Genius! What’s strange is that, on face-value, there’s not a word with which I would disagree.
This is crying out for a “Downfall”- type new soundtrack. Gilad?
Thursday 9 February 2012, the continued charade of the Leveson Inquiry rolls on. In Britain we do things in strange ways. When things go wrong and people (peasants), break the law, it’s fairly straight-forward, they get punished. The problems come when important people get caught doing stuff ‘Joe Public’ would go to jail for in a hurry. That is where the inquiries come in. In Britain when important people are caught breaking the law, we have public inquiries; it’s like justice but without the sense of integrity or punishment. More of slap on the hand and a ‘tut tut’ than real justice.
The Leveson Inquiry is just such a case. The Leveson Inquiry’s remit is to examine the culture, practice and ethics of the press including the role of the police with respect to the phone hacking scandal which floated to the surface in July 2011. First off, a few points to bear in mind: -
- The first thing to note is Lord Justice Leveson himself is a devout Jew and is perhaps best known for defending Rosemary West.
- Murdoch one of the chief protagonists is himself part Jewish .
- Then there is Max Clifford who whilst not being Jewish himself, clearly strongly relates to them. “I like working with Jewish people. Many people think I am Jewish because I spend so much time with them. ~ Max Clifford.
- Richard Desmond (Jewish) publisher, Chairman of the Daily Express Group.
- Then there is the Tony Blair connection to the Enquiry.
Media Standards Trust (MST) –Trojan horse?
The Media Standards Trust was formed in 2006 to address concerns about the deterioration in journalistic standards, at a time when the media were becoming enormously powerful, whilst remaining largely opaque and unaccountable.
The MST has emerged to placate the public’s growing scepticism about the mainstream media. Who can blame them? The mainstream media, press and TV have shown themselves time and time again to be without any moral compass. This is exceedingly bad as they are supposed to be acting as watchers to abuses in the system, when, in actual fact, they are abusing the system themselves, along with the help of corrupt police, freemasons, tax officials and blaggers galore.
So, as a nervous response to the loss of trust from the public in the press, the MST was formed. But just a cursory glance at the trustees will make you wonder – Is this new media watchdog really going to be better, or much, much worse? Is it in fact going to increase censorship? Some of Max Clifford’s comments make me wonder.
- Sir David Bell (Former Chairman, Financial Times Group)
- Julia Middleton (CEO, Common Purpose)
- Sir Cyril Chantler (Chairman, King’s Fund)
- Sir Robert Worcester (Founder, MORI, Pilgrims Society )
- Tim Waterstone (Founder of Waterstones bookstores and Daisy & Tom children’s department stores)
- Robert Peston (Business Editor, BBC)
- William Davies (Goldsmiths College, London)
- Roger Graef (Films of Record)
- Baroness Helena Kennedy QC
- John McCormick (Scottish Qualifications Authority)
- Stephen George Platten (Bishop of Wakefield)
- Geraint Talfan Davies (Chair, Institute of Welsh Affairs)
- Anthony Salz (Executive Vice Chairman, NM Rothschild)
- Sue Stapely (Quiller Consultants /Sue Stapely Consulting)
- Amelia Fawcett (Vice Chairman, Morgan Stanley)
- Albert Scardino (journalist, editor)
- Sir Philip Otton (retired judge)
Max Clifford – Silver-Tongued PR Guru
Silver-tongued PR Guru Max Clifford, is synonymous with the rise and fall of celebrities. From Bob Dylan to Freddie Star, Max has helped to protect and enhance the reputation and power of many of his wealthy clients. And how much does it cost to hire Max Clifford Associates? A trifling £250 000 p.a. for a retainer.
Publicist Max Clifford took a night off from leaking headline-making stories to confess to a young UJIA committee that the secrets of his success were
Confidence and the ability to lie with conviction.” Max Clifford, 2003
Listen to Max Clifford’s testimony
In a little Polish village a drunken priest habitually drinks in a tavern owned by a Jewish tavern-keeper. One Sunday the local priest, deep into his cups, cannot pay his bill. So he offers to leave the keys of the church with the tavern-keeper as surety. A strange offer perhaps but the tavern-keeper agrees.
Sure enough, the following Sunday when the locals come to their church for Mass they find the door locked.
The priest says to them,
“The Jew, the Jew! The Jew has the keys and will not let you in.” So, sure enough, the enraged peasants go round to the Jew, give him a severe beating and a mini-pogrom takes place.
So, who’s to blame?
Go to Diagramatic Thinking re Palestine for a diagrammatic representation of how I view current thinking on Palestine, and my own path through it. At times this becomes pretty convoluted, with polar opposite decisions at certain points. In this respect it is nothing like a flow chart, but more a representation of how the mind (well at least my mind) moves forward through opposite polarities, much as Hegel said it did. I’d be very interested to hear the views of visitors to this site, and in particular to know what you think I’ve missed, or where I’ve gone wrong.
Diagramatic Thinking re Palestine. I attach a diagrammatic representation of how I view current thinking on Palestine, and my own path through it. At times the latter becomes pretty convoluted, with polar opposite decisions at certain points. In this respect it is nothing like a flow chart, but more a representation of how the mind moves forward through the oppositions of polarities, much as Hegel said it did. I’d be very interested to hear the views of visitors to this site, and in particular to know what you think I’ve missed, or where I’ve gone wrong.
Much consternation and nervous navel gazing has broken out amongst the Jewish community recently, due to the on-going cyber- attacks against Israeli websites. A Jerusalem Post article yesterday claimed, that the recent Anonymous video (Message to the state of Israel) is the work of Iranian agents. Yet they have not a single shred of evidence for their groundless suppositions. The author of this article is Dr Andre Oboler; holds a PhD in Computer Science from the UK and completed a postdoctoral fellowship in political science in Israel. Dr Andre Oboler is an ‘Expert in Social Media’. Just yesterday I caught Dr Obler busy on twitter trying to ‘de-legitimise’ the Anonymous movement. Here Dr Obler tells his Zionist chums that the Anonymous video is a fake and he repeats that old paranoid lie – ‘Wipe Israel off the Map’ . I also observed him trying to convince hackers that the video was a fake.
Threat to wipe #Israel off Internet, sounds like #Iran not #Anonymous: goo.gl/f7PYK @Daroff @CiFWatch @jnewsreader @RustyMikeRadio @haivri .. source
Also the video has the same intro sequence as other Anonymous videos, which indicates it is genuine video from Anonymous. But he continued..
@mobius1ski this new video was not part of #OpFreePalestine it had different goals, clearly stated – compare them
The truth is protesters; hacktivists and activists have been realizing in ever greater numbers that the real global enemy is Zionism. This can be easily demonstrated by numerous abuses and UN resolutions against Israel.
I can’t really be bothered with a step-by-step refutation of the paranoid Jerusalem Post’s article. But it does show that Israel is becoming increasingly twitchy (even more than usual) about these cyber attacks.
Also another Hasbara outfit has emerged recently:- ZionOops, I mean ZionOps – Counterhack Cyber Intelligence. This website is championing the Zionist cause on the internet and comes filled with anti-Palestine propaganda & jingoistic chest thumping hasbara. They openly mock the notion of Palestine and maintain it is a fictional state that never really existed. They watch and monitor other hacktivists, keyphrases and hashtags. I have observed ZionOps hijacking various hashtags. What Zionops are doing is trying to hijack the #OpFreePalestine hashtag which was being used by hacktivists and put their own misinfo out.
#OpFreePalestine wp.me/P27ZWC-2 #OpLiePalestine ~ source
What we see here is Israels response to Hactivist attacks against its interests. They have taken the folowing action to counter these ‘cyber threats’.
- They are trying to create their own Zionist Hacker Army – Zionops.
- Experts like Dr Obler to hasbaraducate them to the Zio-truth.
- Undercover Zionist hackers monitoring others.
- Trolling, Threats and smears of ‘holocaust denier’ etc to critics & supporters.
- Using social media to anticipate hack attacks.
- Hijacking and subverting social media to their own aims.
- Probable undercover infiltration of hacker groups
Why is all this significant. Well the next big hacker event against Israel and its allies is planned for Tuesday 14th of February, TOMORROW. Something to look forward to anyway. Lulz galore. ) Watch this space…
People were asked the question “Say something that a Zionist has said to you”.
O.K. I admit I mislead readers with that headline, of course Gilad’s book is not banned, what it should have read was P.S.C. members who read books “we” don’t like should be banned.
Wait a minute, let me put that more clearly; the book should be banned, the people who read it should be banned and probably the P.S.C. should be banned as well.
This is “the word” according to Anthony Cooper.
Palestine Solidarity Campaign members are holding a book reading circle in Brighton. This seemingly innocent and gentle pastime is causing outrage to Anthony Cooper someone whom I know little about except that he appears to be some kind of Gestapo inspired thought police, he certainly spends a lot of time cyber stalking P.S.C. members and what they do in their spare time.
The P.S.C. made a huge error of judgement when they started trying to appease Zionist and so called Anti Zionist bullies, who knows where this McCarthy like hunt for alleged anti Semites (people that Jews don’t like) might end.
So long as its members are happy to join Holocaust deniers to study racist books, the PSC shouldn’t expect reasonable people to take their words seriously.
Evidently “reasonable people” think you should only read books which meet with their approval, no matter that we have laws in the U.K. against racism which would ensure “racist books” were banned. “The Wandering Who” by Gilad Atzmon is endorsed by a long list of humanists headed by no less than John Mearsheimer and Richard Falk. Of course Anthony Cooper and Tony Greenstein have a lot in common in so much as they both like to perpetuate the lie that Gilad Atzmon is a holocaust denier, which he is not.
It would be nice to see the P.S.C. finally join the resistance and become a real solidarity movement, then we really would be able to take them seriously.