’s ‘Useful Idiots’?) the man believed to the the financial backer of Werrity, friend of the former disgraced British Defence Minister Liam Fox. Zabludowicz is the Chairman and a founder of B.I.C.O.M. a pro Israeli lobby group which amongst other things advises the B.B.C. on how to present Israel in a positive light – please read an excellent article by Gilad “How Israel Runs the British Press”
From the “They Work for You” website
(a) (Registered 13 April 2011)(a) Name of donor: Chaim P Zabludowicz(a) Address of donor: private(a) Amount of donation or nature and value if donation in kind: £2,200(a) Donor status: individual(a) (Registered 16 October 2011)
So having given an outline of Mike Freer M.P. and his activities, the real question is why would the Management Committee of North Finchley Mosque allow such a man to set foot inside? Some of the people in the community emailed their concerns about Mike Freer before his last appearance in the masjid but they were met with very evasive tactics by the Committee. In fact the Committee were willing to conceal the fact that no-one was in the slightest bit interested in giving Mike Freer the chance to say he has “excellent relations with the Muslim community in Finchley and especially the mosque management committee”. The committee tried to say no one other than myself had contacted them to express their concerns, which is an absolute lie.
Mike Freer clearly has a lot to gain by being able to say he provides an “advice clinic” for local Muslims in Finchley masjid. Ironically, his office is just around the corner – easy to find for any Muslim with a problem (as long as it is local and not about foreign policy)! But quite who and what the Management Committee are gaining, remains unclear. One suggestion is that one member of the Management Committee is looking to pursue a position as a councillor. It is always sad and disheartening to see Muslims put morals aside and to welcome those to the masjid who support the leaders of the occupation, oppression and ethnic cleansing of our brothers and sisters in Palestine. The committee believe that if they are nice to Mike Freer he may become a Muslim. I would suggest they go and talk to him about Islam in his office (the numbers and address are on his website so they can make an appointment), Mike Freer can hardly refuse some heavy proselytizing when the Committee have put out the welcome-mat for him so often – and don’t forget to take some curry our local Tableegh Jamaat group firmly believe in the power of curry to persuade those who are astray from the right path!
(Excerpted from Chapter 5: Persian Gulf Rent-a-Sheik: Big Oil & Their Bankers…)
Iran’s Press TV reported yesterday that both the US and the Saudis began funding Syrian rebels eight months ago. After funding Libyan Islamist rebels to overthrow Qaddafi, the Saudis and their fellow Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) despots have moved on in an effort to bring down Syria’s Assad government on their road to Tehran.
Both the Muslim Brotherhood House of Saud and Cabalist Israel share a long history with their Freemason brethren at British intelligence dating back to the Egyptian Mystery Schools.
The inbred Illuminati banker oligarchy runs all three secret societies and controls the global economy via central bank monopoly and hegemony over oil, arms and drug trades.
This Rothschild-led cabal of trillionaire Satanists manufacture fanatics within the Jewish, Christian and Muslim faiths to divide the people and maximize war profits.
Since Chevron discovered oil in Saudi Arabia in 1938, the House of Saud monarchy has increasingly served as paymaster for Rothschild covert military adventures. It’s part of an oil for arms quid pro quo.
The Saudis sent over $3.8 billion to the CIA-trained Afghan mujahadeen. Their emissary to the Americans was Osama bin Laden.
They gave $35 million to the Nicaraguan contras. Northrup/Lockheed bribe recipient Adnan Khashoggi played a key role in supplying Richard Secord’s Enterprise with House of Saud funding. But while contra and mujahadeen efforts got the most newsprint, the House of Saud was busy bankrolling counterinsurgency around the world.
In Africa the Saudis provided support decades ago for the National Front for Salvation (NFS), which operated from bases in Chad in its attempts to overthrow Libyan President Mohamar Qaddafi.
Chad has long been an important country in Exxon Mobil’s North Africa oil production schemes. In 1990- following a successful Libyan-backed counter-coup against the Chad government which was sponsoring NFS- the US evacuated 350 NFS leaders with Saudi financing. The US restored $5 million in aid to the dictatorial Kenyan government of Daniel Arap Moi so Kenya would house the NFS leaders, whom other African governments refused to take in. Arap Moi later aided CIA covert operations in Somalia, which the Saudis financed.
The Saudis bankrolled Jonas Savimbi’s UNITA rebels in Angola in their brutal effort to topple the socialist government of MPLA President Jose dos Santos. Upon CIA request, the Saudis sent millions to Morocco to pay for that country’s training of UNITA. Angola has huge oil reserves. In 1985 Chevron Texaco accounted for 75% of Angola’s oil revenue. In 1990 29% of Exxon Mobil’s US-bound crude came from Angola. An annual report of De Beers- the Oppenheimer-family tentacle which monopolizes the world diamond trade- bragged of buying up UNITA diamonds. Savimbi was welcomed at the White House by President Reagan.
The Saudis funded RENAMO in their CIA-backed Pink Plan terror campaign against the nationalist government of Mozambique. In the mid-1980s both the Saudis and Oman sent weapons to RENAMO through the Comoros Islands on behalf of Israel and apartheid South Africa. Two Comoros Presidents- Ali Soilah and Ahmed Abdullah Abderemane- were assassinated by mercenaries who were protecting the arms traffic.
In the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) – formerly Zaire- Illuminati puppet Mobutu Sese-Seiko ruled with an iron fist for nearly four decades. He served as City of London guard dog of Zaire’s rich cobalt, uranium and molybdenum reserves- all of which are vital to the US nuclear weapons program. Zaire is also rich in copper, chromium, zinc, cadmium, tin, gold and platinum. While Mobutu amassed over $5 billion in Swiss, Belgian and French bank accounts, Zaire’s people lived in squalor.
Mobutu was installed in the early 1960’s after CIA agent Frank Carlucci- later Reagan and Bush Defense Secretary and now chairman of bin Laden family investment advisor Carlyle Group- worked with gangsters to assassinate the first prime minister of the Congo Patrice Lumumba. Under Mobutu’s reign the US had military bases at Kitona and Kamina- from where the CIA prosecuted covert wars against Angola, Mozambique and Namibia with House of Saud funding. Mobutu’s DSP palace guard was trained by the Israeli Mossad. In the late 1970’s the Saudis paid for imported Moroccan troops to save Mobutu from Katanganese secessionists led by Laurant Kabila.
Mobutu was deposed in 1998 by forces loyal to Kabila- a friend of Fidel Castro. The Saudis began financing military forays into the Congo by the governments of Rwanda, Uganda and Burundi. This destabilization of the Lake’s region led to the Rwandan genocide. Kabila was assassinated in 2000, after he refused to play Illuminati ball. Over four million people have died in the DRC over the past decade.
Lumumba and Kabila weren’t the first African nationalists targeted for elimination by the inbreds. During the 1950′s and 1960′s the CIA and French intelligence assassinated Moroccan nationalist Mehdi Ben Barka- whose Union Nationale de Forces Populaire threatened US puppet monarch King Hassan II. Giunea’s leftist President Sekou Toure and Tunisian socialist Habib Bourgiba were also assassinated by Western intelligence agencies.
In 1993 Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir accused the Saudis of providing arms to Johnny Garung’s Sudanese People’s Liberation Army (SPLA). The southern part of Sudan- which the SPLA is trying to partition- is rich in oil. Mossad has supplied the SPLA for years through Kenya. In 1996 the Clinton Administration announced military aid to Ethiopia, Eritrea and Uganda. The aid was funneled into an SPLA offensive on Khartoum. The crisis in Darfur is a direct result of Saudi/Israeli/US meddling on behalf of Big Oil.
Algerian President Chadli Benjladid accused the Saudis of bankrolling the barbarous Armed Islamic Group (AIG) who- after Algeria protested US ignition of the Gulf War- launched a reign of terror targeted at the Algerian people. Benjladid was forced to resign. This was followed by hasty passage of the Hydrocarbon Law- which opened the historically socialist country’s oilfields to the Four Horsemen. The CIA then helped AIG terrorists travel to Bosnia, where they helped destroy socialist Yugoslavia.
Algeria has a long history of defying Big Oil. President Houari Boumedienne- one of the great Arab socialist leaders of all time- initiated calls for a more just international economic order in fiery speeches at the UN. He encouraged producer cartels as a means to Third World emancipation from the London bankers. Independent Italian oilman Enrico Mattei began negotiating with Algeria and other nationalistic OPEC states who wanted to sell their oil internationally without having to deal with the Four Horsemen. In 1962 Mattei died in a mysterious plane crash. Former French intelligence agent Thyraud de Vosjoli says his agency was involved. William McHale of Time magazine, who covered Mattei’s attempt to break the Big Oil cartel, also died under strange circumstances.
In 1975 the US sent $138 million in military aid through Saudi Arabia to Yemen, in hopes of heading off a Marxist revolution there. The effort failed and the country split into North and South Yemen for two decades before merging again in the 1990’s. US/Saudi aid to both Yemen and Oman continues to this day in an effort to stamp out nationalist movements in those countries, which border the Kingdom and its vast Four Horsemen-controlled oilfields.
During the US-led effort to partition Bosnia from Yugoslavia, Saudi King Faud led calls for an end to the UN arms embargo. When the embargo was lifted, the Saudis funded Bosnian Muslim arms purchases. Later the Saudis bankrolled the heroin-kingpin Kosovo Liberation Army, as well as NLA Albanian separatists attacking the nationalist government of Macedonia. The Saudis even funded CIA covert operations in Italy, where they plunked down $10 million in 1985 to help destroy the Communist Party.
Recently Saudi Prince Bandar donated $1 million to the Bush Sr. Presidential Library and another $1 million to a Barbara Bush literacy campaign. On the evening of September, 11, 2001- Prince Bandar smoked cigars in the White House with President Bush, while members of the bin Laden family were evacuated from the US in airspace shut down to all other traffic.
Were the Saudis simply playing their historic paymaster role in the prosecution of 911?
The largest shareholder in News Corporation – parent of both the banker mouthpiece Wall Street Journal and the Fox News psyop – is Rupert Murdoch. The 2nd largest owner is Saudi Prince Alaweed bin Talal.
Is Fox News a covert Rothschild mind control operation against the American people?
- “Mercenary Mischief in Zaire”. Jane Hunter. Covert Action Information Bulletin. Spring 1991.
- Hot Money and the Politics of Debt. R.T. Naylor. The Linden Press/Simon & Schuster. New York. 1987. p.238
- Earth First! Journal. Vol. 26, #1. Samhain/Yule. 2005
- “US to Aid Regimes to Oust Government”. David B. Ottaway. Washington Post. 11-10-96
- The Great Heroin Coup: Drugs, Intelligence and International Fascism. Henrik Kruger. South End Press. Boston. 1980. p.43
- The Gulf: Scramble for Security. Raj Choudry. Sreedhar Press. New Dehli.
- 1983. p.14
- Dude, Where’s My Country. Michael Moore. Warner Books. New York. 2003.
- ABC News Online. 10-19-04
Dean Henderson is the author of Big Oil & Their Bankers in the Persian Gulf: Four Horsemen, Eight Families & Their Global Intelligence, Narcotics & Terror Network, The Grateful Unrich: Revolution in 50 Countries and Das Kartell der Federal Reserve. Subscriptions to his Left Hook blog are FREE at www.deanhenderson.wordpress.com
Can a new Hitler rise?
In the last month, there was an accumulation of odd news items concerning German humiliation by Israel, culminating with two truly odd affairs. German Nobel laureate Gunter Grass was declared persona non grata in Israel, and Richard Wagner’s music was rejected by the Israeli Opera as an overture for a show by a U.K.-based Israeli choreographer. Some of these events—if not all of them—were purposely performed by Israel. In the fashion favored by Security services all around the world, let’s make a short review beginning from the end, before asking Israel a tough question.
Jasmin Vardimon censored by Israel
On April 8, 2012, Hebrew media announced that Israeli Opera director Hanna Mantis has asked Jasmin Vardimon to replace the overture of Richard Wagner’s “Tannhäuser,” which features in the opening scene of her show “7734,” with another musical piece. The piece was created in 2010 for the Royal Opera; her author, Jasmin Vardimon, is an Israeli choreographer based in London. Make no mistake; it was the Israeli Opera that invited her to perform in Tel Aviv, Ms. Vardimon didn’t force her work on Israel. The invitation was conditioned that the overture of her show would be changed. This odd–if not insolent–request was placed because Israel considers Wagner an anti-Semitic and his descendants’ ties to the Nazi party. For the first time in human history, and in contradiction to what the Bible teaches, Israel claims one is responsible for the crimes committed by one’s descendants. If this is true, then Israel has already stained its descendants forever.
Jasmin Vardimon complied with the Israeli request. She didn’t have even the integrity necessary to point out that the relevant work–Tannhäuser–centers on the struggle between sacred and profane love, especially on redemption through love, a main theme in Wagner’s work. Probably, this is the real cause for the censorship; Israel’s consistently avoids topics related to love, especially of the other. Israel proposes not only an antithesis to the Bible, but considers the verse “thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself:” (Leviticus 19:18) its ultimate Nemesis.
Nobel laureate banned by Israel
On the same day Jasmin Vardimon stained her own work with shame, Israel’s Interior Minister Eli Yishai declared Gunter Grass persona non grata in Israel. According to Mr. Yishai, this was for his wearing an SS uniform in the past, fact that was disclosed by Gunter Grass himself in 2006. Why did it take six years for Israel to respond to this? Yishai helped us to solve this riddle. “Grass’ poems are an attempt to guide the fire of hate toward the State of Israel and the Israeli people, and to advance the ideas of which he was a public partner in the past, when he wore the uniform of the SS,” Yishai said. “If Gunter wants to continue publicizing his distorted and false works, I suggest he do it in Iran, where he will find a supportive audience.” Mr. Yishai, please have mercy on us; next time mention the real reason first.
“What must be said” is the name of the poem that infuriated Israel. The work is critical of Israel’s role in the Israel-Iran conflict, claiming the Zionist country is a threat to world peace. He claimed in the poem that Israel’s nuclear reactor—and not Iran’s—presents a threat to world peace. The poem calls for Germany to cease supplying Israel with submarines, and warns against an Israeli strike on Iran. In other words, Israel is censoring perfectly sensible and legitimate views only on the grounds that they do not support Israeli ongoing violence. Silly me, I thought Israel was the only real democracy in the Middle East. What a fool!
Six Million Submarines
On March 21, 2012, Israel and Germany signed at Israel’s embassy in Berlin an agreement for the supply of the sixth Dolphin class submarine to Israel. The agreement was achieved after a delay caused by Germany conditioning the deal on concessions to the Palestinian Authority. On December 4, 2011, it was disclosed a German submarine had hit Netanyahu’s office, Welt am Sonntag claimed Germany had told Israel in November 2011 that it could not go ahead with the sixth submarine purchase unless Israel transferred the frozen budget to its legal owner, the Palestinian Authority (see Sanctions on Israel Redeem Germany). An upset Netanyahu surrendered on November 27 and opened the way to the last leg of the negotiations process, which ended last month. As analyzed in Six Million Submarines, this submarines are the most strategic and expensive weapon owned by Israel and form the basis for its second strike capabilities. In other words, Germany helped Israel in its dearest project.
Considering this, one would expect at least a nice “thank you” from Netanyahu to Merkel. He could send her a few roses with a nice note. Israel being Israel, the response was brutal. While the ink on the new submarine agreement was still drying, Israel announced on March 25, a planned re-freezing of the Palestinian budget. The offensive move was strengthened by a decision to ban the Human Rights Council of the UN. “Ignore all phone calls from Rights Council Commissioner,” said Israel’s Foreign Affairs Minister to the Israeli envoy in Geneva (see Israel Hits Back at UN, Palestine and Germany). What Israel did to Germany (unfreeze Palestinian monies in order to reach an agreement on the sixth submarine, and then freeze the money right after its signature), is the mother and father, and probably even the grandparents, of all humiliations in international relationships. Like Jasmin Vardimon, Germany complied.
It is difficult not to see humiliation of the other as a systematic tactic of Israel. This is true not only towards the German. In the past I showed how the same behavior is applied towards Palestinians, especially towards Mahmoud Abbas, Israel’s closest partner. Bringing additional examples is easy. This is the antithesis of the “redemption through love” motif in Wagner’s work. This is the antithesis of godly behavior. This is just savagery.
It would be easy to write a sermon explaining the issue to Mr. Netanyahu and his “Warring Family.” Yet, as the Hebrew proverb says, the message “will fall on circumcised ears,” in other words, it won’t be heard. Thus, dear Mr. Netanyahu, let me speak the language you can hear, the language of war. Following WWI, the Treaty of Versailles forced Germany to relinquish several territories and demilitarize the Rhineland. It imposed economic sanctions, and levied heavy reparations on the country. Many Germans perceived the treaty—especially Article 231, which declared Germany responsible for the war—as a humiliation. This feeling is considered today as the main reason for the rise of Adolf Hitler and the beginning of WWII. Mr. Netanyahu, are you trying to impose a new Treaty of Versailles on Germany? Why are you systematically humiliating the most strategic partnership Israel has?
Mr. Netanyahu, I beg you, can you explain that to us logically? If you do so, people may arrive at the conclusion they are wrong when criticizing Israel. If you do so, you may be able to recruit a few new allies, who are badly needed by your crumbling, violent regime. If you do so, you may be even be sympathized with. Yet, here is Israel’s problem: you can’t justify your violence and lack of love towards everybody, including Jewish children starving on Tel Aviv’s streets. Humiliation backfires, Mr. Netanyahu, and that is what will happen to you.
Over the years, our attention has been drawn to the close proximity of the village of Deir Yassin to the Jewish Holocaust memorial at Yad Vashem. Jews have been encouraged to visit Deir Yassin, the symbolic starting point of over six decades of Palestinian dispossession, and from there to look across to Yad Vashem. Palestinians have also been asked to visit Yad Vashem (if only they could!) - the symbol of Jewish suffering – and to look across the valley toward the birth site of their own tragedy.
Everybody was happy. Jews of conscience were of course pleased to see Jewish suffering again at the centre of the discourse but also happy to extend their narrative of suffering to include Palestinians. Palestinians were perhaps less pleased at having – yet again – to acknowledge Jewish suffering in order to help achieve their own liberation, but they recognized the importance of the publicity that the link between Deir Yassin and Yad Vashem brought to their cause.
Of course, one had to be careful. As so often with these things, there was always a ‘but’. After all, who in their right mind would compare the massacre of a hundred Palestinians at Deir Yassin with the industrial-scale slaughter of six million Jews? And who would dare draw comparison between the 1948 expulsion of over 750,000 Palestinians and the near-successful attempt at physically exterminating every last Jewish man, women and child in Europe?
Both atrocities have seen their fair share of deniers over the years. Many Zionists, either with conscious intent or out of ignorance, have denied Deir Yassin.
“There was no massacre at Deir Yassin,” they say; “It was simply a battle – a battle that the Palestinians lost. These things happen in war and anyway, they did the same to us.” Also, “No, the Palestinians were not expelled; they ran away, and anyway, they didn’t love the land as we love the land – just look how neglected it was until we came along to make the desert bloom.”
The Holocaust too has come under assault. Over the last fifty years, revisionist scholars have amassed a formidable body of substantial evidence, which runs in direct opposition to the traditional Holocaust narrative.
“Where is the evidence,” they say, “for this alleged gargantuan mass-murder? Where are the documents? Where are the traces and remains? Where are the weapons of murder?”
These revisionists all acknowledge of course, that there was a terrible assault on Jews on the part of the National Socialist regime, but disagree as to the scale, motive, and methods cited in the typical narrative, a narrative that most of us choose or are obliged to accept. “What befell the Jews”, they say, “was a brutal ethnic cleansing accompanied by dispossession, pillage and massacre.”
- A brutal ethnic cleansing accompanied by dispossession, pillage and massacre - terms surely familiar to any Palestinian.
But no matter how similar the Jewish and Palestinian histories of suffering may seem, the similarities conceal important differences:
- By all accounts, and according to any version of the events, what was done to the Jews of Europe took place a long distance from Yad Vashem, while what was done to the Palestinian people took place right there at thevillageofDeir Yassinand right there throughout the whole ofPalestine.
- The perpetrators of the atrocity against Jews had nothing to do with Palestine or Palestinians, while perpetrators of the Palestinian tragedy were and are Jews.
- The perpetrators of the atrocity against Jews have been roundly condemned over the years and punished for their crimes, and have mostly shown contrition, while the perpetrators of the massacre at Deir Yassin have been honoured for their crimes, continue to take pride in them, and live on in their ideology and in their deeds.
- The atrocity against the Jews was committed by a totalitarian power with little possibility for dissent. The ethnic cleansing of the Palestinian people was carried out by a fiercely democratic community with every possibility for dissent.
- What befell the Jews had a beginning, a middle and an end, while the assault on the Palestinians goes on with no end in sight.
And one final difference: If the living evidence for the veracity of the Holocaust narrative is a safe, secure and empowered Jewish people, at home wherever they may be, the living evidence for the veracity of Deir Yassin and the Nakba is a Palestinian people dispossessed and exiled and longing to go home.